[The routine use of the Pneumonia Severity Index in the emergency department: effect on process-of-care indicators and results in community acquired pneumonia]. / Uso rutinario del Pneumonia Severity Index en el servicio de urgencias: efecto sobre los indicadores de proceso y resultado en neumonía adquirida en la comunidad.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate process-of-care indicators (inappropriate hospitalisation, suitability and early antibiotic treatment) and outcome indicators (length of hospital stay, hospital readmission, ICU admission, and mortality) in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) when the SEPAR/IDSA guidelines were applied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational retrospective study conducted on patients diagnosed with CAP during the first semester of 2007 and 2008 (186 and 161 patients, respectively) in the emergency unit of a general hospital. Differences in the process-of-care and outcome indicators between 2007 and 2008 (with and without the Pneumonia Severity Index [PSI]) were evaluated. Moreover, the indicators were compared with those obtained in 2006 (110 patients), when the current guidelines were those of SEQ/ATS. RESULTS: The SEPAR/IDSA guidelines improved the following process-of-care indicators: appropriateness of treatment, unjustified hospital readmission (39.4% in 2006 vs. 8.5% in 2007 [P<.001], and 17,2% in 2008 [P=.005]), and early treatment. However, outcome indicators did not change. In 2008, a decrease in the mortality of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated was observed in comparison with the patients in which the PSI was not estimated (2.3% vs. 28.3%; P<.001). Moreover, the mortality rate of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated was lower than those measured using the SEQ/ATS guidelines (22.7%; P=.003). CONCLUSION: SEPAR/IDSA guidelines decreased the unjustified hospital readmission. In the second year of its application an increase in the number of patients who received early treatment, and a decrease of the mortality rate of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated, were also observed.

Discriminant Validity of a Single Clinical Question for the Screening of Inactivity in Individuals Living with COPD.

Introduction: Quantifying physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with questionnaires and activity monitors in clinical practice is challenging. The aim of the present study was to analyse the discriminant validity of a single clinical question for the screening of inactive individuals living with COPD. Methods: A multicentre study was carried out in stable COPD individuals both in primary and tertiary care. Patients wore the Dynaport accelerometer for 8 days and then answered 5 physical activity questions developed for the study, referring to the week in which their physical activity was monitored. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with physical activity level (PAL) as the gold standard reference was used to determine the best cut-off point for each of the 5 clinical physical activity questions tested. Results: A total of 86 COPD participants were analysed (males 68.6%; mean (SD) age 66.6 (8.5) years; FEV1 50.9 (17.3)% predicted; mean of 7305 (3906) steps/day). Forty-two (48.8%) participants were considered physically inactive (PAL ≤1.69). Answers to 4 out of 5 questions significantly differed in active vs inactive patients. The Kappa index and ROC curves showed that the answer to the question "On average, how many minutes per day do you walk briskly?" had the best discriminative capacity for inactivity, with an area under the curve (AUC) (95% Confidence interval (CI)) of 0.73 (0.63-0.84) and 30 min/day was identified as the best cut-off value (sensitivity (95% CI): 0.75 (0.60-0.87); specificity: 0.76 (0.61-0.88)). Conclusion: The present results indicate that self-reported brisk walk time lower than 30 min/day may be a valid tool for the screening of inactivity in individuals living with COPD in routine care, if more detailed physical activity measures are not feasible.

Results of a Diagnostic Procedure Based on Multiplex Technology on Dried Blood Spots and Buccal Swabs for Subjects With Suspected Alpha1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this analysis was the evaluation of a new national circuit used for diagnosing alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) based on multiplex technology using online registration and mail posted samples from dried blood spots (DBS) and buccal swabs. METHODS: This is an observational, ongoing study conducted in Spain since March 2018. Samples are coded on a web platform and sent by postal mail to the central laboratory. Allele-specific genotyping for the 14 most common mutations was done with the Luminex 200 Instrument System. Gene sequencing was done if none of the mutations were found and the AAT serum level was <60mg/dl, or by request from the clinician in charge. RESULTS: At the time of the present report, 5803 (92.9%) samples were processed, 4984 (85.9%) from buccal swab and 819 (14.1%) from DBS. The prevalence of the frequent allele combinations were: MS 19.0%, MZ 14.4%, SS 2.9%, SZ 3.7%, and ZZ: 1.4%. Globally, Z carriers represented 20.0% and S carriers 26.6% of this population, with differences seen between regions. 209 (3.6%) were identified carrying rare alleles, 12 (0.2%) carrying null alleles and 14 (0.3%) new mutations were described. Respiratory diseases other than COPD, including poorly controlled asthma or bronchiectasis, also presented AATD mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a diagnostic system based on the simultaneous testing of 14 genetic variants from buccal swabs or DBS sent by postal mail and with web registration has proven to be useful, and the system can improve the timely diagnosis of AATD.

Results of a Diagnostic Procedure Based on Multiplex Technology on Dried Blood Spots and Buccal Swabs for Subjects With Suspected Alpha1 Antitrypsin Deficiency / Resultados de un procedimiento diagnóstico basado en tecnología multiplex que usa manchas de sangre seca y frotis bucales en sujetos con sospecha de deficiencia de alfa-1 antitripsina

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this analysis was the evaluation of a new national circuit used for diagnosing alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) based on multiplex technology using online registration and mail posted samples from dried blood spots (DBS) and buccal swabs. METHODS: This is an observational, ongoing study conducted in Spain since March 2018. Samples are coded on a web platform and sent by postal mail to the central laboratory. Allele-specific genotyping for the 14 most common mutations was done with the Luminex 200 Instrument System. Gene sequencing was done if none of the mutations were found and the AAT serum level was < 60 mg/dl, or by request from the clinician in charge. RESULTS: At the time of the present report, 5803 (92.9%) samples were processed, 4984 (85.9%) from buccal swab and 819 (14.1%) from DBS. The prevalence of the frequent allele combinations were: MS 19.0%, MZ 14.4%, SS 2.9%, SZ 3.7%, and ZZ: 1.4%. Globally, Z carriers represented 20.0% and S carriers 26.6% of this population, with differences seen between regions. 209 (3.6%) were identified carrying rare alleles, 12 (0.2%) carrying null alleles and 14 (0.3%) new mutations were described. Respiratory diseases other than COPD, including poorly controlled asthma or bronchiectasis, also presented AATD mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a diagnostic system based on the simultaneous testing of 14 genetic variants from buccal swabs or DBS sent by postal mail and with web registration has proven to be useful, and the system can improve the timely diagnosis of AATD

INTRODUCCIÓN: El objetivo de este análisis fue la evaluación de un nuevo circuito nacional utilizado para diagnosticar la deficiencia de alfa-1 antitripsina (DAAT) basado en tecnología multiplex con muestras de manchas de sangre seca (DBS, por sus siglas en inglés) y frotis bucales enviados por correo postal tras un registro previo en línea. MÉTODOS: Este es un estudio observacional en curso que se está llevando a cabo en España desde marzo de 2018. Las muestras se codifican en una plataforma web y se envían por correo postal al laboratorio central. El genotipado de un alelo específico buscando las 14 mutaciones más comunes se realizó con el sistema Luminex(R) 200. Se realizó secuenciación génica si no se encontraba ninguna de las mutaciones y el nivel sérico de AAT era < 60mg/dl, o por solicitud del médico responsable. RESULTADOS: En el momento del presente informe se habían procesado 5.803 (92,9%) muestras, 4.984 (85,9%) de frotis bucal y 819 (14,1%) de DBS. La prevalencia de las combinaciones frecuentes de alelos fue: MS 19,0%, MZ 14,4%, SS 2,9%, SZ 3,7% y ZZ 1,4%. Globalmente, los portadores de Z representaron el 20,0% y los portadores de S el 26,6% de esta población, observándose diferencias entre las regiones. Se identificaron 209 (3,6%) portadores de alelos raros, 12 (0,2%) portadores de alelos nulos y se describieron 14 (0,3%) nuevas mutaciones. Otras enfermedades respiratorias que no eran EPOC, incluyendo el asma mal controlado o las bronquiectasias, también presentaron mutaciones DAAT. CONCLUSIONES: La disponibilidad de un sistema de diagnóstico con registro web basado en el análisis simultáneo de 14 variantes genéticas de frotis bucales o DBS enviados por correo postal ha demostrado ser útil, y el sistema puede mejorar el diagnóstico temprano de DAAT

Uso rutinario del Pneumonia Severity Index en el servicio de urgencias: efecto sobre los indicadores de proceso y resultado en neumonía adquirida en la comunidad / The routine use of the Pneumonia Severity Index in the emergency department: Effect on process-of-care indicators and results in community acquired pneumonia

Objetivos Evaluación de indicadores de proceso (hospitalización inadecuada, adecuación y precocidad de antibioterapia) y resultado (estancia hospitalaria, reingresos, ingresos UCI y mortalidad) de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) al aplicar la guía SEPAR/IDSA. Pacientes y métodos Estudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes consecutivos con diagnóstico al alta de NAC en los primeros semestres de 2007 y 2008 (186 y 161 pacientes, respectivamente) atendidos en urgencias de hospital general. Se han analizado las diferencias en los indicadores entre los grupos de pacientes con/sin Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) calculado, según el año de implantación de la guía, y se compararon con los de 110 pacientes de 2006 según la guía SEQ/ATS. Resultados La guía SEPAR/IDSA ha mejorado los indicadores de proceso: mayor adecuación del ámbito de tratamiento, disminución de ingresos injustificados (del 39,4% en 2006 al 8,5% en 2007 [p<0,001] y al 17,2% en 2008 [p=0,005]) y mayor precocidad de antibioterapia. No se han modificado los indicadores de resultado. En 2008 se observó una reducción de la mortalidad en el subgrupo de pacientes con PSI IV-V en los que se calculó el PSI (2,3%), respecto a los que no se calculó (28,3%; p<0,001), y esta tasa fue inferior a la de los pacientes con criterios de hospitalización según la guía SEQ/ATS (22,7%; p=0,003).Conclusión La guía SEPAR/IDSA ha reducido los ingresos injustificados y en el segundo año de aplicación se ha observado mayor precocidad de la antibioterapia junto a una reducción de la mortalidad en los pacientes con riesgo moderado-alto en los que se calculó el PSI (AU)

Objective To evaluate process-of-care indicators (inappropriate hospitalisation, suitability and early antibiotic treatment) and outcome indicators (length of hospital stay, hospital readmission, ICU admission, and mortality) in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) when the SEPAR/IDSA guidelines were applied. Patients and methods An observational retrospective study conducted on patients diagnosed with CAP during the first semester of 2007 and 2008 (186 and 161 patients, respectively) in the emergency unit of a general hospital. Differences in the process-of-care and outcome indicators between 2007 and 2008 (with and without the Pneumonia Severity Index [PSI]) were evaluated. Moreover, the indicators were compared with those obtained in 2006 (110 patients), when the current guidelines were those of SEQ/ATS. Results The SEPAR/IDSA guidelines improved the following process-of-care indicators: appropriateness of treatment, unjustified hospital readmission (39.4% in 2006 vs. 8.5% in 2007 [P<.001], and 17,2% in 2008 [P=.005]), and early treatment. However, outcome indicators did not change. In 2008, a decrease in the mortality of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated was observed in comparison with the patients in which the PSI was not estimated (2.3% vs. 28.3%; P<.001). Moreover, the mortality rate of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated was lower than those measured using the SEQ/ATS guidelines (22.7%; P=.003).Conclusion SEPAR/IDSA guidelines decreased the unjustified hospital readmission. In the second year of its application an increase in the number of patients who received early treatment, and a decrease of the mortality rate of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated, were also observed (AU)