RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about cholestasis, including its most severe variant secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC), in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). In this study, we analysed the occurrence of cholestatic liver injury and SSC, including clinical, serological, radiological and histopathological findings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre analysis of all consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) as a result of severe COVID-19 at the University Hospital Zurich to describe cholestatic injury in these patients. The findings were compared to a retrospective cohort of patients with severe influenza A. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU were included. Of these, 14 patients (41%) had no cholestasis (group 0), 11 patients (32%, group 1) developed mild and 9 patients (27%, group 2) severe cholestasis. Patients in group 2 had a more complicated disease course indicated by significantly longer ICU stay (median 51 days, IQR 25-86.5) than the other groups (group 0: median 9.5 days, IQR 3.8-18.3, P = .001; and group 1: median 16 days, IQR 8-30, P < .05 respectively). Four patients in group 2 developed SSC compared to none in the influenza A cohort. The available histopathological findings suggest an ischaemic damage to the perihilar bile ducts. CONCLUSIONS: The development of SSC represents an important complication of critically ill COVID-19 patients and needs to be considered in the diagnostic work up in prolonged cholestasis. The occurrence of SSC is of interest in the ongoing pandemic since it is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Colangitis Esclerosante , Ictericia , Colangitis Esclerosante/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Dyspnea and Right Heart Failure Abstract. Acute right ventricular failure is a critical condition diagnosed by clinical presentation combined with echocardiography. Additional diagnostic tools including laboratory, ECG, right heart catheterization, and other imaging modalities are needed to confirm the diagnosis and determine the cause. The identification and treatment of the underlying pathology, the reduction of right ventricular afterload (if possible), optimization of preload (often diuretics, rarely volume), and hemodynamic support using vasopressors and/or inodilators are mainstays of treatment. In severe cases, special therapies and mechanical circulatory support come into play.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha , Humanos , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/etiología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía/efectos adversos , Disnea/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Portable respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) is promising for noninvasive monitoring of breathing patterns in unrestrained subjects. However, its use has been hampered by requiring recalibration after changes in body position. OBJECTIVES: To facilitate RIP application in unrestrained subjects, we developed a technique for adjustment of RIP calibration using position sensor feedback. METHODS: Five healthy subjects and 12 patients with lung disease were monitored by portable RIP with sensors incorporated within a body garment. Unrestrained individuals were studied during 40-60 min while supine, sitting and upright/walking. Position was changed repeatedly every 5-10 min. Initial qualitative diagnostic calibration followed by volume scaling in absolute units during 20 breaths in different positions by flow meter provided position-specific volume-motion coefficients for RIP. These were applied during subsequent monitoring in corresponding positions according to feedback from 4 accelerometers placed at the chest and thigh. Accuracy of RIP was evaluated by face mask pneumotachography. RESULTS: Position sensor feedback allowed accurate adjustment of RIP calibration during repeated position changes in subjects and patients as reflected in a minor mean difference (bias) in breath-by-breath tidal volumes estimated by RIP and flow meter of 0.02 liters (not significant) and limits of agreement (+/-2 SD) of +/-19% (2,917 comparisons). An average of 10 breaths improved precision of RIP (limits of agreement +/-14%). CONCLUSIONS: RIP calibration incorporating position sensor feedback greatly enhances the application of RIP as a valuable, unobtrusive tool to investigate respiratory physiology and ventilatory limitation in unrestrained healthy subjects and patients with lung disease during everyday activities including position changes.