Effects of hypoglycaemic agents on reducing surrogate metabolic parameters for the prevention of cardiovascular events and death in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: To investigate the impact of glucose-lowering therapy-induced glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction on the risk of major clinical events according to body weight change and, as a secondary objective, to evaluate the impact of concomitant reductions in HbA1c and body weight on major clinical events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to June 30, 2022, for large-scale studies on glucose-lowering therapies in which more than 1000 patient-years of follow-up in each randomized group were completed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022355479). RESULTS: Thirty-four trials involving 227 220 patients with type 2 diabetes were meta-analysed using a random-effects model. Each 1% reduction in HbA1c was associated with a different risk of mortality depending on the ability of glucose-lowering therapies to induce body weight loss or gain. When glucose-lowering therapies were associated with weight gain, the risk of mortality increased by 8% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.16) for each 1% reduction in HbA1c. When glucose-lowering therapies were associated with weight loss, the risk of mortality was reduced by 22% (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72-0.85) for each 1% reduction in HbA1c. In addition, concomitant reductions in HbA1c and body weight were associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality and vascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes, concomitant reductions in HbA1c and body weight might be more effective in preventing the risk of vascular events and mortality.

Larger effect size in composite kidney outcomes than in major cardiovascular events associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors compared with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs): A pooled analysis of type 2 diabetes trials.

AIM: To compare treatment effect sizes between a composite kidney outcome (CKO) and three-point major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE-3) outcomes with use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and to investigate the relationship between treatment effects on CKO and MACE-3 in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE database search up to December 31, 2021 to identify all placebo-controlled Phase 3 trials which investigated the efficacy of glucose-lowering interventions, and selected those reporting results for CKO and MACE-3. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both outcomes were extracted for each trial, and we evaluated differences in treatment effect sizes by using a ratio of HRs (rHR): the HR for CKO to the HR for MACE-3. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain the overall rHR across trials and according to subgroup. We investigated the relationship between treatment effects on CKO and MACE-3 using the coefficient of determination (R2 ) with weighted meta-regression. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022299690). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies fulfilled the prespecified criteria, and comprised a total of 104 987 patients with T2D. On average, treatment effect sizes were 17% greater for CKO than for MACE-3 (rHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.92; I2  = 50%; P = 0.03; τ2  = 0.0161), especially for trials of SGLT2 inhibitors compared with GLP-1RAs. For secondary outcomes, treatment effect size was 22%, 21%, 16% and 9% greater for CKO than for myocardial infarction, stroke, death from cardiovascular causes, and hospitalization for heart disease, respectively. MACE-3 and CKO were moderately correlated (ρ = 0.40; P = 0.21), and only 11% (95% CI 1% to 54%) of the variability in the MACE-3 effect could be explained by the variability in the CKO effect. CONCLUSION: In T2D patients, treatment effect sizes were greater for kidney than for macrovascular (MACE-3) outcomes, with important differences according to the drugs considered. CKO and MACE-3 are independent. Caution must be taken when interpreting CKO in the absence of MACE-3 data.

Different profiles of body mass index variation among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the predictive role of body weight variation in treatment outcome in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), few corroborating data are available. We studied weight variation in patients with MDR-TB to identify groups of weight change and to determine factors that influence these changes. METHODS: We analyzed patients with rifampicin resistance who were treated with an MDR-TB treatment regimen between June 07, 2016 and June 22, 2018 at three major drug-resistant TB centers in Guinea. Patients were seen monthly until the end of treatment. Clinical outcome was the body mass index (BMI). We used a linear mixed model to analyze trajectories of BMI and a latent class mixed model to identify groups of BMI trajectories. RESULTS: Of 232 patients treated for MDR-TB during the study period, 165 were analyzed. These patients had a total of 1387 visits, with a median of 5 visits (interquartile range, 3-8 visits). Monthly BMI increase was 0.24 (SE 0.02) per kg/m2. Factors associated with faster BMI progression were success of MDR-TB treatment (0.24 [SE 0.09] per kg/m2; p = 0.0205) and absence of lung cavities on X-ray (0.18 [0.06] per kg/m2; p = 0.0068). Two groups of BMI change were identified: rapid BMI increase (n = 121; 85%) and slow BMI increase (n = 22; 15%). Patients in the slow BMI increase group were mostly female (68%) had no history of TB treatment (41%), had a positive HIV infection (59%), and had a more severe clinical condition at baseline, characterized by a higher frequency of symptoms including depression (18%), dyspnea (68%), poor adherence to MDR-TB treatment (64%), lower platelet count, and higher SGOT. These patients also had a longer time to initial culture conversion (log-rank test: p = 0.0218). CONCLUSION: Quantitative BMI data on patients with MDR-TB treated with a short regimen allowed the identification of subgroups of patients with different trajectories of BMI and emphasized the usefulness of BMI as a biomarker for the monitoring of MDR-TB treatment outcome.

