Characteristics of Severe Asthma Patients and Predictors of Asthma Control in the Swiss Severe Asthma Registry.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic airway disease, affecting over 300 million people worldwide. 5-10% of patients suffer from severe asthma and account for 50% of asthma-related financial burden. Availability of real-life data about the clinical course of severe asthma is insufficient. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to characterize patients with severe asthma in Switzerland, enrolled in the Swiss Severe Asthma Registry (SSAR), and evaluate predictors for asthma control. METHOD: A descriptive characterisation of 278 patients was performed, who were prospectively enrolled in the registry until January 2022. Socio-demographic variables, comorbidities, diagnostic values, asthma treatment, and healthcare utilisation were evaluated. Groups of controlled and uncontrolled asthma according to the asthma control test were compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of patients were female and the mean age was 55.8 years (range 13-87). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.4 kg/m2 (±6). 10.8% of patients were current smokers. Allergic comorbidities occurred in 54.3% of patients, followed by chronic rhinosinusitis (46.4%) and nasal polyps (34.1%). According to the ACT score, 54.7% had well controlled, 16.2% partly controlled and 25.9% uncontrolled asthma. The most common inhalation therapy was combined inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting ß2-agonists (78.8%). Biologics were administered to 81.7% of patients and 19.1% received oral steroids. The multivariable analysis indicated that treatment with biologics was positively associated with asthma control whereas higher BMI, oral steroids, exacerbations, and COPD were negative predictors for asthma control. CONCLUSION: Biologics are associated with improved control in severe asthma. Further studies are required to complete the picture of severe asthma in order to provide improved care for those patients.

Pulmonary Recovery 12 Months after Non-Severe and Severe COVID-19: The Prospective Swiss COVID-19 Lung Study.

BACKGROUND: Lung function impairment persists in some patients for months after acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Long-term lung function, radiological features, and their association remain to be clarified. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to prospectively investigate lung function and radiological abnormalities over 12 months after severe and non-severe COVID-19. METHODS: 584 patients were included in the Swiss COVID-19 lung study. We assessed lung function at 3, 6, and 12 months after acute COVID-19 and compared chest computed tomography (CT) imaging to lung functional abnormalities. RESULTS: At 12 months, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCOcorr) was lower after severe COVID-19 compared to non-severe COVID-19 (74.9% vs. 85.2% predicted, p < 0.001). Similarly, minimal oxygen saturation on 6-min walk test and total lung capacity were lower after severe COVID-19 (89.6% vs. 92.2%, p = 0.004, respectively, 88.2% vs. 95.1% predicted, p = 0.011). The difference for forced vital capacity (91.6% vs. 96.3% predicted, p = 0.082) was not statistically significant. Between 3 and 12 months, lung function improved in both groups and differences in DLCO between non-severe and severe COVID-19 patients decreased. In patients with chest CT scans at 12 months, we observed a correlation between radiological abnormalities and reduced lung function. While the overall extent of radiological abnormalities diminished over time, the frequency of mosaic attenuation and curvilinear patterns increased. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort study, patients who had severe COVID-19 had diminished lung function over the first year compared to those after non-severe COVID-19, albeit with a greater extent of recovery in the severe disease group.

Deep learning diagnostic and severity-stratification for interstitial lung diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in digital lung auscultations and ultrasonography: clinical protocol for an observational case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD), such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are severe, progressive pulmonary disorders with a poor prognosis. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is important to enable patients to receive appropriate care at the earliest possible stage to delay disease progression and prolong survival. Artificial intelligence-assisted lung auscultation and ultrasound (LUS) could constitute an alternative to conventional, subjective, operator-related methods for the accurate and earlier diagnosis of these diseases. This protocol describes the standardised collection of digitally-acquired lung sounds and LUS images of adult outpatients with IPF, NSIP or COPD and a deep learning diagnostic and severity-stratification approach. METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients (≥ 18 years) meeting international criteria for IPF, NSIP or COPD and 40 age-matched controls will be recruited in a Swiss pulmonology outpatient clinic, starting from August 2022. At inclusion, demographic and clinical data will be collected. Lung auscultation will be recorded with a digital stethoscope at 10 thoracic sites in each patient and LUS images using a standard point-of-care device will be acquired at the same sites. A deep learning algorithm (DeepBreath) using convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory models, and transformer architectures will be trained on these audio recordings and LUS images to derive an automated diagnostic tool. The primary outcome is the diagnosis of ILD versus control subjects or COPD. Secondary outcomes are the clinical, functional and radiological characteristics of IPF, NSIP and COPD diagnosis. Quality of life will be measured with dedicated questionnaires. Based on previous work to distinguish normal and pathological lung sounds, we estimate to achieve convergence with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of > 80% using 40 patients in each category, yielding a sample size calculation of 80 ILD (40 IPF, 40 NSIP), 40 COPD, and 40 controls. DISCUSSION: This approach has a broad potential to better guide care management by exploring the synergistic value of several point-of-care-tests for the automated detection and differential diagnosis of ILD and COPD and to estimate severity. Trial registration Registration: August 8, 2022. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT05318599.

[Diagnosis of asthma: new developments in general internal medicine]. / Diagnostic de l'asthme : nouveautés pour la médecine interne générale.

Asthma, a chronic inflammatory lung disease affecting about 10 % of the population, involves both the general internist and the pulmonologist. The risk of over and underdiagnosis generates significant health costs and evitable clinical consequences. Improved screening through dedicated anamneses and questionnaires, as well as use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may improve the diagnosis of asthma in general internal medicine.

L'asthme, maladie pulmonaire inflammatoire chronique affectant environ 10 % de la population, implique autant la médecine interne générale (MIG) que la pneumologie. Les risques de sous- et surdiagnostic engendrent d'importants coûts et conséquences cliniques évitables. Améliorer le dépistage lors de l'anamnèse avec l'utilisation de questionnaires dédiés et lors des examens fonctionnels par l'utilisation de la mesure de la fraction exhalée de l'oxyde nitrique pourrait être la clé d'un meilleur diagnostic de l'asthme en MIG.

[COPD : a still neglected condition]. / BPCO : une maladie encore négligée.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous lung disorder with a complex clinical picture. The diagnosis may be difficult at times, as COPD may develop insidiously and remain unnoticed for a long time. Therefore, general practitioners play a central role in early detection of disease. Suspected COPD may be confirmed by further investigations in collaboration with a pulmonologist. The most recent GOLD guideline defines three COPD risk groups (A-B-E) which should guide the personalized treatment concept. General practitioners are crucial for implementing non-pharmacological measures such as smoking cessation, regular exercise, vaccinations, and patient self-management education. However, this also underlines the challenges to implement the GOLD recommendations in daily practice.

La BPCO est une maladie hétérogène avec un tableau clinique complexe. Le diagnostic n'est pas toujours facile à évoquer, car elle peut se développer insidieusement et passer longtemps inaperçue. Les médecins de premier recours (MPR) jouent donc un rôle central dans le diagnostic précoce. La suspicion de BPCO peut être confirmée en collaboration avec un pneumologue par des examens fonctionnels respiratoires avant l'instauration d'un traitement médicamenteux. Les nouvelles recommandations GOLD, publiées en 2022 définissent trois groupes de risques pour la BPCO (A-B-E). Les MPR sont importants pour la mise en œuvre de mesures accompagnant le traitement (arrêt du tabac, activité physique régulière, vaccinations, éducation thérapeutique). Mais cela souligne également les exigences élevées de la mise en œuvre des recommandations GOLD dans la pratique quotidienne.*.

Accuracy of a score predicting the presence of an atypical pathogen in hospitalized patients with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Atypical pathogens (AP), present in some patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), are intrinsically resistant to betalactam drugs, the mainstay of empirical antibiotic treatment. Adding antibiotic coverage for AP increases the risk of adverse effects and antimicrobial selection pressure, while withholding such coverage may worsen the prognosis if an AP is causative. A clinical model predicting the presence of AP would allow targeting atypical coverage for patients most likely to benefit. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multicentric randomized controlled trial that included 580 adults patients hospitalized for CAP. A predictive score was built using independent predictive factors for AP identified through multivariate analysis. Accuracy of the score was assessed using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Prevalence of AP was 5.3%. Age < 75 years (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.2), heart failure (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.1), absence of chest pain (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.2), natremia < 135 mmol/L (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.6) and contracting the disease in autumn (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.9) were independently associated with AP. A predictive score using these factors had an AUROC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.85). A score of 0 or 1 (present in 33% of patients) had 100% sensitivity and 35% specificity. CONCLUSION: Use of a score built on easily obtained clinical and laboratory data would allow safe withholding of atypical antibiotic coverage in a significant number of patients, with an expected positive impact on bacterial resistance and drug adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00818610.

Underlying lung disease and exposure to terrestrial moderate and high altitude: personalised risk assessment.

Once reserved for the fittest, worldwide altitude travel has become increasingly accessible for ageing and less fit people. As a result, more and more individuals with varying degrees of respiratory conditions wish to travel to altitude destinations. Exposure to a hypobaric hypoxic environment at altitude challenges the human body and leads to a series of physiological adaptive mechanisms. These changes, as well as general altitude related risks have been well described in healthy individuals. However, limited data are available on the risks faced by patients with pre-existing lung disease. A comprehensive literature search was conducted. First, we aimed in this review to evaluate health risks of moderate and high terrestrial altitude travel by patients with pre-existing lung disease, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sleep apnoea syndrome, asthma, bullous or cystic lung disease, pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung disease. Second, we seek to summarise for each underlying lung disease, a personalized pre-travel assessment as well as measures to prevent, monitor and mitigate worsening of underlying respiratory disease during travel.

[Amiodarone: some toxicity considerations]. / Amiodarone : quelques considérations sur les toxicités.

Amiodarone is a class III antiarrhythmic drug effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation. The prolonged half-life and lipo-solubility are responsible for its accumulation in tissues and its toxicity ranges from mild to severe. Main adverse effects are observed on thyroid, pulmonary and cardiac system. Clinical and biological monitoring allows early detection of their occurrence. In case of serious side effect, treatment discontinuation is often necessary and therapeutic alternatives must be considered.

L'amiodarone est un antiarythmique de classe III, efficace dans le traitement des arythmies ventriculaires et de la fibrillation auriculaire. La longue demi-vie d'élimination et la liposolubilité sont responsables de l'accumulation dans les tissus et sa toxicité peut varier du degré léger à sévère. Les effets toxiques les plus fréquents s'observent au niveau de la thyroïde, du poumon et du cœur. Un suivi clinique et biologique permet de détecter précocement leur survenue. En cas d'effet indésirable grave, l'interruption du traitement est souvent nécessaire et des alternatives thérapeutiques doivent être considérées.

[Novelties in the Treatment of Asthma]. / Nouveautés dans la prise en charge de l'asthme.

For general practitioners there have been important novelties in the treatment of asthma due to recent modifications of the international guidelines from Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). In Step 1, use of short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA) without concomitant inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as controller is no longer recommended for lack of efficacy and safety reasons. Instead, low dose ICS-formoterol as needed is recommended. In Step 5, in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma GINA recommends targeted biologic therapies like interleukin antibodies. Asthma patients presenting simultaneously with symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should receive treatment containing ICS. Independent of the current corona pandemic, GINA recommendations stay in place.

Les nouvelles recommandations GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) modifient radicalement la prise en charge des patients asthmatiques pour le médecin de premier recours. Dans l'asthme léger (palier 1 GINA), les bêta2-agonistes à courte durée d'action (SABA) seuls comme traitement de secours ne sont plus recommandés au profit d'une association de corticostéroïdes inhalés (CSI) faiblement dosés avec un bronchodilatateur à longue durée d'action à début d'action rapide (formotérol). Dans l'asthme sévère non contrôlé (palier 5 GINA), l'objectif est d'éviter la corticothérapie orale au profit de thérapies biologiques ciblées (par exemple, anticorps anti-interleukine). Un traitement contenant des CSI doit être maintenu chez les asthmatiques même si une BPCO est associée. Les recommandations GINA ne sont pas modifiées par les conditions actuelles de pandémie.

Pulmonary function and radiological features 4 months after COVID-19: first results from the national prospective observational Swiss COVID-19 lung study.

BACKGROUND: The infectious coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an ongoing global healthcare challenge. Up to one-third of hospitalised patients develop severe pulmonary complications and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pulmonary outcomes following COVID-19 are unknown. METHODS: The Swiss COVID-19 lung study is a multicentre prospective cohort investigating pulmonary sequelae of COVID-19. We report on initial follow-up 4 months after mild/moderate or severe/critical COVID-19 according to the World Health Organization severity classification. RESULTS: 113 COVID-19 survivors were included (mild/moderate n=47, severe/critical n=66). We confirmed several comorbidities as risk factors for severe/critical disease. Severe/critical disease was associated with impaired pulmonary function, i.e. diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) % predicted, reduced 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and exercise-induced oxygen desaturation. After adjustment for potential confounding by age, sex and body mass index (BMI), patients after severe/critical COVID-19 had a D LCO 20.9% pred (95% CI 12.4-29.4% pred, p=0.01) lower at follow-up. D LCO % pred was the strongest independent factor associated with previous severe/critical disease when age, sex, BMI, 6MWD and minimal peripheral oxygen saturation at exercise were included in the multivariable model (adjusted odds ratio per 10% predicted 0.59, 95% CI 0. 37-0.87; p=0.01). Mosaic hypoattenuation on chest computed tomography at follow-up was significantly associated with previous severe/critical COVID-19 including adjustment for age and sex (adjusted OR 11.7, 95% CI 1.7-239; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: 4 months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, severe/critical COVID-19 was associated with significant functional and radiological abnormalities, potentially due to small-airway and lung parenchymal disease. A systematic follow-up for survivors needs to be evaluated to optimise care for patients recovering from COVID-19.

