Ultrasensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric methodologies for quantification of five HIV-1 integrase inhibitors in plasma for a microdose clinical trial.

HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors are an important class of compounds targeted for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Microdosing has emerged as an attractive tool to assist in drug candidate screening for clinical development, but necessitates extremely sensitive bioanalytical assays, typically in the pg/mL concentration range. Currently, accelerator mass spectrometry is the predominant tool for microdosing support, which requires a specialized facility and synthesis of radiolabeled compounds. There have been few studies attempted to comprehensively assess a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) approach in the context of microdosing applications. Herein, we describe the development of automated LC-MS/MS methods to quantify five integrase inhibitors in plasma with the limits of quantification at 1 pg/mL for raltegravir and 2 pg/mL for four proprietary compounds. The assays involved double extractions followed by UPLC coupled with negative ion electrospray MS/MS analysis. All methods were fully validated to the rigor of regulated bioanalysis requirements, with intraday precision between 1.20 and 14.1% and accuracy between 93.8 and 107% at the standard curve concentration range. These methods were successfully applied to a human microdose study and demonstrated to be accurate, reproducible, and cost-effective. Results of the study indicate that raltegravir displayed linear pharmacokinetics between a microdose and a pharmacologically active dose.

A Model-Based Approach to Bridging Plasma and Dried Blood Spot Concentration Data for Phase 3 Verubecestat Trials.

In-clinic venous dried blood spot (DBS) pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was incorporated into two phase 3 studies of verubecestat for Alzheimer's disease (EPOCH [NCT01739348] and APECS [NCT01953601]), as a potential alternative to plasma PK sampling. Initially, plasma and DBS PK samples were collected concurrently to better understand the DBS-plasma verubecestat concentration relationship, with the intention of discontinuing DBS or plasma sampling following interim analysis. Following initial analyses and comparison of results with prespecified selection criteria, plasma PK sampling was discontinued; however, a stability issue resulting in generally lower DBS verubecestat concentrations with longer collection-to-assay times was subsequently discovered (associated with non-compliance in DBS sample handling), prompting reintroduction of plasma sampling. To enable inclusion of DBS data in population PK analyses, a conversion algorithm for calculating plasma-equivalent concentrations (accounting for DBS sample instability) was developed using paired (time-matched) plasma and DBS data from the EPOCH study. Verubecestat population PK models developed from pooled phase 1/1b and EPOCH data using either (1) plasma-only data or (2) plasma and plasma-equivalent concentrations (calculated from non-paired DBS samples) yielded similar results. The algorithm robustness was demonstrated using DBS data from paired samples from the APECS study and comparison between plasma and plasma-equivalent concentrations. The population PK model was updated with APECS data (both plasma and, if no plasma sample available, plasma equivalents). The results demonstrated similar PK in the two phase 3 populations and exposures consistent with expectations from phase 1 data. This case study illustrates challenges with employing new sampling techniques in large, global trials and describes lessons learned.

An Investigation of Instability in Dried Blood Spot Samples for Pharmacokinetic Sampling in Phase 3 Trials of Verubecestat.

In-clinic dried blood spot (DBS) pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was incorporated into two phase 3 studies of verubecestat for Alzheimer's disease (EPOCH [NCT01739348] and APECS [NCT01953601]), as a potential alternative to plasma PK sampling for improved logistical feasibility and decreased blood volume burden. However, an interim PK analysis revealed verubecestat concentrations in DBS samples declined with time to assay in both trials. An investigation revealed wide variation in implementation practices for DBS sample handling procedures resulting in insufficient desiccation which caused verubecestat instability. High-resolution mass spectrometry evaluations of stressed and aged verubecestat DBS samples revealed the presence of two hydrolysis degradants. To minimize instability, new DBS handling procedures were implemented that provided additional desiccant and minimized the time to analysis. Both verubecestat hydrolysis products were previously discovered and synthesized during active pharmaceutical ingredient stability characterization. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay to quantitate the dominant verubecestat degradant in DBS samples was developed and validated. The application of this method to stressed and aged verubecestat DBS samples confirmed that degradant concentrations accounted for the observed decreases in the verubecestat concentration. Furthermore, after increasing desiccant amounts, degradant concentrations accounted for approximately 7% of the verubecestat concentration in DBS clinical samples, indicating that issues with sample handling were minimized with new storage and shipping conditions. This case study illustrates the challenges with employing new sampling techniques in large, global trials, and the importance of anticipating and mitigating implementation risks.

Incorporating protein precipitation to resolve hybrid IP-LC-MS assay interference for ultrasensitive quantification of intact therapeutic insulin dimer in human plasma.

For pharmacokinetics characterization of a therapeutic insulin dimer, an ultrasensitive plasma method was required due to the expected low circulating levels in humans. A bioanalytical strategy combining immunoprecipitation enrichment with liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis of the intact protein offers the opportunity to resolve the analyte from endogenous and exogenous insulin and insulin analogs. Nonetheless, interference from complex background matrix was observed limiting reliable measurements at the low concentration range. A sample preparation approach incorporating protein precipitation and immunoprecipitation was developed and optimized to further reduce sample complexity prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. This approach enabled a deeper level of selectivity and presented a cleaner mass spectrometric detection that may otherwise be confounded. Sample preparation was automated to allow high throughput analysis. The method reached a limit of quantitation at 0.3 ng/mL (25 pM), and a linear dynamic range from 0.3 to 300 ng/mL. Results were highly reproducible, with intra-day and inter-day precision and bias below 11%. Furthermore, the organic solvent treatment involved in protein precipitation is expected to improve assay resistance to the bias introduced by endogenous protein binding such as that exerted by anti-drug antibodies. The method was successfully applied to support clinical pharmacokinetics studies. This approach may potentially be adapted to bioanalysis of low abundance proteins.

Total raltegravir concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid exceed the 50-percent inhibitory concentration for wild-type HIV-1.

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders continue to be common. Antiretrovirals that achieve higher concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are associated with better control of HIV and improved cognition. The objective of this study was to measure total raltegravir (RAL) concentrations in CSF and to compare them with matched concentrations in plasma and in vitro inhibitory concentrations. Eighteen subjects with HIV-1 infection were enrolled based on the use of RAL-containing regimens and the availability of CSF and matched plasma samples. RAL was measured in 21 CSF and plasma pairs by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and HIV RNA was detected by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). RAL concentrations were compared to the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) for wild-type HIV-1 (3.2 ng/ml). Volunteers were predominantly middle-aged white men with AIDS and without hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. The median concurrent CD4(+) cell count was 276/µl, and 28% of CD4(+) cell counts were below 200/µl. HIV RNA was detectable in 38% of plasma specimens and 4% of CSF specimens. RAL was present in all CSF specimens, with a median total concentration of 14.5 ng/ml. The median concentration in plasma was 260.9 ng/ml, with a median CSF-to-plasma ratio of 0.058. Concentrations in CSF correlated with those in with plasma (r(2), 0.24; P, 0.02) but not with the postdose sampling time (P, >0.50). RAL concentrations in CSF exceeded the IC(50) for wild-type HIV in all specimens by a median of 4.5-fold. RAL is present in CSF and reaches sufficiently high concentrations to inhibit wild-type HIV in all individuals. As a component of effective antiretroviral regimens or as the main antiretroviral, RAL likely contributes to the control of HIV replication in the nervous system.

Effects of omeprazole on plasma levels of raltegravir.

Raltegravir, a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase inhibitor, has pH-dependent solubility. Raltegravir plasma concentration increases with omeprazole coadministration in healthy subjects; this is likely secondary to an increase in bioavailability attributable to increased gastric pH. Increased gastric pH has been reported in HIV-1-infected individuals, and the effects of omeprazole in this intended population may be diminished. Further investigation is necessary.

Lack of a clinically important effect of moderate hepatic insufficiency and severe renal insufficiency on raltegravir pharmacokinetics.

Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Raltegravir is primarily cleared by hepatic metabolism via glucuronidation (via UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1), with a minor component of elimination occurring via the renal pathway. Since the potential exists for raltegravir to be administered to patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency, two studies were conducted to evaluate the influence of moderate hepatic insufficiency (assessed by using the Child-Pugh criteria) and severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir. Study I evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 400 mg raltegravir in eight patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency and eight healthy, matched control subjects. Study II evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 400 mg raltegravir in 10 patients with severe renal insufficiency and 10 healthy, matched control subjects. All participants received a single 400-mg dose of raltegravir in the fasted state. In study I, the geometric mean ratios (GMR; mean value for the group with moderate hepatic insufficiency/mean value for the healthy controls) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), the maximum concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)), and the concentration at 12 h (C(12)) were 0.86 (90% CI, 0.41, 1.77), 0.63 (90% CI, 0.23, 1.70), and 1.26 (90% CI, 0.65, 2.43), respectively. In study II, the GMRs (mean value for the group with renal insufficiency/mean value for the healthy controls) and 90% CIs for AUC(0-infinity), C(max), and C(12) were 0.85 (90% CI, 0.49, 1.49), 0.68 (90% CI, 0.35, 1.32), and 1.28 (90% CI, 0.79, 2.06), respectively. Raltegravir was generally well tolerated by patients with moderate hepatic or severe renal insufficiency, and there was no clinically important effect of moderate hepatic or severe renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir. No adjustment in the dose of raltegravir is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic or renal insufficiency.

Toward highly sensitive and reproducible LC-MS/MS analysis of MK-8591 phosphorylated anabolites in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Aim: MK-8591 (EFdA), a novel anti-HIV nucleoside analog, is converted to mono-, di- and tri-phosphates (MK-8591-MP, MK-8591-DP and MK-8591-TP) intracellularly, among which MK-8591-TP is the active pharmacological form. An ultrasensitive LC-MS/MS assay was required to measure MK-8591-DP and MK-8591-TP levels in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Sensitivity and reproducibility were major bottlenecks in these analyses. Materials and methods: Human PBMCs were isolated from blood and lysed with 70/30 methanol/RPMI-1640. An LC-MS/MS method was developed to simultaneously quantify MK-8591-DP and MK-8581-TP in PBMC lysates. Results: Low flow LC and dimethyl sulfoxide mediated signal enhancement enabled an extreme sensitivity with limit of quantitation at 0.1 ng/ml. Assay accuracy was 92.5-106% and precision was 0.7-12.1% for a linear curve range of 0.1-40 ng/ml. Matrix variability and interference liability were comprehensively evaluated. Conclusion: Our study findings and steps taken in addressing clinical sample issues help understand and overcome the challenges facing intracellular nucleotide analog analysis.

Atazanavir modestly increases plasma levels of raltegravir in healthy subjects.

Raltegravir is an HIV integrase inhibitor that is metabolized through glucuronidation by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1, and its use is anticipated in combination with atazanavir (a uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 inhibitor). Two pharmacokinetic studies of healthy subjects assessed the effect of multiple-dose atazanavir or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir on raltegravir levels in plasma. Atazanavir and atazanavir plus ritonavir modestly increase plasma levels of raltegravir.

Lack of a significant drug interaction between raltegravir and tenofovir.

Raltegravir is a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase inhibitor with potent in vitro activity (95% inhibitory concentration of 31 nM in 50% human serum). This article reports the results of an open-label, sequential, three-period study of healthy subjects. Period 1 involved raltegravir at 400 mg twice daily for 4 days, period 2 involved tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at 300 mg once daily for 7 days, and period 3 involved raltegravir at 400 mg twice daily plus TDF at 300 mg once daily for 4 days. Pharmacokinetic profiles were also determined in HIV-1-infected patients dosed with raltegravir monotherapy versus raltegravir in combination with TDF and lamivudine. There was no clinically significant effect of TDF on raltegravir. The raltegravir area under the concentration time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) and peak plasma drug concentration (C(max)) were modestly increased in healthy subjects (geometric mean ratios [GMRs], 1.49 and 1.64, respectively). There was no substantial effect of TDF on raltegravir concentration at 12 h postdose (C(12)) in healthy subjects (GMR [TDF plus raltegravir-raltegravir alone], 1.03; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.45), while a modest increase (GMR, 1.42; 90% CI, 0.89 to 2.28) was seen in HIV-1-infected patients. Raltegravir had no substantial effect on tenofovir pharmacokinetics: C(24), AUC, and C(max) GMRs were 0.87, 0.90, and 0.77, respectively. Coadministration of raltegravir and TDF does not change the pharmacokinetics of either drug to a clinically meaningful degree. Raltegravir and TDF may be coadministered without dose adjustments.

Minimal effects of ritonavir and efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir.

Raltegravir is a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase strand transfer inhibitor with potent in vitro activity against HIV-1 (95% inhibitory concentration = 31 nM in 50% human serum). The possible effects of ritonavir and efavirenz on raltegravir pharmacokinetics were separately examined. Two clinical studies of healthy subjects were conducted: for ritonavir plus raltegravir, period 1, 400 mg raltegravir; period 2, 100 mg ritonavir every 12 h for 16 days with 400 mg raltegravir on day 14; for efavirenz plus raltegravir, period 1, 400 mg raltegravir; period 2, 600 mg efavirenz once daily for 14 days with 400 mg raltegravir on day 12. In the presence of ritonavir, raltegravir pharmacokinetics were weakly affected: the plasma concentration at 12 h (C(12 h)) geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.99 (0.70, 1.40), area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) was 0.84 (0.70, 1.01), and maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)) was 0.76 (0.55, 1.04). In the presence of efavirenz, raltegravir pharmacokinetics were moderately to weakly reduced: C(12 h) GMR (90% CI) was 0.79 (0.49, 1.28); AUC(0-infinity) was 0.64 (0.52, 0.80); and C(max) was 0.64 (0.41, 0.98). There were no substantial differences in the time to maximum concentration of drug in plasma or the half-life. Plasma concentrations of raltegravir were not substantially affected by ritonavir. Though plasma concentrations of raltegravir were moderately to weakly reduced by efavirenz, the degree of this reduction was not clinically meaningful. No dose adjustment is required for raltegravir with coadministration with ritonavir or efavirenz.

Strategy for peptide quantification using LC-MS in regulated bioanalysis: case study with a glucose-responsive insulin.

AIM: Advances in technology have led to a shift for peptide quantification from traditional ligand-binding assays to LC-MS/MS-based analysis, which presents challenges, in other assay sensitivity, specificity and ruggedness, in addition to lacking of regulatory guidance, especially for the hybrid assay format. Methodology & results: This report communicates a strategy that has been employed in our laboratories for method development and assay validation, and exemplified in a case study of MK-2640, a glucose-responsive insulin, in multiple matrices. Intact MK-2640 was monitored, while immunoaffinity purification and SPE were used to support the rat/dog GLP and clinical studies, respectively. The rationale and considerations behind our approach, as well as the acceptance criteria applied to the assay validation are discussed.

Extractability-mediated stability bias and hematocrit impact: High extraction recovery is critical to feasibility of volumetric adsorptive microsampling (VAMS) in regulated bioanalysis.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), a new microsampling technique, was evaluated for its potential in supporting regulated bioanalysis. Our initial assessment with MK-0518 (raltegravir) using a direct extraction method resulted in 45-52% extraction recovery, significant hematocrit (Ht) related bias, and more importantly, unacceptable stability (>15% bias from nominal concentration) after 7-day storage. Our investigation suggested that the observed biases were not due to VAMS absorption, sampling techniques, lot-to-lot variability, matrix effect, and/or chemical stability of the compound, but rather the low extraction recovery. An effort to improve assay recovery led to a modified liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) method that demonstrated more consistent performance, minimal Ht impact (Ht ranged from 20 to 65%), and acceptable sample stability. The same strategy was successfully applied to another more hydrophilic model compound, MK-0431 (sitagliptin). These results suggest that the previously observed Ht effect and "instability" were in fact due to inconsistent extractability, and optimizing the extraction recovery to greater than 80% was critical to ensure VAMS performance. We recommend adding Ht-independent recovery as part of feasibility assessment to de-risk the long-term extractability-mediated stability bias before implementing VAMS in regulated bioanalysis.

Insulin glargine and its two active metabolites: A sensitive (16pM) and robust simultaneous hybrid assay coupling immunoaffinity purification with LC-MS/MS to support biosimilar clinical studies.

MK-1293 is a newly approved follow-on/biosimilar insulin glargine for the treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics. To support pivotal clinical studies during biosimilar evaluation, a sensitive, specific and robust liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for the simultaneous quantification of glargine and its two active metabolites, M1 and M2 were developed. Strategies to overcome analytical challenges, so as to optimize assay sensitivity and improve ruggedness, were evolved, resulting in a fully validated LC-MS/MS method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at 0.1ng/mL (∼16pM, equivalent to ∼2.8µU/mL) for glargine, M1 and M2, respectively, using 0.5mL of human plasma. The assay employed hybrid methodology that combined immunoaffinity purification and reversed-phase chromatography followed by electrospray-MS/MS detection operated under positive ionization mode. Stable-isotope labeled 6[D10]Leu-glargine and 4[D10]Leu-M1 were used as internal standards. With a calibration range from 0.1 to 10ng/mL, the intra-run precision (n=5) and accuracy were <6.21%, and 96.9-102.1%, while the inter-run (n=5/run for 7days) precision and accuracy were <9.55% and 96.5-105.1%, respectively, for all 3 analytes. Matrix effect, recovery, analyte stability, and interferences from control matrix, potential concomitant medications and anti-drug antibody were assessed. The assay was fully automated and has been successfully used in support of biosimilar clinical studies. Greater than 94.3% of incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) results met acceptance criteria, demonstrating the robustness of the assay. The strategic considerations during method development and validation are discussed, and can be applied to quantification of other peptides, especially insulin analogs, in the future.

Report on the 17th Annual Land O'Lakes Bioanalytical Conference.

17th Annual Land O'Lakes Bioanalytical Conference, Madison, WI, USA, 11-14 July 2016 The 17th Annual Land O'Lakes Bioanalytical Conference, titled 'Biomarker Validation, Stability, and Regulatory Concerns', was held on 11-14 July 2016 (Monday through Thursday) in Madison, WI, USA. The Land O'Lakes Conference is presented each year by the Division of Pharmacy Professional Development within the School of Pharmacy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (USA). The purpose of this 3-day conference is to provide an educational forum to discuss issues and applications associated with the analysis of xenobiotics, metabolites, biologics and biomarkers in biological matrices. The conference is designed to include and encourage an open exchange of scientific and methodological applications for bioanalysis. To increase the interactive nature of the conference, the program is a mixture of lectures, interactive discussions and a poster session. This report summarizes the presentations at the 17th Annual Conference.

Lack of meaningful effect of ridaforolimus on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in cancer patients: model prediction and clinical confirmation.

Ridaforolimus, a unique non-prodrug analog of rapamycin, is a potent inhibitor of mTOR under development for cancer treatment. In vitro data suggest ridaforolimus is a reversible and time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A. A model-based evaluation suggested an increase in midazolam area under the curve (AUC(0- ∞)) of between 1.13- and 1.25-fold in the presence of therapeutic concentrations of ridaforolimus. The pharmacokinetic interaction between multiple oral doses of ridaforolimus and a single oral dose of midazolam was evaluated in an open-label, fixed-sequence study, in which cancer patients received a single oral dose of 2 mg midazolam followed by 5 consecutive daily single oral doses of 40 mg ridaforolimus with a single dose of 2 mg midazolam with the fifth ridaforolimus dose. Changes in midazolam exposure were minimal [geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals: 1.23 (1.07, 1.40) for AUC(0-∞) and 0.92 (0.82, 1.03) for maximum concentrations (C(max)), respectively]. Consistent with model predictions, ridaforolimus had no clinically important effect on midazolam pharmacokinetics and is not anticipated to be a perpetrator of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when coadministered with CYP3A substrates. Model-based approaches can provide reasonable estimates of DDI liability, potentially obviating the need to conduct dedicated DDI studies especially in challenging populations like cancer patients.

Quantitative determination of odanacatib in human plasma using liquid-liquid extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis.

Odanacatib (ODN, MK-0822) is an investigational drug under development for the treatment of osteoporosis. A quantitative LC/MS-MS methodology was developed and validated to determine ODN concentrations in human plasma, with a linear calibration range from 0.500 to 500ng/mL. Stable isotope (13)C(6)-labeled ODN was employed as the internal standard (IS). Sample preparation was based on liquid-liquid extraction of basified plasma with methyl t-butyl ether in a 96-well plate format. The extracted samples were analyzed on a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system equipped with a turbo ion spray source. Chromatographic separation of the analyte and IS was achieved on a Phenomenex Luna C18 (50mm×2.0mm, 5µm) column. Ion pairs m/z 526→313 for the analyte and m/z 532→319 for the IS were monitored in positive ionization mode for MS detection. This methodology has been fully validated and proved to be rugged and reproducible. Intra- and inter-run variability was within 5.88%, with accuracy between 95.6 and 106% of the nominal concentrations. Analyte stability was evaluated under various sample preparation, analysis and storage conditions. This assay has been utilized to analyze human plasma samples obtained from phase I to III clinical trials.

The effect of multiple doses of rifampin and ketoconazole on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ridaforolimus.

PURPOSE: Ridaforolimus is an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin protein, with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Ridaforolimus is primarily cleared by metabolism via cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate. Since potential exists for ridaforolimus to be co-administered with agents that affect CYP3A and P-gp activity, this healthy volunteer study was conducted to assess the effect of rifampin or ketoconazole on ridaforolimus pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Part 1: single-dose ridaforolimus 40 mg followed by rifampin 600 mg daily for 21 days and singledose ridaforolimus 40 mg on day 14. Part 2: single-dose ridaforolimus 5 mg followed by ketoconazole 400 mg daily for 14 days and single-dose ridaforolimus 2 mg on day 2. RESULTS: Part 1: the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence interval [CI]) for ridaforolimus area under the concentration-time curve to the last time point with a detectable blood concentration (AUC0-∞) and maximum blood concentration (Cmax) (rifampin + ridaforolimus/ ridaforolimus) were 0.57 (0.41, 0.78) and 0.66 (0.49, 0.90), respectively. Both time to Cmax (Tmax) and apparent halflife (t1/2) were similar. Part 2: the GMRs (90% CI) based on dose-normalized AUC0-∞ and Cmax (ketoconazole + ridaforolimus/ridaforolimus alone) were 8.51 (6.97, 10.39) and 5.35 (4.40, 6.52), respectively. Ridaforolimus apparent t1/2 was *1.5-fold increased for ketoconazole ? ridaforolimus; however, Tmax values were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Rifampin and ketoconazole both have a clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of ridaforolimus.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of twice-daily atazanavir 300 mg and raltegravir 400 mg in healthy individuals.

BACKGROUND: Atazanavir plus raltegravir 300/400 mg twice daily is being explored as a ritonavir- and nucleoside-sparing treatment strategy. The pharmacokinetics and safety of this combination in healthy individuals were evaluated. METHODS: A total of 22 healthy individuals received raltegravir 400 mg on days 1-5, atazanavir 300 mg on days 6-12 and atazanavir plus raltegravir 300/400 mg on days 13-26, twice daily with a light meal. Serial blood samples were collected 12 h after the morning dose on days 5, 12 and 26; safety assessments, clinical laboratory data and serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) at 0, 2 and 6 h were obtained. RESULTS: Raltegravir coadministration reduced atazanavir geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose (AUC(0-12)) and trough plasma concentration (C(min)) by 11%, 17% and 29%, respectively, compared with atazanavir alone. Geometric mean atazanavir C(min) was 817 ng/ml (range 250-1,550) with raltegravir coadministration. Atazanavir increased raltegravir geometric mean C(max), AUC(0-12) and C(min) by 39%, 54% and 48%, respectively. All adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity. Hyperbilirubinaemia and ECG PR increases with atazanavir were similar to those of atazanavir/ritonavir once daily. No corrected QT prolongations were noted. Mean QRS increase from baseline was 11.0 ms (range 2-25) after receiving atazanavir for 7 days; no further QRS increase was noted and no QRS interval was >120 ms with raltegravir coadministration. No ECG changes were observed with raltegravir alone. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of atazanavir and raltegravir 300/400 mg twice daily decreased atazanavir AUC(0-12) and C(min) relative to atazanavir alone, and increased AUC(0-12) of raltegravir relative to raltegravir alone. Atazanavir and raltegravir alone and coadministered appeared safe and well-tolerated.