Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Med Genet A ; 191(3): 896-898, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36541401

RESUMEN

Uncombable hair syndrome is a hair shaft condition in which the hair is frizzy, light in color (silver to light brown), and cannot be combed flat. Autosomal dominant (with complete or incomplete penetrance), autosomal recessive, and sporadic cases have been reported. In 2016 causative mutations in three genes were identified for uncombable hair syndrome, all with an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern: PADI3, TGM3, and TCHH. In many cases, however, there is still no molecular diagnosis. Here, we describe a case of autosomal recessive uncombable hair syndrome resulting from maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 1.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Cabello , Disomía Uniparental , Humanos , Disomía Uniparental/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 1 , Enfermedades del Cabello/genética , Cabello , Transglutaminasas/genética
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 42(6): 762-774, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34643287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adding rapid exome sequencing (rES) to conventional genetic tests improves the diagnostic yield of pregnancies showing ultrasound abnormalities but also carries a higher chance of unsolicited findings. We evaluated how rES, including pre- and post-test counseling, was experienced by parents investigating its impact on decision-making and experienced levels of anxiety. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was adopted. Participating couples (n = 46) were asked to fill in two surveys (pre-test and post-test counseling) and 11 couples were approached for an additional interview. RESULTS: All couples accepted the rES test-offer with the most important reason for testing emphasizing their hope of finding an underlying diagnosis that would aid decision-making. The actual impact on decision-making was low, however, since most parents decided to terminate the pregnancy based on the major and multiple fetal ultrasound anomalies and did not wait for their rES results. Anxiety was elevated for most participants and decreased over time. CONCLUSION: Major congenital anomalies detected on ultrasound seem to have more impact on prenatal parental decision-making and anxiety then the offer and results of rES. However, the impact of rES on reproductive decision-making and experienced anxiety requires further investigation, especially in pregnancies where less (severe) fetal anomalies are detected on ultrasound.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Anomalías Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías Múltiples/genética , Exoma , Femenino , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Padres , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Secuenciación del Exoma/métodos
3.
Prenat Diagn ; 40(10): 1300-1309, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32627857

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Conventional genetic tests (quantitative fluorescent-PCR [QF-PCR] and single nucleotide polymorphism-array) only diagnose ~40% of fetuses showing ultrasound abnormalities. Rapid exome sequencing (rES) may improve this diagnostic yield, but includes challenges such as uncertainties in fetal phenotyping, variant interpretation, incidental unsolicited findings, and rapid turnaround times. In this study, we implemented rES in prenatal care to increase diagnostic yield. METHODS: We prospectively studied 55 fetuses. Inclusion criteria were: (a) two or more independent major fetal anomalies, (b) hydrops fetalis or bilateral renal cysts alone, or (c) one major fetal anomaly and a first-degree relative with the same anomaly. In addition to conventional genetic tests, we performed trio rES analysis using a custom virtual gene panel of ~3850 Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) genes. RESULTS: We established a genetic rES-based diagnosis in 8 out of 23 fetuses (35%) without QF-PCR or array abnormalities. Diagnoses included MIRAGE (SAMD9), Zellweger (PEX1), Walker-Warburg (POMGNT1), Noonan (PTNP11), Kabuki (KMT2D), and CHARGE (CHD7) syndrome and two cases of Osteogenesis Imperfecta type 2 (COL1A1). In six cases, rES diagnosis aided perinatal management. The median turnaround time was 14 (range 8-20) days. CONCLUSION: Implementing rES as a routine test in the prenatal setting is challenging but technically feasible, with a promising diagnostic yield and significant clinical relevance.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples/diagnóstico , Secuenciación del Exoma , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Anomalías Múltiples/epidemiología , Anomalías Múltiples/genética , Adulto , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA