Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 635, 2020 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32847524

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the prevalence of metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in cystic fibrosis patients are scarce. Furthermore, there is limited knowledge on the effect of MBL production on patient outcomes. Here we describe a fatal respiratory infection due to P. aeruginosa producing VIM-type MBLs in a lung transplant recipient and the results of the subsequent epidemiological investigation. CASE PRESENTATION: P. aeruginosa isolates collected in the index patient and among patients temporally or spatially linked with the index patient were analyzed in terms of antibiotic susceptibility profile and MBL production. Whole-genome sequencing and phylogenetic reconstruction were also performed for all P. aeruginosa isolates producing VIM-type MBLs. A VIM-producing P. aeruginosa strain was identified in a lung biopsy of a lung transplant recipient with cystic fibrosis. The strain was VIM-1-producer and belonged to the ST308. Despite aggressive treatment, the transplant patient succumbed to the pulmonary infection due to the ST308 strain. A VIM-producing P. aeruginosa strain was also collected from the respiratory samples of a different cystic fibrosis patient attending the same cystic fibrosis center. This isolate harbored the blaVIM-2 gene and belonged to the clone ST175. This patient did not experience an adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first description of a fatal infection due to P. aeruginosa producing VIM-type MBLs in a lung transplant recipient. The circulation of P. aeruginosa isolates harboring MBLs pose a substantial risk to the cystic fibrosis population due to the limited therapeutic options available and their spreading potential.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Pulmón , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adulto , Fibrosis Quística/cirugía , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/microbiología , Pulmón/patología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Filogenia , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas/genética , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
2.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 51(3): 116-20, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21361116

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the last few decades, an increasing attention has been drawn to public health expenditure and resource use. The increasing aging population has highlighted the need to deliver post-acute care and to assess its appropriateness. The "PRUO rehab" (Protocollo di Revisione dell'Utilizzo dell'Ospedale riabilitativo) protocol was realized and validated to assess the appropriateness of use of rehabilitation units. The aims of this study were to test the validity of the PRUO-rehab tool and to analyse the causes for Inappropriate Hospital Stay (IPS) in rehabilitation units. METHODS: The PRUO rehab tool was retrospectively applied to the medical records of 502 patients who stayed at least overnight in one of ten different rehabilitation units set in Northern Italy, during 2007. RESULTS: The tool was valid and the inappropriate patient stay (IPS) score was 25.0%. CONCLUSION: Although reasonably low, the IPS indicates that the rehabilitation structures analysed could be used more efficiently.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías como Asunto , Gastos en Salud/normas , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Prioridades en Salud/normas , Prioridades en Salud/tendencias , Unidades Hospitalarias/economía , Unidades Hospitalarias/normas , Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos
3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(10): 1413.e9-1413.e13, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32569835

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The management of healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still a matter of debate. We aimed to assess in this group the attack rate of asymptomatic carriers and the symptoms most frequently associated with infection. METHODS: Occupational and clinical characteristics of HCWs who underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a university hospital from 24 February 2020 to 31 March 2020 were collected. For those who tested positive and for those who tested positive but who were asymptomatic, we checked the laboratory and clinical data as of 22 May to calculate the time necessary for HCWs to then test negative and to verify whether symptoms developed thereafter. Frequencies of positive tests were compared according to selected variables using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: There were 139 positive tests (8.8%) among 1573 HCWs (95% confidence interval, 7.5-10.3), with a marked difference between symptomatic (122/503, 24.2%) and asymptomatic (17/1070, 1.6%) workers (p < 0.001). Physicians were the group with the highest frequency of positive tests (61/582, 10.5%), whereas clerical workers and technicians had the lowest frequency (5/137, 3.6%). The likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19 increased with the number of reported symptoms; the strongest predictors of test positivity were taste and smell alterations (odds ratio = 76.9) and fever (odds ratio = 9.12). The median time from first positive test to a negative test was 27 days (95% confidence interval, 24-30). CONCLUSIONS: HCWs can be infected with SARS-CoV-2 without displaying any symptoms. Among symptomatic HCWs, the key symptoms to guide diagnosis are taste and smell alterations and fever. A median of almost 4 weeks is necessary before nasopharyngeal swab test results are negative.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Fiebre/epidemiología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Olfato/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Convalecencia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Femenino , Fiebre/fisiopatología , Fiebre/virología , Personal de Salud , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nasofaringe/virología , Trastornos del Olfato/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Olfato/virología , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Pronóstico , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , SARS-CoV-2
4.
J Hosp Infect ; 76(2): 139-42, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20633960

RESUMEN

Validity is one of the most critical factors concerning surveillance of nosocomial infections (NIs). This article describes the first validation study of the Italian Nosocomial Infections Surveillance in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) project (SPIN-UTI) surveillance data. The objective was to validate infection data and thus to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of NI data reported on patients in the ICUs participating in the SPIN-UTI network. A validation study was performed at the end of the surveillance period. All medical records including all clinical and laboratory data were reviewed retrospectively by the trained physicians of the validation team and a positive predictive value (PPV), a negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Eight ICUs (16.3%) were randomly chosen from all 49 SPIN-UTI ICUs for the validation study. In total, the validation team reviewed 832 patient charts (27.3% of the SPIN-UTI patients). The PPV was 83.5% and the NPV was 97.3%. The overall sensitivity was 82.3% and overall specificity was 97.2%. Over- and under-reporting of NIs were related to misinterpretation of the case definitions and deviations from the protocol despite previous training and instructions. The results of this study are useful to identify methodological problems within a surveillance system and have been used to plan retraining for surveillance personnel and to design and implement the second phase of the SPIN-UTI project.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Vigilancia de Guardia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Italia/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA