The Geriatrics at Risk Score (GeRi-Score) for mortality prediction in geriatric patients with proximal femur fracture - a development and validation study from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU).

This study developed an easy-to-use mortality prediction tool, which showed an acceptable discrimination and no significant lack of fit. The GeRi-Score was able to predict mortality and could distinguish between mild, moderate and high risk groups. Therefore, the GeRi-Score might have the potential to distribute the intensity of medical care. PURPOSE: Several mortality-predicting tools for hip fracture patients are available, but all consist of a high number of variables, require a time-consuming evaluation and/or are difficult to calculate. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an easy-to-use score, which depends mostly on routine data. METHODS: Patients from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma were divided into a development and a validation group. Logistic regression models were used to build a model for in-house mortality and to obtain a score. Candidate models were compared using Akaike information criteria (AIC) and likelihood ratio tests. The quality of the model was tested using the area under the curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: 38,570 patients were included, almost equal distributed to the development and to the validation dataset. The AUC was 0.727 (95% CI 0.711 - 0.742) for the final model, AIC resulted in a significant reduction in deviance compared to the basic model, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed no significant lack of fit (p = 0.07). The GeRi-Score predicted an in-house mortality of 5.3% vs. 5.3% observed mortality in the development dataset and 5.4% vs. 5.7% in the validation dataset. The GeRi-Score was able to distinguish between mild, moderate and high risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: The GeRi-Score is an easy-to-use mortality-predicting tool with an acceptable discrimination and no significant lack of fit. The GeRi-Score might have the potential to distribute the intensity of perioperative medical care in hip fracture surgery and can be used in quality management programs as benchmark tool.

Self-rated health status and activities of daily living in the first 12 months after fragility fractures of the pelvis-a prospective study on 134 patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in activities of daily living and self-reported health status in the first year after fragility fractures of the pelvis. We found out that these fractures lead to a significant, long-lasting deterioration of both parameters, comparable with hip fractures. PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the development and to identify influencing factors in activities of daily living (ADL) and self-reported health status (HS) in the first year after fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). METHODS: A total of 134 patients with FFP ≥ 60 years were included. ADL were measured using the Barthel index (BI) and the IADL scale pre-fracture, at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. HS was evaluated using the EQ-5D questionnaire at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Multiple regression analysis and hierarchical linear models were applied to identify influencing factors in ADL and HS. RESULTS: The BI was 95 pre-fracture, 75 at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), 80 at 6 months (p = 0.178), and 80 at 12 months (p = 0.149). The IADL was 6 pre-fracture, 3 at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), 4 at 6 months (p = 0.004), and 4 at 12 months (p = 0.711). The EQ-5D index was 0.70 at 6 weeks, 0.788 at 6 months (p = 0.158), and 0.788 at 12 months (p = 0.798). Significant influencing factors in the multiple regression analysis were pre-fracture nursing care level for all scores; pre-fracture mobility for BI; and pre-fracture IADL, ASA score, and age for IADL. Significant influencing factors in the hierarchical linear model were pre-fracture nursing care level for all scores; pre-fracture IADL, ASA score, age, and time for IADL; and pre-fracture mobility, sex, and time for the EQ-5D. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that FFP lead to a significant, long-lasting deterioration in ADL and HS, comparable with hip fractures.

Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Treatment of Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: An Analysis of 15,099 Patients of the AltersTraumaRegister DGU®.

Background and Objectives: The increased use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) results in an increased prevalence of DOAC treatment in hip fractures patients. However, the impact of DOAC treatment on perioperative management of hip fracture patients is limited. In this study, we describe the prevalence of DOAC treatment in a population of hip fracture patients and compare these patients with patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and patients not taking anticoagulants. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU). The data were collected prospectively from patients with proximal femur fractures treated between January 2016 and December 2018. Among other factors, anticoagulation was surveyed. The primary outcome parameter was time-to-surgery. Further parameters were: type of anesthesia, surgical complications, soft tissue complications, length of stay and mortality. Results: In total, 11% (n = 1595) of patients took DOACs at the time of fracture, whereas 9.2% (n = 1325) were on VKA therapy. During the study period, there was a shift from VKA to DOACs. The time-to-surgery of patients on DOACs and of patients on VKA was longer compared to patients who did not take any anticoagulation. No significant differences with regard to complications, type of anesthesia and mortality were found between patients on DOACs compared to VKA treatment. Conclusion: An increased time-to-surgery in patients taking DOACs and taking VKA compared to non-anticoagulated patients was found. This underlines the need for standardized multi-disciplinary orthopedic, hematologic and ortho-geriatric algorithms for the management of hip fracture patients under DOAC treatment. In addition, no significant differences regarding complications and mortality were found between DOAC and VKA users. This demonstrates that even in the absence of widely available antidotes, the safe management of geriatric patients under DOACs with proximal femur fractures is possible.

Open Reduction in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures Is Not Accompanied by a Higher Rate of Complications.

Backgroundand Objectives: Hip fractures are among the most typical geriatric fractures. Subtrochanteric fractures are considered difficult to treat, and, to date, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment. Materialisand Methods: We analyzed data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma, which includes patients ≥ 70 years old with hip fractures or periprosthetic fractures requiring surgery (21,734 patients in 2017-2019). For this study, we analyzed only the subgroup of patients with a subtrochanteric fracture. We analyzed the difference between closed and open surgical methods on a range of outcomes, including mortality, mobility, length of acute hospital stay, and the need for surgical revisions. Results: A total of 506 patients with subtrochanteric fractures were analyzed in this study. The median age was 85 years (interquartile range of 81-89). About 21.1% (n = 107) were operated on with a closed technique, 73.3% (n = 371) with open reduction without using a cerclage, and 5.53% (n = 28) with open reduction with the additional use of one or more cerclage wires. A total of 3.56% (n = 18) of the patients had complications requiring operative revision, most commonly soft tissue interventions (open vs. closed reduction-3.26% vs. 4.67%) (p = 0.687). Patients treated with open reduction were significantly more mobile 7 days after surgery (p = 0.008), while no significant effects on mortality (p = 0.312), length of hospital stay (p = 0.968), or surgical complications (p = 0.687) were found. Conclusion: Proper reduction is the gold standard practice for successful union in subtrochanteric fractures. This study shows that open reduction is not associated with a higher complication rate but does lead to increased mobility 7 days after operation. Therefore, in case of doubt, a good reduction should be aimed for, even using open techniques.

[Online survey for assessment of geriatric early rehabilitation complex treatment in geriatric trauma centers of the DGU by the medical services of the health funds]. / Onlinebefragung zur Prüfung der geriatrisch frührehabilitativen Komplexbehandlung durch den Medizinischen Dienst der Krankenversicherung in AltersTraumaZentren DGU®.

BACKGROUND: Orthogeriatric co-management of proximal femoral fractures has been proven to effectively reduce mortality rates. This involves extending resources in hospitals treating these patients as well as dealing with the possibility of prolonged periods of hospitalization. The increase in costs of orthogeriatric co-management are best illustrated by the implementation of geriatric early rehabilitation complex treatment. In view of the problems concerning billing this complex treatment, an online survey was carried among certified geriatric trauma centers of the German Trauma Society (DGU®). METHODS: Based on a trauma-geriatric consensus 20 questions were formulated by the Academy of Trauma Surgery (AUC) as an online questionnaire and sent to all 75 certified geriatric trauma centers. Apart from a description of the results, a subanalysis based on the figures presented by the case closing departments (geriatrics or trauma surgery) was included. The questions covered a 2-year period of experiences from 2016 to 2018. RESULTS: A total of 26 of the 75 certified geriatric trauma centers participated (35%). A continuous increase in cost analysis evaluations by the medical services of the health funds was observed. A rise from 38% in 2016 to 45% in 2018 was seen. An analogous rejection trend from 16% to 24% during this period was evident as well. Subanalysis revealed significantly higher cost evaluation by the medical services of the health funds and cost rejection rates if trauma departments were the case closing disciplines. CONCLUSION: The online survey revealed significantly higher assessment and rejection rates when compared to other hospital services. This could prove potentially detrimental to the future of orthogeriatric co-management.

[120-day follow-up after proximal femoral fractures-first results from the Geriatric Trauma Registry DGU®]. / 120-Tage-Follow-up nach hüftgelenknahen Frakturen ­ erste Daten aus dem AltersTraumaRegister DGU®.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric trauma centers which are certified to the status of a Geriatic Trauma Center DGU® based on the criteria catalogue as outlined by the German Trauma Society (DGU), are required to participate in the Geriatric Trauma Register (ATR-DGU) for quality management and outcome analyses. The evaluation is pseudoanonymous and includes data on all treated hip fracture patients over 70 years old. This has been in regular use since 2016. This study analyzed the postoperative evaluation of gait, mortality, quality of life, hospital readmission and treatment of osteoporosis after 120 days. METHODS: A voluntary retrospective data evaluation of the ATR-DGU 120-day follow-up from 2017 was carried out. Written consent for the analysis and publication of the data was obtained from six clinics that already participated in the follow-up. The primary target parameters were mortality rate, readmission and revision rates, gait quality, osteoporosis treatment and quality of life according to EQ-5D-3L. The patient data were completely pseudonymized and a descriptive analysis was carried out. RESULTS: In this study 957 patients from the 6 hospitals were included. The average age was 84.5 years (±6.8 years). The mortality rate during the acute treatment phase was 5%. The 120-day follow-up could be evaluated in 412 patients, 10% of these required hospital readmission due to complications oft he same fracture and of these 6% required revision surgery. The mortality rate at 120 days was 12%. In 54% of the patients the fracture led to deterioration of mobility and 49% of patients received osteoporosis treatment after 120 days. The results of the EQ-5D-3L at 120 days revealed improvement as compared to the values on postoperative day 7; however, the preoperative status with respect to mobility and quality of life could not be regained. CONCLUSION: Despite the clear advantages of interdisciplinary treatment, the results are still limited concerning mobilization and quality of life. Further analysis of causative and influencing factors is necessary.

Association between longitudinal clinical outcomes in patients with hip fracture and their pre-fracture place of residence.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of patients with proximal femoral fracture within 1 year after hospitalization are presented. In particular, associations between the patients' clinical status and their pre-fracture residence were evaluated (community-dwelling vs nursing home). METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years with proximal femoral fractures were included in a prospective, single-centre observational study and followed for 12 months. Patients' clinical status at baseline was compared to their health status at follow-up 12 months later. Several standardized questionnaires were used to evaluate the patients' functional and cognitive capacity (e.g. Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Barthel Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination), mobility (timed up-and-go test, Tinetti Test, and Harris Hip Score), quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions index and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale), and psychological status (Geriatric Depression Scale). RESULTS: This study included 402 patients (mean age: 81.3 ± 8.2 years, 72% women). Patients stayed in hospital for 13.7 ± 6.1 days on average. The comparison of patients' clinical status at baseline and at 12-month follow-up revealed that the Mini-Mental State Examination and Charlson Comorbidity Index remained unchanged (P = 0.527 and P = 0.705), the level of depression (Geriatric Depression Scale) significantly decreased (P < 0.001), and quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions index) diminished (P < 0.001). Although patients' mobility increased after 12 months (P < 0.001 for timed up-and-go test and Harris Hip Score), their functional capacity was significantly reduced (P < 0.001 for Barthel Index and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale). Nursing home residents showed a significantly higher impairment at baseline than community-dwelling individuals and less improvement in functional and cognitive tests at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes after hip fracture are significantly associated with patients' pre-fracture residence status. Place of residence as well as functional and cognitive status on admission may lead to differences in functional recovery and affect therapeutic and rehabilitative decision-making.

Medical Complications Predict Cognitive Decline in Nondemented Hip Fracture Patients-Results of a Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify factors that are associated with cognitive decline in the long-term follow-up after hip fractures in previously nondemented patients. METHODS: A consecutive series of 402 patients with hip fractures admitted to our university hospital were analyzed. After exclusion of all patients with preexisting dementia, 266 patients were included, of which 188 could be examined 6 months after surgery. Additional to several demographic data, cognitive ability was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Patients with 19 or less points on the MMSE were considered demented. Furthermore, geriatric scores were recorded, as well as perioperative medical complications. Mini-Mental State Examination was performed again 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Of 188 previously nondemented patients, 12 (6.4%) patients showed a cognitive decline during the 6 months of follow-up. Multivariate regression analysis showed that age ( P = .040) and medical complications ( P = .048) were the only significant independent influencing factors for cognitive decline. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, the incidence of dementia exceeded the average age-appropriate cognitive decline. Significant independent influencing factors for cognitive decline were age and medical complications.

