[Are psychedelics fast acting antidepressant agents?] / Sind Psychedelika schnell wirksame Antidepressiva?

BACKGROUND: Psychedelics, such as psilocybin represent one of the most promising current therapeutic approaches in psychiatry. OBJECTIVE: Psychedelics seem to have not only potent antidepressant effects. Do they also work particularly quickly, i.e. within one day? MATERIAL AND METHODS: The available literature on clinical studies of psychedelics in depressive syndromes is presented both from the period up to the prohibition of these substances in the late 1960s as well as after the resumption of research in the 2000s. One focus is the speed of onset of antidepressant action. RESULTS: Only the clinical studies published since 2016 that meet modern methodological standards have also systematically examined the speed of the antidepressant onset of action. The published studies, which were almost exclusively carried out with psilocybin, so far show small sample sizes (the total number of patients with depression treated in published clinical studies is < 200) and some of them have methodological weaknesses; however, they suggest a pronounced and very rapid onset of action within one day for depression, treatment-resistant depression and depression in the context of life-threatening cancer. CONCLUSION: The available studies indicate a potent, rapid onset and in many cases long-lasting antidepressant effect over several months. The currently conducted studies with three-digit patient numbers will provide final information about the potential of psilocybin for depression.

Treatment with psychedelics is psychotherapy: beyond reductionism.

Treatment of psychiatric disorders with psychedelic substances represents one of the most promising current treatment approaches in psychiatry. Since its inception in the 1950s, therapy with psychedelics has been conceptualised as psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy-ie, a form of psychotherapy that uses the profound biological effects of this class of substances as a catalyst for changing thinking, emotions, and behaviour. In this view, the psychotherapy component of the treatment is considered as being of the utmost importance for both the safety and efficacy of the therapy. This conceptualisation has been challenged by the idea that the latest clinical studies suggest that the potential therapeutic effects of psychedelics must be attributed solely to the substance itself, with no role for psychotherapy. Here, accompaniment by therapists is understood as mere psychological support, to maintain the safety of the substance administration. In this Personal View, we contrast these two views and argue that the characterisation of treatment with psychedelics as a biological intervention (with psychological support as a purely safety-related component) represents an outdated and reductionistic dualism that has dominated psychiatric treatment and research for far too long. This discussion has important implications for the study and the regulation of these compounds.