RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of adverse perinatal outcomes between planned home births versus planned hospital births. DESIGN: A nationwide cohort study. SETTING: The Netherlands. POPULATION: Low-risk women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour. METHODS: Analysis of national registration data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intrapartum and neonatal death, Apgar scores, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) within 28 days of birth. RESULTS: Of the total of 814 979 women, 466 112 had a planned home birth and 276 958 had a planned hospital birth. For 71 909 women, their planned place of birth was unknown. The combined intrapartum and neonatal death rates up to 28 days after birth, including cases with discrepancies in the registration of the moment of death, were: for nulliparous women, 1.02 for planned home births versus 1.09 for planned hospital births, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.79-1.24; and for parous women, 0.59 versus 0.58, aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87-1.55. The rates of NICU admissions and low Apgar scores did not significantly differ among nulliparous women (NICU admissions up to 28 days, 3.41 versus 3.61, aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.18). Among parous women the rates of Apgar scores below seven and NICU admissions were significantly lower among planned home births (NICU admissions up to 28 days, 1.36 versus 1.95, aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: We found no increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes for planned home births among low-risk women. Our results may only apply to regions where home births are well integrated into the maternity care system.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/mortalidad , Parto Domiciliario/mortalidad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Morbilidad , Mortalidad Perinatal , Puntaje de Apgar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Parto Domiciliario/efectos adversos , Parto Domiciliario/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Atención Perinatal , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The 'Hague Protocol' enables professionals at the adult Emergency Department (ED) to detect child abuse based on three parental characteristics: (i) suicide attempt or self-harm, (ii) domestic violence or (iii) substance abuse, and to refer them to the Reporting Centre for Child Abuse and Neglect (RCCAN). This study investigates what had happened to the families three months after this referral. METHOD: ED referrals based on parental characteristics (N = 100) in which child abuse was confirmed after investigation by the RCCAN were analysed. Information was collected regarding type of child abuse, reason for reporting, duration of problems prior to the ED referral, previous involvement of support services or other agencies, re-occurrence of the problems and outcome of the RCCAN monitoring according to professionals and the families. RESULTS: Of the 100 referred cases, 68 families were already known to the RCCAN, the police or family support services, prior to the ED referral. Of the 99 cases where information was available, existing support was continued or intensified in 31, a Child Protection Services (CPS) report had to be made in 24, new support was organized for 27 cases and in 17 cases support was not necessary, because the domestic problems were already resolved. Even though the RCCAN is mandated to monitor all referred families after three months, 31 cases which were referred internally were not followed up. CONCLUSION: Before referral by the ED two thirds of these families were already known to organizations. Monitoring may help provide a better, more sustained service and prevent and resolve domestic problems. A national database could help to link data and to streamline care for victims and families. We recommend a Randomized Controlled Trial to test the effectiveness of this Protocol in combination with the outcomes of the provided family support.
Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Protección a la Infancia , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Padres/psicología , Adulto , Niño , Maltrato a los Niños/prevención & control , Protocolos Clínicos , Violencia Doméstica/psicología , Composición Familiar , Salud de la Familia , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Países Bajos , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Factores de Riesgo , Servicio Social/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Intento de Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate trends in prevalence of Down syndrome (DS) births in the Netherlands over an 11-year period and how they have been affected by maternal age and introduction of prenatal screening. METHOD: Nationwide data of an 11-year birth cohort (1997-2007) from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry were analyzed. First-trimester combined screening was introduced in 2002, free of charge only for women 36 years of age or older and only on patients' request. Changes in maternal age, prevalence of DS births, and rates of births at <24 weeks (legal limit for termination of pregnancy in the Netherlands) during the study period were evaluated using logistic and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 1,972,058 births were registered (91% of the births in 1997-2007). Mean prevalence of DS was 14.57 per 10,000 births (95% confidence interval 14.43; 14.73); 85% of DS were live births. No significant trend in overall prevalence of DS births was observed (p = 0.385), in spite of a significant increase of mean maternal age during the same period (p < 0.001). The increased prevalence of DS births at ≥ 24 weeks among women ≥ 36 years of age (p = 0.011) was offset by a significant increase in the proportion of DS births at <24 weeks among women aged <36 years (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The proportion of DS births in the Netherlands has not changed during the period 1997-2007.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Aborto Eugénico/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Eugénico/tendencias , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Edad Materna , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/tendencias , Prevalencia , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , UltrasonografíaAsunto(s)
Parto Domiciliario , Consentimiento Informado , Comunicación , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Parto , Embarazo , RiesgoRESUMEN
AIM: To examine the association between semi-sitting and sitting position at the time of birth and perineal damage amongst low-risk women in primary care. BACKGROUND: Evidence on the association between birthing positions and perineal trauma is not conclusive. Most studies did not distinguish between positions during the second stage of labour and position at the time of birth. Therefore, although birthing positions do not seem to affect the overall perineal trauma rate, an increase in trauma with upright position for birthing cannot be ruled out. METHODS: Secondary analysis was performed on data from a large trial. This trial was conducted amongst primary care midwifery practices in the Netherlands. A total of 1646 women were included who had a spontaneous, vaginal delivery. Perineal outcomes were compared between women in recumbent, semi-sitting and sitting position. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the effects of these positions after controlling for other factors. FINDINGS: No significant differences were found in intact perineum rates between the position groups. Women in sitting position were less likely to have an episiotomy and more likely to have a perineal tear than women in recumbent position. After controlling for other factors, the odds ratios (OR) were 0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.54] and 1.83 (95% CI: 1.22-2.73) respectively. Women in semi-sitting position were more likely to have a labial tear than women in recumbent position (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.00-2.04). CONCLUSION: A semi-sitting or sitting birthing position does not need to be discouraged to prevent perineal damage. Women should be encouraged to use positions that are most comfortable to them.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Perineo/lesiones , Adulto , Peso al Nacer , Femenino , Humanos , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Paridad , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the trends and patterns of referral from midwives to obstetricians within the Dutch maternity care system from 1988 to 2004, and the differences in referral patterns between nulliparous and parous women. DESIGN: A descriptive study. SETTING: The Dutch midwifery database (LVR1), which monitored 74% (1988) to 94% (2004) of all midwifery care in the Netherlands between 1988 and 2004. POPULATION: A total of 1 977 006 pregnancies, attended by a primary care level midwife. METHODS: The indications for referral from midwifery to obstetric care were classified into fifteen groups (eight antepartum, six intrapartum and one postpartum). The trends in referrals of these indications were analysed by general linear models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trends in the percentage of antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum referrals from midwifery care to obstetric care; trends in the specific indications for referral; contribution of different groups of the indications to the trend. RESULTS: From 1988 to 2004 an increase of 14.5% (from 36.9 to 51.4%) occurred in referrals from primary midwifery care to secondary obstetric care either during pregnancy, childbirth or in the postpartum period. The timing of the referrals was as follows: antepartum +9.0%, intrapartum +5.2% and postpartum +0.3%. In parous women, the increase in referrals was greater (+16.6%) than in nulliparous women (+12.3%) (P = 0.001). The commonest indications for referrals in nulliparous women were anticipated or evident complications due to 'failure to progress in the first or second stage' and 'fetal distress'. Parous women were most commonly referred for anticipated or evident complications due to 'medical history' and 'fetal distress'. In nulliparous women, 52% of the increase in referrals was related to the need of pain relief and occurrence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid; in parous women, 54% of the increase in referrals was related to the general medical and obstetrical history of the women, particularly previous caesarean section, and the occurrence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid. CONCLUSIONS: During a 17-year period, there was a continuous increase in the referral rate from midwives to obstetricians. Previous caesarean section, requirement for pain relief and the presence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid were the main contributors to the changes in referral rates. Primary prevention of caesarean section and antenatal preparation for childbirth are important interventions in the maintenance of primary obstetric care for low-risk pregnant women.
Asunto(s)
Partería/tendencias , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Atención Prenatal/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Adulto , Femenino , Sufrimiento Fetal/terapia , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Dolor de Parto/terapia , Edad Materna , Síndrome de Aspiración de Meconio/terapia , Países Bajos , Paridad , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal mortality and severe perinatal morbidity between planned home and planned hospital births, among low-risk women who started their labour in primary care. DESIGN: A nationwide cohort study. SETTING: The entire Netherlands. POPULATION: A total of 529,688 low-risk women who were in primary midwife-led care at the onset of labour. Of these, 321,307 (60.7%) intended to give birth at home, 163,261 (30.8%) planned to give birth in hospital and for 45,120 (8.5%), the intended place of birth was unknown. METHODS: Analysis of national perinatal and neonatal registration data, over a period of 7 years. Logistic regression analysis was used to control for differences in baseline characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intrapartum death, intrapartum and neonatal death within 24 hours after birth, intrapartum and neonatal death within 7 days and neonatal admission to an intensive care unit. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between planned home and planned hospital birth (adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals: intrapartum death 0.97 (0.69 to 1.37), intrapartum death and neonatal death during the first 24 hours 1.02 (0.77 to 1.36), intrapartum death and neonatal death up to 7 days 1.00 (0.78 to 1.27), admission to neonatal intensive care unit 1.00 (0.86 to 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that planning a home birth does not increase the risks of perinatal mortality and severe perinatal morbidity among low-risk women, provided the maternity care system facilitates this choice through the availability of well-trained midwives and through a good transportation and referral system.
Asunto(s)
Parto Domiciliario/mortalidad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Edad Materna , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Paridad , Mortalidad Perinatal , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
AIMS: Information about risk factors and preventive measures given before conception is estimated to prevent 15-35% of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to identify women's motives for not responding to an invitation for preconception counseling (PCC) from their general practitioner. METHODS: A purposive sample of 11 women who did not respond to an invitation for PCC and who became pregnant within 1 year was interviewed. RESULTS: Three key themes influencing nonresponse emerged from the data: perceived knowledge, perceived lack of risk and a misunderstanding of the aim of PCC. CONCLUSION: For successful future implementation of PCC, a more tailored approach may be necessary for certain (groups of) women, addressing the reasons why women do not consider themselves part of the target group for PCC.
Asunto(s)
Consejo Dirigido , Motivación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Atención Preconceptiva , Mujeres/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Escolaridad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Edad Materna , Países Bajos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the nature and outcome of intrapartum referrals from primary to secondary care within the Dutch obstetric system. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Dutch midwifery database (LVR1), covering 95% of all midwifery care and 80% of all Dutch pregnancies (2001-03). POPULATION: Low-risk women (280,097) under exclusive care of a primary level midwife at the start of labour either with intention to deliver at home or with a personal preference to deliver in hospital under care of a primary level midwife. METHODS: Women were classified into three categories (no referral, urgent referral and referral without urgency) and were related to maternal characteristics and to neonatal outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution of referral categories, main reasons for urgent referral, Apgar score at 5 minutes, perinatal death within 24 hours and referral to a paediatrician within 24 hours. RESULTS: In our study, 68.1% of the women completed childbirth under exclusive care of a midwife, 3.6% were referred on an urgency basis and 28.3% were referred without urgency. Of all referrals, 11.2% were on an urgency basis. The main reasons for urgent referrals were fetal distress and postpartum haemorrhage. The nonurgent referrals predominantly took place during the first stage of labour (73.6% of all referrals). Women who had planned a home delivery were referred less frequently than women who had planned a hospital delivery: 29.3 and 37.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). On average, the mean Apgar score at 5 minutes was high (9.72%) and the peripartum neonatal mortality was low (0.05%) in the total study group. No maternal deaths occurred. Adverse neonatal outcomes occurred most frequently in the urgent referral group, followed by the group of referrals without urgency and the nonreferred group. CONCLUSIONS: Risk selection is a crucial element of the Dutch obstetric system and continues into the postpartum period. The system results in a relatively small percentage of intrapartum urgent referrals and in overall satisfactory neonatal outcomes in deliveries led by primary level midwives.
