Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Int J Cancer ; 148(6): 1489-1498, 2021 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33128777

RESUMEN

Colorectal and glioblastoma cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are essential for translational research. Cell line authentication by short tandem repeat (STR) profiling ensures reproducibility of results in oncology research. This technique enables to identify mislabeling or cross-contamination of cell lines. In our study, we provide a reference dataset for a panel of colorectal and glioblastoma CSCs that allows authentication. Each cell line was entered into the cell Line Integrated Molecular Authentication database 2.1 to be compared to the STR profiles of 4485 tumor cell lines. This article also provides clinical data of patients from whom CSCs arose and data on the parent tumor stage and mutations. STR profiles and information of our CSCs are also available in the Cellosaurus database (ExPASy) as identified by unique research resource identifier codes.


Asunto(s)
Autenticación de Línea Celular/métodos , Autenticación de Línea Celular/normas , Línea Celular Tumoral , Repeticiones de Microsatélite , Células Madre Neoplásicas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/normas , Glioblastoma/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Am J Hematol ; 96(2): 234-240, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146914

RESUMEN

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the rate of full donor chimerism (F-DC) in patients with myelofibrosis, prepared for an allogeneic stem cell transplant, with one or two alkylating agents. We analyzed 120 patients with myelofibrosis, for whom chimerism data were available on day +30. There were two groups: 42 patients were conditioned with one alkylating agent (ONE-ALK), either thiotepa or busulfan or melphalan, in combination with fludarabine, whereas 78 patients were prepared with two alkylating agents, thiotepa busulfan and fludarabine (TBF). Patients receiving TBF were older (57 vs 52 years), were less frequently splenectomized pre-HSCT (31% vs 59%), had more frequently intermediate-2/high DIPSS scores (90% vs 74%), were grafted more frequently from alternative donors (83% vs 33%) and received more frequently ruxolitinib pre-HSCT (26% vs 7%). The proportion of patients with F-DC on day +30, in the TBF vs the ONE-ALK group, was respectively 87% vs 45% (P < .001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 9% in the TBF group, vs 43% for the ONE-ALK group (P < .001). The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival was 63% for TBF and 38% for the ONE-ALK group (P = .004). In conclusion, early full donor chimerism is a prerequisite for long term control of disease in patients with myelofibrosis, undergoing an allogeneic HSCT. The combination of two alkylating agents in the conditioning regimen, provides a higher chance of achieving full donor chimerism on day+30, and thus a higher chance of long term disease free survival.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mielofibrosis Primaria/mortalidad , Mielofibrosis Primaria/terapia , Quimera por Trasplante , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Busulfano/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esplenectomía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tiotepa/administración & dosificación
3.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 22(2): 324-329, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26456259

RESUMEN

This is a retrospective analysis of 95 patients with myelofibrosis who were allografted between 2001 and 2014. The aims of the study were to assess whether the outcome of alternative donor grafts has improved with time and how this compares with the outcome of identical sibling grafts. Patients were studied in 2 time intervals: 2000 to 2010 (n = 58) and 2011 to 2014 (n = 37). The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System score was comparable in the 2 time periods, but differences in the most recent group included older age (58 versus 53 years, P = .004), more family haploidentical donors (54% versus 5%, P < .0001), and the introduction of the thiotepa-fludarabine-busulfan conditioning regimen (70% of patients versus 2%, P < .0001). Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were comparable in the 2 time periods. The 3-year transplantation-related mortality (TRM) in the 2011 to 2014 period versus the 2000 to 2010 period is 16% versus 32% (P = .10), the relapse rate 16% versus 40% (P = .06), and actuarial survival 70% versus 39% (P = .08). Improved survival was most pronounced in alternative donor grafts (69% versus 21%, P = .02), compared with matched sibling grafts (72% versus 45%, P = .40). In conclusion, the outcome of allografts in patients with myelofibrosis has improved in recent years because of a reduction of both TRM and relapse. Improvement is most significant in alternative donor transplantations, with modifications in donor type and conditioning regimen.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Mielofibrosis Primaria/terapia , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mielofibrosis Primaria/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Donante no Emparentado , Adulto Joven
4.
Electrophoresis ; 35(21-22): 3134-44, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25176610

RESUMEN

The role of DNA damage in PCR processivity/fidelity is a relevant topic in molecular investigation of aged/forensic samples. In order to reproduce one of the most common lesions occurring in postmortem tissues, a new protocol based on aqueous hydrolysis of the DNA was developed in vitro. Twenty-five forensic laboratories were then provided with 3.0 µg of a trial sample (TS) exhibiting, in mean, the loss of 1 base of 20, and a molecular weight below 300 bp. Each participating laboratory could freely choose any combination of methods, leading to the quantification and to the definition of the STR profile of the TS, through the documentation of each step of the analytical approaches selected. The results of the TS quantification by qPCR showed significant differences in the amount of DNA recorded by the participating laboratories using different commercial kits. These data show that only DNA quantification "relative" to the used kit (probe) is possible, being the "absolute" amount of DNA inversely related to the length of the target region (r(2) = 0.891). In addition, our results indicate that the absence of a shared stable and certified reference quantitative standard is also likely involved. STR profiling was carried out selecting five different commercial kits and amplifying the TS for a total number of 212 multiplex PCRs, thus representing an interesting overview of the different analytical protocols used by the participating laboratories. Nine laboratories decided to characterize the TS using a single kit, with a number of amplifications varying from 2 to 12, obtaining only partial STR profiles. Most of the participants determined partial or full profiles using a combination of two or more kits, and a number of amplifications varying from 2 to 27. The performance of each laboratory was described in terms of number of correctly characterized loci, dropped-out markers, unreliable genotypes, and incorrect results. The incidence of unreliable and incorrect genotypes was found to be higher for participants carrying out a limited number of amplifications, insufficient to define the correct genotypes from damaged DNA samples such as the TS. Finally, from a dataset containing about 4500 amplicons, the frequency of PCR artifacts (allele dropout, allele drop-in, and allelic imbalance) was calculated for each kit showing that the new chemistry of the kits is not able to overcome the concern of template-related factors. The results of this collaborative exercise emphasize the advantages of using a standardized degraded DNA sample in the definition of which analytical parameters are critical for the outcome of the STR profiles.


Asunto(s)
ADN/análisis , ADN/química , Genética Forense/métodos , Genética Forense/normas , Dermatoglifia del ADN/métodos , Técnicas de Genotipaje , Humanos , Repeticiones de Microsatélite , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
5.
BMC Genet ; 3: 23, 2002 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12441003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The traditional exact method for inferring relationships between individuals from genetic data is not easily applicable in all situations that may be encountered in several fields of applied genetics. This study describes an approach that gives affordable results and is easily applicable; it is based on the probabilities that two individuals share 0, 1 or both alleles at a locus identical by state. RESULTS: We show that these probabilities (zi) depend on locus heterozygosity (H), and are scarcely affected by variation of the distribution of allele frequencies. This allows us to obtain empirical curves relating zi's to H for a series of common relationships, so that the likelihood ratio of a pair of relationships between any two individuals, given their genotypes at a locus, is a function of a single parameter, H. Application to large samples of mother-child and full-sib pairs shows that the statistical power of this method to infer the correct relationship is not much lower than the exact method. Analysis of a large database of STR data proves that locus heterozygosity does not vary significantly among Caucasian populations, apart from special cases, so that the likelihood ratio of the more common relationships between pairs of individuals may be obtained by looking at tabulated zi values. CONCLUSIONS: A simple method is provided, which may be used by any scientist with the help of a calculator or a spreadsheet to compute the likelihood ratios of common alternative relationships between pairs of individuals.


Asunto(s)
Tamización de Portadores Genéticos , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Dermatoglifia del ADN/métodos , Dermatoglifia del ADN/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes/genética , Variación Genética/genética , Genética de Población/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Estadísticos , Núcleo Familiar , Paternidad , Hermanos , Secuencias Repetidas en Tándem/genética , Población Blanca/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA