[Treatment of Opioid-dependent Inmates - Attitudes and Treatment Practice of medical Staff in Bavarian Prisons]. / Behandlung opioidabhängiger Inhaftierter ­ Einstellungen und Behandlungspraxis des medizinischen Personals in bayerischen Justizvollzugsanstalten.

BACKGROUND: The present study examines the treatment practice and attitudes of medical staff towards opioid-dependent inmates in Bavarian prisons. METHOD: We interviewed medical staff (n=20) from 18 Bavarian prisons about substitution practice and attitudes by semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: With regard to the treatment routines and the attitudes of the medical staff, we found mixed results. From the perspective of the medical staff, the treatment decision depends on the patients' wishes, the severity and duration of the dependence, the length of sentence and organizational factors. Problems were discussed in particular with regard to the care situation inside and outside the prisons and difficulties in transition management. CONCLUSIONS: Substitution therapy is considered a standard treatment method in prisons today. However, our respondents highlighted some disadvantages (e. g. passing on the substitution drug). Although the treatment goal of complete abstinence was generally viewed positively by a part of the medical staff, it was not considered very realistic. From the point of view of the respondents, special attention should be paid to the continuity of the chosen treatment strategy in the context of discharge management.

On the Effectiveness of Sexual Offender Treatment in Prisons: A Comparison of Two Different Evaluation Designs in Routine Practice.

Although there is less continuity of sexual offending in the life course than stereotypes suggest, treatment should lead to a further reduction of reoffending. Contrary to this aim, a recent large British study using propensity score matching (PSM) showed some negative effects of the core sex offender treatment program (SOTP) in prisons. International meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment revealed that there is considerable variety in the results, and methodological aspects and the context play a significant role. Therefore, this study compared different designs in the evaluation of sex offender treatment in German prisons. PSM was compared with an exact matching (EM) by the Static-99 in a sample of 693 sex offenders from Bavarian prisons. Most results were similar for both methods and not significant due to low base rates. There was a treatment effect at p < .05 on general recidivism in the EM and at p = .06 on serious reoffending in the PSM. For sexual recidivism, EM showed a negative trend, whereas PSM suggested the opposite. Overall, the study underlines the need for more replications of evaluations of routine practice, methodological comparisons, sensitive outcome criteria, and differentiated policy information.