Clinical Role of Lung Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronavirus Disease Pneumonia in Elderly Patients: A Pivotal Study.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) showed a promising role in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients hospitalized for novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, no data are available on its role in elderly patients. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of LUS in elderly patients hospitalized for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia. METHODS: Consecutive elderly patients (age >65 years) hospitalized for COVID-19 were enrolled. Demographics, laboratory, comorbidity, and the clinical features of the patients were collected. All patients underwent LUS on admission to the ward. LUS characteristics have been analyzed. Uni- and multivariate analyses to evaluate predictors for in-hospital death were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven hospitalized elderly patients (19 men) with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection were consecutively enrolled. The median age was 82 years (interquartile range 74.5-93.5). Ultrasound alterations were found in all patients enrolled; inhomogeneous interstitial syndrome with spared areas (91.9%) and pleural alterations (100%) were the most frequent findings. At univariate analysis, LUS score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.168, 95% CI 1.049-1.301) and pleural effusions (HR 3.995, 95% CI 1.056-15.110) were associated with in-hospital death. At multivariate analysis, only LUS score (HR 1.168, 95% CI 1.049-1.301) was independelty associated with in-hospital death. The LUS score's best cutoff for distinguishing patients experiencing in-hospital death was 17 (at multivariate analysis LUS score ≥17, HR 4.827, 95% CI 1.452-16.040). In-hospital death was significantly different according to the LUS score cutoff of 17 (p = 0.0046). CONCLUSION: LUS could play a role in the diagnosis and prognosis in elderly patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Prognostic Value of Stress Hyperglycemia in Patients Admitted to Medical/Geriatric Departments for Acute Medical Illness.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperglycemia is common in patients admitted to Italian medical/geriatric units and is associated with a poorer outcome. We tested the significance of diabetes and stress-induced hyperglycemia in clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients with hyperglycemia at entry (≥ 126 mg/dl) (206 without known diabetes) were included, with a wide range of underlying diseases requiring hospital admission and independent of the presence of diabetes. Relative hyperglycemia was calculated as admission glucose divided by average glucose, estimated based of glycosylated hemoglobin. Values ≥ 1.20 were considered indicative of stress hyperglycemia (SHR). The association of SHR with outcome variables (all-cause complications, infections, non-infectious events, deaths) was tested by logistic regression analysis, adjusted for sex, BMI, age-adjusted comorbidities (Charlson index) and known diabetes. RESULTS: During hospital stay, one or more events were registered in 96 patients (25.4%); 44 patients died in hospital, and fatality rate was borderline higher in patients without diabetes (14.6% vs. 8.1% in diabetes; P = 0.052) and nearly three times higher in patients with stress hyperglycemia (15.0%) vs. those with SHR < 1.2 (P = 0.005). Stress hyperglycemia-more common in the absence of diabetes (71% vs. 58%)-and age were the only independent prognostic factors for death. At multivariable analysis, the risks of death (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.25-14.81), of all complications (OR 5.90, 95% CI 2.22-15.71) and of newly developed systemic infections (OR 5.67, 95% CI 1.61-19.92) were associated with stress hyperglycemia in subjects without diabetes, as was the risk in non-insulin-treated cases (OR 4.02, 95% CI 1.16-13.92; OR 5.47, 95% CI 2.21-13.52; OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.70-15.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study confirms the prognostic value of stress-related hyperglycemia in patients requiring hospital admission to a geriatric/medical unit for a variety of acute medical conditions, contributing to adverse outcomes not limited to events commonly associated with hyperglycemia (e.g., infections).

[A three-months follow up of a randomized controlled trial of Assisted Walking Program for in-hospital geriatric patients]. / Valutazione dell'efficacia di un programma individualizzatodi deambulazione assistita nel paziente anziano ospedalizzato con follow-up a tre mesi: trial randomizzato e controllato.

. A three-months follow up of a randomized controlled trial of Assisted Walking Program for in-hospital geriatric patients. INTRODUCTION: Functional decline is common among older hospitalized patients. In fact, low mobility and bed rest during hospitalization have been considered as predictable causes of independent ambulation decline in older hospitalized patients. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: the older patients' walking ability change, compared with usual care, from hospital pre-admission/admission to discharge and 90 days follow-up, assessed with the Braden Activity subscale. The secondary end point was the occurrence of re-hospitalization and mortality. METHODS: A 90-days follow-up randomized controlled trial, open labeled was conducted in a geriatric ward. RESULTS: A total of 307 hospitalized patients (>65 years) were included. The intervention group received an Individualized Assisted Walking Program (IAWP), which significantly improved walking ability at discharge (p<.001) and 90-day follow-up (p=0.009), compared to the control group, which received the usual care. There were no significant differences in terms of mortality and re-hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized assisted walking program improves walking abilitiy during hospitalization and over time. For this, a nurse staffing and workload reorganization, a multidisciplinary approach, and an early nurses' planning, could be relevant factors in influencing successfully the older patients' healthcare.

Assisted Walking Program on Walking Ability in In-Hospital Geriatric Patients: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to evaluate if an individualized assisted walking program (IAWP) for hospitalized older patients could improve walking ability compared with usual geriatric care and rehabilitation. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial with an active control group, open labeled with parallel assignment was conducted between October 2018 and January 2020. SETTING: Geriatric ward. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 387 hospitalized patients (≥65 years) were randomly assigned to an intervention or control (usual-care) group. INTERVENTION: The control group received usual hospital care. The intervention group received also an IAWP. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was change in walking ability from hospital admission (considering both current and pre-admission status) to discharge, as assessed with the Braden Activity subscale measures. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of in-hospital adverse events, such as complications of mobility, pressure ulcers, falls, pain and mortality, and the length of hospital stay. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between intervention and control groups. The intervention group, relative to the control group, had significantly improved walking ability at discharge (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of in-hospital adverse events. No adverse effects were detected. CONCLUSION: In in-hospital patients aged 65 and older, an IAWP improves walking ability at discharge.

Syphilis as osteomyelitis of the fifth metatarsal of the left foot: the great imitator hits once again.

INTRODUCTION: We report an unusual case of osteomyelitis of the left foot due to syphilitic bone involvement. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old man came to our attention with a four-month history of fever and a hypertrophic ulceration of the fifth metatarsal of the left foot. He had a history of syphilis treated years before. The CT scan showed an evident osteolytic area of the metatarsal phalangeal joint of the fifth left toe. The serological tests demonstrated a syphilitic reinfection. On suspicion of a bone localization of syphilis, an US-guided bone biopsy was performed. The histological examination with silver impregnation confirmed the diagnosis. The patient was treated with the traditional treatment of syphilis using penicillin, obtaining the complete resolution of the radiological and cutaneous alterations. CONCLUSIONS: The aim of this work is to sensitize clinicians to suspect syphilis in case of osteolytic lesions in patients with a history of this disease.

A Simple Screening Tool to Predict Outcomes in Older Adults Undergoing Emergency General Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST) can be used to accurately assess frailty in an emergency setting. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: of a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: All individuals aged 70 and older consecutively admitted to the emergency surgery unit with an urgent need for abdominal surgery between December 2015 and May 2016 who met inclusion criteria (N=110). MEASUREMENTS: Individuals were screened with the fTRST and additional metrics such as the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index and American Society of Anesthesiology score. Thirty- and 90-day postoperative complications where recorded. Regression analyses were performed to identify possible preoperative predictors of adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-day major complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification 3-5) occurred in 28.2% of participants (n=31). fTRST had the highest correlation with major complications (odds ratio (OR) = 7.42). All participants who died within 30 days of surgery has a fTRST score of 2 or greater (area under the receiver operating curve (AUC)=71.3). When risk factors for overall 90-day mortality were analyzed, a fTRST score of 2 or greater had sensitivity of 96% (95% confidence interval CI=79.6-99.9%), specificity of 43.5% (95% CI=32.8-54.7%) (AUC=69.8%; OR=18.50, 95% CI=2.39-143.11, p = .005). The average length of hospital stay was more than twice as long in the group with a fTRST score of 2 or greater (15.2 days) than in those with a score less than 2 (6.6 days) (p = .005). CONCLUSION: The fTRST is an effective tool to predict mortality, morbidity, and length of stay after emergency surgery and can therefore be used to anticipate postoperative course, determine care goals, and plan for involvement of a dedicated geriatric care team. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:309-316, 2019.