Increasing water nutrient reduces the availability of high-quality food resources for aquatic consumers and consequently simplifies river food webs.

While eutrophication has led to serious habitat degradation and biotic shifts in freshwater ecosystems, most current studies have focused on changes in community assemblages, with few considering the effect of eutrophication on food webs. We conducted a field study in subtropical headwater streams with a gradient of water nutrient levels to examine the effect of increasing water nutrients on food webs by using the long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) as a measure of the nutritional quality of food. Basal food resources (macrophytes, submerged leaf litter, and periphyton), and aquatic consumers (macroinvertebrates and fish) were collected, and their fatty acid (FA) profiles were analyzed. Our results showed that periphyton was the dominant source of EPA for macroinvertebrates and fish, and a high-quality resource for consumers. As water nutrient concentrations increased, nutritional quality of periphyton significantly decreased and, in turn, the correlation between FA profiles of periphyton and macroinvertebrates declined. However, periphyton FA profiles did not account for the variability of fish FA, which may be induced by the increasing proportions of omnivorous fish in eutrophic streams that derived EPA from other sources. Further, the reduced periphyton EPA was associated with decreased trophic links and simplified stream food webs. Our study highlights the importance of high-quality food resources for aquatic food webs as water nutrients increased in stream ecosystems and provides a nutritional perspective to understand the mechanisms how eutrophication affects aquatic ecosystems.

Body size predicts ontogenetic nitrogen stable-isotope (δ15N) variation, but has little relationship with trophic level in ectotherm vertebrate predators.

Large predators have disproportionate effects on their underlying food webs. Thus, appropriately assigning trophic positions has important conservation implications both for the predators themselves and for their prey. Large-bodied predators are often referred to as apex predators, implying that they are many trophic levels above primary producers. However, theoretical considerations predict both higher and lower trophic position with increasing body size. Nitrogen stable isotope values (δ15N) are increasingly replacing stomach contents or behavioral observations to assess trophic position and it is often assumed that ontogenetic dietary shifts result in higher trophic positions. Intraspecific studies based on δ15N values found a positive relationship between size and inferred trophic position. Here, we use datasets of predatory vertebrate ectotherms (crocodilians, turtles, lizards and fishes) to show that, although there are positive intraspecific relationships between size and δ15N values, relationships between stomach-content-based trophic level (TPdiet) and size are undetectable or negative. As there is usually no single value for 15N trophic discrimination factor (TDF) applicable to a predator species or its prey, estimates of trophic position based on δ15N in ectotherm vertebrates with large size ranges, may be inaccurate and biased. We urge a reconsideration of the sole use of δ15N values to assess trophic position and encourage the combined use of isotopes and stomach contents to assess diet and trophic level.