Swiss Recommendations for the Follow-Up and Treatment of Pulmonary Long COVID.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence suggests that long-term pulmonary symptoms and functional impairment occurs in a proportion of individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although the proportion of affected patients remains to be determined, physicians are increasingly being confronted with patients reporting respiratory symptoms and impairment beyond the acute phase of COVID-19. In face of limited evidence, the Swiss Society for Pulmonology established a working group to address this area of unmet need and formulated diagnostic and treatment recommendations for the care of patients with pulmonary long COVID (LC). METHOD: The Swiss COVID Lung Study group and Swiss Society for Pulmonology (SSP) formulated 13 questions addressing the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary LC. A survey within the SSP special interest groups involved in care of LC patients was conducted in Switzerland. A CORE process/Delphi-like process was used to formulate recommendations. Forty experienced pulmonologists replied to the first survey and 22 completed the second follow-up survey. Agreement of ≥70% consensus led to formulation of a recommendation. RESULTS: The participants in the survey reached consensus and formulated a strong recommendation for regarding the following points. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 should have a pulmonary assessment including pulmonary function tests. Symptomatic subjects affected by COVID-19, including those with mild disease, should benefit from a pulmonary follow-up. Persistent respiratory symptoms after COVID-19 should be investigated by a pulmonary follow-up including plethysmography, diffusion capacity measurement, and blood gases analysis. Individuals having suffered from COVID-19 and who present with persistent respiratory symptoms should be offered a rehabilitation. Additional questions were given moderateor weak recommendations for. The panel did not reach sufficient consensus for pharmacological therapy (e.g., therapy specifically targeting lung fibrosis) to formulate recommendations for LC drug treatment. CONCLUSION: The formulated recommendations should serve as an interim guidance to facilitate diagnosis and treatment of patients with pulmonary LC. As new evidence emerges, these recommendations may need to be adapted.

[Diagnostic and therapeutic management of medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection]. / Prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique des séquelles à moyen et long termes liées à l'infection à SARS-CoV-2.

Somatic or psychological sequelae after a SARS-CoV-2 infection are common. Specific organ damage should be investigated to explain persistent symptomatology and propose a treatment. A specialized consultation for the follow-up of patients after a SARS-CoV-2 infection is useful to clinically assess the patient, organized further investigations, offer treatment options and refer the patient to other specialists or to a rehabilitation program. Such a consultation is also intended to reduce the public health burden of long Covid and to collect data that can improve our management in the future.

Les séquelles somatiques ou psychologiques après une infection à SARS-CoV-2 sont fréquentes. Des atteintes d'organes spécifiques doivent être recherchées pour expliquer une symptomatologie persistante et proposer un traitement. Une consultation spécialisée pour le suivi des patients après une infection à SARS-CoV-2 est utile pour évaluer cliniquement le patient, organiser les examens complémentaires, offrir des options de traitements et orienter le patient vers d'autres spécialistes ou un programme de réhabilitation. Une telle consultation a également pour objectif de diminuer le fardeau du Covid long sur la santé publique et de collecter les données qui pourront améliorer notre prise en charge dans le futur.

[E-Cigarette associated lung injury]. / Pneumopathies associées au vapotage.

Vaping associated lung injury is defined by a compatible clinical and radiological picture in a patient who smoked an electronic cigarette in the previous 90 days and after exclusion of other conditions, -notably infections. The severity varies from mild symptoms to -hypoxemic respiratory failure eventually leading to death. The clinical presentation includes general, respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms. Laboratory findings show leukocytosis with elevated -inflammatory markers. Radiological features consist of bilateral ground-glass opacities with or without consolidation. Broncho-alveolar lavage can be used to refine the diagnosis and exclude an infection. Corticosteroids are at the center of therapy. Antibiotics are often given because of the initial suspicion of infection.

La pneumopathie liée au vapotage est définie par un tableau ­clinique et radiologique compatible chez un sujet ayant inhalé de la vapeur de cigarette électronique dans les 90 jours, après exclusion des diagnostics différentiels. La sévérité est variable allant d'une atteinte discrète à l'insuffisance respiratoire hypoxémique pouvant conduire au décès. La clinique associe des symptômes généraux, respiratoires et gastro-intestinaux. Le laboratoire montre une leucocytose avec une élévation des marqueurs ­inflammatoires. L'imagerie thoracique révèle des infiltrats bila­téraux en verre dépoli avec ou sans condensation. Le lavage ­bronchoalvéolaire peut être utilisé pour préciser le diagnostic et exclure une infection. Les corticostéroïdes constituent le centre du traitement. Des antibiotiques sont souvent administrés en suspectant initialement une atteinte infectieuse.

Development and validation of a simple tool for the assessment of home noninvasive ventilation: the S3-NIV questionnaire.

Patient-centred outcomes are significantly modified by long-term home noninvasive ventilation (NIV), but a short, self-administered, specific tool for routine clinical assessment is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the S3-NIV questionnaire, a short questionnaire to measure respiratory symptoms, sleep quality and NIV-related side effects.Patients with stable disease who were under long-term home NIV were recruited from three outpatient NIV services. Questionnaire development consisted of a selection of core items for analysis, followed by item reduction, validation and test-retest reliability.338 patients completed a 22-item questionnaire. 11 items were removed because of non-scalability (n=2), redundancy (n=8) and lack of fit (n=1). The final version of the S3-NIV questionnaire consisted of 11 items covering two dimensions: "respiratory symptoms" (Cronbach's α=0.84) and "sleep & NIV-related side effects" (Cronbach's α=0.77). Convergent validity was high between the "respiratory symptoms" subscale of the S3-NIV questionnaire and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (rho= -0.76, p<0.001), and between the "sleep & NIV-related side effects" subscale and the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire (rho=0.51, p<0.001). The S3-NIV questionnaire had good test--retest reliability after 4 weeks (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.72).The S3-NIV questionnaire is a short, valid and repeatable self-completed tool for the routine clinical assessment of patients undergoing home NIV.

Diagnosis and Management of Asthma - The Swiss Guidelines.

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) is a network of individuals, organizations, and public health officials that was established to disseminate information about the care of patients with asthma and to improve asthma care. The GINA ("Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention") report has been updated annually since 2002. Due to new knowledge and therapeutic development in the field, the Swiss Respiratory Society felt the need to provide a new document that is based on both the available literature and the recommendations of the 2016 GINA report. Key new features of the 2016 GINA report include a "new" definition of asthma, underscoring its heterogeneous nature, and the core elements of variable symptoms and variable expiratory airflow limitation; the importance of confirming the diagnosis of asthma in order to minimize both under- and overtreatment; practical tools for the assessment of symptom control and risk factors for adverse outcomes; a comprehensive approach to asthma management that acknowledges the foundational role of inhaled corticosteroid therapy, but also provides a framework for individualizing patient care; an emphasis on maximizing the benefit of available medications by addressing common problems such as incorrect inhaler technique and poor adherence; a continuum of care for worsening asthma, starting with early self-management and progressing to primary care or acute care management; and diagnosis of the asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome. This document is meant to advice the key stakeholders on the diagnosis and management of asthma and highlights the need to individualize the care of each and every asthmatic patient.

Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Stable COPD and Acute Exacerbations of COPD: The Swiss Recommendations 2018.

The Swiss National Guidelines 2013 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been revised in order to acknowledge recent progress in diagnosis and management of this disease. The resulting new Swiss recommendations are based on best evidence from the literature, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2018 report and other published national guidelines. Misdiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is common and means that patients do not always receive optimal treatment. To improve the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Switzerland, these recommendations encourage a more comprehensive assessment of patients, based on the combined assessment of symptoms, degree of airflow limitation, risk of exacerbation and the presence of comorbidities. Recommendations for evidence-based preventive measures, as well as pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for the management of both stable and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are provided in this update.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Switzerland: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a severe progressive and irreversible lung disease. Novel antifibrotic drugs that slow disease progression are now available. However, many issues regarding patient management remain unanswered, such as the choice between available drugs, their use in particular subgroups and clinical situations, time of treatment onset, termination, combination or switch, or nonpharmacologic management. To guide Swiss respiratory physicians in this evolving field still characterized by numerous areas of uncertainty, the Swiss Working Group for interstitial and rare lung diseases of the Swiss Respiratory Society provides a position paper on the diagnosis and treatment of IPF.

[Bronchodilatation during spirometry : indications, realization and interpretation]. / Bronchodilatation lors de spirométrie : indications, réalisation et interprétation.

Spirometry with response to short-acting bronchodilators is a key element in the diagnostic work-up of patients with obstructive airways diseases and should be systematically assessed. Response to bronchodilators (RBD) is useful to differentiate asthma from COPD and to grade the severity of obstruction in COPD cases. RBD should not be used to decide for a bronchodilator therapy. An increase in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec (FEV1) or Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) by > 200 ml and 12 % of baseline value is considered as criteria for significant bronchodilator response. With the exception of asthma diagnostic work-up, inhaled therapy should not be interrupted before spirometry. Paradoxical loss of lung function after administration of beta 2 agonists is rarely observed. When present, choice of an alternative bronchodilator agent should be considered.

La spirométrie avec mesure de la réponse aux bronchodilatateurs d'action rapide est un élément diagnostique clé dans le bilan des syndromes obstructifs et doit être systématiquement effectuée. Elle est utile pour distinguer l'asthme de la BPCO et permet de grader la sévérité de l'obstruction en cas de BPCO. On ne devrait pas l'utiliser pour décider du choix d'un bronchodilatateur. On retient comme critère de réversibilité une augmentation du volume expiré maximal en 1 seconde (VEMS) ou de la capacité vitale forcée (CVF) supérieure à 200 ml et 12 % de la valeur de base.Excepté pour le bilan initial d'un asthme, les traitements inhalés ne doivent pas être interrompus avant un bilan spirométrique. Une aggravation paradoxale après bêta-agonistes est une observation rare qui doit faire envisager une alternative à cette classe de bronchodilatateurs.

Spirometer Replacement and Serial Lung Function Measurements in Population Studies: Results From the SAPALDIA Study.

The Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Disease in Adults (SAPALDIA), a population cohort study, used heated-wire spirometers in 1991 and 2002 and then ultrasonic spirometers in 2010 revealing measurement bias in healthy never smokers. To provide a practical method to control for measurement bias given the replacement of spirometer in long-term population studies, we built spirometer-specific reference equations from healthy never smokers participating in 1991, 2002, and 2010 to derive individualized corrections terms. We compared yearly lung function decline without corrections terms with fixed terms that were obtained from a quasi-experimental study and individualized terms. Compared with baseline reference equations, spirometer-specific reference equations predicted lower lung function. The mean measurement bias increased with age and height. The decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second during the reference period of 1991-2002 was 31.5 (standard deviation (SD), 28.7) mL/year while, after spirometer replacement, uncorrected, corrected by fixed term, and individualized term, the declines were 47.0 (SD, 30.1), 40.4 (SD, 30.1), and 30.4 (SD, 29.9) mL/year, respectively. In healthy never smokers, ultrasonic spirometers record lower lung function values than heated-wire spirometers. This measurement bias is sizeable enough to be relevant for researchers and clinicians. Future reference equations should account for not only anthropometric variables but also spirometer type. We provide a novel method to address spirometer replacement in cohort studies.

Gender differences in adult-onset asthma: results from the Swiss SAPALDIA cohort study.

A higher incidence of asthma is reported in women compared with men, but evidence in later adulthood is limited. We aimed to determine the 20-year cumulative incidence of adult asthma in Switzerland and its relation to sex, taking into account age and allergic sensitisation.We assessed incidence of self-report of doctor-diagnosed asthma between 1991/1992 and 2010/2011 in 5128 subjects without asthma, aged 18-60 years at baseline. The age-related probability of asthma onset was analysed by logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders and stratified by sex and allergic sensitisation at baseline.Over 20 years, 128 (5.1%) men and 198 (7.5%) women newly reported doctor-diagnosed asthma. The adjusted odds ratio for female sex was 1.99 (95% CI 1.54-2.57) overall, 3.21 (95% CI 2.12-4.85) among nonsensitised subjects, and 1.43 (95% CI 1.02-2.02) in sensitised subjects. The probability of asthma onset decreased with increasing baseline age in women but not in men. The higher probability of new asthma in sensitised compared with nonsensitised men was unrelated to age, whereas in women it decreased with age.Asthma incidence was higher in women than in men but decreased with increasing age. The female predominance was considerably stronger in nonsensitised adults compared with those with allergic sensitisation.