Asunto(s)
Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/enfermería , Atención Perinatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Parto Domiciliario/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Países Bajos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of perinatal mortality in The Netherlands with that in other European countries (Peristat-II), and with data collected 5 years previously (Peristat-I). DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHOD: Indicators ofperinatal mortality which were developed for Peristat-I were used again in Peristat-II. Data on perinatal mortality in 2004 were delivered by 26 European countries. The Dutch data originated from national registers of midwives and gynaecologists and the National Neonatology Register. RESULTS: In Peristat-I, from 22 weeks gestation, The Netherlands had the highest fetal mortality rate (7.4 per 1,000 total number of births). Furthermore, after Greece, The Netherlands had the highest early neonatal mortality rate (3.5 per 1,000 live births). In Peristat-II from 22 weeks gestation, after France, The Netherlands had the highest fetal mortality rate (7.0 per 1,000 total number of births). Of all western European countries, The Netherlands had the highest early neonatal mortality rate (3.0 per 1,000 live births). Over the past 5 years the perinatal mortality rate in The Netherlands has dropped from 10.9 to 10.0 per 1,000 total births but this drop has been faster in other countries. CONCLUSION: The Netherlands has a relatively high number of older mothers and multiple pregnancies, but this only partly explains the high Dutch perinatal mortality rate which still ranks unfavourably in the European tables. More research is necessary to gain insight into the prevalence of risk factors for perinatal mortality compared with other European countries. In addition, perinatal health and the quality ofperinatal healthcare deserve a more prominent position in Dutch research programmes.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Infantil , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/normas , Atención Perinatal/normas , Mortalidad Perinatal , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Fetal/tendencias , Humanos , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Edad Materna , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Mortalidad Perinatal/tendencias , Embarazo , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference in neonatal mortality and morbidity between breech and cephalic presentations at term. METHODS: This was a retrospective matched cohort study in two centers between July 1998 and April 2000, including all breech deliveries between 37(+0) and 41(+6) weeks, except cases with multiple gestations and antepartum intrauterine deaths. All breech presentations were matched with two cephalic presentations. Onset of labor and route of delivery were recorded, and neonatal data were categorized into variables belonging to serious morbidity or moderate morbidity. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and nineteen deliveries were included. Three hundred and seventy-three babies were in breech position and 746 in cephalic position. The gestational age and birth weight of the babies in the breech group were lower than in the cephalic group (p < 0.001). Congenital abnormalities occurred more often in the breech group (p < 0.005). An elective cesarean section was performed in 23.3% of breech presentations versus 3.5% of cephalic presentations (p < 0.001). Emergency cesarean sections were done in 29.2% of breech presentations versus 8.8% of cephalic presentations (p < 0.001). Children born in breech presentation had lower Apgar scores after 1 minute (p < 0.0001), but 5-minute Apgar scores were the same in both groups (p = 0.22). Children born in breech presentation received significantly more resuscitation than children born in cephalic presentation (p < 0.001). In both groups no perinatal mortality occurred. No differences were observed in percentages of children with serious or moderate neonatal morbidity between the breech and cephalic lies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the numbers are small, this study shows that the conservative (vaginal) approach in selected fetuses in breech position can be safely pursued with neonatal results similar to fetuses in cephalic presentation.
Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas/terapia , Adulto , Puntaje de Apgar , Peso al Nacer , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Inicio del Trabajo de Parto , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Resucitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preconception counselling (PCC) can reduce adverse pregnancy outcome by addressing risk factors prior to pregnancy. This study explores whether anxiety is induced in women either by the offer of PCC or by participation with GP-initiated PCC. METHODS: Randomised trial of usual care versus GP-initiated PCC for women aged 18-40, in 54 GP practices in the Netherlands. Women completed the six-item Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before PCC (STAI-1) and after (STAI-2). After pregnancy women completed a STAI focusing on the first trimester of pregnancy (STAI-3). RESULTS: The mean STAI-1-score (n = 466) was 36.4 (95% CI 35.4-37.3). Following PCC there was an average decrease of 3.6 points in anxiety-levels (95% CI, 2.4-4.8). Mean scores of the STAI-3 were 38.5 (95% CI 37.7-39.3) in the control group (n = 1090) and 38.7 (95% CI 37.9-39.5) in the intervention group (n = 1186). CONCLUSION: PCC from one's own GP reduced anxiety after participation, without leading to an increase in anxiety among the intervention group during pregnancy. We therefore conclude that GPs can offer PCC to the general population without fear of causing anxiety.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Consejo/métodos , Servicios de Planificación Familiar , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Atención Preconceptiva/métodos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Humanos , Países Bajos , Pruebas de Personalidad , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo/psicología , Psicometría , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
It is generally believed that non-differential misclassification will lead to a bias toward the null-value. However, using one graphical and one numerical example, we show that in situations where underestimation more than overestimation is the problem, non-differential misclassification may lead to a bias away from the null-value for intermediate categories of exposure variables. We show that a true threshold level for an exposure may, subsequently, appear as a dose-response relationship. Underestimation more than overestimation is likely to occur in studies in which self-reports are used to obtain data on activities which respondents voluntarily engage in and which are socially not acceptable or known to be potentially dangerous. Researchers should be aware that both a shown deleterious effect at a low level of exposure and a dose-response relationship may in fact be spurious and due to underestimation of exposure at higher levels.
