Hepatitis B-CpG vaccine series for healthcare workers who are hepatitis B vaccine nonresponders.

This prospective study enrolled healthcare workers (HCW) who were nonresponders following at least 5 doses of aluminum-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine received the 2-dose Heplisav-B (HepB-CpG) series. After two doses of HepB-CpG, 43/47 (91%) participants, and with 1 dose 41/49 (84%) responded. HepB-CpGcould be the preferred vaccine in HCW nonresponders.

Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Are at Increased Risk of Hospitalization Due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing respiratory infections. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common respiratory virus with adverse outcomes in older adults. This study aimed to determine whether patients with IBD are at increased risk of a serious infection due to RSV. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using the multi-institutional research network TriNetX to assess the risk of hospitalization in a cohort of patients with IBD compared with that in a non-IBD control cohort with RSV infection from January 1, 2007, to February 27, 2023. One-to-one (1:1) propensity score matching was performed for demographic variables and RSV risk factors between the 2 cohorts. Risk was expressed as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: There were 794 patients in the IBD-RSV cohort and 93,074 patients in the non-IBD-RSV cohort. The mean age of the IBD-RSV cohort was 55.6 ± 20 years, 59% were female, 80% were White, and 56.9% had Crohn's disease. The IBD-RSV cohort was at an increased risk of hospitalization (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.59). There was no difference in the risk (aOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.19) of a composite outcome of hospitalization-related complications between the 2 cohorts. Recent systemic corticosteroid use (<3 months) was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.30-2.59) in the IBD-RSV cohort. DISCUSSION: We found that adult patients with IBD and RSV infection are at an increased risk of hospitalization and may benefit from the new RSV vaccine recommended for adults aged 60 years and older.

Utility of a Third Heplisav-B Dose in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Without Immunity After 2-Dose Heplisav-B Vaccination.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is recommended in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the 2-dose Heplisav-B vaccine has proven effective, more than 20% of patients with IBD do not seroconvert. We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of a third Heplisav-B dose in patients with IBD lacking HBV immunity despite 2-dose vaccination. METHODS: Adults with IBD who had received 2-dose Heplisav-B vaccination between 2018 and 2023 were identified. Seroconversion was defined as hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) ≥ 10 IU/L measured at ≥4 weeks after vaccination. Patients who did not seroconvert were prospectively offered a third Heplisav-B dose, followed by repeat HBsAb measurement. Demographic, clinical, medication, and vaccination data were compared between those who did and did not seroconvert. RESULTS: Of 192 patients identified, 71.9% (138/192) seroconverted after 2-dose Heplisav-B vaccination. The 54 patients (28.1%) who did not seroconvert were more likely to be male, have diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or elevated Charlson Comorbidity Index. Of the 54 patients, 30 (55.6%) elected to receive a third Heplisav-B dose, with 56.7% (17/30) achieving seroconversion (median HBsAb titer 376 IU/L, IQR 47-1,000 IU/L) despite a median intervaccination time of 416 days (IQR 90.8-667.8). No differences were noted between patients who did vs did not seroconvert after third-dose vaccination. DISCUSSION: In patients with IBD lacking HBV immunity despite 2-dose Heplisav-B vaccination, administration of a third dose resulted in a 56.7% seroconversion rate. Our results suggest that administration of an additional Heplisav-B dose may be an effective strategy in patients lacking immunity despite primary 2-dose vaccination.

In Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Racial Disparities Exist in Burden of Vaccine-preventable Disease Hospitalizations and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). Despite the increasing prevalence of IBD in non-white populations, little is known regarding racial disparities in VPD burden. METHODS: Retrospectively analyzing the 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample, we identified adults with IBD hospitalized for a principal diagnosis of VPD. The primary outcome investigated was hospitalization for VPD stratified by patient-reported race. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and health care utilization. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to adjust for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: The search identified 554,114 hospitalizations for VPD, including 4170 hospitalizations in patients with IBD. Patients with IBD had significantly greater odds of hospitalization from herpes zoster virus (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.73) and varicella zoster virus (aOR: 2.31). Comparing white and non-white patients with IBD, significant racial disparities were noted. Non-white patients were at greater odds of hospitalization from influenza (aOR: 1.74), herpes zoster virus (aOR: 1.77), and varicella zoster virus (aOR: 1.62). In-hospital morbidity was greater in non-white patients, including greater odds of requiring intensive care unit stay (aOR: 1.18). Morbidity was elevated in African Americans, with greater odds of acute kidney injury (aOR: 1.25), venous thromboembolism (aOR: 1.17), respiratory failure (aOR: 1.16), and intensive care unit stay (aOR: 1.18). No differences were found in mortality, length of stay, and health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial disparities in VPD hospitalization and in-hospital morbidity were found among adults with IBD in the United States. With the increasing prevalence of IBD in non-white populations, targeted efforts are needed to improve health equity.

High Rates of Seroprotection to Hepatitis B After a Hepatitis B Challenge Dose in Previously Vaccinated Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Immunosuppressive Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Healthy populations have high rates of sustained vaccine-induced seroprotection to hepatitis B virus, but previous studies in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have shown suboptimal seroprotection rates. A challenge dose of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) is recommended in previously vaccinated individuals who are seronegative to elicit an anamnestic response and determine if they are seroprotected. The aim of our study was to determine sustained seroprotection rates to hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) in patients with IBD. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study of patients with IBD previously vaccinated with a three dose HepB series. Patients had a hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) drawn; if it was below 10 mIU/mL, they received a challenge dose of the HepB vaccine to assess for anamnestic response and sustained seroprotection. The primary outcome was to determine the rate of sustained seroprotection (anti-HBs ≥ 10). RESULTS: A total of 168 patients met inclusion criteria, mean age 35.7 years ± 13.6 standard deviation (SD). Initially 120 (71.4%) had anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL, with median anti-HBs of 37 mIU/mL (interquartile range 0-234); 48 (28.6%) needed a challenge dose, of which 34 responded with anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL. In total, 154 (91.7%) demonstrated sustained seroprotection to HepB. Those not seroprotected were more likely to have been vaccinated on immunosuppressive therapy or after their diagnosis of IBD. CONCLUSIONS: Most vaccinated patients with IBD maintain sustained seroprotection to HepB despite prolonged exposure to immunosuppression. This contradicts prior studies and shows that immunosuppression does not lead to loss of seroprotection.

Thromboembolic Events in Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic vascular complications. Although studies from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) examined this association to some extent, sub-stratification for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in larger studies is lacking. The aims of this study were to utilize the NIS to determine the prevalence of thromboembolic events in inpatients with IBD compared to in patients without IBD and to explore the inpatient outcomes like morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization in patients with IBD and thromboembolic events as stratified by disease subtype. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using the NIS 2016. All patients with ICD10-CM codes for IBD were included. Patients with thromboembolic events were identified using diagnostic ICD codes and stratified into 4 categories: (1) Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), (2) Pulmonary embolism (PE), (3) Portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and (4) Mesenteric ischemia, which were then sub-stratified for CD and UC. The primary outcome was the inpatient prevalence and odds of thromboembolic events in patients with IBD compared to without IBD. Secondary outcomes were inpatient morbidity, mortality, resource utilization, colectomy rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital costs and charges compared to patients with IBD and thromboembolic events. RESULTS: A total of 331,950 patients with IBD were identified, of who 12,719 (3.8%) had an associated thromboembolic event. For the primary outcome, after adjusting for confounders, inpatients with IBD had higher adjusted odds of DVT (aOR 1.59, p < 0.001), PE (aOR 1.20, p < 0.001), PVT (aOR 3.18, p < 0.001) and mesenteric ischemia (aOR 2.49, p < 0.001) compared to inpatients without IBD, an observation which was confirmed for both patients with CD and UC. Inpatients with IBD and associated DVT, PE and mesenteric ischemia had higher morbidity, mortality, odds of colectomy, cost, and charges. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients with IBD have higher odds of associated thromboembolic disorders compared to patients without IBD. Furthermore, inpatients with IBD and thromboembolic events have significantly higher mortality, morbidity, colectomy rates and resource utilization. For these reasons, increased awareness and specialized strategies for the prevention and management of thromboembolic events should be considered in inpatients with IBD.

High But Inequitable COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are recommended for all patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).1 Patients with IBD historically have had low vaccine uptake relative to the general population.2 However, a recent survey suggested a rate higher than that of the general population with regard to COVID-19 vaccine intent among the IBD population. Their study was limited being that 96% of the patients surveyed identified as White, and 88% had attained a bachelor's degree or higher level of education.3 Therefore, these findings may not be representative of the IBD population as a whole. Previous studies have indeed identified disparities in influenza vaccine uptake within the IBD population.4,5.

Humoral Immunogenicity of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Healthy Controls.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immune-modifying therapies may have a lower vaccine response to certain vaccines. The aim of our study was to evaluate humoral immunogenicity of mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among patients with IBD and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: We performed a prospective study to evaluate humoral immunogenicity among patients with IBD and HCs after completion of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients with IBD and 60 HCs were enrolled. All HCs and 97% of patients with IBD developed antibodies. Antibody concentrations were lower in patients with IBD compared with those in HCs (median 31 vs 118 µg/mL; P < 0.001). Those who received the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 (median 38; interquartile range [IQR] 24-75 vs µg/mL) had higher antibody concentrations compared with those who received the Pfizer-BNT vaccine series (median 22; IQR 11-42 µg/mL; P < 0.001). Patients on immune-modifying therapy (median 26; IQR 13-50 µg/mL) had lower antibody concentrations compared with those who were on no treatment, aminosalicylates, or vedolizumab (median 59; IQR 31-75 µg/mL; P = 0.003). DISCUSSION: Almost all patients with IBD in our study mounted an antibody response. Future studies are needed in evaluating sustained humoral immunity and the impact of booster dosing in patients with IBD.

The Burden of Vaccine-preventable Diseases in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of infections, including vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). The aim of this study was to explore the inpatient prevalence of VPD in patients with IBD, as well as inpatient outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study using the 2013-2017 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases. All patients 18 years of age or older with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and 10th Revisions , Clinical Modification (ICD-9/10 CM) codes for IBD were included, as well as patients with VPDs as a principal diagnostic code. The primary outcome was the occurrence and odds of VPD in patients with IBD compared with patients with no IBD. Secondary outcomes were inpatient mortality, morbidity, and economic burden compared with patients with IBD and non-vaccine-preventable infections (VPIs). Multivariate regression yielded adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: Of 1,622,245 (0.9%) patients with a diagnosis of IBD, 3560 (0.2%) had associated VPDs, while 131,150 patients had non-VPI (8.1%). The most common VPDs were influenza, herpes zoster (HZ), pneumococcal pneumonia, and varicella. Only HZ and varicella had increased odds of occurrence in patients with IBD of all ages. Patients with IBD 65 years of age or older had increased odds of VPD compared with patients under 65 years. Patients with IBD and associated VPD had higher odds of intensive care unit stay, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and multiorgan failure compared with patients with IBD and non-VPI. CONCLUSIONS: VPDs represent a clinically relevant cause of infectious disease-related hospital admissions in patients with IBD. Patients with IBD are at increased risk for hospitalization due to HZ and varicella. Those hospitalized for VPD have higher morbidity compared with patients with IBD and non-VPI. These findings echo the importance of instituting optimal immunization schedules in patients with IBD, particularly in patients 65 years or older.

Accuracy of Self-Reported Vaccination Status in a Cohort of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases is important in the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Thus, accurate immunization histories are critical. Many providers rely on patient self-report when assessing immunization status. The primary aim of our study was to determine the accuracy of self-reported influenza vaccination status in a cohort of patients with IBD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients with IBD who answered a vaccination status questionnaire and compared their responses to the Wisconsin Immunization Registry, a state-wide electronic immunization information system. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of self-reported influenza vaccination status. A secondary outcome evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of pneumococcal vaccination status. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients with IBD were included in the study. Documented immunization rates were 74.5% for influenza vaccinations and 79.9% for pneumococcal vaccinations. Influenza vaccination self-report had a sensitivity of 98.7%, a specificity of 90.2%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.7% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.8%. In comparison, the sensitivity for pneumococcal vaccination was 83.5% with a specificity of 86.2%, PPV of 96.4%, and NPV of 54.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported influenza immunization status is sensitive and specific in patients with IBD. Accuracy for pneumococcal vaccination is slightly lower, but responses were notable for a high PPV. Self-report is an effective way to determine influenza immunization status and provides useful information for receipt of pneumococcal vaccine in patients with IBD.

Methotrexate Reduces DNA Integrity in Sperm From Men With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

There are few data on the effects of methotrexate on reproductive capacity in men with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We performed a case-control study to determine the effects of methotrexate on sperm quality and genetic integrity. We compared sperm samples from 7 men with IBD who had been exposed to methotrexate for at least 3 months with sperm samples collected from 1912 age-matched men at fertility centers (controls) where sperm parameters would be expected to be worse than those of the general population. Sperm were evaluated by basic semen analysis and advanced sperm integrity testing. In samples from men with IBD, all basic semen analysis parameters were within normal limits. However, these samples had reduced sperm integrity, based on significant increases in levels of DNA fragmentation and damage from oxidative stress compared with controls. Our findings indicate that methotrexate can reduce DNA integrity in sperm and cause damage via oxidative stress.

Clear liquid diet before bowel preparation predicts successful chromoendoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chromoendoscopy (CE) has been shown to generate both a superior diagnostic yield and dysplasia detection rate than conventional white-light endoscopy and requires a high-quality bowel preparation. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of the ability to perform CE in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We performed an observational study of patients with IBD undergoing colorectal cancer surveillance examinations with CE. Same-day colonoscopy surveys were used to collect patient and procedural variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to establish odds ratios of successful completion of CE. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients with IBD were enrolled. We found that patients who did not follow a clear liquid diet before colonoscopy had much lower odds of being able to undergo CE (odds ratio, 0.106; 95% confidence interval, 0.013-0.845; P < .034). Further, we found that previously identified risk factors (older age, history of diabetes mellitus, the timing and split dosing of preparation solution, and procedure time (AM or PM), chronic narcotic use, and history of constipation) for inadequate bowel preparation were not associated with the ability to perform CE. CONCLUSIONS: Following a clear liquid diet the entire day before the procedure was highly predictive of the ability to perform CE. However, established risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation did not inhibit the ability to perform CE in our population. Endoscopists performing CE should consider recommending that patients follow a clear liquid diet the entire day before their examination.

Immunosuppression Does Not Affect Antibody Concentrations to Measles, Mumps, and Rubella in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends using the immunization record and not serologic testing to determine immunity against measles and rubella in the general population, due to potential false negatives. However, it is unknown whether the immune response is less durable among patients who are immunosuppressed. AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate sustained vaccine-induced measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) antibody concentrations in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study to compare antibody concentrations following the two-dose (MMR) vaccine among 46 patients with IBD and 20 healthy controls (HC). Three IBD groups stratified by the immunosuppressive regimen that preceded study entry for at least 3 months: (1) thiopurine monotherapy, (2) anti-TNF monotherapy, or (3) combination therapy (anti-TNF agent combined with an immunomodulator) were enrolled. RESULTS: All subjects had measurable antibody concentrations to the three vaccine viruses. Age and time since receipt of MMR series were similar in both groups. There were no difference in the antibody concentration of measles (IBD 667 mIU/ml vs HC 744 mIU/ml; p = 0.45), mumps (IBD 339 EU/ml vs HC 402 EU/ml; p = 0.62), or rubella (IBD 25 mIU/ml vs HC 62 mIU/ml; p = 0.11) among the groups. No differences in antibody concentrations were found among the IBD treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppressed patients with IBD have sustained antibody concentrations comparable to healthy controls. Thus, gastroenterologist should follow the ACIP recommendations and use the immunization record when available to determine immunity to measles and rubella in patients with IBD. Clinical Trials Registry # NCT02434133.

Lower Sustained Diphtheria and Pertussis Antibody Concentrations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often immunosuppressed, and those patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) therapy can have lower antibody responses to vaccines. Pertussis cases are at their highest levels in the post-vaccine era. There is little data regarding responses to the Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccine in IBD patients. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare sustained vaccine-induced Tdap antibody concentrations in a cohort of IBD patients stratified by medication regimens with healthy controls (HC) who had received an adult Tdap booster. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study evaluating antibody responses to Tdap vaccine among IBD patients compared to HC. Our study consisted of three patient groups: adults with IBD stratified by maintenance medication regimen: (1) thiopurine monotherapy; (2) anti-TNF monotherapy; and (3) combination therapy (anti-TNF and immunomodulator (thiopurine or methotrexate)). RESULTS: Ninety IBD patients and 20 HC participated. Pertussis pertactin antibody concentrations were significantly lower in IBD patients (p = 0.021) compared to HC, and those on anti-TNF agents (monotherapy or combination) had lower antibody concentrations compared to those on thiopurine monotherapy (p = 0.028). Diphtheria antibody concentrations were also lower in IBD patients (p < 0.001), and those on anti-TNF agents (monotherapy or combination) had lower antibody concentrations compared to the thiopurine monotherapy group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IBD patients on anti-TNF agents had lower antibody concentrations to diphtheria and pertussis. These findings suggest a need for different Tdap booster schedules for IBD patients on anti-TNF therapy. Clinical Trials Registry NCT02434133.

TNF inhibitor induced alopecia: an unusual form of psoriasiform alopecia that breaks the Renbök mold.

TNF-α-inhibitors are known to induce skin adverseeffects including psoriasis and alopecia areata. Here, wedescribe a unique pattern of hair loss that has psoriaticand alopecia areata-like features. Diagnosis requiresclinical-pathologic correlation and is supportedby increased catagen/telogen hairs, psoriasiformepidermal hyperplasia, perifollicular lymphocyticinfiltrate, and the presence of eosinophils and plasmacells. Although there are no treatment consensusguidelines, management options include stoppingtherapy, switching to a different TNF-α inhibitor orustekinumab (in severe cases), or continuing TNF-αinhibitor therapy with addition of topical, intralesional,or systemic immunosuppressants.