Visualizing External Validity: Graphical Displays to Inform the Extension of Treatment Effects from Trials to Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: In the presence of effect measure modification, estimates of treatment effects from randomized controlled trials may not be valid in clinical practice settings. The development and application of quantitative approaches for extending treatment effects from trials to clinical practice settings is an active area of research. METHODS: In this article, we provide researchers with a practical roadmap and four visualizations to assist in variable selection for models to extend treatment effects observed in trials to clinical practice settings and to assess model specification and performance. We apply this roadmap and visualizations to an example extending the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil vs. plus oxaliplatin) for colon cancer from a trial population to a population of individuals treated in community oncology practices in the United States. RESULTS: The first visualization screens for potential effect measure modifiers to include in models extending trial treatment effects to clinical practice populations. The second visualization displays a measure of covariate overlap between the clinical practice populations and the trial population. The third and fourth visualizations highlight considerations for model specification and influential observations. The conceptual roadmap describes how the output from the visualizations helps interrogate the assumptions required to extend treatment effects from trials to target populations. CONCLUSIONS: The roadmap and visualizations can inform practical decisions required for quantitatively extending treatment effects from trials to clinical practice settings.

Real-world outcomes of systemic therapy in locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Aim: Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma were evaluated. Methods: Adults receiving their first systemic therapy for unresectable, locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma from 4 September 2014 to 30 June 2017, were evaluated. The primary end point was real-world overall response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or physician assessment. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 51 eligible patients, the median age was 76 years, 80% were male and 65% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-1. The most common regimens were cetuximab (51%) and carboplatin + paclitaxel (22%). Median real-world overall response rate ranged from 9.8% per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors to 43.1% when supplemented by physician assessment. Median overall survival was 10.7 months, and median time to next treatment was 7.5 months. Conclusion: Survival in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma was short. Real-world overall response rate was lower with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors than physician assessment.

This study looked at chemotherapy treatments and responses in patients receiving treatment for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, a type of skin cancer. Patients had advanced and metastatic cancer that could not be cured by radiation or surgery. Most of the patients were white males, and their median age was 76 years. About two-thirds of the patients in the study had their original cancer in the head and neck, and in most patients (approximately 80%), the cancer had spread, mostly to the lungs or lymph nodes. Half of the patients in the study were treated with cetuximab, and about a quarter received platinum chemotherapy or other cetuximab-based treatment. The study examined how response to treatment may be measured in clinical care and clinical trials. Response to treatment and length of survival were short: patients responded to treatment for a median of 9 months and survived for a median of 10.7 months.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma Treated in U.S. Oncology Clinical Practices: Results from SPEAR-Merkel.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy (IO) has been associated with improved outcomes in patients with locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (laMCC) and metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC). The primary objective of SPEAR-Merkel was to explore treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with laMCC or mMCC initiating first-line (1L) treatment with avelumab, non-avelumab IO, or chemotherapy in a U.S. community oncology setting. METHODS: Adult patients with laMCC or mMCC initiating 1L avelumab, non-avelumab IO, or chemotherapy from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2019, were identified from the U.S. Oncology Network electronic health care record database and followed up through September 30, 2019. Baseline characteristics and HCRU were analyzed descriptively, including physician-stated overall response rate in the real-world clinical setting. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to measure duration of response, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among the overall population (n = 94), 28 received 1L avelumab (9 laMCC, 19 mMCC), 26 received 1L non-avelumab IO (8 laMCC, 18 mMCC), and 40 received 1L chemotherapy (10 laMCC, 30 mMCC). The real-world overall response rate was 64.3%, 61.5%, and 42.5%, respectively. From 1L treatment initiation, median rwPFS was 11.4, 8.1, and 6.1 months, and median OS was 20.2 months, not reached, and 14.7 months for the respective cohorts. CONCLUSION: SPEAR-Merkel showed that patients with laMCC or mMCC treated with IO had improved outcomes compared with chemotherapy in clinical practice. The study provides insight on utilization and clinical outcomes associated with newer, more innovative therapies in clinical practice, which may help clinicians understand the variety of newer treatment options for both laMCC and mMCC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To the authors' knowledge, SPEAR-Merkel is the first study to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (laMCC) and metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) receiving first-line (1L) avelumab, non-avelumab immuno-oncology therapies, or chemotherapy in a real-world setting. SPEAR-Merkel showed clinical benefit for immuno-oncology therapies compared with chemotherapy. The study provides insight on uses and clinical outcomes associated with innovative therapies in clinical practice, which may help clinicians understand the variety of newer treatment options for both laMCC and mMCC. The study is of particular importance as it shows that chemotherapy is still being used as 1L treatment despite its inferior clinical and safety profile.

Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes among patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: A community oncology-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is no standard systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) after failure of first-line (1L) therapy. This study characterizes the patient experience, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of patients who initiated second-line (2L) therapy for r/mCC in a US community oncology setting. METHODS: This is an observational study of cervical cancer patients who failed 1L systemic treatment for r/mCC and initiated 2L systemic therapy between 2014 and 2019 within the US Oncology Network (USON). USON's electronic health records were used to identify eligible patients and abstract data. Overall survival (OS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and time to first subsequent treatment (TFST) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were identified (mean age 53 years). Over 60% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-1. Cytotoxic monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed regimen (N = 60, 46%) in 2L, followed by combination therapies (N = 45, 35%), pembrolizumab monotherapy (N = 19, 15%), and bevacizumab monotherapy (N = 6, 5%). Median OS was 9.1 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.2) after initiation of 2L therapy. Median TTD was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.5-3.3), and median TFST was 4.9 months (95% CI: 4.2-5.7). No significant difference in outcomes was found when stratified by 2L treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The observed heterogeneity in 2L r/mCC therapy suggests no clear standard-of-care in this setting. Additionally, short duration of OS observed was consistent across 2L regimens. New, effective treatment options in this setting are needed.

Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma in a community practice setting.

Aim: To assess real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. Patients & methods: Retrospective database analysis. Results: In all, 469 patients received first-line systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) at community centers. Median follow-up from diagnosis was 11.6 months. Pemetrexed + platinum was the most common first-line SACT; similar proportions of patients received cisplatin or carboplatin with pemetrexed. Only a small proportion of patients received second- and third-line therapies. Median overall survival for first-line SACT was 12.0 months (95% CI: 10.7-14.2). Results were similar with pemetrexed + cisplatin and pemetrexed + carboplatin. Median overall survival with second-line SACT was 6.4 months (95% CI: 5.1-7.6). Conclusion: There is a need for more effective SACTs for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Lay abstract Real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), largely a cancer of the lining surrounding the lungs, are limited. In this analysis based on patients treated in the USA, pemetrexed + cisplatin or pemetrexed + carboplatin was shown to be the most common treatment received by patients when first diagnosed with advanced MPM. Only a few patients received any subsequent treatments. Survival among patients receiving treatment was poor, with a median of approximately 12 months. Immunotherapy regimens are currently being investigated, with nivolumab + ipilimumab being the first immunotherapy regimen approved in October 2020 for the treatment of advanced MPM.

Real-world clinical outcomes with first-line avelumab in locally advanced/metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma in the USA: SPEAR-Merkel.

Aim: To assess clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced (la) or metastatic (m) Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) initiating first-line (1L) avelumab in a USA community oncology setting. Materials & methods: Adults with laMCC or mMCC initiating 1L avelumab were identified from The US Oncology Network electronic health record database and chart review. Results: Median overall survival and progression-free survival were not reached in laMCC (n = 9) vs 20.2 and 10.0 months in mMCC (n = 19); response rates were similar (66.7% vs 63.2%). Conclusion: This is the first study to show clinical benefit in patients with laMCC receiving 1L avelumab in a US real-world setting. Response rates in patients with mMCC were consistent with pivotal trials.

Lay abstract Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer. Because MCC progresses quickly, many patients have a poor prognosis. Avelumab is a type of drug that helps the patient's immune system to fight cancer. Avelumab was the first such drug approved by the US FDA for treating metastatic MCC based on the results of the JAVELIN Merkel 200 clinical trial. In SPEAR-Merkel, we studied how MCC patients with locally advanced as well as metastatic disease responded when they were treated with first-line avelumab in a real-world setting. These patients were from oncology practices in communities throughout the USA. Overall response rates in SPEAR-Merkel were comparable between patients with locally advanced and metastatic MCC. Importantly, we found that these patients experienced survival benefit similar to patients in the JAVELIN Merkel 200 (part B) study and other real-world studies.

Treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

AIM: Cetuximab was approved in 2008 for treating recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and this study assessed the utilization of cetuximab for R/M-HNSCC in a real-world setting. MATERIALS & METHODS: Adult patients with R/M-HNSCC, who initiated systemic therapy between 1 September 2011 and 31 December 2014 and followed through 31 December 2015, were identified from iKnowMed electronic-health-records database (McKesson Specialty Health) supplemented with manual chart-abstraction. RESULTS: For 325 R/M-HNSCC patients; median age 62 years; 82% males, 67% had oropharyngeal cancer, most common first-line (1L) regimen was platinum-based combinations (76%), of whom only 8% received platinum + cetuximab +/- 5-fluorouracil. CONCLUSION: Despite US FDA approval and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommending use of cetuximab for palliative treatment of R/M-HNSCC, our study demonstrates low utilization in 1L and 2L settings, underscoring the need to understand reasons for low utilization.

Outcomes in patients with metastatic bladder cancer in the USA: a retrospective electronic medical record study.

Aim: Investigate the effectiveness of chemotherapy for first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic bladder cancer (mBC). Methods: Retrospective cohort study evaluating treatment patterns/outcomes in 1155 mBC patients receiving initial treatment in the community practice setting from January 2010 to June 2014, and followed through July 2016. Results: The most commonly utilized 1L and second-line (2L) regimens were platinum-based and taxane-based, respectively. Median (95% CI) OS for all patients from 1L initiation was 12.8 months (11.7-14.6), and median OS for all 2L regimens was 9.4 months (8.2-11.1). Conclusion: mBC patients eligible for and who received cis-based regimens experienced better OS results. Poor renal function was a key driver of cis-ineligibility. The various monotherapy and combination chemotherapy regimens in 2L produced relatively short OS outcomes.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Sequencing, and Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Avelumab First-Line Maintenance in the United States.

For patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), first-line (1L) treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab 1L maintenance (1LM) is a recommended therapy per treatment guidelines in patients without disease progression. However, contemporary real-world (rw) data among patients receiving this treatment are necessary to understand clinical outcomes and optimal treatment sequencing. This retrospective cohort study analyzed rw treatment patterns and clinical outcomes, including overall survival (rwOS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS), in patients with la/mUC receiving avelumab 1LM. From the Flatiron Health database, 214 patients who received avelumab 1LM following 1L PBC were included. From the start of avelumab 1LM, median rwOS was 23.8 months (95% CI: 18.2-not estimable [NE]) and median rwPFS was 5.1 months (95% CI: 4.1-7.0). A total of 96 patients received second-line (2L) therapy, with 53 receiving enfortumab vedotin (EV). From the start of 2L EV, median rwOS was 11.2 months (95% CI: 6.8-NE) and median rwPFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.9-8.8). Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in this study align with guidelines and outcomes observed in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 and EV-301 clinical trials and other rw studies, supporting the use of 1L PBC followed by avelumab 1LM and 2L EV for eligible patients.

Real-world outcomes among patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers initiating second-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding second-line (2 L) treatment for advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC) in the US real-world setting. This study explores the rapidly evolving and growing treatment landscape in the 2 L setting for advanced or metastatic BTC with a large cohort of patients treated in a community oncology setting. METHODS: Adult patients with BTC initiating 2 L treatment after a platinum-containing first-line between 1/1/10- and 6/30/19 were identified from the US Oncology Network electronic healthcare record database and followed through 12/31/19. Baseline patient and treatment characteristics were analyzed descriptively, including overall response rate (ORR) in the real-world clinical setting. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to measure duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The overall population (N = 160) included 74 patients (46.3%) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 41 (25.6%) with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 45 (28.1%) with gallbladder cancer. Thirty unique 2 L regimens were recorded for the study population, with folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, 34.4%) and capecitabine monotherapy (20.0%) being the most common. ORR was 7.5% (95% CI, 3.9%-12.7%). From 2 L initiation, median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.4-3.3 months), and median OS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.7 months). CONCLUSION: Results from this study provide real-world evidence that although patients treated in the community oncology setting receive a wide variety of 2 L treatments, the regimens are consistent with those recommended by guidelines. Although responses are observed with 2 L treatment, duration is brief and associated with poor OS in patients with advanced or metastatic disease.

Comparing Trial and Real-world Adjuvant Oxaliplatin Delivery in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer Using a Longitudinal Cumulative Dose.

Importance: Delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy can differ substantially between trial and real-world populations. Adherence metrics like relative dose intensity (RDI) cannot capture the timing of modifications and mask differences in the total amount of chemotherapy received. Objective: To compare oxaliplatin delivery between MOSAIC trial participants and patients treated in the US Oncology Network with stage III colon cancer using a longitudinal cumulative dose (LCD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used secondary data from the MOSAIC trial, an international randomized clinical trial (concluded in 2004), and electronic health records from US Oncology (2009-2018), a network of community oncology practices in the US. It included participants in MOSAIC with stage III colon cancer who were randomized to receive treatment with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil/leucovorin (n = 663) and US Oncology patients with stage III colon cancer who were treated with a modified FOLFOX-6 regimen (n = 2523). Exposures: Oxaliplatin and fluorouracil/leucovorin. Outcomes and Measures: We evaluated RDI and LCD over time and at the end of treatment in the MOSAIC and US Oncology populations. We used bootstrapping to estimate 95% confidence bands for LCD differences between the populations. Results: The 663 MOSAIC participants (296 women [44.7%]) and 2523 US Oncology patients (1245 women [49.4%]) were generally similar with respect to demographic characteristics. Median RDI was lower in US Oncology (80% in MOSAIC vs 70% in US Oncology). The LCD also suggested differences in the total amount of oxaliplatin received between populations; the final median LCD in US Oncology was 10.2% lower than in MOSAIC, equivalent to receiving 1.2 fewer treatment cycles less of oxaliplatin. This difference only began 133 days into treatment and persisted after accounting for covariates, likely in terms of more frequent oxaliplatin treatment discontinuation in US Oncology patients than their MOSAIC counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: The study results suggest that real-world patients in community practice in the US treated with modified FOLFOX 6 received less oxaliplatin than their historical counterparts in the MOSAIC trial, with differences manifesting late in the treatment course. The LCD allowed us to identify the amount and extent of these differences, the timing of which was unclear when using RDI alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00275210.

Real-world Overall Survival Using Oncology Electronic Health Record Data: Friends of Cancer Research Pilot.

In prior work, Friends of Cancer Research convened multiple data partners to establish standardized definitions for oncology real-world end points derived from electronic health records (EHRs) and claims data. Here, we assessed the performance of real-world overall survival (rwOS) from data sets sourced from EHRs by evaluating the ability of the end point to reflect expected differences from a previous randomized controlled trial across five data sources, after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria. The KEYNOTE-189 clinical trial protocol of platinum doublet chemotherapy (chemotherapy) vs. programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy (PD-1 combination) in first-line nonsquamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer guided retrospective cohort selection. The Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator was used to calculate 12-month rwOS with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each data source. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% CIs, controlled for prognostic factors. Once the inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, the five resulting data sets included 155 to 1,501 patients in the chemotherapy cohort and 36 to 405 patients in the PD-1 combination cohort. Twelve-month rwOS ranged from 45% to 58% in the chemotherapy cohort and 44% to 68% in the PD-1 combination cohort. The adjusted HR for death ranged from 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.93) to 1.15 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.85), controlling for age, gender, performance status, and smoking status. This study yielded insights regarding data capture, including ability of real-world data to precisely identify patient populations and the impact of criteria on end points. Sensitivity analyses could elucidate data set-specific factors that drive results.

The Friends of Cancer Research Real-World Data Collaboration Pilot 2.0: Methodological Recommendations from Oncology Case Studies.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential collective opportunities and challenges of transforming real-world data (RWD) to real-world evidence for clinical effectiveness by focusing on aligning analytic definitions of oncology end points. Patients treated with a qualifying therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the frontline setting meeting broad eligibility criteria were included to reflect the real-world population. Although a trend toward improved outcomes in patients receiving PD-(L)1 therapy over standard chemotherapy was observed in RWD analyses, the magnitude and consistency of treatment effect was more heterogeneous than previously observed in controlled clinical trials. The study design and analysis process highlighted the identification of pertinent methodological issues and potential innovative approaches that could inform the development of high-quality RWD studies.

Clinical outcomes and resource utilization after surgical resection with curative intent among patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with adjuvant therapies in a community oncology setting: A real-world retrospective observational study.

AIMS: Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in patients with completely resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated real-world relapse rates and healthcare resource utilization in patients with stage II-IIIB NSCLC receiving adjuvant therapy in a community oncology setting after complete resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients with stage II-IIIB NSCLC and complete resection receiving any adjuvant therapy during 06/2008-04/2017 at US Oncology Network clinics, with follow-up through 04/2019. Primary endpoints were rate of relapse, time to relapse (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and monthly emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations before and after relapse. RESULTS: The study identified 456 patients; median age was 66 years, 50% were male. In patients with relapse (45.2%), median follow-up was 31.7 months and median TTR was 13.7 months. Median DFS in the overall population was 42.9 months. Median OS was 82.4 months in the overall population and shorter in patients with relapse than without relapse (41.6 months vs. not reached, p < 0.0001). Patients with relapse had significantly more monthly ED visits (mean [SD] 0.10 [0.24] vs. 0.03 [0.08], p < 0.0001) and hospitalizations (mean [SD] 0.20 [0.43] vs. 0.05 [0.10], p < 0.0001) following relapse than before relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage II-IIIB NSCLC treated with adjuvant therapy after complete resection had high relapse rates, reduced survival, and significantly increased healthcare resource use when relapse occurred. New therapeutic options to reduce relapse rates in patients with early-stage NSCLC could reduce healthcare utilization and costs.

Pembrolizumab Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Advanced Melanoma in the US Community Oncology Setting: An Updated Analysis.

Favorable outcomes have been observed with pembrolizumab among patients with advanced melanoma in clinical trials; however, limited evidence exists on the long-term efficacy in the real-world setting. This was an updated, retrospective observational study of adult patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma who initiated pembrolizumab (in any line of therapy) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, in The US Oncology Network and were followed through December 31, 2019 [median follow-up: 18.2 mo (range: 0.1-63.1 mo)]. Study data were sourced from electronic health records. Patient demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), time to treatment discontinuation, time to next treatment, physician-assessed time to tumor progression, and physician-assessed progression-free survival (rwPFS). Independent risk factors for OS and rwPFS were identified with multivariable Cox regression models. Of the 303 study-eligible patients, 119, 131, and 53 received pembrolizumab in the first-line, second-line, and third-line or beyond setting, respectively. Median OS across the study population was 29.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 20.3-49.7] and was the longest among those who received first-line pembrolizumab [42.8 mo (95% CI: 24.8-not reached)]. Median rwPFS across the study population was 5.1 months (95% CI: 4.0-7.6) and 8.1 months (95% CI: 4.6-14.4) among those who received first-line pembrolizumab. In the multivariable analyses for OS, increased age, worsening performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, brain metastases, and pembrolizumab use in later lines were significantly associated a worse prognosis.

