Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 82: 33-36, 2024 May 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38772156

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Routine evaluation with CTA for patients with isolated lower extremity penetrating trauma and normal ankle-brachial-indices (ABI) remains controversial. While prior literature has found normal ABI's (≥0.9) and a normal clinical examination to be adequate for safe discharge, there remains concern for missed injuries which could lead to delayed surgical intervention and unnecessary morbidity. Our hypothesis was that routine CTA after isolated lower extremity penetrating trauma with normal ABIs and clinical examination is not cost-effective. METHODS: We performed a decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obtaining a CTA routinely compared to clinical observation and ABI evaluation in hemodynamically normal patients with isolated penetrating lower extremity trauma. Our base case was a patient that sustained penetrating lower extremity trauma with normal ABIs that received a CTA in the trauma bay. Costs, probability, and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were generated from published literature. RESULTS: Clinical evaluation only (no CTA) was cost-effective with a cost of $2056.13 and 0.98 QALYs gained compared to routine CTA which had increased costs of $7449.91 and lower QALYs 0.92. Using one-way sensitivity analysis, routine CTA does not become the cost-effective strategy until the cost of a missed injury reaches $210,075.83. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with isolated, penetrating lower extremity trauma with normal ABIs and clinical examination do not warrant routine CTA as there is no benefit with increased costs.

2.
J Surg Res ; 289: 16-21, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37075606

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced alterations to modes of transportation among trauma patients suffering penetrating injuries. Historically, a small percentage of our penetrating trauma patients use private means of prehospital transportation. Our hypothesis was that the use of private transportation among trauma patients increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and was associated with better outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adult trauma patients (January 1, 2017 to March 19, 2021), using the date of the shelter-in-place ordinance (March 19, 2020) to separate trauma patients into prepandemic and pandemic patient groups. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, mode of prehospital transportation, and variables such as initial Injury Severity Score, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilator days, and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: We identified 11,919 adult trauma patients, 9017 (75.7%) in the prepandemic group and 2902 (24.3%) in the pandemic group. The number of patients using private prehospital transportation also increased (from 2.4% to 6.7%, P < 0.001). Between the prepandemic and pandemic private transportation cohorts, there were reductions in mean Injury Severity Score (from 8.1 ± 10.4 to 5.3 ± 6.6: P = 0.02), ICU admission rates (from 15% to 2.4%: P < 0.001), and hospital length of stay (from 4.0 ± 5.3 to 2.3 ± 1.9: P = 0.02). However, there was no difference in mortality (4.1% and 2.0%, P = 0.221). CONCLUSIONS: We found that there was a significant shift in prehospital transportation among trauma patients toward private transportation after the shelter-in-place order. However, this did not coincide with a change in mortality despite a downward trend. This phenomenon could help direct future policy and protocols in trauma systems when battling major public health emergencies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Heridas y Lesiones , Heridas Penetrantes , Adulto , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Transporte de Pacientes/métodos
3.
J Surg Res ; 281: 89-96, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36137357

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Given the disparate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on people of color, we hypothesized that patients of color experienced a disproportionate increase in trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared trauma patients arriving in the 3 y before our statewide stay-at-home mandate on March 20, 2020 (PRE) to those arriving in the year afterward (POST). In addition to race/ethnicity, we assessed patient demographics and other clinical variables. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for univariate analyses. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess for associations with mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 8583 patients were included in the PRE group and 2883 were included in the POST group. There were increases in penetrating trauma (PRE 14.7%, POST 23.1%; P < 0.001) and mortality rates (PRE 3.20%, POST 4.60%; P < 0.001). From PRE to POST, the percentage of Black patients increased from 35.0% to 38.3% (P = 0.01) and the percentage of Hispanic patients increased from 19.2% to 23.0% (P < 0.001). After a multivariable analysis, Asian patients experienced an independent increase in mortality from PRE to POST (odds ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.13-3.54, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating trauma and mortality rates increased during the pandemic. There was a simultaneous increase in the percentage of Black and Hispanic trauma patients. Asian patient mortality increased significantly after the start of the pandemic independent of other variables. Identifying racial/ethnic disparities is the first step in finding ways to improve dissimilar outcomes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Heridas Penetrantes , Humanos , Estados Unidos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Población Blanca , Negro o Afroamericano , Hispánicos o Latinos
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 66: 36-39, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36680867

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic pneumothorax management has evolved to include the use of smaller caliber tube thoracostomy and even observation alone. Data is limited comparing tube thoracostomy to observation for small traumatic pneumothoraces. We aimed to investigate whether observing patients with a small traumatic pneumothorax on initial chest radiograph (CXR) is associated with improved outcomes compared to tube thoracostomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed trauma patients at our level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2020. We included those with a pneumothorax size <30 mm as measured from apex to cupola on initial CXR. We excluded patients with injury severity score ≥ 25, operative requirements, hemothorax, bilateral pneumothoraces, and intensive care unit admission. Patients were grouped by management strategy (observation vs tube thoracostomy). Our primary outcome was length of stay with secondary outcomes of pulmonary infection, failed trial of observation, readmission, and mortality. Results are listed as mean ± standard error of the mean. RESULTS: Of patients who met criteria, 39 were in the observation group, and 34 were in the tube thoracostomy group. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Average pneumothorax size on CXR was 18 ± 1.0 mm in the observation group and 18 ± 0.84 mm in the tube thoracostomy group (p > 0.99). Average pneumothorax sizes on computed tomography were 25 ± 2.1 and 37 ± 3.9 mm in the observation and tube thoracostomy groups, respectively (p = 0.01). Length of stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than the tube thoracostomy group (3.6 ± 0.33 vs 5.8 ± 0.81 days, p < 0.01). While pneumothorax size on computed tomography was associated with tube thoracostomy, only tube thoracostomy correlated with length of stay on multivariable analysis; pneumothorax size on CXR and computed tomography did not. There were no deaths or readmissions in either cohort. One patient in the observation group required tube thoracostomy after 18 h for worsening subcutaneous emphysema, and one patient in the tube thoracostomy group developed an empyema. CONCLUSIONS: Select patients with small traumatic pneumothoraces on initial chest radiograph who were treated with observation experienced an average length of stay over two days shorter than those treated with tube thoracostomy. Outcomes were otherwise similar between the two groups suggesting that an observation-first strategy may be a superior treatment approach for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Neumotórax , Traumatismos Torácicos , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Tubos Torácicos , Neumotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumotórax/etiología , Neumotórax/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicaciones , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Toracostomía/métodos , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones
5.
J Surg Res ; 229: 150-155, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29936983

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest improved splenic salvage rates when angioembolization (AE) is routinely employed for high-grade splenic injuries; however, protocols and salvage rates vary among centers. MATERIALS/METHODS: Adult patients with isolated splenic injuries were identified using the National Trauma Data Bank, 2013-2014. Patients were excluded if they underwent immediate splenectomy or died in the emergency department. To characterize patterns of AE, trauma centers were grouped into quartiles based on frequency of AE use. Unadjusted analyses and mixed-effects logistical regression controlling for center effects were performed. RESULTS: Five thousand and ninety three adult patients were identified. Overall, 705 (13.8%) underwent AE and 290 (5.7%) required a splenectomy. In unadjusted comparisons, splenectomy rates were lower for patients with severe spleen injuries who underwent AE (7% versus 11%, P = 0.02). In mixed-effect logistical regression patients with severe splenic injuries undergoing AE had a lower odds ratio (OR) for splenectomy (OR = 0.67, P = 0.04). Patients treated at centers in the highest quartile of AE use had a lower OR for splenectomy (OR = 0.58, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The use of AE in patients with isolated severe splenic injuries is associated with decreased splenectomy rates. There is an association between centers that perform AE frequently and reduced splenectomy rates.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/estadística & datos numéricos , Bazo/lesiones , Esplenectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bazo/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
6.
Biomed Instrum Technol ; 50(5): 336-48, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27632039

RESUMEN

A battery-operated active cooling/heating device was developed to maintain thermoregulation of trauma victims in austere environments while awaiting evacuation to a hospital for further treatment. The use of a thermal manikin was adopted for this study in order to simulate load testing and evaluate the performance of this novel portable active cooling/heating device for both continuous (external power source) and battery power. The performance of the portable body temperature conditioner (PBTC) was evaluated through cooling/heating fraction tests to analyze the heat transfer between a thermal manikin and circulating water blanket to show consistent performance while operating under battery power. For the cooling/heating fraction tests, the ambient temperature was set to 15°C ± 1°C (heating) and 30°C ± 1°C (cooling). The PBTC water temperature was set to 37°C for the heating mode tests and 15°C for the cooling mode tests. The results showed consistent performance of the PBTC in terms of cooling/heating capacity while operating under both continuous and battery power. The PBTC functioned as intended and shows promise as a portable warming/cooling device for operation in the field.


Asunto(s)
Análisis de Falla de Equipo/instrumentación , Calefacción/instrumentación , Hipertermia Inducida/instrumentación , Hipotermia/terapia , Maniquíes , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Hipotermia/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Temperatura Cutánea
7.
J Trauma ; 70(2): 334-9, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21307731

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the promulgation of emergency department (ED) thoracotomy>40 years ago, there has been an ongoing search to define when this heroic resuscitative effort is futile. In this era of health care reform, generation of accurate data is imperative for developing patient care guidelines. The purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to identify injury patterns and physiologic profiles at ED arrival that are compatible with survival. METHODS: Eighteen institutions representing the Western Trauma Association commenced enrollment in January 2003; data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: During the ensuing 6 years, 56 patients survived to hospital discharge. Mean age was 31.3 years (15-64 years), and 93% were male. As expected, survival was predominant in those with thoracic injuries (77%), followed by abdomen (9%), extremity (7%), neck (4%), and head (4%). The most common injury was a ventricular stab wound (30%), followed by a gunshot wound to the lung (16%); 9% of survivors sustained blunt trauma, 34% underwent prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and the presenting base deficit was >25 mequiv/L in 18%. Relevant to futile care, there were survivors of blunt torso injuries with CPR up to 9 minutes and penetrating torso wounds up to 15 minutes. Asystole was documented at ED arrival in seven patients (12%); all these patients had pericardial tamponade and three (43%) had good functional neurologic recovery at hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Resuscitative thoracotomy in the ED can be considered futile care when (a) prehospital CPR exceeds 10 minutes after blunt trauma without a response, (b) prehospital CPR exceeds 15 minutes after penetrating trauma without a response, and (c) asystole is the presenting rhythm and there is no pericardial tamponade.


Asunto(s)
Resucitación/métodos , Toracotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resucitación/mortalidad , Resucitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Traumatismos Torácicos/mortalidad , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Toracotomía/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Heridas Punzantes/mortalidad , Heridas Punzantes/cirugía , Adulto Joven
8.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(2): 301-310, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332255

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of trauma patients on prehospital novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is increasing. After an initial negative computed tomography of the head (CTH), practice patterns are variable for obtaining repeat CTH to evaluate for delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH-d). However, the risks and outcomes of ICH-d for patients on NOACs are unclear. We hypothesized that, for these patients, the incidence of ICH-d is low, similar to that of warfarin, and when it occurs, it does not result in clinically significant worse outcomes. METHODS: Five level 1 trauma centers in Northern California participated in a retrospective review of anticoagulated trauma patients. Patients were included if their initial CTH was negative. Primary outcomes were incidence of ICH-d, neurosurgical intervention, and death. Patient factors associated with the outcome of ICH-d were determined by multivariable regression. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2018, 777 patients met the inclusion criteria (NOAC, n = 346; warfarin, n = 431), 54% of whom received a repeat CTH. Delayed intracranial hemorrhage incidence was 2.3% in the NOAC group and 4% in the warfarin group (p = 0.31). No NOAC patient with ICH-d required neurosurgical intervention or died because of their head injury. Two warfarin patients received neurosurgical intervention, and three died from their head injury. Head Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥3 was associated with increased odds of developing ICH-d (adjusted odds ratio, 32.70; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ICH-d in patients taking NOAC is low. In this study, patients on NOACs who developed ICH-d after an initial negative CTH did not need neurosurgical intervention or die from their head injury. Repeat CTH in this patient population does not appear necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.Therapeutic, level IV.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragias Intracraneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , California/epidemiología , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/complicaciones , Humanos , Incidencia , Hemorragias Intracraneales/epidemiología , Hemorragias Intracraneales/etiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico
9.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 4(1): e000334, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31321313

RESUMEN

CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old man was brought in by ambulance as a trauma activation after sustaining a self-inflicted stab wound in the left upper quadrant with a kitchen knife. His primary survey was unremarkable and his vital signs were normal. Secondary survey revealed a 2 cm transverse stab wound inferior and medial to the left nipple. Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) did not show intra-abdominal or pericardial fluid and chest X-ray did not show a definite pneumothorax or hemothorax. WHAT WOULD YOU DO?: Wound exploration at bedside.Admit for observation and serial examinations.Exploratory laparotomy and open repair of traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI).Thoracotomy and open repair of TDI.Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic repair of TDI.

10.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 2(1): e000068, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29766082

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Benchmark data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) identified an opportunity for improvement in our trauma programme. Our unexpected return to the intensive care unit (ICU) was found to be higher than the national averages and we also noticed that our readmission rate had increased. We chose to address these complications as continuous quality improvement projects. It was hypothesized that restructuring the workflow of the trauma advanced practice providers (APPs) to focus on the delivery of comprehensive clinical care would decrease return to ICU and readmission rates of trauma patients. METHODS: The development of the APP programme occurred from 2012 to 2014. First, APP daily shifts were extended to mirror the resident physicians' coverage. Second, the APPs' original job description was expanded from 'task-oriented' workflow to providing comprehensive clinical care. Third, the APPs were involved in the evaluation and decision-making process for transferring trauma patients from the ICU. Finally, the APPs implemented a new discharge process that included all information in a standardized format and a follow-up phone call 24-48 hours after discharge. The trauma registry at our verified, academic level I trauma center was use to assess our ICU and hospital readmission rates during the time we instituted the new APP workflow programme. RESULTS: In 2012, our ICU readmission rate was 5.7% (TQIP=1.9%) but then decreased to 4.4% in 2013 (TQIP=2.5%) and 2.1% in 2014 (TQIP=2.8%). Our hospital readmission rate was 2.0% in 2012 but then decreased to 1.38% and 0.96% over the next 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: After extending the APP service coverage, implementing a comprehensive clinical care model and standardizing the discharge process, our unplanned return to ICU rates have decreased to below the TQIP national average and hospital readmission rates have also decreased by half. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

11.
Am J Surg ; 189(1): 85-91, 2005 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15701499

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that the type of resuscitation fluid used to treat hemorrhagic shock contributes to cellular dysfunction METHODS: Rats were hemorrhaged, exposed to a hypovolemic shock period for 75 minutes, and then resuscitated for 1 hour. Treatment animals were assigned randomly to lactate Ringer's solution, normal saline solution, bicarbonate Ringer's solution, hypertonic saline solution, rat plasma solution, ketone Ringer's solution, or nonresuscitation. After resuscitation, lung and liver samples were collected and evaluated for apoptosis by using ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Nonresuscitated shock rats had significantly higher levels of apoptosis in lung and liver. Rats treated with normal saline solution, bicarbonate Ringer's solution, ketone Ringer's solution, and hypertonic saline solution had significantly lower levels of apoptosis in lung compared with nonresuscitated animals. Rats treated with bicarbonate Ringer's solution and ketone Ringer's solution had significantly lower levels of apoptosis in liver tissue when compared with nonresuscitated animals. CONCLUSIONS: Cellular damage results from hemorrhagic shock. The use of resuscitation fluids decreases apoptosis during shock.


Asunto(s)
Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Soluciones Isotónicas/farmacología , Choque Hemorrágico/fisiopatología , Animales , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Resucitación , Solución de Ringer , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia
12.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 78(6): 1076-83; discussion 1083-5, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26151506

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques have evolved, allowing increased capabilities within most subspecialties of general surgery, but have failed to gain traction managing injured patients. We hypothesized that laparoscopy is effective in the diagnosis and treatment of penetrating abdominal injuries. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing abdominal exploration following penetrating trauma at our Level 1 trauma center during a 6-year period from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2013. Demographic and resuscitation data were obtained from our trauma registry. Charts were reviewed for operative details, hospital course, and complications. Hospital length of stay (LOS) and complications were primary end points. Patients were classified as having nontherapeutic diagnostic laparoscopy (DL), nontherapeutic diagnostic celiotomy (DC), therapeutic laparoscopy (TL), or therapeutic celiotomy (TC). TL patients were case-matched 2:1 with TC patients having similar intra-abdominal injuries. RESULTS: A total of 518 patients, including 281 patients (55%) with stab wounds and 237 patients (45%) with gunshot wounds, were identified. Celiotomy was performed in 380 patients (73%), laparoscopy in 138 (27%), with 44 (32%) converted to celiotomy. Nontherapeutic explorations were compared including 70 DLs and 46 DCs with similar injury severity. LOS was shorter in DLs compared with DCs (1 day vs. 4 days, p < 0.001). There were no missed injuries. Therapeutic explorations were compared by matching all TL patients 2:1 to TC patients with similar type and severity of injuries. Twenty-four patients underwent TL compared with 48 TC patients in the case matched group. LOS was shorter in the TL group than in the TC group (4 days vs. 2 days, p < 0.001). Wound infections were more common with open exploration (10.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.002), and more patients developed ileus or small bowel obstruction after open exploration (9.4% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy is safe and accurate in penetrating abdominal injuries. The use of laparoscopy resulted in shorter hospitalization, fewer postoperative wound infection and ileus complications, as well as no missed injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Laparotomía , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
13.
Curr Surg ; 60(4): 364-6, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15212031
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA