Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Surg ; 212(6): 1115-1120, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27810137

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery remains challenging and the advantages compared to an open approach remain unclear. METHODS: Retrospective chart review and follow-up questionnaire via phone. RESULTS: 50 reoperative hiatal hernia repairs were performed in 47 patients. VALUES: median and interquartile range (IQR). There were 10 males, 37 females, 55 (49-66) years. Reoperative procedures: 38 laparoscopic vs. 12 open transabdominal. Length of operation: 185 (147-254) vs. 325 (276-394) minutes (p < 0.0008). Length of stay: 3 (2-4) vs.10 (8-13) days (p < 0.0001). None required Collis gastroplasty. There was no 30-day mortality. Follow-up questionnaire was obtained in 36/45 (80%) at 21 (11-40) months (2 cancer related deaths). In all, 24/36 (67%) were free of preoperative symptoms and 33/36 (92%) were satisfied with the operation. There was no difference between the laparoscopic and open group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery is a safe approach with high patient satisfaction and low morbidity. Tension-free esophageal length can be achieved laparoscopically without Collis gastroplasty. The duration of the operation and length of stay are less in the laparoscopic vs. open group. Symptomatic relief and patient satisfaction are similar in both approaches.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Reoperación , Anciano , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA