Pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy in platinum-pretreated, recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (KEYNOTE-122): an open-label, randomized, phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab previously demonstrated robust antitumor activity and manageable safety in a phase Ib study of patients with heavily pretreated, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The phase III KEYNOTE-122 study was conducted to further evaluate pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-pretreated, recurrent and/or metastatic NPC. Final analysis results are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: KEYNOTE-122 was an open-label, randomized study conducted at 29 sites, globally. Participants with platinum-pretreated recurrent and/or metastatic NPC were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to pembrolizumab or chemotherapy with capecitabine, gemcitabine, or docetaxel. Randomization was stratified by liver metastasis (present versus absent). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using the stratified log-rank test (superiority threshold, one-sided P = 0.0187). Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. RESULTS: Between 5 May 2016 and 28 May 2018, 233 participants were randomly assigned to treatment (pembrolizumab, n = 117; chemotherapy, n = 116); Most participants (86.7%) received study treatment in the second-line or later setting. Median time from randomization to data cut-off (30 November 2020) was 45.1 months (interquartile range, 39.0-48.8 months). Median OS was 17.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.7-22.9 months] with pembrolizumab and 15.3 months (95% CI 10.9-18.1 months) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio, 0.90 (95% CI 0.67-1.19; P = 0.2262)]. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 12 of 116 participants (10.3%) with pembrolizumab and 49 of 112 participants (43.8%) with chemotherapy. Three treatment-related deaths occurred: 1 participant (0.9%) with pembrolizumab (pneumonitis) and 2 (1.8%) with chemotherapy (pneumonia, intracranial hemorrhage). CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab did not significantly improve OS compared with chemotherapy in participants with platinum-pretreated recurrent and/or metastatic NPC but did have manageable safety and a lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with very high-dose cisplatin combined with etoposide and mitomycin C.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer are inadequate. There remains a critical need for more effective systemic therapies. METHODS: Forty-one patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were treated on a 28-day cycle with a very high-dose, cisplatin-based three-drug regimen. A treatment cycle consisted of an intravenous (IV) injection of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; etoposide 60 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 (cycles 1 and 3 only); and mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1 (cycles 2 and 4 only) (PEM regimen). RESULTS: The median dose intensity of cisplatin delivered was 49 mg/m2/wk, or 98% of the planned dose. One patient achieved a complete response and 16 patients a partial response or regression, yielding an overall objective response rate of 41%. The median duration of response was 21 weeks. Median survival of all patients was 38 weeks. Neurologic toxicity was dose limiting. The frequency of peripheral neuropathy and ototoxicity was directly related to cumulative cisplatin dose. In five patients, a progressive peripheral neuropathy developed after discontinuation of cisplatin. Hematologic toxicity also was significant. CONCLUSIONS: This very high-dose, cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen has appreciable activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In comparison with previous reports on the use of very high-dose cisplatin alone, however, this combination appears at best to be only marginally more active, to confer no additional survival advantage, and to be considerably more toxic.