Cost-effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of wrist and hand disability due to upper-limb post-stroke spasticity in Scotland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating upper-limb post-stroke spasticity (ULPSS) with usual care (UC) plus onabotulinumtoxinA versus UC alone in Scotland. METHODS: We developed a model to simulate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from treating ULPSS. Efficacy data and health utilities were taken from clinical trials. Unit costs were taken from published Scottish sources. We compared UC plus onabotulinumtoxinA and UC alone in three scenarios: (i) a scenario from the National Health Service perspective, which included differences in onabotulinumtoxinA use, specialist visits and day-hospital visits; (ii) a scenario that only included differences in onabotulinumtoxinA use and specialist visits; and (iii) a scenario from a societal perspective that included differences in onabotulinumtoxinA use, specialist visits and caregiver burden. RESULTS: In the first scenario, the model predicted that UC plus onabotulinumtoxinA produced 0.107 QALYs at an additional cost of £1099 compared with UC alone over 5 years, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £10,271/QALY. In the second scenario, the ICER increased to £27,134/QALY. In the third scenario (societal perspective), UC plus onabotulinumtoxinA produced lower total cost and higher QALYs, and therefore was superior to UC alone. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a model, UC plus onabotulinumtoxinA improved disability, which translated into greater QALYs but also increased direct medical costs compared with UC alone; however, the resulting ICER can be considered cost-effective. Moreover, UC plus onabotulinumtoxinA can be cost-saving if reduction in caregiver burden was included. OnabotulinumtoxinA offers value for money in the management of ULPSS in Scotland.

Botulinum neurotoxin versus tizanidine in upper limb spasticity: a placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: While spasticity is commonly treated with oral agents or botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection, these treatments have not been systematically compared. METHODS: This study performed a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare injection of BoNT-Type A into spastic upper limb muscles versus oral tizanidine (TZD), or placebo, in 60 subjects with upper-limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI). Wrist flexors were systematically injected, while other upper limb muscles were injected as per investigator judgement. Participants were randomised into three groups: (1) intramuscular BoNT plus oral placebo; (2) oral TZD plus intramuscular placebo; (3) intramuscular placebo plus oral placebo. The primary outcome was the difference in change in wrist flexor modified Ashworth score (MAS) between groups. Other outcome measures included MAS at elbow and finger joints, Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) and adverse events (AE). RESULTS: BoNT produced greater tone reduction than TZD or placebo in finger and wrist flexors at week 3 (p<0.001 vs TZD; p<0.02 vs placebo) and 6 (p = 0.001 vs TZD; p = 0.08 vs placebo), and greater improvement in the cosmesis domain of the DAS at week 6 (p<0.01). TZD was not superior to placebo in tone reduction at either time point (p>or=0.09). The incidence of AE related to study treatment was higher with TZD than in the BoNT (p<0.01) or placebo groups (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BoNT is safer and more effective than TZD in reducing tone and disfigurement in upper-extremity spasticity, and may be considered as first-line therapy for this disorder.

The safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type B in the treatment of patients with cervical dystonia: summary of three controlled clinical trials.

Cervical dystonia (CD) is characterized by abnormal, involuntary contractions of the cervical and/or shoulder muscles. Direct injection of Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) into the affected muscles has been used successfully to treat this condition. However, clinical resistance to BTX-A therapy develops in a limited number of patients. Moreover, an unknown proportion of treated patients have a suboptimal response to their present therapy. BTX-B is antigenically distinct from BTX-A and possesses a different mechanism of action. Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluated the safety and efficacy of BTX-B (Elan's BTX-B evaluated as NeuroBloc) as a treatment for patients with CD. Patients received a single dose of BTX-B ranging from 2,500 to 10,000 U. The primary efficacy evaluation for each of these studies used the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score. Additional efficacy measures included the TWSTRS severity, disability, and pain subscale scores, as well as the Patient Analog Pain Assessment and Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments of Change. In all three studies, groups receiving BTX-B displayed statistically significant improvements in TWSTRS total score and other efficacy end points compared with those who received placebo treatment. The clinical benefits after BTX-B treatment lasted 12 to 16 weeks and were observed in both BTX-A-responsive and BTX-A-resistant patients. In general, treatment with BTX-B was well tolerated and most of the reported adverse events were of short duration, mild to moderate in severity, and anticipated. The results from the three controlled clinical trials demonstrate the safety and efficacy of BTX-B in the treatment of patients with CD, including those who are resistant to BTX-A treatment.

Rapid-onset dystonia-parkinsonism in a second family.

Rapid-onset dystonia-parkinsonism (RDP), first described in a large Midwestern family, is now reported in a second, apparently unrelated, family in which four individuals have this same syndrome. All four developed sudden onset of dysarthria, dysphagia, severe dystonic spasms, bradykinesia, and postural instability over less than 1 hour to a few days. Three of the four had stable limb dystonia for several years preceding the onset of combined dystonia-parkinsonism. Treatment with levodopa/carbidopa provided little benefit. We propose diagnostic criteria for RDP and further define the spectrum of this unusual disease.

Ethylene oxide neurotoxicity: a cluster of 12 nurses with peripheral and central nervous system toxicity.

Ethylene oxide (EO) is commonly used to sterilize heat-sensitive products used by hospital patients and personnel. Ethylene chlorohydrin (EC), a by-product, is considered highly toxic. We report a cluster of 12 operating-room nurses and technicians who developed symptoms after a 5-month exposure to high levels of EO and EC in disposable surgical gowns. All patients reported a rash on the wrist where contact was made with the gowns, headaches, and hand numbness with weakness. Ten of 12 patients complained of memory loss. Neurologic evaluation revealed neuropathy on examination in nine of the 12 patients, elevated vibration threshold in four of nine, abnormal pressure threshold in 10 of 11, atrophy on head MRI in three of 10, and neuropathy on conduction studies in four of 10. Neuropsychological testing demonstrated mild cognitive impairment in four of six patients. Sural nerve biopsy in the most severely affected patient showed findings of axonal injury. Several patients in this group display signs of peripheral and CNS dysfunction following exposure to EO. Possible mechanisms of neurotoxicity include direct exposure of peripheral nerves through cutaneous absorption and central involvement through inhalation and vascular dissemination. The frequency of central and peripheral nervous system symptoms, supported by objective testing in these EO-exposed patients, suggests other healthcare personnel may be at similar risk.

Metrifonate treatment of AD: influence of APOE genotype.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an interaction exists between APOE genotype and the response of AD patients to metrifonate treatment and whether APOE genotype independently affects the rate of AD progression. BACKGROUND: Metrifonate is a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for the treatment of AD symptoms. METHODS: Data were pooled from four prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials and analyzed retrospectively. A total of 959 patients who received once-daily placebo (n = 374) or metrifonate (30 to 60 mg based on weight or a 50-mg fixed dose, n = 585) for up to 26 weeks agreed to APOE genotyping. RESULTS: Metrifonate clearly improved the cognitive performance of the AD patients when compared with placebo (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale [ADAS-Cog], p = 0.0001). The interaction of APOE genotype and the metrifonate effect on cognitive performance were not significant (p = 0.25). Metrifonate also clearly improved the global function of the AD patients when compared with placebo (Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change with Caregiver Input [CIBIC-Plus], p = 0.0001). The interaction of APOE genotype with the metrifonate effect on global function also was not significant (p = 0.70). No significant three-way interactions were observed among APOE genotype, gender, and response to metrifonate treatment (ADAS-Cog, p = 0.68; CIBIC-Plus, p = 0.26). APOE genotype did not influence disease progression as evaluated by either cognitive performance (ADAS-Cog, p = 0.93) or global function (CIBIC-Plus, p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from these studies of up to 26 weeks' duration do not clearly support an interaction between APOE genotype and metrifonate treatment effects. They suggest that APOE genotypes do not necessarily predict an AD patient's response to metrifonate treatment and that APOE genotype may not influence the rate of disease progression for patients with mild to moderate AD.

Rapid-onset dystonia-parkinsonism.

We studied a large family with a previously undescribed, autosomal dominant dystonia-parkinsonism syndrome. We chose to call the disorder "rapid-onset dystonia-parkinsonism" (RDP) based on the unusually rapid evolution of signs and symptoms. Affected individuals developed dystonia and parkinsonism between 14 and 45 years of age. The onset was acute in six individuals with the abrupt onset of symptoms over the course of several hours, and subacute in four others who had evolution over several days or weeks. Thereafter, progression of symptoms was usually very slow. Two had intermittent focal dystonia without parkinsonism, and one obligate gene carrier was asymptomatic at 68 years. CSF levels of homovanillic acid were decreased in the two individuals tested, but dopaminergic therapy provided only slight benefit. The DYT1 gene responsible for early-onset, generalized idiopathic torsion dystonia in Jewish and some non-Jewish families has been mapped to chromosome 9q34. Linkage analysis with three markers near the DYT1 gene showed several obligate recombinations, excluding DYT1 as a candidate gene for RDP. We believe RDP is unique and should be classified separately from other forms of hereditary dystonia-parkinsonism.

Safety and efficacy of NeuroBloc (botulinum toxin type B) in type A-responsive cervical dystonia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) in patients with cervical dystonia (CD). BACKGROUND: BoNT/B is a form of chemodenervation therapy for the treatment of patients with CD. METHODS: The authors performed a 16-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BoNT/B in patients with CD who continue to respond to botulinum toxin type A. Placebo, or 5,000 U or 10,000 U of BoNT/B was administered in two to four muscles involved clinically in CD. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score at week 4 was the primary efficacy measure. Clinical assessments and adverse events were recorded for treatment day 1 and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were enrolled randomly across all three treatment groups. The mean improvement in the TWSTRS-Total scores in each group at week 4 was 4.3 (placebo), 9.3 (5,000 U), and 11.7 (10,000 U). For the prospectively defined primary contrast (10,000 U versus placebo), highly significant differences were noted for the primary (TWSTRS-Total, baseline to week 4, p = 0.0004) and supportive secondary (Patient Global Assessment, baseline to week 4, p = 0.0001) outcome measures. Improvement in pain, disability, and severity of CD occurred for patients who were treated with BoNT/B when compared with placebo-treated patients. Overall, improvements associated with BoNT/B treatment were greatest for patients who received the 10,000-U dose. The duration of treatment effect for BoNT/B was 12 to 16 weeks for both doses. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin type B (NeuroBloc) is safe and efficacious at 5,000 U and 10,000 U for the management of patients with cervical dystonia.

Botulinum toxin type B: a new injectable treatment for cervical dystonia.

Cervical dystonia (CD) causes involuntary muscle spasms and is often associated with pain. Recently, botulinum toxin type B (BTX-B) (Myobloc, Elan South San Francisco, CA, USA) was approved for general use in the treatment of CD in the USA. In two large pivotal trials, BTX-B was found to be safe and effective in decreasing the movements, pain and disability associated with CD. Benefits were noted both in patients who no longer respond and in those who continue to respond to botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). BTX-B offers an additional therapeutic option for patients with CD.

Duration of effect of botulinum toxin type A in adult patients with cervical dystonia: a retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have established the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in patients with cervical dystonia. To maintain the clinical benefits of BTX-A, injections need to be repeated whenever patients' symptoms begin to recur. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine, in clinical practice settings, the mean duration of effect of BTX-A in the treatment of adult patients with cervical dystonia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was undertaken at an academic center and a private neurology practice. At each site, > or =50 patients being treated for cervical dystonia were identified and randomized for chart review. Patients had to have received the first assessable injection of BTX-A between January 1, 1998, and March 31, 1998, to coincide with the clinical availability of the most current formulation of the neurotoxin. A chart was eligible for review if the patient was aged > or =18 years, had a documented diagnosis of idiopathic cervical dystonia, was being treated with BTX-A, and had been under the continuous care of investigators from January 1, 1998, to August 31, 1999. Of the 102 patients initially identified, the first 30 from each site who met the study inclusion criteria were assessed for (1) age and sex; (2) severity of dystonia; (3) years of BTX-A use; (4) dates of first, second, third, and fourth BTX-A injections; (5) drug dose; (6) use of electromyography; (7) use of other prescribed therapies; (8) laboratory tests; and (9) adverse events. The mean interval between each visit and mean per-patient duration of effect were calculated and stratified by patient characteristics. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 56.4 years. Two thirds of the patients were women. Forty-one of the 60 patients (68.3%) had either moderate or severe disease, and 48 (80.0%) had experienced cervical dystonia for >5 years. The mean per-patient duration of effect across the 4 visits was 15.5 weeks (range, 12.2-24.3 weeks). The duration of effect did not differ significantly between study sites despite the differences in disease severity, drug dose, and use of adjunctive therapy. CONCLUSION: BTX-A the controls symptoms of cervical dystonia for 12 to 24 weeks, with a mean duration of effect per patient of 15.5 weeks.

Rapid onset dystonia-parkinsonism in a 14-year-old girl.

A painful dystonia of rapid onset and associated parkinsonian features is described in a girl aged 14 years. The condition is refractory to treatment and has led to severe neurological disability. Her father had presented with a similar picture.

Costs of treating dystonias and hemifacial spasm with botulinum toxin A.

Botulinum toxin (BTX) has become a safe and effective therapeutic tool in the treatment of a variety of neurological disorders, especially dystonias. One major disadvantage, however, is the high cost of a single injection of BTX. In this study of 835 patients, we calculated the cost of treatment with BTX serotype A (BTX-A) for different dystonias and hemifacial spasm. The annual expenditure per patient for BTX-A injections in this cohort totalled (mean +/- standard deviation) 1030 Deutschmarks (DM) [1996 values] +/- DM610 [$US570 +/- $US340; 230 +/- 130 pounds sterling (Pound)] for blepharospasm (n = 158), DM1450 +/- DM1520 ($US800 +/- $US830; 310 Pounds +/- 280 Pounds) for craniocervical dystonia (n = 148), and DM1480 +/- DM780 ($US810 +/- $US430; 330 Pounds +/- 180 Pounds) for oromandibular dystonia (n = 16), while the treatment of cervical dystonia consumed DM4590 +/- DM2060 ($US2520 +/- $US1130; 960 Pounds +/- 420 Pounds) [n = 362] per patient. In order to alleviate symptoms in patients with hemifacial spasm (n = 151), DM510 +/- DM270 ($US280 +/- $US150; 110 Pounds +/- 60 Pounds) had to be spent annually. The expenses for surgical therapy for cervical dystonia were DM10,120 +/- DM1900 (n = 54). No major differences concerning expenditure could be found in this study between the 2 available preparations of BTX. However, there appeared to be a lower rate of adverse effects with the Botox formulation, compared with the Dysport formulation, of BTX-A (this difference was statistically significant, i.e. p < 0.001). Although the cost of an individual injection is high, other cost factors also substantially contribute to the societal costs of adult-onset dystonias. Some of these costs may be attenuated with the use of BTX. The subjective and objective relief of these socially devastating and sometimes painful conditions rewards the expenditure associated with the use of BTX-A.

Botulinum toxin type A: Exploring new indications.

The use of botulinum toxin has expanded in the last five years to include traditional neurological use against dystonia and spasticity, as well as the emerging use for headache, pain, neuropathy, myofascial pain, joint arthritis, otolaryngology, gastroenterology and genitourinary disorders. This review will focus on these emerging uses of botulinum toxin as reported in recent literature. The exploratory use of botulinum toxin for cervical dystonia, blepharospasm and spasticity in small trials and case reports, has led to its detailed study in larger placebo-controlled clinical trials. Although the use of botulinum toxin for new indications may benefit a specific subset of patients with refractory pain and disability, the reader must realize that this is an emerging area, generally limited by a lack of large, placebo-controlled studies.

Assessment: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of movement disorders (an evidence-based review): report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

OBJECTIVE: To perform an evidence-based review of the safety and efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) in the treatment of movement disorders. METHODS: A literature search was performed including MEDLINE and Current Contents for therapeutic articles relevant to BoNT and selected movement disorders. Authors reviewed, abstracted, and classified articles based on American Academy of Neurology criteria (Class I-IV). RESULTS: The highest quality literature available for the respective indications was as follows: blepharospasm (two Class II studies); hemifacial spasm (one Class II and one Class III study); cervical dystonia (seven Class I studies); focal upper extremity dystonia (one Class I and three Class II studies); focal lower extremity dystonia (one Class II study); laryngeal dystonia (one Class I study); motor tics (one Class II study); and upper extremity essential tremor (two Class II studies). RECOMMENDATIONS: Botulinum neurotoxin should be offered as a treatment option for the treatment of cervical dystonia (Level A), may be offered for blepharospasm, focal upper extremity dystonia, adductor laryngeal dystonia, and upper extremity essential tremor (Level B), and may be considered for hemifacial spasm, focal lower limb dystonia, and motor tics (Level C). While clinicians' practice may suggest stronger recommendations in some of these indications, evidence-based conclusions are limited by the availability of data.

