Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(3): 498-503, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28610745

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing primary advanced ovarian cancer surgery and to evaluate the prognostic implication of AL on overall survival in these patients. METHODS: We analyzed our institutional database for primary EOC and included all consecutive patients treated by debulking surgery including any type of full circumferential bowel resection beyond appendectomy between 1999 and 2015. We performed logistic regression models to identify risk factors for AL and log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between AL and survival. RESULTS: AL occurred in 36/800 (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [3%-6%]) of all patients with advanced ovarian cancer and 36/518 (6.9% [5%-9%]) patients undergoing bowel resection during debulking surgery. One hundred fifty-six (30.1%) patients had multiple bowel resections. In these patients, AL rate per patient was only slightly higher (9.0% [5%-13%]) than in patients with rectosigmoid resection only (6.9% [4%-10%]), despite the higher number of anastomosis. No independent predictive factors for AL were identified. AL was independently associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.9 [1.2-3.4], p=0.01). CONCLUSION: In the present study, no predictive pre- and/or intraoperative risk factors for AL were identified. AL rate was mainly influenced by rectosigmoid resection and only marginally increased by additional bowel resections.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 395(7): 845-9, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20628756

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One of the advocated benefits of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is reduction of postoperative pain. We compared in a prospective study pain after video-assisted and conventional thyroidectomy (CT). METHODS: One hundred sixty-nine patients (56 men, 113 women, mean age: 50 ± 14 years) operated between November 2007 and February 2008 were included. MIVAT was performed if thyroid volume was <30 ml or the nodule diameter < 35 mm. Postoperative pain scores were documented on a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no and 100 = unbearable pain) at 8, 24, 36, and 48 h after surgery. Additionally, postoperative analgesic consumption was registered. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (17 men, 58 women, mean age: 45 ± 15 years) underwent MIVAT and 94 (39 men, 55 women, mean age: 54 ± 15 years) CT. The mean overall VAS score at 8, 24, 36 and 48 h did not significantly differ between the groups (26 ± 21 vs. 26 ± 19 at 8 h, 17 ± 15 vs. 21 ± 18 at 24 h, 11 ± 13 vs. 10 ± 11 at 36 h and 7 ± 12 vs. 6 ± 8 at 48 h in MIVAT and CT group, respectively) [p = ns]. Twelve vs. 13 patients (16% vs. 14%) required opioid administration on the day of the operation [p = ns]. CONCLUSIONS: The length of the skin incision seems not to influence the perception of pain after thyroid surgery.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Postoperatorio/fisiopatología , Tiroidectomía/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Video , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA