RESUMEN
The PANTHER-IPF trial was a turning point in treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (#IPF) highlighting the importance of randomised controlled trials in determining treatment strategies, even for rare diseases and/or potentially fatal acute events https://bit.ly/3Oi0KwD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 may require tracheostomy and transfer to a weaning center. To date, data on the outcome of these patients are scarce. The objectives of this study were to determine the factors associated with time to decannulation and limb-muscle strength recovery. METHODS: This was an observational retrospective study of subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS requiring tracheostomy after prolonged ventilation, who were subsequently transferred to a weaning center from April 4, 2020-May 30, 2020. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects were included. Median age (interquartile range) was 61 (48-66) y; 81% were men, and median body mass index (BMI) was 30 (26-35) kg/m2. Tracheostomy was performed after a median of 19 (12-27) d of mechanical ventilation, and the median ICU length of stay prior to transfer to the weaning center was 30 (21-46) d. On admission to the weaning center, the median Medical Research Council (MRC) score was 36 (27-44). Time to decannulation was 9 (7-18) d after admission to the weaning center. The only factor independently associated with early decannulation was the MRC score on admission to the weaning center (odds ratio 1.16 [95% CI 1.06-1.31], P = .005). Two factors were independently associated with MRC gain ≥ 10: BMI (odds ratio 0.88 [95% CI 0.76-0.99], P = .045) and MRC on admission (odds ratio 0.91 [95% CI 0.82-0.98], P = .03. Three months after admission to the weaning center, 40 subjects (93%) were weaned from mechanical ventilation and 36 (84%) had returned home. CONCLUSIONS: MRC score at weaning center admission predicted both early decannulation and limb-muscle strength recovery.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Fuerza Muscular , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Traqueostomía , Desconexión del VentiladorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low income, a known prognostic indicator of various chronic respiratory diseases, has not been properly studied in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We hypothesize that a low income has an adverse prognostic impact on IPF. METHODS: Patients were selected from the French national prospective cohort COFI. Patients' income was assessed through the median city-level income provided by the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies according to their residential address. Patients were classified in two groups as "low income" vs. "higher income" depending on whether their annual income was estimated to be < or ≥18 170 /year (the first quartile of the income distribution in the study population). The survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of the groups were compared by a log-rank test and a Cox model in multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 200 patients were included. The average follow-up was 33.8 ± 22.7 months. Patients in the low income group were significantly more likely to be of non-European origin (p < 0.006), and to have at least one occupational exposure (p < 0.0001), and they tended to have a higher cumulative exposure to fine particles PM2.5 (p = 0.057). After adjusting for age, gender, forced vital capacity at inclusion, geographical origin, and occupational exposure having a low-income level was a factor associated with a worse PFS (HR: 1.81; CI95%: 1.24-2.62, p = 0.001) and overall survival (HR: 1.49; CI95%: 1.0006-2.23, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Low income appears to be a prognostic factor in IPF. IPF patients with low incomes may also be exposed more frequently to occupational exposures.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática , Renta/clasificación , Pobreza , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Francia , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/economía , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/etiología , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/mortalidad , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/fisiopatología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Capacidad VitalRESUMEN
Trichloroethylene exposure is a major risk factor for pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. We demonstrated that trichloroethylene alters the endothelial barrier integrity, at least in part, through vascular endothelial (VE)-Cadherin internalisation, and suggested that this mechanism may play a role in the development of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a severe complication of major lung resection. The objective of this study was to describe the current epidemiology and appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in severe POP, 4 years after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program that was based on weekly multidisciplinary review of all antibiotic therapies. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. It included all cases of severe POP occurring within 30 days after major lung resection of in a 1,500-bed hospital between 2013 and 2015. Criteria for severe POP were acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis, or a rapidly extensive pulmonary infiltrate. The study collected data on incidence, clinical outcomes, and microbiological analyses. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was assessed by quality indicators previously validated in the literature. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1,555 patients underwent major lung surgery. Severe POP occurred in 91 patients (5.8%; confidence interval, 4.7%; 7.0%), with a mortality rate of 9.0% (8 of 91; confidence interval, 3.0%; 14.6%). In POP with positive microbiological results, the proportion of gram-negative bacteria other than Haemophilus was 76% (50 of 66 cases). All patients (91 of 91) had respiratory samples taken within 24 hours after the start of antibiotics; empiric therapy was concordant with the guideline in 80% (69 of 86), and it was switched to pathogen-directed therapy in 74% (46 of 62). In 71 of 91 patients (78%), the antibiotic duration was up to 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported a high proportion of gram-negative bacteria in severe POP. Four years after implementation of the program, quality indicators of antibiotic prescribing were all >70%. The rate of de-escalation to pathogen-directed therapy could be improved, however.