Clinico-immunologic aspects of botulinum toxin type B treatment of cervical dystonia.

In this multicenter study of 100 patients with cervical dystonia, we examined the immunogenicity of botulinum toxin type B (BTX-B) and correlated the clinical response with the presence of blocking antibodies (Abs) using a novel mouse protection assay. One-third of the patients who were negative for BTX-B Abs at baseline became positive for BTX-B Abs at last visit. Thus, the high antigenicity of BTX-B limits its long-term efficacy.

The botulinum toxins in the treatment of cervical dystonia.

The use of botulinum toxin to treat cervical dystonia (CD) has dramatically improved the quality of life of patients with this disabling, often painful disease. Two forms of toxins, botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and botulinum toxin type B (BTX-B), have each been studied in large multicenter trials in subjects with CD. A study of BTX-A demonstrated improvement of 5.15 to 10.65 degrees in head position using the Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS) in those treated with BTX-A (trade name BOTOX) compared with placebo. A study in patients who continued to respond to BTX-A and a similarly designed study in patients who were resistant to BTX-A demonstrated statistical improvement in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) in those treated with BTX-B (evaluated as NeuroBloc) compared with placebo. The potential availability of both forms of toxin will allow physicians to offer further treatment options to patients with CD.

Focal dystonia after chemotherapy: a case series.

Dystonia is a rare neurologic disorder of the basal ganglia presenting with involuntary twisting or turning spasm of muscles. Movements localized to the face, eyes, or neck generally present during late adulthood. Cranial dystonia is usually idiopathic but may be caused by trauma or medications. Of 148 patients with focal dystonia referred to Indiana University over four years, four women had the onset of face and neck symptoms eight days to 34 months after completing treatment with chemotherapy alone or combined with radiation therapy. Two patients were treated with 5-FU, one received doxorubicin and one was treated with both. Both drugs have been associated with transient parkinsonism, but no chemotherapeutic medications have been reported to cause dystonia. Three patients remain free of demonstrable malignancy. A possible association of chemotherapy and focal dystonia has not been previously described.

A spectrophotometric, enzymatic assay for D-3-hydroxybutyrate that is not dependent on hydrazine.

Because of the potential carcinogenic properties of hydrazine and because of other health hazards associated with its use in the laboratory, an enzymatic assay has been developed for D-3-hydroxybutyrate that is not dependent on hydrazine to drive the reaction toward completion. The use of a high concentration of NAD+ and a buffer at pH 9.5 resulted in a favorable conversion of D-3-hydroxybutyrate to acetoacetate by D-3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase even though the reaction favors D-3-hydroxybutyrate formation under physiological conditions. The assay was also completed faster than previous assays using hydrazine so that the amount of enzyme used for the assay could be reduced. The recovery of D-3-hydroxybutyrate added to liver samples was 98 +/- 1% (mean +/- SEM, n = 6). The assay was found to be suitable for the measurement of D-3-hydroxybutyrate in samples such as perchloric acid extracts of isolated hepatocytes even when the acetoacetate to D-3-hydroxybutyrate ratio was 4 to 1. This assay presents a reliable alternative to the use of hydrazine and may be used for the assay of D-3-hydroxybutyrate in a variety of physiological and experimental samples.

The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration: leg nerve observations and an alternative reference site.

Peroneal and tibial compound motor action potentials (CMAP) recorded using the standard belly-tendon montage have different configurations. The peroneal CMAP is a smooth dome shape, while the tibial CMAP has a slow-rising initial component followed by a higher amplitude negative peak. To evaluate possible causes of these differences we investigated the individual activity recordable at the belly and tendon electrodes by using a referential montage with the opposite foot as the reference. This type recording shows that the peroneal belly site produces most of the nerve CMAP, whereas the tendon site generates most of the high tibial CMAP. Some features and technical problems of referential CMAP recording using an opposite limb reference are shown. An alternative method using an ipsilateral distal leg reference site is described. A montage which separately records the activity at the belly or tendon electrodes may provide new insight into mechanisms of commonly observed nerve conduction phenomena.