Screw-blade fixation systems in Pauwels three femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To reduce mechanical complications after osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures, improved fixation techniques have been developed including blade or screw-anchor devices. This biomechanical study compares different fixation systems used for treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures with evaluation of failure mode, load to failure, stiffness, femoral head rotation, femoral neck shortening and femoral head migration. METHODS: Standardized Pauwels type 3 fractures (AO/OTA 31-B2) with comminution were created in 18 biomechanical sawbones using a custom-made sawguide. Fractures were stabilized using either SHS-Screw, SHS-Blade or Rotationally Stable Screw-Anchor (RoSA). Femurs were positioned in 25 degrees adduction and ten degrees posterior flexion and were cyclically loaded with an axial sinusoidal loading pattern of 0.5 Hz, starting with 300 N, with an increase by 300 N every 2000 cycles until bone-implant failure occurred. RESULTS: Mean failure load for the Screw-Anchor fixation (RoSA) was 5100 N (IQR 750 N), 3900 N (IQR 75 N) for SHS-Blade and 3000 N (IQR 675 N; p = 0.002) for SHS-Screw. For SHS-Screw and SHS-Blade we observed fracture displacement with consecutive fracture collapse as the main reason for failure, whereas RoSA mainly showed a cut-out under high loadings. Mean stiffness at 1800 N was 826 (IQR 431) N/mm for SHS-Screw, 1328 (IQR 441) N/mm for SHS-Blade and 1953 (IQR 617) N/mm for RoSA (p = 0.003). With a load of 1800 N (SHS-Screw 12° vs. SHS-Blade 7° vs. RoSA 2°; p = 0.003) and with 2700 N (24° vs. 15° vs. 3°; p = 0.002) the RoSA implants demonstrated a higher rotational stability and had the lowest femoral neck shortening (p = 0.002), compared with the SHS groups. At the 2700 N load point, RoSA systems showed a lower axial (p = 0.019) and cranial (p = 0.031) femoral head migration compared to the SHS-Screw. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the new Screw-Anchor fixation (RoSA) was superior to the comparable SHS implants regarding rotational stability and femoral neck shortening. Failure load, stiffness, femoral head migration, and resistance to fracture displacement were in RoSA implants higher than in SHS-Screws, but without significance in comparison to SHS-Blades.

Is treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients cost-covering? Results of a prospective study conducted at a German University Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures have increased medical and socio-economic importance due to demographic transition. Information concerning direct treatment costs and their reimbursement in Germany is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred two hip fracture patients older than 60 years of age were observed prospectively at a German University Hospital. Treatment costs were determined with up to 196 cost factors and compared to the reimbursement. Finally, statistical analysis was performed to identify clinical parameters influencing the cost-reimbursement relation. RESULTS: Treatment costs were 8853 € (95% CI 8297-9410 €), while reimbursement was 8196 € (95% CI 7707-8772 €), resulting in a deficit of 657 € (95% CI 143-1117 €). Bivariate analysis showed that the cost-reimbursement relation was negatively influenced mainly by higher age, higher ASA score, readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and red blood cell transfusion. Adjusted for other parameters, readmission to the ICU was a significant negative predictor (- 2669 €; 95% CI - 4070 to - 1268 €; p < 0.001), while age of 60-75 years was a positive predictor for the cost-reimbursement relation (1373 €; 95% CI 265-2480 €; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients in a university hospital in Germany does not seem to be cost-covering. Adjustment of the reimbursement for treatment of complex hip fracture patients should be considered.

[Challenges of implementing a geriatric trauma network : A regional structure]. / Herausforderung der Implementierung eines Alterstraumanetzwerks : Ein standortübergreifendes Verbundsystem.

BACKGROUND: At present, there is a high percentage and increasing tendency of patients presenting with orthogeriatric injuries. Moreover, significant comorbidities often exist, requiring increased interdisciplinary treatment. These developments have led the German Society of Trauma Surgery, in cooperation with the German Society of Geriatrics, to establish geriatric trauma centers. METHODS: As a conglomerate hospital at two locations, we are cooperating with two external geriatric clinics. In 2015, a geriatric trauma center certification in the form of a conglomerate network structure was agreed upon for the first time in Germany. For this purpose, the requirements for certification were observed. Both structure and organization were defined in a manual according to DIN EN ISO 9001:2015. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2016, an increase of 70% was seen in geriatric trauma cases in our hospital, with a rise of up to 360% in specific diagnoses. The necessary standards and regulations were compiled and evaluated from our hospitals. After successful certification, improvements were necessary, followed by a planned re-audit. These were prepared by multiprofessional interdisciplinary teams and implemented at all locations. CONCLUSIONS: A network structure can be an alternative to classical cooperation between trauma and geriatric units in one clinic and help reduce possible staffing shortage. Due to the lack of scientific evidence, future evaluations of the geriatric trauma register should reveal whether network structures in geriatric trauma surgery lead to a valid improvement in medical care.

The impact of pre-existing conditions on functional outcome and mortality in geriatric hip fracture patients.

PURPOSE: Due to pre-existing illnesses, elderly hip fracture patients represent a vulnerable patient population. The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of various pre-existing conditions on the outcomes of hip fracture patients. METHODS: A total of 402 surgically treated geriatric hip fracture patients were included in this prospective, single-centre study. Upon admission, patient age, gender and fracture type were documented, among other information. Patients were divided into six groups according to their pre-existing illness (neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal or musculoskeletal). Outcomes in all six patient groups were measured using the following outcome parameters: length of hospital stay, mobility, functional results and mortality rate at discharge and at the one-year follow-up examination. RESULTS: Reduced values for the pre-fracture Barthel index (BI) were detected in patients with neurological (p < 0.001) and kidney-related diseases (p = 0.001). Neurological and kidney-related diseases were associated with reduced values on the BI (p < 0.001; p = 0.002) and Tinetti test (TT) (p < 0.001; p = 0.004) as well as an increased mortality rate (p < 0.001; p < 0.001) at the one-year follow-up. In addition, patients with respiratory (p = 0.004) and gastrointestinal disorders (p = 0.007) had an increased mortality rate in the medium term. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existing conditions are common among geriatric hip fracture patients. Pre-existing neurological and kidney-related diseases had the highest impact on functional outcomes and mortality rates at the end of acute care and in the medium term. In contrast to pre-existing cardiovascular disease, pre-existing neurological, kidney, respiratory and gastrointestinal disorders were also found to be associated with increased mortality rates in the medium term.

Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture.

PURPOSE: Inadequate reconstruction of femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with unfavourable outcomes, but its importance following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture is unknown. METHODS: Our study examined the correlation between reconstructed femoral offset and functional outcome 12 months after post traumatic hemiarthroplasty in 126 prospectively enrolled elderly patients. Rotation-corrected femoral offset (FORC), relative femoral offset (FORL) and contralateral femoral offset (FOC) were measured on anteroposterior radiographs. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was the primary outcome measure; the timed up and go (TUG) test and Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score were secondary outcomes. Correlations were sought using the Spearman correlation coefficient (r). Sample size was calculated using an Altman nomogram, with the power set at 80 %, the significance level of 0.05 and a standardised difference of 0.75. RESULTS: The mean reconstructed FORC was 41 mm (17-67 mm) and showed a linear relationship and excellent correlation with the FOC. At 12 months, we found a significant positive correlation between FORC and HHS (r = 0.303, p = 0.025) and IADL (r = 0.325, p = 0.013), but not TUG (r = -0.026, p = 0.863). These findings were confirmed by bivariate and multivariate correlation between FORL and functional outcome parameters. CONCLUSIONS: We found a clinically relevant relationship between femoral offset and functional outcome after hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients, comparable with that of THA, for treating osteoarthritis.

Prehospital Pain and Analgesic Therapy in Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: As a part of aging, hip fractures are becoming more common. The connection between increased pain and a poor outcome has previously been shown. Therefore, even in prehospital situations, analgesic therapy appears to be reasonable. We established a prospective study with 153 patients to evaluate the patients' pain levels during the prehospital phase of treatment and prehospital analgesic therapy. METHODS: We performed a prospective study on 153 patients the age of 60 years or older in a University hospital setting between 2010 and 2011 who suffered hip fracture. Analgesics given and the type of medical staff that was involved were documented. Pain was measured using the NRS upon initial contact of the medical staff and upon admission to our emergency department. RESULTS: Initial pain level evaluated by EMS (emergency medical service) was 6.8 (SD = 2.7). Twenty-two percent of the patients reported an NRS of 10 as the highest value following their injury. Forty-three of 153 patients (28%) received analgesics. The mean initial pain score for those 43 patients who did receive pain medication was 7.0 (SD = 2.6). However, this score dropped to a mean of 2.8 (SD = 1.4) upon hospital arrival (P < 0.001). The patients who did not receive pain medication had an initial pain score of 4.5 (SD = 1.9). Upon admission to the hospital, this score decreased to a mean of 4.0 (SD = 1.7, P = 0.092). CONCLUSION: Only a minority of patients with hip fractures received prehospital analgesia. The administration of prehospital analgesia was associated with significant pain relief.

Effect of Preexisting Cognitive Impairment on In-Patient Treatment and Discharge Management among Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of cognitive impairment on the functional outcomes and complication rates of patients with hip fracture during in-patient treatment. METHODS: A total of 402 patients who were surgically treated for hip fractures were consecutively enrolled at a single trauma center. The patients were grouped according to their results on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), i.e., ≥20 points (group I) and ≤19 points (group II). Complication and in-hospital mortality rates as well as postoperative functional outcomes according to the Barthel Index (BI) were compared between the groups. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for additional factors. RESULTS: 33% of the patients had MMSE scores ≤19 points. The complication rates were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Likewise, the overall in-hospital mortality rates were similar between the patients in group I (4.5%) and those in group II (9.8%; ß = 0.218, p < 0.740). Functional outcomes, as assessed by the BI, were lower in group II (ß = -0.266, p < 0.001). The patients in group II were transferred to a rehabilitation clinic less frequently (52.3 vs. 76.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lower MMSE scores are at a higher risk for poorer functional outcomes. Perioperative care should focus on the preservation of functional abilities to protect these patients from an additional loss of independence and disadvantageous clinical course.

The effect of osteoarthritis on functional outcome following hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis on the functional outcome of elderly patientents with displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck treated by hemiarthroplasty is unclear. METHODS: We prospectively examined the impact of pre-existing osteoarthritis on the functional outcome of 126 elderly patients with displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck treated by hemiarthroplasty. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 82.7 years. At 12 months, we observed no statistically significant differences in the Harris hip score (p = 0.545), the timed up and go test (p = 0.298), the Tinetti test (p = 0.381) or the Barthel Index (p = 0.094) between patients with Kellgren and Lawrence grades 3 or 4 osteoarthritis, and patients with grades 0 to 2 changes. Furthermore, there were no differences in complication or revision rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings challenge the hypothesis that pre-existing osteoarthritis is a contraindication to hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.

Mid-term results of a less-invasive locking plate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for proximal humeral fractures remains under debate. In this article, we report the mid-term results of patients who underwent the less-invasive implantation of a polyaxial locking plate for displaced proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: This study included patients who were treated with a polyaxial locking plate via an anterolateral deltoid split approach from May 2008 to December 2011. We evaluated outcome parameters after a minimum follow-up period of 2.5 years (median 4.5 years, follow-up rate 62 %) including the age- and gender-dependent Constant score, the activities of daily living score, and the visual analog scale for both pain and subjective shoulder function. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients who underwent surgery, 114 were included in the follow-up and 71 completed the questionnaire. Fifteen patients (21 %) exhibited 2-fragment fractures, and 56 patients (79 %) exhibited 3- and 4-part fractures. The Constant score improved significantly (4.5 years: 70 ± 21, p < 0.001) between the first two follow-ups (6 weeks: 35 ± 14, 6 months: 56 ± 18, p < 0.001), and also between 6 months and 4.5 years post-surgery. At the final follow-up, the activities of daily living score had not reached pre-fracture levels (before trauma: 27 ± 5, 4.5 years: 20 ± 8, p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that age has a more significant influence on the final outcome than fracture morphology or gender. CONCLUSION: Although the less-invasive surgical procedure is a feasible treatment option in proximal humeral fractures with acceptable complications and considerable improvement during the first six months, a lengthy recovery time is required. The majority of our patients did not become pain-free or reach pre-fracture activity levels.

The influence of pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis on functional outcome after trochanteric fracture.

PURPOSE: It is crucially important to optimise functional outcome after fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures. While a number of risk factors that predict a poor clinical course have been identified, the influence of pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is unclear. METHODS: The influence of pre-existing radiographic OA of the hip on short- to mid-term functional outcome was prospectively analysed in a cohort of patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing for trochanteric fracture. OA was graded according to Kellgren and Lawrence; functional outcome was assessed at six and 12 months by the Harris hip score (HHS), the timed up and go (TUG) test and the Barthel Index. RESULTS: Our cohort comprised 188 patients (58 were male and 130 female), with a mean age of 82 years. At six and 12 months postoperatively, the HHS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) and Barthel Index (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively) correlated significantly with the grade of pre-existing OA. After adjustment for confounding variables, there was a significant association between the grade of pre-existing OA and the HHS at six months (p = 0.02). Although we observed trends suggestive of other relationships, none reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existing radiographic OA of the hip is an important determinant of clinical outcome in elderly patients with a trochanteric femoral fracture. Further studies will be needed to establish the most effective means of restoring hip function after trochanteric femoral fracture in patients with radiographic OA of the hip.

Distal femoral fractures in the elderly: biomechanical analysis of a polyaxial angle-stable locking plate versus a retrograde intramedullary nail in a human cadaveric bone model.

INTRODUCTION: Compromised bone quality and the need for early mobilization still lead to high rates of implant failure in geriatric patients with distal femoral fractures. With the newest generation of polyaxial locking plates and the proven retrograde femoral nails today two minimally invasive surgical procedures have been established. Indications for both procedures overlap. This study attempts to define the strength and failure mode of both surgical procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized fracture model was established to simulate an unstable AO/OTA 33-A3 fracture. Eight pairs of human cadaver femora (mean age 79 years, range 63-100 years) with compromised bone quality were used. Osteosyntheses with eight retrograde femoral nails and eight locking plates were randomly performed. A materials testing machine (Instron 5566) was used to perform cyclic stress tests according to a standardized loading protocol, up to a maximum load of 5,000 N. RESULTS: All specimens survived loading of at least 2,500 N. Three nail and one plate construct survived a maximum load of 5,000 N. The mean compressive force leading to failure was 4,400 N (CI 4,122-4,678 N) for nail osteosynthesis and 4,429 N (CI 3,653-5,204 N) for plate osteosynthesis (p = 0.943). Proximal cutting out of the osteosynthesis was the most common reason for interruption in the nail and plate osteosyntheses. Significant differences between the retrograde femoral nail and plate osteosyntheses were seen under testing conditions for plastic deformation and stiffness of the constructs (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, no statements regarding the superiority of either of the devices can be made. Even though the load to failure values for both osteosyntheses were much higher than the loads experienced during normal walking; however, because only axial loading was applied, it remains unclear whether both osteosyntheses meet the estimated requirements for postoperative full weight-bearing for an average heavy patient with a distal femoral fracture.

Impact of Parkinson's disease on the acute care treatment and medium-term functional outcome in geriatric hip fracture patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have a heightened risk of sustaining hip fractures due to disturbed balance and gait insecurity. This study aims to determine the impact of PD on the perioperative course and medium-term functional outcome of patients with hip fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 402 hip fracture patients, aged ≥60 years, were prospectively enrolled. On admission, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Mini-Mental Status Examination, and Barthel Index (BI), among other scales, were documented. The Hoehn and Yahr scale was used to assess the severity of PD. The functional outcome was assessed by performance on the BI, Tinetti test (TT), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) at discharge and at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, the length of hospitalization, perioperative complications, and discharge management were documented. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for influencing factors. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (4.7%) had a concomitant diagnosis of PD. The functional outcome (BI, TT, and TUG) was comparable between groups (all p > 0.05). Grade II (52.6 vs. 26.1%; OR = 4.304, p = 0.008) and IV complications (15.8 vs. 4.4%; OR = 7.785, p = 0.012) occurred significantly more often among PD patients. While the diagnosis of PD was associated with a significantly longer mean length of hospital stay (ß = 0.119, p = 0.024), the transfer from acute hospital care showed no significant difference (p = 0.246). Patients with an additional diagnosis of PD had inferior results in BI at the 6-month follow-up (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: PD on hospital admission is not an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality or an inferior functional outcome at hospital discharge. However, patients with PD are at risk for specific complications and longer hospitalization at the time of transfer from acute care so as for reduced abilities in activities of daily living in the medium term.