Blood pressure-lowering effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists for preventing of cardiovascular events and death in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: To investigate the lowering BP effects of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on the risk of major cardiovascular event stratified by glucose-lowering drugs, baseline BP, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and history of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases search up to December 31, 2022, (PROSPERO, CRD42023400899) to identify all large-scale cardiovascular outcomes (CVO) trials of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs in which more than 1,000 patient-years of follow-up in each randomized group. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and its component (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction [MI], and stroke), heart failure, and renal failure. A random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool the estimates. RESULTS: Eighteen CVOTs (ten for SGLT2i and eight for GLP-1 RAs) with 127,606 patients with type 2 diabetes were included. Over 2.5 years median follow-up, the average reduction of systolic BP was 2.2 mmHg (mean difference [MD] - 2.2; 95% CI - 2.7 to - 1.7) with more important reduction (Pinteraction = 0.001) with SGLT2 inhibitors (- 2.9; - 3.4 to - 2.5) than with GLP-1 RAs (- 1.4; - 1.8 to - 1). With SGLT2i, every 5-mmHg reduction in systolic BP was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio[HR], 0.77; 95% CI 0.65-0.90), MACE (HR 0.81 [0.74-0.89]), cardiovascular death (HR 0.72 [0.59-0.88]), MI (HR 0.82 [0.71-0.95]), heart failure (HR 0.49 [0.42-0.57]), and renal failure (HR 0.46 [0.38-0.55]), while the association was not significant for stroke (HR 0.91 [0.69-1.19]). The corresponding effects for every 5-mmHg reduction in SBP with GLP-1 RAs were 0.65 (0.51-0.84) for all-cause mortality, 0.65 (0.56-0.76) for MACE, 0.62 (0.45-0.85) for CV death, 0.71 (0.52-0.76) for MI, 0.49 (0.35-0.69) for stroke, and 0.49 (0.35-0.66) for renal failure, while the association was not significant for heart failure (HR 0.82 [0.63-1.08]). CONCLUSION: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the hypotensive effects of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs were significantly associated with a reduction in mortality and cardiorenal events. These findings suggest that the lowering BP effect could be seen as an additive indicator of cardiovascular protection by SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs drugs.

Age, sex, race, BMI, and duration of diabetes differences in cardiovascular outcomes with glucose lowering drugs in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Summarized data of cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shown a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), whether these benefits are extended in certain risk groups (elderly or obese patients or those with a longer duration of diabetes) or certain minorities (Black participants) are not clearly established. We aimed to provide overall hazard ratios (HRs) estimates for MACE of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs stratified by age (< 65 years vs. ≥ 65 years and < 75 years vs. ≥ 75 years), sex (male vs. female), race (Black vs. White, Black vs. Asian, and White vs. Asian), body mass index (BMI: < 30 kg/m2 vs. ≥ 30 kg/m2), and duration of diabetes (< 10 years vs. ≥ 10 years). Methods: We performed a MEDLINE database search from inception up to July 31, 2022 to identify all placebo-controlled phase 3 CVOTs that evaluated the efficacy of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs on vascular events at least 1-year after randomisation in participants with type 2 diabetes, and we selected those reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for the specific risk groups for MACE. Differences on MACE in risk groups were examined using a random-effect meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022347901). Findings: A total of 11 studies fulfilled the prespecified criteria, comprising 96,580 patients with T2D were included. Of these patients, 61,975 (64.2%) were male, 34,605 (35.8%) were female, and race groups included 74,982 (77.6%) White, 7760 (8.0%) Asian, and 4023 (4.2%) Black. In two SGLT2i trials, the HR (95% CI) for long-term diabetes duration more than10 years versus short duration was 0.84 (0.77-0.93) vs. 1.02 (0.89-1.16), respectively (P interaction = 0.03). In four SGLT2i trials, the MACE benefit was similar by sex (P interaction = 0.13), age (P interaction = 0.36), BMI (P interaction = 0.69), and race groups (P interaction = 0.86 between Black and White, P interaction = 0.98 between Black and Asian, and P interaction = 0.69 between White and Asian). For GLP-1 RAs, the MACE benefit from the seven trials tended to be greater for Asian (0.71, [0.58-0.87]) than for White (0.87, [0.81-0.94]), (P interaction = 0.07). In two GLP-1 RAs trials, the MACE outcome was reduced by 22% (0.78, 0.63-0.95) in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) while no difference was observed in those < 75 years (0.87; 0.75-1.01), (P interaction = 0.37). In the remaining risk groups, the MACE benefit was similar by sex (P interaction = 0.37), age < 65 years (P interaction = 0.80), duration of diabetes (P interaction = 0.70), and race (P interaction = 0.57 between Black and White, and P interaction = 0.15 between Black and Asian), BMI (P interaction = 0.78). Risk of bias was lower, and overall heterogeneity was high for sex with SGLT2i, and moderate to low for the remaining comparisons, with a I2 values ranging from 0% to 54%. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes at highest risk of cardiovascular disease or established cardiovascular disease, a greater benefit on MACE was found for elderly patients and for Asian individuals compared with White individuals with GLP-1 RAs, and those with a long duration of diabetes with SGLT2i. These findings could help in providing guidance for treatment prescription and facilitate selection and stratification of patients for future CVOTs. Furthermore, pooled individual patient-level data are urgently needed to support our conclusions, and to derive definitive evidence. Funding: None.

Efficacy of approved vaccines to prevent COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of reconstructed individual patient data from randomized trials.

Aim: To optimize vaccination strategy, evidence on vaccine efficacy against COVID-19 is needed. Method: The present network meta-analysis uses reconstructed individual patient data from phase III trials on vaccine efficacy (VE), identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (CENTRAL) peer-reviewed and published in English before August 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the VE against confirmed COVID-19 at any time after the first dose as defined in each study. VE was re-estimated using the two-stage approach. Poisson regression models were applied to each trial at the first stage, and the incidence risk ratio (IRR) and their 95% CI were aggregated to allow random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) at the second stage. VE was expressed as: (1-IRR) × 100. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020200012). Results: A total of eight studies, evaluating nine different vaccines were identified and analyzed. Between April 23, 2020 and January 05, 2021, 210,418 participants were recruited in 354 sites worldwide. During a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 69.8 (69.7-70.3) days, 2131 confirmed COVID-19 cases occurred (604; 26.0 per 1000 person-years in vaccine recipients and 1527; 85.9 per 1000 person-years in the control group). The mRNA-1273 vaccine was the most effective (P-score 0.99); at any time after dose 1, incidence reduction for mRNA-1273 ranged from 78% to 98% compared to the other vaccines. Conclusion: Our results provide evidence for the short-term superiority of mRNA vaccines, especially the mRNA-1273 vaccine in prevention of COVID-19 in different populations. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-022-01707-1.

An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 25 randomized trials assessing the efficacy and safety of treatments in COVID-19 disease.

To date, there is no definite effective treatment for the COVID- 19 pandemic. We performed an update network meta-analysis to compare and rank COVID-19 treatments according to their efficacy and safety. Literature search was performed from MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases from inception to September 5, 2020. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) which compared the effect of any pharmacological drugs versus standard care or placebo 28-day after hospitalization in adult patients with COVID-19 disease were included. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI were calculated for 28-day all-cause mortality, clinical improvement, any adverse event (AEs), and viral clearance. A total of 25 RCTs, evaluating 17 different treatments, and 11,597 participants were analyzed. Remdesivir for 10- day compared to standard care (RR 0.69, 95% CI [0.48-0.99]), and a low dose compared to a high dose of HCQ (0.38, [0.17-0.89]) were associated with a lower risk of death. A total of 2,766 patients experienced clinical improvement, a 5-day course of remdesivir was associated with a higher frequency of clinical improvement compared to standard care (RR 1.21, 95% CI [1.00-1.47]). Compared to standard care, remdesivir for both 5 and 10 days, lopinavir/ritonavir, and dexamethasone reduced the risk of any severe AEs by 52% (0.48, 0.34-0.67), 24% (0.77, 0.63-0.92), 40% (0.60, 0.37-0.98), and 50% (0.50, 0.25-0.98) respectively. In this study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, administration of remdesivir for 10-day compared to standard care was associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality and serious AEs, and higher clinical improvement rate.

Immunogenicity and safety of Ebola virus vaccines in healthy adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Clinical development of Ebola virus vaccines (EVV) was accelerated by the West African Ebola virus epidemic which remains the deadliest in history. To compare and rank the EVV according to their immunogenicity and safety. A total of 21 randomized controlled trial, evaluating seven different vaccines with different doses, and 5,275 participants were analyzed. The rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP (2 × 10 7) vaccine was more immunogenic (P-score 0.80). For pain, rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP (≤10 5) had few events (P-score 0.90). For fatigue and headache, the DNA-EBOV (≤ 4 mg) was the best one with P-scores of 0.94 and 0.87, respectively. For myalgia, the ChAd3 (10 10) had a lower risk (P-score 0.94). For fever, the Ad5.ZEBOV (≤ 8 × 10 10) was the best one (P-score 0.80). The best vaccine to be used to stop future outbreak of Ebola is the rVSVDG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine at dose of 2 × 107 PFU.