Prophylactic Mesh-related Reoperations and Mesh-related Problems During Subsequent Relaparotomies: Long-term Results From the PRIMA Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate all mesh-related problems during reoperations after mesh-reinforcement 15 years after the start of the PRIMA trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Prophylactic mesh reinforcement during closure of a midline laparotomy has proven to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia, especially in high-risk patients, but long-term mesh-related morbidity is largely unknown. METHODS: Patients receiving a prophylactic onlay or retro-rectus mesh in the PRIMA trial between 2009 and 2012 were included on an as-treated basis from participating centers that made reoperation notes available. Main outcomes were the incidences of complications requiring mesh explantation, mesh-related ileus, and mesh-related problems during laparotomy for other diagnoses. METHODS: Out of 373 patients randomized to prophylactic mesh reinforcement, 242 were included: 127 with onlay and 115 patients with retrorectus mesh. Median follow-up is 27 months (IQR 12-78). Thirty-four patients underwent reoperation for any reason during entire follow-up, 22 after onlay (17.3%) and 12 after retrorectus mesh (10.4%). Reoperation rate for complications that required mesh explantation was 4/127 (3.1%) after onlay and 0/115 (0%) after retrorectus mesh. Mesh-related ileus occurred in none of the onlay group, and 3/115 (2.6%) in the retrorectus group. During subsequent laparotomies for other primary diagnoses, adhesions to the mesh were noted in 3/10 patients in the onlay group and 1/5 patients in the retro-rectus group. Overall, the mesh was removed in 10/127 (7.9%) in the onlay group and 7/115 (6.1%) patients in the retro-rectus group. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk patients receiving a prophylactic mesh during midline laparotomy closure, low incidences of mesh-related complications requiring reoperation and mesh-related problems during unrelated subsequent laparotomies were found, for both the onlay and retrorectus techniques.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Benign Symptomatic Thyroid Nodules in the Netherlands: Successful Introduction of a Minimally Invasive Treatment Option Improving Quality of Life.

PURPOSE: To determine whether adoption of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with symptomatic benign thyroid nodules (SBTNs) in a Dutch regional thyroid network resulted in clinical success and improvement in health-related and thyroid-related quality of life (QoL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The eligibility criteria for RF ablation were as follows: (a) nodule size between 2.0 and 5.0 cm, (b) solid component >20%; (c) benign cytology in 2 separate cytological assessments, and (d) symptoms unequivocally related to mechanical compression. The primary end point of this study was volume reduction 1 year after ablation. The secondary outcomes were health-related and thyroid-related QoL, measured using the short form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) and thyroid-specific patient-reported outcome questionnaire (ThyPRO-39), respectively, as well as adverse event rates. RESULTS: A total of 72 SBTNs in 67 patients were included. Median age was 50.0 (interquartile range, 41.0-56.0) years, and 91.0% were women. The median volume reduction at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years was 51.0%, 63.9%, 65.2%, 81.3%, and 90.3%, respectively. The patients showed a significant improvement on the SF-36 physical component scale and ThyPRO-39 overall QoL-impact scale. An absolute improvement was seen in goiter and cosmetic complaints, determined using ThyPRO-39. The overall adverse event rate was 9.0%, of which 4.5% were considered major. CONCLUSIONS: RF ablation is an effective treatment option for SBTNs, with a significant volume reduction and improvement in health-related and thyroid-related QoL.

Surgical excision of post-traumatic myositis ossificans of the adductor longus in a football player.

A football player was diagnosed with myositis ossificans of his right adductor longus muscle after an acute injury. Conservative treatment failed and 1 year after the initial trauma the patient underwent surgical excision of a large ossification. Seven months postoperatively, the patient was fully recovered and returned to his preinjury activity levels. We present our approach to this case and discuss our considerations, referring to background information about this rare disease.