RESUMEN
Eponyms, whereas commonly used in hand surgery, are perhaps misused as often as they are used correctly. Many commonly used eponyms, such as Colles fracture, Barton fracture, Smith fracture, and Bennett fracture, were actually described decades before the development of radiographs. The goal of this article is to revisit the original descriptions of commonly used eponymous terms for distal radius and first metacarpal base fractures to provide clarity and enhance understanding of what these eponyms actually mean.
Asunto(s)
Epónimos , Fracturas Óseas , Huesos del Metacarpo/lesiones , Ortopedia , Fracturas del Radio , Fracturas Óseas/historia , Historia del Siglo XIX , Humanos , Ortopedia/historia , Fracturas del Radio/historiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (CACL) injuries after recovery from a first-time anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption is high in women; however, little is known about the risk factors associated with this trauma. HYPOTHESIS: Patient characteristics, strength, anatomic alignment, and neuromuscular characteristics of the contralateral uninjured leg at the time of the first ACL trauma are associated with risk of subsequent CACL injury, and these risk factors are distinct from those for a first-time ACL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Sixty-one women who suffered a first-time noncontact ACL injury while participating in high school or college sports and underwent measurement of potential risk factors on their contralateral limb soon after the initial ACL injury and before reconstruction were followed until either a CACL injury or an ACL graft injury occurred, or until the last date of contact. RESULTS: Follow-up information was available for 55 (90.0%) of the 61 athletes and 11 (20.0%) suffered a CACL injury. Younger age, decreased participation in sport before the first ACL disruption, decreased anterior stiffness of the contralateral knee, and increased hip anteversion were associated with increases in the risk of suffering a CACL injury. CONCLUSION: A portion of CACL injury risk factors were modifiable (time spent participating in sport and increasing anterior knee stiffness with bracing), while others were nonmodifiable (younger age and increased hip anteversion). The relationship between younger age at the time of an initial ACL injury and increased risk of subsequent CACL trauma may be explained by younger athletes having more years available to be exposed to at-risk activities compared with older athletes. A decrease of anterior stiffness of the knee is linked to decreased material properties and width of the ACL, and this may explain why some women are predisposed to bilateral ACL trauma while others only suffer the index injury. The risk factors for CACL injury are unique to women who suffer bilateral ACL trauma compared with those who suffer unilateral ACL trauma. This information is important for the identification of athletes who may benefit from risk reduction interventions.