Asunto(s)
Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Sesgo , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The validity of the results of studies using retrospectively collected information on exposures is often criticized, because cases may report differently from controls even if their true exposure status is the same. This study was performed to quantify the extent to which this effect (differential misclassification) may occur for alcohol and cigarette consumption by pregnancy outcome. METHODS: Prospective as well as retrospective information on alcohol and cigarette consumption was collected for 2806 mothers resident in all 12 provinces of the Netherlands, who gave birth between 1978 and 1979. Changes in mean reported consumption and changes from user to non-user based on retrospective and prospective information were compared for cases and controls. This was done by calculating absolute differences (retrospective minus prospective) in reported consumption and by calculating 'misclassification odds ratios'. Further, conventional odds ratios based on retrospective information were compared with those based on prospective information. Outcome measures were stillbirth, small for gestational age (SGA), congenital malformations, preterm birth and low birthweight. RESULTS: The only statistically significant result was found for smoking and SGA. Mothers with an SGA child retrospectively reported a higher number of cigarettes smoked than they had prospectively, more so than mothers of a control child. However, the odds ratios of the relation between SGA and smoking based on prospective and retrospective information, respectively, were virtually the same. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that information bias is unlikely to have a large influence on effect estimates in studies using retrospective information on alcohol and cigarette consumption.
Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Sesgo , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumar/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in perinatal death rate and associated obstetric risk factors between ethnic groups in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study based on the 1990-1993 birth cohorts in the National Obstetric Registry. SUBJECTS: 569,743 births of which 85,527 were for women belonging to ethnic minorities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal death occurring between 16th week of pregnancy and 24 hours after birth. METHOD: Bivariate and multivariate analysis of perinatal death rate per ethnic group. A total of 42,282 women living in the three main cities of the Netherlands were classified on the basis of postal code districts into four socioeconomic (SES) classes for analysis of the relation between SES, perinatal death, and preterm birth. RESULTS: Black mothers had the highest perinatal death rate compared with indigenous Dutch (odds ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.9, 2.4) followed by a group "others", consisting of women of mixed or unknown ethnicity (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.5, 2.0), Hindustani (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.2, 1.6), and Mediterraneans (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.2, 1.4). Asians (excluding West Indian Asians) and non-Dutch Europeans did not have higher rates than Dutch women. The increased rates of black and Hindustani women could be explained fully and that of the group "others" partially by higher rates of preterm birth. Controlling for age and parity lowered the odds ratio of the Mediterraneans slightly. The risk of ethnicity was independent of SES. CONCLUSION: Ethnic minorities in the Netherlands except immigrants from Asia and other European countries have higher rates of perinatal death than indigenous Dutch women. With a twofold increase, black women had the highest rate, which was related to an equally large increased rate of preterm birth.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Mortalidad Infantil , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Clase SocialRESUMEN
In the 'Overview of the role of antibiotics in curtailing labour and early delivery' (ORACLE I)-trial in women with premature rupture of membranes, the use of erythromycin was found to be associated with a decrease in the primary composite outcome (neonatal death, chronic lung disease or major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound; p = 0.08) and in single adverse neonatal outcomes (p = 0.02) when compared to placebo. The positive results were more significant in the singleton group (p = 0.02 for the composite outcome), while no effects were found in twin pregnancies. The combination of amoxycillin and clavulanic acid, with or without erythromycin, was associated with some improvements in outcome, but was also accompanied by a higher rate of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. Another trial (ORACLE II) found no effects of antibiotic use in women with premature labour with intact membranes. Although both trials were of good quality, the stratification into singleton and twin pregnancies should have been done more consistently. Because premature rupture of membranes in singleton pregnancies is more likely to be associated with a pre-existing infection than in multiple pregnancies, the potential benefit of treatment with antibiotics is larger in singleton pregnancies.
Asunto(s)
Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/inducido químicamente , Eritromicina/uso terapéutico , Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
In the Peristat-project, a European collaborative study, a set of indicators has been defined for monitoring perinatal health outcomes. For a group of 10 core indicators, with variables for subgroup analysis, national registry data from 15 European member states were collected and compared. The Netherlands was found to have the highest perinatal mortality in Europe: the foetal and neonatal mortality amounted to 7.4 and 3.5 per 1000 births, respectively. European countries differ in registration practices. Some countries do not register perinatal deaths occurring before a duration of amenorrhoea of 28 weeks. Therefore, the Peristat mortality data should be compared with 28 weeks of gestation as a cut-off point. With this cut-off point, The Netherlands has the second highest perinatal mortality. A number of factors may have contributed to this relatively high mortality, such as differences in registration practices, the profile of the Dutch childbearing population and the characteristics of Dutch perinatal care. The Netherlands has a relatively high proportion of older mothers, multiple births and mothers belonging to an ethnic minority. Also, Dutch neonatologists are known to be conservative in their treatment of premature newborns, which reduces their chances of survival. There is also less prenatal screening for congenital abnormalities in The Netherlands than in many other European countries. Further analysis of the Dutch data, as well as continued monitoring at the European level, can serve as a basis for future policy decisions to enhance the health of Dutch mothers and newborns.
Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos/normas , Muerte Fetal/epidemiología , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Atención Perinatal/normas , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Etnicidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Atención Perinatal/métodos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the course of teenage pregnancies and deliveries with that in women between the ages of 20 and 29. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: The Netherlands. METHOD: Using data from the 1989 National Obstetric Database (LVR), 4500 teenage pregnancies were studied, to compare the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and delivering a small for gestational age (SGA) baby between teenagers and older women. RESULTS: Women between the ages of 13 and 19 ran one and a half times as high a risk of having a preterm baby as women between the ages of 20 and 29 years (p < 0.0001). The risk of intrauterine death was 4 times as high for age 13-17 and 2 times as high for age 18-19 compared with older women (p < 0.0001). These results were found for teenage mothers of Dutch origin as well as for young mothers of foreign descent. Deliveries by teenagers were more often spontaneous, were of shorter duration and less often needed assistance than deliveries in older mothers (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Even in the Netherlands, with the lowest teenage pregnancy rate in the Western world and a prenatal care system generally considered of high quality, teenage pregnancies have less favourable outcomes than those in older women. Since we had no information on cultural background, socioeconomic status or life style, further research into determinants of outcomes of Dutch teenage pregnancies is indicated.
PIP: The objective was to compare the course of teenage pregnancies and deliveries with those of women between the ages of 20 and 29, using data from the 1989 National Obstetric Database (LVR) when approximately 76% of cases conducted by obstetricians were registered. 4500 teenage pregnancies were studied to compare the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and delivering a small for gestational age (SGA) baby between teenagers and older women. In the 13-17 year age group, 61.5% were of foreign origin. The 13-17 age group had the lowest percentage of delivery at home, with 10%. Women 13-19 years old ran 1.5 times as high a risk of having a preterm baby as women age 20-29 (p 0.0001). The likelihood of SGA delivery was increased only in the 18-19 age group (13.2%) compared to 11% in the 20-29 age group. The risk of death within 24 hours after delivery was also increased because of the risk of intrauterine death, which was 4 times as high for age 13-17 (1.6%) and 2 times as high for age 18-19 (0.7%) compared with women age 20-29 (0.4%) (p 0.0001). These results were found for teenage mothers of Dutch origin as well as for young mothers of foreign descent. Deliveries by teenagers were more often spontaneous, were of shorter duration and less often needed assistance than deliveries in older mothers (p 0.001). The incidence of home delivery was low in both age groups (8.5%), and it was the same for both Dutch and foreign origin groups. Even in the Netherlands, with the lowest teenage pregnancy rate in the Western world and a prenatal care system generally considered of high quality, teenage pregnancies have less favorable outcomes than those in older women. Since the study was conducted without information on cultural background, socioeconomic status or life style, further research into determinants of outcomes of Dutch teenage pregnancies is indicated.
