Endoscopic Interventions in Acute Pancreatitis: What the Advanced Endoscopist Wants to Know.

Endoscopic interventions play an important role in the modern management of pancreatic fluid collections. Successful management of pancreatitis is dependent on proper classification of the disease and its local complications. The 2012 revised Atlanta classification divides acute pancreatitis into subtypes of necrotizing pancreatitis and interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP) on the basis of the radiologic presence or absence of necrosis, respectively. Local complications of IEP include acute pancreatic fluid collections and pseudocysts, which contain fluid only and are differentiated by the time elapsed since the onset of symptoms. Local complications of necrotizing pancreatitis include acute necrotic collections and walled-off necrosis, which contain nonliquefied necrotic debris and are differentiated by the time elapsed since the onset of symptoms. Endoscopic techniques are used to treat local complications of pancreatitis, often in a step-up approach, by which less invasive techniques are preferred initially with potential subsequent use of more invasive procedures, dependent on the patient's clinical response and collection evolution. Common interventions performed by the advanced endoscopist include endoscopic transmural drainage and endoscopic transmural necrosectomy. However, some collections require a multimodal approach with adjunctive placement of percutaneous drainage catheters or the use of videoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal débridement. Additional endoscopic interventions may be required in the setting of pancreatic or biliary duct stones or strictures. Common complications of endoscopic intervention in the setting of pancreatitis include bleeding, infection, perforation, and stent migration. This article reviews the classification of acute pancreatitis, familiarizes radiologists with the common endoscopic techniques used in its management, and improves identification of the clinically relevant imaging findings and procedural complications related to endoscopic interventions in pancreatitis. ©RSNA, 2018.

Vestibular Schwannomas: Do Linear and Volumetric Parameters on MRI Correlate With Hearing Loss?

PURPOSE: To determine if two-dimensional and volumetric imaging parameters in vestibular schwannomas (VS) correlate with hearing loss at presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. METHODS: Forty-one cases of pathologically confirmed sporadic VS were analyzed. Maximal tumor dimensions in anteroposterior (AP), coronal (ML), and craniocaudal (CC) dimensions were obtained along with tumor-fundus distance and internal auditory canal (IAC) porus diameters. Volumetric analysis was done on 37 cases. Tumors volumes were calculated through both 3-D volumetric and ABC/2 [AP × ML × CC/2] methodology. With the 3-D method, total tumor volume (TTV), and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor volume were separately calculated and IAC volumes obtained by subtracting CPA tumor volumes from TTV. Pure tone average (PTA) and speech discrimination scores (SDS) were correlated with tumor dimensions. RESULTS: Non-volumetric analysis was performed on 41 tumors. The AP and ML dimensions correlated with both PTA and SDS (p < 0.05). No significant correlations were seen between hearing loss and tumor-fundus distance or porus diameters. The tumor volume calculated through ABC/2 methodology correlated with PTA and SDS (p < 0.05). The 3-D TTV and CPA volumes only correlated with PTA. IAC tumor volumes did not correlate with hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Maximal AP and ML dimensions are the only non-volumetric variables, which significantly correlate with hearing loss. Tumor volume calculated through ABC/2 method significantly correlates with hearing impairment while the 3-D TTV and CPA tumor volumes only correlated significantly with PTA scores but not SDS scores.