Retroperitoneal tumour resection in fifteen consecutive cases: Single centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal tumours (RTs) in adults are a rare heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from the retroperitoneal space. RTs'clinical manifestations are nonspecific and depend on their anatomical positioning and relation with bordering structures. Our study aimed to retrospectively evaluate our patients' diagnosis, length of hospital stay, disease-free period and postoperative metastasis occurrence. METHODS: From 2011 to 2019, fifteen suspected RT resections were performed at our centre. Retrospective analysis of patients' hospital stays, follow-up, histological and immunological tumour profile, and metastasis occurrence/ re-occurrence was performed. RESULT: All of the 15 (100%) patients were males. The average age of our patients was 44 years (SD ± 11.2 years), average hospital stay was 7.4 days (SD±3.4 days) (Tab.1). All resected tumours underwent histological and immunological evaluation. Based on histological examination of the resected tumours, nonseminomatous germ cell tumours were present in 12 (80%) patients - including teratoma in 4 (26.6%) patients, seminoma in 2 (13.3%) patients, and malignant B-cell lymphoma in 1 (6.6%) patient. The average patient follow-up was 42.7 months (SD±31.4.9 months). Complete remission after the surgery was achieved in 11 (76.9%) patients, and 2 (13.3%) patients were lost in follow-up. CONCLUSION: RT is a rare heterogeneous group of neoplasm. The patient's prognosis dramatically depends on the type of tumour, metastasis occurrence and re-occurrence, and the surgeons' ability to resect the tumour completely.

Improved survival in patients with FDG-PET/CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for squamous cell anal cancer.

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET/CT-based target volume definition on locoregional control and survival, compared to conventional CT-based target volume definition and dose prescription. One hundred and twenty-two patients with squamous cell anal cancer were treated with curative radiotherapy (RT) alone (27%) or with RT with concurrent chemotherapy (73%) and analyzed. Forty-six percent had the early disease (stage I+II) and 54% were stage III. FDG-PET/CT-based staging was performed in 21% of the patients. The mean follow-up time was 60 months. Other risk factors affecting survival were investigated. According to initial staging in both groups (FDG-PET/CT and conventional CT) were 10% of stage IV disease, and they were excluded from radical radiotherapy and treated with palliative intent. Ninety-two percent of the patients achieved complete remission. Significant favorable factors in univariate analysis associated with disease-free survival (DFS) were PET/CT staging, T1/2 and N0 stage, and clinical stage I and II. Locoregional control (LRC) correlated with the T1/2 stage and initial performance status (PS) 0. There were no significant factors affecting overall survival (neither in univariate nor multivariate analysis). In multivariate analysis, the factor associated with better DFS was PET/CT staging and for LRC, PS 0 and concomitant chemoradiation. Acute toxicity was increased in the concurrent chemo-radiotherapy group. Two-, five- and ten-year overall survival rates were 83%, 69%, and 60%; disease-free survival rates were 76%, 73%, 73%; local control rates were 91%, 90%, and 90% and colostomy-free survival was 89%, 86%, and 81%, respectively. PET/CT staging allowed targeted dose escalation to the primary tumor and nodal metastases while decreasing dose to uninvolved regions, resulting in significantly improved DFS without compromising locoregional control.

Association of triple positivity with prognostic parameters and overall survival in a population-based study of 6,122 HER2-positive breast cancer patients: analysis of real-world clinical practice based on a research database.

Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC), i.e. HER2-positive (HER2+) and hormone receptors-positive breast cancer, is a specific subgroup of breast cancers. TPBC biology is characterized by strong mutual interactions between signaling pathways stimulated by estrogens and HER2 amplification. The present study aims to carry out a population-based analysis of treatment outcomes in a cohort of hormone receptor (HR) positive and negative breast cancer patients who were treated with anti-HER2 therapy in the Czech Republic. The BREAST research database was used as the data source for this retrospective analysis. The database covers approximately 95% of breast cancer patients treated with targeted therapies in the Czech Republic. The analysis included 6,122 HER2-positive patients. The patients were divided into two groups, based on estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) positivity: hormone receptor negative (HR-) patients had both ER- and PR-negative tumors (n=2,518), unlike positive (HR+) patients (n=3,604). HR+ patients were more often diagnosed premenopausal at the time of diagnosis, presented more often at stage I or II and their tumors were less commonly poorly differentiated. The overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in subgroups of HR+ patients according to treatment setting. When evaluated by stages, significantly higher OS was observed in HR+ patients diagnosed at stages II, III, and IV and regardless of tumor grade.

[Pilot Study on MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Response to Sunitinib Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Renall Cell Carcinoma]. / MikroRNA jako biomarkery odpovedi na lécbu sunitinibem u pacientu s metastatickým karcinomem ledvin - pilotní studie.

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2-3% of all malignant tumours. Metastatic RCC (mRCC) is commonly treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Effective TKIs administration can be achieved only by accurate prediction of therapeutical response. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse papers concerning predictive potential of microRNA (miRNA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We chose seven candidate miRNAs and analysed their expression on 44 patients divided into cohort with poor and good response to sunitinib treatment. Patients were divided into two groups according to progression-free survival. RNA from tissue samples was isolated and expression of selected miRNAs was measured using quantitative PCR with miRNA-specific TaqMan probes. RESULTS: We successfully validated two miRNAs to be differentially expressed in responding and non-responding patients to sunitinib treatment. Other analysed miRNAs have not shown predictive potential. CONCLUSION: From miRNAs studied so far, two miRNAs had predictive value according to present study.Key words: microRNA - renal cell carcinoma - sunitib The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Supported by Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant No. 15-34678A. All rights reserved.Submitted: 19. 3. 2018Accepted: 20. 3. 2018.

Prognostic role of serum C-reactive protein in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with pemetrexed.

Pemetrexed is an intravenously administered antifolate cytostatic agent targeting several folate-dependent enzymatic pathways, widely used in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has been previously demonstrated that the superiority of pemetrexed is limited to patients with non-squamous histology. Aside from the non-squamous histology, there is still no available molecular biomarker predicting treatment efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the association of baseline serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) with outcomes in a large cohort of patients with non-squamous NSCLC treated with pemetrexed. Clinical data of 325 patients were analysed. Serum samples were collected within one week before the initiation of treatment. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with high CRP was 2.1 and 9.5 compared to 4.2 and 20.5 months for those with normal CRP (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model revealed that serum CRP (HR=1.46, p=0.002) was significantly associated with PFS and also with OS (HR=1.95, p<0.001). In conclusion, the study results suggest that pretreatment serum CRP is associated with poor outcome of non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed.

[Immunotherapy for Bladder Cancer]. / Imunoterapie karcinomu mocového mechýre.

Urothelial carcinoma is the most common urological malignancy. Nonspecific immunotherapy using the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine has long been the mainstay for the treatment of high-risk superficial bladder carcinoma in an adjuvant setting after transurethral endoscopic resection. In metastatic disease, cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the main therapeutic modality. In Europe, the standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with cisplatin-refractory tumours is vinflunine. Other systemic treatments with a lower level of evidence include paclitaxel and docetaxel. Studies of tumour microenvironment indicate a significant role for the immune system in the pathogenesis of urothelial tumours and the presence of a CD8 lymphocyte infiltrate is associated with better survival. In urothelial tumours, the correlation between PD-L1 expression in the tumour and the response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has been repeatedly demonstrated in clinical studies. Several inhibitors of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway are undergoing advanced-phase clinical trials and atezolizumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab have already have received permanent or temporary registration status in the United States, mostly as second-line treatments for patients progressing on cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Three of these agents are currently registered in Europe: nivolumab for second line treatment and atezolizumab and pembrolizumab for first line treatment in patients not eligible for cisplatin as well as and for second line treatment. These novel immunotherapeutic agents for bladder cancer are relatively well tolerated and therefore potentially useful for patients with contraindications or intolerance to platinum regimens. The main toxicities include asthenia/fatigue, lymphopenia, anaemia, musculoskeletal pain, decreased appetite, and nausea.Key words: bladder cancer - imunotherapy - PD-1 receptor - antibodies - monoclonal This work was supported by the Czech Ministry of Health CR - RVO Thomayer Hospital - TN 0064190. The author declare he has no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 29. 8. 2017Accepted: 3. 10. 2017.

[Comparison of RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST for Response Evaluation in Solid Tumours]. / Souhrnné srovnání kritérií RECIST 1.1 a iRECIST pro hodnocení odpovedi na onkologickou lécbu solidních tumoru.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy is a relatively new and developing modality in oncological treatment, which may significantly improve treatment results for some patients with malignant tumors. With the increasing number of clinical trials, the demand for a suitable tool to assess and compare treatment responses is growing. Currently, the most common response assessment system for solid tumors is RECIST (response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) version 1.1. However, in immuno-oncology, a small percentage of patients manifest a new response pattern termed pseudoprogression, in which, after the initial increase in tumor burden or after the discovery of new lesions, a response or at least a prolonged stabilization of the disease can occur. This patient group would be included in the progression category when using RECIST 1.1 and effective treatment would be discontinued. Therefore, iRECIST criteria were established to capture the phenomenon of pseudoprogression, the need for PD confirmation (according to RECIST 1.1) was introduced, and changes were made in the evaluation of new lesions. AIM: The present work introduces criteria for the evaluation of oncological responses in solid tumors using RECIST version 1.1 and iRECIST immunotherapy variant (including a brief overview of previous immune criteria). These criteria are compared in an immuno-oncological context and their potential pitfalls are discussed. CONCLUSION: iRECIST criteria were established by expert consensus; however, sufficient data for final validation has not yet been collected. As a result, RECIST 1.1 should be the primary assessment system in immuno-oncology. The use of iRECIST should be reserved for research purposes (testing and validation). Distinguishing pseudoprogression from true PD in patients treated with immunotherapy remains a major challenge in oncological imaging.Key words: RECIST - response criteria - immunotherapy - measurement - tumor burden The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 24. 9. 2017Accepted: 3. 10. 2017.

[Immunotherapy of Renal Cell Carcinoma]. / Imunoterapie zhoubného nádoru ledviny.

Treatment of renal cell carcinoma is still palliative. Targeted therapy increases response rates and prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival compared with cytokines and chemotherapy. Checkpoint inhibitors constitute the up-date of therapeutic approaches, and anti-PD-1 antibody, one checkpoint inhibitor, is now well established as a second and/or third palliative treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma. In this study, we present the latest data from current studies on cytokines, cancer vaccines, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. The therapeutic efficacies of combinations such as targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-CTLA-4 with anti PD-1 (-L1) have been reported in many studies. Preliminary results are encouraging but the high toxicities and elevated cost are limiting. Treatments with combinations of bevacizumab and atezolizumab, axitinib and pembrolizumab or avelumab, lenvatinib and pembrolizumab, and nivolumab and ipilimumab (results from study phase I, II, and sometimes III) are reported to be highly effective and to result in long-lasting responses with response-rates of 70-100%. So far, valid predictors for these therapies have not been forthcoming, but considerable work is being exerted in this area. Heng and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) models are still being used to select patients for immunotherapy. Immunotherapy will definitely continue to play an important role in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma; however, many questions remain.Key words: renal cell carcinoma - immunotherapy - checkpoint inhibitors - target therapy Supported by MH CZ - DRO (MMCI, 00209805) This work was supported by program of the Czech Ministry of Health No. P03-15-34 678A. The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 16. 8. 2017Accepted: 7. 9. 2017.

Durable Complete Response of Colorectal Cancer Metastasis after Biochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Resection of the metastatic site is indicated but not always possible in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who achieve a partial or complete response (CR) to induction systemic treatment. CR after systemic treatment alone is uncommon, and even patients with radiologic CR after induction chemotherapy harbour persistent macroscopic or microscopic residual disease in more than 80% of cases. Occasionally, some metastatic lesions disappear radiologically but others persist after induction systemic treatment. The indication and extent of metastasectomy in these situations is controversial, especially regarding sites with completely regressed metastases. CASE: This case report describes a patient with mCRC who achieved a long-term response after biochemotherapy and incomplete metastasectomy. One of the known liver lesions could not be removed due to its disappearance after induction biochemotherapy with FOLFOX and bevacizumab. Further adjuvant chemotherapy using the FOLFOX regimen was administered postoperatively. The patient has been meticulously followed by radiology including repeated positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance scans, clinical examination and tumour markers. No recurrence of cancer has been detected after a follow-up of 5 years. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: CR to systemic treatment is uncommon, but this case report demonstrates that it can be durable in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases. This case report indicates that some patients with mCRC can be cured with systemic therapy only, challenging the prevailing paradigm of mCRC therapy.Key words: colorectal cancer - metastasis - chemotherapy - molecular targeted therapy - diagnostic imaging.

[Molecular Pathogenesis of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors]. / Molekulární patogeneze testikulárních germinálních nádoru.

BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) are the most frequently diagnosed solid tumors in young men and their incidence has been increasing over the past decades. Several factors may combine and play a role in the TGCT etiology, including environmental factors and genetic predispositions at multiple genomic loci that affect both testicular germ cells and stromal cells, and their interactions within the testicular microenvironment. The pathogenesis of TGCT starts prenatally with primordial germ cell arrest, and further proceeds postnatally, giving rise to in situ germ cell neoplasia and, finally, to invasive TGCT with the characteristic 12p chromosome amplification. Apart from the genes localized here, further molecular mechanisms have been linked to TGCT pathogenesis, such as the activation of the KIT/KITL signaling pathway, and aberrations in genes involved in DNA reparation, regulation of cellular differentiation, proliferation, and survival. Despite the relatively good prognosis and known etiopathogenesis of these tumors, neither targeted therapy nor molecular prognostic/predictive factors have yet been implemented in the management of TGCT, because there is not enough information about the molecular pathways or molecules involved in TGCT development that could be used for patient stratification and treatment. Current high-throughput technologies, such as next generation sequencing at the exome or transcriptome level could provide this missing information on genetic predispositions and other factors influencing the clinical course of the disease and treatment response in TGCT. AIM: In this review, we summarize the main molecular characteristics of TGCT and the probable mechanisms participating in tumor initiation and progression.Key words: testicular germ cell tumors - signaling pathways - molecular aberrations - predictive factors - prognostic factors The work was supported by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports NPU I nr.LO 1604. The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 20. 3. 2017Accepted: 23. 7. 2017.

[Evaluation of Anti-cancer Therapies with Reimbursement Limited to Comprehensive Cancer Centres Using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale]. / Hodnocení klinického benefitu protinádorových léku limitovaných na komplexní onkologická centra podle metodiky ESMO-MCBS.

BACKGROUND: The costs of oncology treatments are increasing, due to the rising prevalence of malignant diseases and the introduction of expensive novel anti-cancer agents. The new European Society for Clinical Oncology (ESMO) has recently developed a new parametric system to evaluate the clinical benefit of drugs. The Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) compares the contribution of a novel drug based on overall and progression-free survival and quality of life with those of current treatment options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An expert group of the Czech Oncological Society conducted an assessment based on published data and an ESMO-MCBS methodology for antineoplastic agents used for the treatment of solid tumors with limited reimbursement to Comprehensive Cancer Centers. We evaluated drugs categorized as "S" that were eligible for public health insurance as of January 1, 2017. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The ESMO-MCBS score is a promising new parameter for the evaluation of new anticancer drugs. The ESMO-MCBS method for assessing the clinical benefit of drugs is simple, robust, and reproducible. The advantage of the assessment is that it is not based on a single index but rather combines several dimensions of drug performance. This parameter will be gradually added to Czech cancer guidelines. Scores obtained in the majority of cases correspond to the observed benefit of a drug in routine clinical practice.Key words: tumors - farmacotherapy - assesment study as a subject - survival - protocols of anti-cancer therapy The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 3. 5. 2017Accepted: 20. 6. 2017.

[Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma]. / Imunoterapie renálního karcinomu.

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma is characterised by chemo and radioresistance. Although drugs targeting angiogenesis and intracellular signaling have become the mainstay of systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma in the last decade, latest immunotherapeutic approaches have achieved promising results. AIM: To review the development of immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma, especially the results of published studies using novel immunotherapeutic agents including checkpoint inhibitors. RESULTS: It has long been known that nonspecific immunotherapy may result in long term complete remission in a small number of patients. Advances in immunology have led to the renewal of interest in the use of anticancer immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Promising results in phase I and II studies have been achieved using monoclonal antibodies against PD 1 receptor and its ligand. Studies comparing immunotherapy to standard targeted therapies are ongoing.

Estimating cancer incidence, prevalence, and the number of cancer patients treated with antitumor therapy in 2015 and 2020 -  analysis of the Czech National Cancer Registry.

BACKGROUND: Cancer burden in the Czech population ranks among the highest worldwide, which introduces a strong need for a prospective modelling of cancer incidence and prevalence rates. Moreover, a prediction of number of cancer patients requiring active antitumor therapy is also an important issue. This paper presents the stage-specific predictions of cancer incidence and prevalence, and the stage- and region-specific patients requiring active antitumor therapy for the most common cancer diagnoses in the Czech Republic for years 2015 and 2020. The stage-specific estimates are also presented with regard to the treatment phase as newly diagnosed patients, patients treated for non-terminal recurrence, and patients treated for terminal recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of the Czech National Cancer Registry from 1977 to 2011 has been used for the analysis, omitting the records of patients diagnosed as death certificate only or at autopsy. In total, 1,777,775 incidences have been considered for the estimation using a statistical model utilizing solely the population-based cancer registry data. All estimates have been calculated with respect to the changing demographic structure of the Czech population and the clinical stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: Considering year 2011 as the baseline, we predict 89%, 15%, 31% and 32% increase in prostate, colorectal, female breast and lung cancer incidence, respectively, in 2020 resulting in 13,153, 9,368, 8,695, and 8,604 newly dia-g--nosed cancer patients in that year, respectively. Regarding cancer prevalence in 2020, the estimated increase is 140%, 40%, 51%, and 17% for prostate, colorectal, female breast and lung cancer, respectively, meaning that more than 100,000 prevalent female breast cancer patients as well as more than 100,000 prevalent prostate cancer patients are expected in the Czech Republic. The estimated numbers of patients requiring active antitumor therapy for prostate, colorectal, female breast and lung cancer in the Czech Republic in 2020 are 23,652, 14,006, 14,759 and 8,272; respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis documents a serious increase in cancer incidence and prevalence in the Czech Republic in years 2015 and 2020 when compared to the situation in 2011. Regarding the estimated numbers of patients requiring active antitumor therapy, the model confirms a continuous increase that must be accounted for in the future planning of health care in the Czech Republic.

[On the importance of standardization in the assessment of population-based cancer patient survival in the Czech Republic -  methodology and results from the Czech National Cancer Registry]. / Význam standardizace v hodnocení populacního prezití onkologických pacientu v CR -  metodický koncept a výsledky analýzy dat Národního onkologického registru.

BACKGROUND: Calculating 5-year overall and relative survival is the standard method for population-based analyses in oncology. Survival rates based on population data do not, however, guarantee standardized benchmarks for comparison of different patient populations, which is especially true when compared populations differ considerably in age structure and representation of clinical stages. In this paper, we present and compare statistical methods for standardization of cancer survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using data of the Czech National Cancer Registry, we estimated 5-year overall and relative survival estimates for periods 2001- 2005 and 2006- 2010. To demonstrate the effect of standardization, we calculated crude and age -standardized survival rates as well as survival rates standardized for both age and clinical stage. RESULTS: Our results show that the particular standardization method influences resulting 5-year overall and relative survival rates regarding both within and between time periods comparisons. In addition, our results document a recent improvement in 5-year relative survival between periods 2001- 2005 and 2006- 2010 for 19 of 20 evaluated diagnoses. All most prevalent cancers including prostate, lung, colorectal, breast, kidney, and uterine cancer and melanoma were observed among the diagnoses with statistically significantly improved patient survival. CONCLUSION: Unless the use of standardization to the age and stage of tumor is limited due to a small number of patients in individual age-  and stage- specific subgroups, this method can be considered as a proper statistical methodology for the population assessment of Czech cancer patient survival rates.

[Cost analysis of radiotherapy provided in inpatient setting -  testing potential predictors for a new prospective payment system]. / Analýza nákladu na radioterapii v luzkové péci - hledání vhodných prediktoru pro potreby nového prospektivního úhradového modelu.

BACKGROUND: As a part of the development of a new prospective payment model for radiotherapy we analyzed data on costs of care provided by three comprehensive cancer centers in the Czech Republic. Our aim was to find a combination of variables (predictors) which could be used to sort hospitalization cases into groups according to their costs, with each group having the same reimbursement rate. We tested four variables as possible predictors -  number of fractions, stage of disease, radiotherapy technique and diagnostic group. METHODS: We analyzed 7,440 hospitalization cases treated in three comprehensive cancer centers from 2007 to 2011. We acquired data from the I COP database developed by Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses of Masaryk University in cooperation with oncology centers that contains records from the National Oncological Registry along with data supplied by healthcare providers to insurance companies for the purpose of retrospective reimbursement. RESULTS: When comparing the four variables mentioned above we found that number of fractions and radiotherapy technique were much stronger predictors than the other two variables. Stage of disease did not prove to be a relevant indicator of cost distinction. There were significant differences in costs among diagnostic groups but these were mostly driven by the technique of radiotherapy and the number of fractions. Within the diagnostic groups, the distribution of costs was too heterogeneous for the purpose of the new payment model. CONCLUSION: The combination of number of fractions and radiotherapy technique appears to be the most appropriate cost predictors to be involved in the prospective payment model proposal. Further analysis is planned to test the predictive value of intention of radiotherapy in order to determine differences in costs between palliative and curative treatment.

Cancer incidence and mortality in the Czech Republic.

BACKGROUND: The Czech Republic ranks among the countries with the highest cancer burden in Europe as well as worldwide. The purpose of this study is to summarize longterm trends in the cancer burden and to provide up-to-date estimates of incidence and mortality rates after 2011. DATA AND METHODS: The Czech National Cancer Registry (CNCR) was instituted in 1977 and contains information collected over a 34-year period of standardized registration covering 100% of cancer diagnoses within the entire Czech population. The CNCR analysis is supported by demographic data and by the Death Records Database. An overview of the epidemiology of malignant tumors in the Czech population is available online at www.svod.cz. RESULTS: All neoplasms, including nonmelanoma skin cancer, reached a crude incidence rate of almost 802 cases per 100,000 men and 681 cases per 100,000 women in 2011. The annual mortality rate exceeded 258 deaths per 100,000 individuals; in other words, more than 27,000 individuals die of cancer each year. The overall incidence of malignancies has increased with a growth index of +27.6% during the last decade (2001- 2011), while the mortality rate has been stabilized over the time span (growth index in 2001- 2011: - 5.0%). Consequently, the prevalence has significantly increased in the observed period and exceeded 475,000 cases in 2011. In addition to demographic aging of the Czech population, the cancer burden has also increased due to the growing incidence of multiple primary tumors (recently more than 15% of the total incidence). The most frequent diagnoses include colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. Although some neoplasms are increasingly diagnosed at an early stage (e. g. the proportion of stage I or II was 75.3% for female breast cancer and 84.2% for skin melanoma), the numbers of early diagnosed cases are generally insufficient, even in the case of highly prevalent cancers such as colorectal carcinoma (only 46.1% of incident cases are diagnosed at stage I or II, according to recent data). CONCLUSION: Population-based data on malignant tumors are available in the Czech Republic. The data survey can help us define national cancer management priorities. The current priority is to achieve a sustained reduction of cases diagnosed at an advanced stage and reduction of the significant regional differences in diagnostic efficiency.

Sunitinib followed by sorafenib or vice versa for metastatic renal cell carcinoma--data from the Czech registry.

BACKGROUND: Sequential therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), sunitinib and sorafenib, is a common treatment choice for patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) despite lack of randomised trials. The aim of this retrospective registry-based study was to analyse the outcomes of RCC patients treated with sunitinib-sorafenib or sorafenib-sunitinib sequence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Czech database containing information on patients treated for mRCC using targeted agents was used as a source of data for retrospective analysis. There were 138 patients treated with sunitinib-sorafenib sequence and 122 patients treated with sorafenib-sunitinib sequence. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.7 months for patients treated with sunitinib-sorafenib sequence and 18.8 months for those receiving sorafenib followed by sunitinib (P = 0.47). Overall survival (OS) at 1 year was 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 77% to 90%] for patients treated with sunitinib-sorafenib and 84% (95% CI 77% to 91%) for sorafenib-sunitinib patients (P = 0.99). Treatment toxic effects were predictable but a significant proportion of patients (up to 14%-25% for different lines of therapy and used TKI) switched between TKIs or discontinued TKI therapy because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to most of the previously published reports, we have not observed improved PFS or OS for mRCC patients treated with the sorafenib-sunitinib sequence as compared to the sunitinib-sorafenib sequence.

Skin toxicity and efficacy of sunitinib and sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a national registry-based study.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective, registry-based analysis to assess the outcomes of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib who developed dermatologic adverse events was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on mRCC patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib were obtained from the Czech Clinical Registry of Renal Cell Cancer Patients. Outcomes of patients who developed hand-foot syndrome (HFS) of any grade and/or grade 3/4 rash during the treatment were compared with patients without HFS and no, mild, or moderate rash. RESULTS: The cohort included 705 patients treated with sunitinib and 365 patients treated with sorafenib. For sunitinib, the median overall survival (OS) was 43.0 months versus 31.0 months (P = 0.027) and median progression-free survival (PFS) 20.8 months versus 11.1 months (P = 0.007) for patients with versus without dermatologic toxicity, respectively. For sorafenib, the median OS and PFS were 27.9 and 24.6 months (P = 0.244), and 12.2 and 8.8 months (P = 0.050), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, the skin toxicity was significantly associated with longer OS in the sunitinib cohort. CONCLUSION: The presence of skin toxicity is associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib.

[Cost analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy regimens for colorectal carcinoma]. / Porovnání nákladu u rezimu XELOX a FOLFOX-4 v lécbe kolorektálního karcinomu.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to compare healthcare-related costs of treatment with XELOX and FOLFOX4 chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with colorectal cancer. We have evaluated costs claimed to the health insurance by the hospital administering these cancer therapies. This study is a pilot project utilising the new I-COP database developed by the Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses of the Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: First, we estimated the costs based on current prices of procedures, medication, and materials from public sources. Using the I-COP database, we then carried out a matched-pair comparison of 26 patients treated with FOLFOX4 or XELOX for colorectal cancer. We evaluated a period of three months of therapy (i.e. 6 cycles of FOLFOX4 or 4 cycles of XELOX). Statistical analysis was done using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. RESULTS: The estimated cost for three months of therapy was 148,288 Czech crowns (CZK) for FOLFOX4 (including CZK 101,064 for chemotherapy drugs) and CZK 123,756 for XELOX. The overall costs claimed to the insurance companies were CZK 160,158 and CZK 151,176 for FOLFOX4 and XELOX, respectively (p = 0.221). The XELOX regimen had significantly higher costs for chemotherapy drugs (CZK 131,705 versus 114,531, p = 0.023) whereas other costs were lower than those for FOLFOX4. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOX4 and XELOX regimens can be considered as equivalent in terms of costs claimed by the hospital administering cancer treatment.

Positron emission tomography and clinical predictors of survival in primary extragonadal germ cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: Primary extragonadal germ cell tumors (EGTs) are an uncommon malignancy -accounting for 2-4% of all germ cell neoplasms in adult males. Their prognosis is worse than that for testicular germ cell tumors because of their relative chemoresistance and frequent presentation with widely disseminated metastases. We have studied the role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for outcome prediction of patients with EGTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have retrospectively analysed 36 men with germ cell tumors originating in the mediastinum or the retroperitoneum. All patients were treated between 1994 and 2010. Negative result of testicular ultrasonographic examination and/or testicular biopsy was required for diagnosis of EGT. Platinum-based systemic therapy was used in all cases, and resectable residual tumor masses were removed surgically. RESULTS: Overall survival at one and three years was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68-94%) and 55% (CI: 38-71%), respectively. None of the patients who had positive FDG-PET findings after first line chemotherapy survived at three years after diagnosis. In contrast, 69% and 20% of patients with positive tumor markers, and 90% and 67% of patients with negative tumor markers after first line chemotherapy survived at one and three years, respectively. Negative FDG-PET after completion of treatment was also a powerful predictor of long-term survival with 100% patients surviving three years and 89% surviving five years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Negative FDG-PET after first-line chemotherapy or after the completion of systemic treatment and resection of residual tumor masses strongly predicts long-term event-free survival in patients with EGTs.