Asunto(s)
Resultado del Embarazo , Embarazo en Adolescencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Femenino , Muerte Fetal/epidemiología , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Edad Materna , Embarazo , Embarazo en Adolescencia/etnologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study factors that influence the probability of episiotomy in Dutch gynaecologist-supervised deliveries. SETTING: Obstetric units of Dutch hospitals. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Data of 65,313 gynaecologist-supervised, vaginal deliveries of live-born singletons registered in the Dutch National Obstetric Database of 1990, were used. Firstly, the effect of characteristics of the mother, the child, the pregnancy, and the delivery on the probability of episiotomy were assessed in univariate analyses. Subsequently logistic regression analysis was used to determine the effect of each variable, while adjusting for the other variables. RESULTS: The episiotomy rate in the total group of gynaecologist supervised deliveries was 39%. In the subgroup of vaginal deliveries of live born singletons, the rate was 46%. Besides the well-known risk factors such as parity, instrumental delivery and length of second stage of labour, ethnicity was also found to have an independent effect on the risk of an episiotomy. Mediterranean, Creole and Hindu women had a lower episiotomy risk than Dutch women (OR: 0.47 and 95% CI: 0.44-0.51). Gynaecologists more often performed episiotomy than midwives, after adjusting for possible confounding factors (OR: 1.54; 1.46-1.63). In University hospitals fewer episiotomies were performed than in large non-university hospitals (OR: 0.81; 0.76-0.87. CONCLUSION: The decision to perform episiotomy appears not to depend solely on factors related to perineal rupture or foetal complications. The probability of episiotomy is also influenced by attendant at delivery and type of hospital.
Asunto(s)
Episiotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Intervalos de Confianza , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad , Extracción Obstétrica/métodos , Femenino , Ginecología , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Obstetricia , Oportunidad Relativa , Paridad , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To establish to what extent general practitioners (GP's) are familiar with the folic acid campaign of the Netherlands Bureau for Food and Nutrition Education, display a positive attitude regarding use of folic acid tablets by women who would like to become pregnant and factually provide information on folic acid. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive. SETTING: Regions: Central Brabant, Achterhoek, Randstad and Northern Netherlands. METHOD: In 1996 a printed questionnaire was sent to 300 GP's selected at random. It contained questions about knowledge, attitude and management regarding the use of folic acid by women who would like to become pregnant and with a normal risk to have a child with a neural tube defect. RESULTS: The response was high (81%). Most GP's were familiar with the national campaign on folic acid (87%), but 18% considered themselves insufficiently informed about the education campaign and/or the folic acid recommendations. Half the GP's considered use of folic acid tablets by women who would like to become pregnant as important, while two-thirds were of the opinion that it contributed to medicalization of the pregnancy. Most GP's (82%) thought that pregnant women who had not used folic acid tablets might develop feelings of guilt. Nevertheless, 64% recommended use of folic acid tablets and 63% were willing to write a prescription if the woman asked for it. Seventy-five per cent of the GP's reported that they themselves suggested use of folic acid tablets to women who they assumed would like to become pregnant, although most stated they sometimes forgot (58%). The percentages of GP's who sometimes or always suggested folic acid tablets during a contraception advice after delivery or who advised women who would like to become pregnant to switch to a diet rich in folic acid, were much smaller (29 and 37%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although a large number of the GP's mentioned potential problems, the majority actively cooperated in promoting use of folic acid by women who would like to become pregnant.