An observational study of drug utilization and associated outcomes among adult patients diagnosed with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma treated with first-line anti-PD-1 monotherapies or BRAF/MEK inhibitors in a community-based oncology setting.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-PD-1 monotherapies (aPD-1) and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) changed the BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma treatment landscape. This study aimed to improve the understanding of real-world treatment patterns and optimal treatment sequence. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma patients who initiated 1L aPD-1 or BRAF/MEKi in the US Oncology Network between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017, followed through 31 December 2018. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively, with Kaplan-Meier methods used for time-to-event endpoints. As the primary analysis, overall survival (OS) and physician-assessed progression-free survival (rwPFS) were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard regression models and propensity score matching (n = 49). RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were included (median age 61 years, 62.9% male, 89.7% white): 36.2% received aPD-1 and 63.8% BRAF/MEKi. Median OS and rwPFS were longer among aPD-1 vs BRAF/MEKi patients (OS: not reached vs 13.9 months, log-rank P = .0169; rwPFS: 7.6 vs 6.5 months, log-rank P = .0144). Receipt of aPD-1 was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.602 vs BRAF/MEKi [95%CI 0.382-0.949]; P = .0287). Among patients without an event within 6 months of 1L initiation, receipt of aPD-1 was associated with a decreased risk of progression or death from 6 months onwards (HR = 0.228 [95%CI 0.106-0.493]; P = .0002). This association was not observed among patients within 6 months of 1L initiation (HR = 1.146; 95% CI 0.755-1.738). Results from the propensity score-matched pairs were consistent with these trends. CONCLUSION: These results suggest a clinical benefit of 1L aPD-1 compared to BRAF/MEKi after 6 months of treatment for BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. Future research should explore factors associated with early progression and their relationship with clinical outcomes.

Treatment Sequencing Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Treated in the Community Practice Setting in the United States: SPEAR-Bladder (Study informing treatment Pathway dEcision in bladder cAnceR).

PURPOSE: Clinical trial evidence has affirmed the role for immuno-oncology (IO) treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). This Study informing treatment Pathway dEcision in bladder cAnceR (SPEAR-Bladder) aimed to provide insight into the optimal sequencing of IO treatments among la/mUC patients treated in the US Oncology Network. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with la/mUC who initiated first-line chemotherapy followed by either IO therapy (C-IO subgroup) or chemotherapy (C-C subgroup) between 01/01/2015 and 04/30/2017 and included a potential follow-up period through 06/30/2017. Data were sourced from iKnowMed electronic health records. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively, with Kaplan-Meier methods used to evaluate time-to-event outcomes, including overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included in this analysis (median age 69 years, 74.4% male, 88.0% Caucasian): 79 and 38 patients were in the C-IO and C-C subgroups, respectively. The median OS was 19.2 months among patients who received the C-IO sequence and 11.9 months among those who received the C-C treatment sequence. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients who received the C-IO treatment sequence had notable improvement in OS compared with those who received the C-C sequence. In light of the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, further investigation will be required to determine how best to select the optimal therapeutic regimen and sequencing for patients with la/mUC.

Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma in US Community Practices.

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to examine treatment and healthcare resource utilization patterns of this patient population in a United States (US) community-based oncology practice setting over time. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective observational study was conducted within the US Oncology Network (USON). Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with advanced or metastatic STS and were treated at a USON site between 01 July 2015 and 31 August 2018. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were described for the overall study population. Comparisons between patients by time period (prior to and after October 2016) were evaluated using the T test for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. Data were available for analysis through 31 August 2018. RESULTS: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the eligible study cohort (N = 376) were similar between patients who initiated treatment before and after October 2016 (all p > 0.05). Forty-three unique regimens were observed in the first-line setting, with the predominant regimen (gemcitabine + docetaxel) received by 33.2% (n = 125) patients. Prior to October 2016, 45.4% of patients received first-line gemcitabine + docetaxel, while 29.0% received this regimen after October 2016. CONCLUSIONS: While demographic and clinical characteristics were similar, treatment patterns changed in 2016. Future research should evaluate the impact of changing drug approvals and clinical trial results on future treatment patterns.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced melanoma: A retrospective, community oncology-based cohort study (A STROBE-compliant article).

Recently, the effectiveness of novel immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-directed therapies has been demonstrated in advanced melanoma trial populations. Limited research, however, has evaluated the impact of these therapies in a real-world setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among advanced melanoma patients treated with modern therapies within community oncology clinics. Adult patients with advanced melanoma who initiated treatment within the US Oncology Network between 1/1/14 and 12/31/16 were included. Data were sourced from electronic healthcare records. Patients were followed through 12/31/17. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess patient and treatment characteristics and Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event outcomes. In total, 484 patients met eligibility criteria (32.0% with brain metastasis, 12.6% with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2). In the first-line (1L) setting during the study period, 37.0% received anti-PD1 monotherapies, 26.4% ipilimumab monotherapy, 19.8% BRAF/MEK combination therapy, 6.4% BRAF or MEK monotherapy, 4.1% ipilimumab/nivolumab combination therapy and 6.2% other regimens. Differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were observed across treatment groups. For the overall study population, the median (95% confidence interval) estimates for overall survival, time to next treatment and progression-free survival were 20.7 (16.0, 26.8), 5.8 (5.3, 6.5), and 4.9 (4.2, 5.7) months, respectively. The results of this study provide real-world insight into advanced melanoma treatment trends and clinical outcomes, including high utilization of immunotherapies and BRAF/MEK combination therapy. Future research can explore underlying differences in patient subpopulations and the sequence of therapies across lines of therapy.

A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting.

BACKGROUND: Most multiple myeloma (MM) patients ultimately progress, with remission duration decreasing after first relapse. Recently, novel agents have been approved for the treatment of relapsed MM. There is a paucity of real-world data on these treatments. We sought to compare time to next treatment (TTNT) in MM patients in their second line of therapy (LOT2), treated with common proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based triplets. METHODS: Adult MM patients who received carfilzomib (K) between 1 November 2013 and 29 February 2016 at US Oncology Network (USON) clinics utilizing iKnowMed™ electronic health records (EHRs) were identified. Patients were included if they were ⩾18 years of age, not enrolled in clinical trials, had ⩾2 visits at a USON clinic and received LOT2 regimens consisting of: K+lenalidomide with steroid (KRd), bortezomib+lenalidomide with steroid (VRd), or bortezomib+cyclophosphamide with steroid (VCyd). TTNT was estimated from LOT2 initiation to LOT3 initiation using the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox modeling. RESULTS: A total of 718 patients received a K-containing regimen sometime during their MM treatment (LOT1 to LOT5). Of these, 156 patients received: KRd (n = 112; 71.8%), VRd (n =27; 17.3%), or VCyd (n = 17; 10.9%). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (mean age: 64.8 years; 58% male). Median TTNT was longest for KRd [25.3 months; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.71-NR], versus VRd or VCyd (VRd median TTNT: 10.2 months, 95% CI: 4.24-12.71; VCyd: 6.5 months, 95% CI: 3.02-12.78; log-rank p < 0.0001). The adjusted HR for KRd was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11-0.37), compared with VRd. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the real-world nature of these data, the median TTNT observed with KRd was relatively consistent, with progression-free survival (PFS) for KRd observed in the phase III ASPIRE trial (median PFS: ITT population = 26.3 months; LOT2 = 29.6 months). Patients who received KRd at first relapse had significantly longer TTNT, compared with those on VRd or VCyd, confirming the value of KRd as an important treatment option for relapsed MM.