Young-age onset colorectal cancer in Brazil: Analysis of incidence, clinical features, and outcomes in a tertiary cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies report increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the young-age population, but data concerning clinical behavior, pathologic findings, and prognosis are controversial for this group. Early recognition of CRC in young patients is a challenge and diagnosis at advanced stage is clearly associated with worse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 5806 patients diagnosed with CRC between January/2011 and November/2016 and identified 781 patients aged less than 50-years-old. RESULTS: We found an absolute increasing in the incidence of CRC in patients <50 years old of 1.88%-2.23% annually, with a relative increasing of 35.3% between 2011 and 2016. Median age was 42 years, 57.4% were female and 20.9% reported family history of CRC. Left-sided tumors were more frequent and the majority of patients were symptomatic. The most common stages at diagnosis were III (34.1%) and IV (37.3%). The median overall survival (OS) for stage IV was 25 months (95% CI 20.7-29.3) and was not reached for Stages I-III (P < 0.001). Family history of CRC was independently associated with better OS in stage IV(P = 0.02). For stages I-III, wild-type KRAS, family history of CRC, and absence of angiolymphatic invasion were associated with better OS (P = 0.02, P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the incidence of early-onset CRC is increasing over the past years. Young patients were more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease, left-sided and/or rectum site and symptoms at presentation. These findings highlight the emerging importance of young-age onset CRC and the need to discuss strategies to early diagnosis.

Next-generation Sequencing-based genomic profiling: Fostering innovation in cancer care?

OBJECTIVES: With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, DNA sequencing has been increasingly utilized in clinical practice. Our goal was to investigate the impact of genomic evaluation on treatment decisions for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic cancer. METHODS: We analyzed metastatic cancer patients from a single institution whose cancers had progressed after all available standard-of-care therapies and whose tumors underwent next-generation sequencing analysis. We determined the percentage of patients who received any therapy directed by the test, and its efficacy. RESULTS: From July 2013 to December 2015, 185 consecutive patients were tested using a commercially available next-generation sequencing-based test, and 157 patients were eligible. Sixty-six patients (42.0%) were female, and 91 (58.0%) were male. The mean age at diagnosis was 52.2 years, and the mean number of pre-test lines of systemic treatment was 2.7. One hundred and seventy-seven patients (95.6%) had at least one identified gene alteration. Twenty-four patients (15.2%) underwent systemic treatment directed by the test result. Of these, one patient had a complete response, four (16.7%) had partial responses, two (8.3%) had stable disease, and 17 (70.8%) had disease progression as the best result. The median progression-free survival time with matched therapy was 1.6 months, and the median overall survival was 10 months. CONCLUSION: We identified a high prevalence of gene alterations using an next-generation sequencing test. Although some benefit was associated with the matched therapy, most of the patients had disease progression as the best response, indicating the limited biological potential and unclear clinical relevance of this practice.

Next-generation Sequencing-based genomic profiling: Fostering innovation in cancer care?

OBJECTIVES: With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, DNA sequencing has been increasingly utilized in clinical practice. Our goal was to investigate the impact of genomic evaluation on treatment decisions for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic cancer. METHODS: We analyzed metastatic cancer patients from a single institution whose cancers had progressed after all available standard-of-care therapies and whose tumors underwent next-generation sequencing analysis. We determined the percentage of patients who received any therapy directed by the test, and its efficacy. RESULTS: From July 2013 to December 2015, 185 consecutive patients were tested using a commercially available next-generation sequencing-based test, and 157 patients were eligible. Sixty-six patients (42.0%) were female, and 91 (58.0%) were male. The mean age at diagnosis was 52.2 years, and the mean number of pre-test lines of systemic treatment was 2.7. One hundred and seventy-seven patients (95.6%) had at least one identified gene alteration. Twenty-four patients (15.2%) underwent systemic treatment directed by the test result. Of these, one patient had a complete response, four (16.7%) had partial responses, two (8.3%) had stable disease, and 17 (70.8%) had disease progression as the best result. The median progression-free survival time with matched therapy was 1.6 months, and the median overall survival was 10 months. CONCLUSION: We identified a high prevalence of gene alterations using an next-generation sequencing test. Although some benefit was associated with the matched therapy, most of the patients had disease progression as the best response, indicating the limited biological potential and unclear clinical relevance of this practice.

Academética: um novo método de estudo continuado sobre Ética Médica e Bioética / Academética: a new method of continuous study in Medical Ethics and Bioethics

A consciência de que a prática deve estar fundamentada na postura ética dos profissionais leva à crescente importância de um ensino continuado e aprofundado, que ressalte os valores morais e humanos e o comprometimento social dos estudantes. Buscando adequar-se a esse novo paradigma, estudantes de Medicina da Universidade Federal da Bahia aceitaram a sugestão de criação, em novembro de 2000, de um grupo denominado Academética - Associação de Acadêmicos para o estudo da Ética Médica e Bioética. Os objetivos traçados pela equipe são: continuar o contato com o conteúdo da disciplina Ética Médica, aprofundando e atualizando as discussões acerca de Ética Médica e Bioética, e desenvolver trabalhos ligados a este assunto. As discussões de temas são realizadas através do estudo de artigos, vídeos e estímulo à participação dos estudantes em congressos, palestras e afins. Desta forma, a Academética se constitui em mais uma ferramenta para que os alunos durante a graduação na faculdade de Medicina possam desenvolver o senso crítico e conhecimento acerca de assuntos que englobem a Ética Médica e Bioética.