RESUMEN
Metastatic colorectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach. Herein, we reported the case of a young woman diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer who received an individualized multimodal treatment strategy that resulted in a remarkable survival. There were several particular aspects of this case, such as the early onset of the disease, the successful use of conversion therapy, the application of liquid biopsy to guide treatment, and the specific nature of the bone metastasis. To offer more insights for navigating such challenges in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, we have conducted a literature review to find more data related to the particularities of this case. The incidence of early onset colorectal cancer is on the rise. Data suggests that it differs from older-onset colorectal cancer in terms of its pathological, epidemiological, anatomical, metabolic, and biological characteristics. Conversion therapy and surgical intervention provide an opportunity for cure and improve outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to approach each case individually, as every patient with limited liver disease should be considered as a candidate for secondary resection. Moreover, liquid biopsy has an important role in the individualized management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients, as it offers additional information for treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Femenino , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity worldwide. Bevacizumab was approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on favorable benefit-risk assessments from randomized controlled trials, but evidence on its use in the real-world setting is limited. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the outcomes and safety profile of bevacizumab in mCRC in a real-world setting in Romania. Patients and Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, multicentric, cohort study conducted in Romania that included patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab as part of routine clinical practice. Study endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events, and patterns of bevacizumab use. Results: A total of 554 patients were included in the study between January 2008 and December 2018. A total of 392 patients (71%) received bevacizumab in the first line and 162 patients (29%) in the second line. Bevacizumab was mostly combined with a capecitabine/oxaliplatin chemotherapy regimen (31.6%). The median PFS for patients treated with bevacizumab was 8.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.7-15.1 months) in the first line and 6.6 months (IQR, 3.8-12.3 months) in the second line. The median OS was 17.7 months (IQR, 9.3-30.6 months) in the first line and 13.5 months (IQR, 6.7-25.2 months) in the second line. Primary tumor resection was associated with a longer PFS and OS. The safety profile of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy was similar to other observational studies in mCRC. Conclusions: The safety profile of bevacizumab was generally as expected. Although the PFS was generally similar to that reported in other studies, the OS was shorter, probably due to the less frequent use of bevacizumab after disease progression and the baseline patient characteristics. Patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab who underwent resection of the primary tumor had a higher OS compared to patients with an unresected primary tumor.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of tumors that raise challenges in terms of diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Despite continuous efforts, no biomarker has showed satisfying accuracy in predicting outcome or response to treatment. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to determine relevant circulating biomarkers for angiogenesis in neuroendocrine tumors. We searched three databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science) using the keywords "neuroendocrine" and "biomarkers", plus specific biomarkers were searched by full and abbreviated name. From a total of 2448 publications, 11 articles met the eligibility criteria. RESULTS: VEGF is the most potent and the most studied angiogenic molecule, but results were highly controversial. Placental growth factor, Angiopoietin 2 and IL-8 were the most consistent markers in predicting poor outcome and aggressive disease behavior. CONCLUSIONS: There is no robust evidence so far to sustain the use of angiogenic biomarkers in routine practice, although the results show promising leads.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided FNA is recommended as a first-line procedure for the histopathologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Molecular analysis of EUS-FNA samples might be used as an auxiliary tool to strengthen the diagnosis. The current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of K-ras testing using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and a novel single-nucleotide variant (SNV) assay performed on pancreatic EUS-FNA samples. METHODS: EUS-FNA specimens from 31 patients with pancreatic masses (22 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, 7 chronic pancreatitis, and 2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors) were included in the study. K-ras testing was initially performed by ddPCR. In addition, mutational status was evaluated using an SNV assay by NanoString technology, using digital enumeration of unique barcoded probes to detect 97 SNVs from 24 genes of clinical significance. RESULTS: The overall specificity and sensitivity of cytologic examination were 100% and 63%, respectively. K-ras mutation testing was performed using ddPCR, and the sensitivity increased to 87% with specificity 90%. The SNV assay detected at least 1 variant in 90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma samples; the test was able to detect 2 K-ras codon 61 mutations in 2 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which were missed by ddPCR. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the cytologic examination alone was 74%, and it increased to 91% when the results of both molecular tests were considered for the cases with negative and inconclusive results. CONCLUSIONS: The current study illustrated that integration of K-ras analysis with cytologic evaluation, especially in inconclusive cases, can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Endosonografía , Humanos , Nucleótidos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be classified as mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) with high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H), or mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) and microsatellite stable (MSS). Approximately 15% of patients have microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI-H tumors are associated with a high mutation burden. Monoclonal antibodies that block immune checkpoints can induce long-term durable responses in some patients. Pembrolizumab is the first checkpoint inhibitor approved in the EU to treat dMMR-MSI-H metastatic CRC. Materials and Methods: Our study assesses the regional variability of MSI-H colorectal cancer tumors in Romania. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks containing tumor samples from 90 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were collected from two tertiary referral Oncology Centers from Romania. Tissues were examined for the expression loss of MMR proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) using immunohistochemistry or MSI status using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively. Results: MSI-H was detected in 19 (21.1%) patients. MSI-H was located more in ascending colon (36.8% vs. 9.9%, p-value = 0.0039) and less in sigmoid (5.3% vs. 33.8%, p-value = 0.0136) than MSS patients. Most patients were stage II for MSI-H (42.1%) as well as for MSS (56.3%), with significant more G1 (40.9% vs. 15.8%, p-value = 0.0427) for MSS patients. Gender, N stage, and M stage were identified as significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. MSI status was not a statistically significant predictor neither in univariate analysis nor multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Considering the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor in metastatic CRC with MSI-H or dMMR, and its recent approval in EU, it is increasingly important to understand the prevalence across tumor stage, histology, and demographics, since our study displayed higher regional MSI-H prevalence (21%) compared to the literature.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN/genética , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , RumaníaRESUMEN
Pancreatic cancer patients have not benefited from survival improvements brought about by personalized medicine in other malignancies. Even though this is the era of precision medicine, unfortunately most clinicians in practice either do not embrace or are unaware of the concept of molecular profiling for pancreatic cancer patients. Improving the grim prognosis of this challenging disease requires a paradigm shift. To exploit all potential therapeutic options in this lethal disease, molecular profiling should be performed ideally at the moment of diagnosis to identify potentially trial-eligible tumoral mutations or support off label use of an agent approved for another indication. This perspective article aims to increase awareness of the importance of upfront molecular profiling for pancreatic cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina de PrecisiónRESUMEN
In Europe at present, but also in 2040, 1 in 3 cancer-related deaths are expected to be caused by digestive cancers. Endoscopic technologies enable diagnosis, with relatively low invasiveness, of precancerous conditions and early cancers, thereby improving patient survival. Overall, endoscopy capacity must be adjusted to facilitate both effective screening programs and rigorous control of the quality assurance and surveillance systems required. 1 : For average-risk populations, ESGE recommends the implementation of organized population-based screening programs FOR COLORECTAL CANCER: , based on fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), targeting individuals, irrespective of gender, aged between 50 and 75 years. Depending on local factors, namely the adherence of the target population and availability of endoscopy services, primary screening by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy may also be recommendable. 2 : In high-risk populations, endoscopic screening FOR GASTRIC CANCER: should be considered for individuals aged more than 40 years. Its use in countries/regions with intermediate risk may be considered on the basis of local settings and availability of endoscopic resources. 3 : For esophageal and pancreatic cancer, endoscopic screening may be considered only in high-risk individuals:- FOR SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: , in those with a personal history of head/neck cancer, achalasia, or previous caustic injury; - FOR BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS (BE)-ASSOCIATED ADENOCARCINOMA: , in those with long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (i.âe.,â>â5 years) and multiple risk factors (ageâ≥â50 years, white race, male sex, obesity, first-degree relative with BE or esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC]). - FOR PANCREATIC CANCER SCREENING: , endoscopic ultrasound may be used in selected high-risk patients such as those with a strong family history and/or genetic susceptibility.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to evaluate the emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the guidance of tumor-targeted therapies for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). RECENT FINDINGS: EUS-guided ablation, brachytherapy, fiducial marker placement, and antitumor agent injection have been described to date. EUS-guided fiducial placement for SBRT in pancreatic cancer has entered the clinical practice and is performed at many centers clinically without a research protocol. EUS-guided brachytherapy and RFA have been shown to be feasible and safe procedures, and potentially offer local disease control. Other potential techniques of EUS-guided treatment of pancreatic cancer are still considered experimental, with many of them appearing to be safe and reasonably well tolerated. However, their effectiveness and exact role in oncological treatment have yet to be established. Clinical trials with many of the techniques/agents described are underway and multicentric randomized trials with prospective design are eagerly awaited.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Endosonografía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Braquiterapia , Marcadores Fiduciales , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodosRESUMEN
Background: In Romania, colorectal cancer does not benefit yet from a national screening program. In order to decrease the harm and burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), opportunistic programs relying on endoscopy has been adopted by each centre according to its capacity. A colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme based on faecal immunochemical test (FIT) was launched at Ponderas Academic Hospital (PAH) in 2019. Aim: The present study analyses the outcomes after the first 1500 tests in the PAH-FIT-CRC Screening Program. We have also aimed to compare the efficiency of the FIT testing program with the screening colonoscopies performed in our Center, withing the same time interval (2019). Methods: The test was recommended in asymptomatic patients over 45 years, and it was followed by a colonoscopy when the test results were positive. Furthermore, we performed a retrospective observational study gathering data from all the consecutive patients prospectively included in the respective databases of our hospital, comparing the efficacy of the two colorectal cancer screening methods (FIT versus colonoscopy). Results: Between 01.01.2019 and 01.01.2020, 1524 screening colonoscopies were performed, and the resulting data were compared with those obtained in the FIT group (1500 FIT tests freely distributed). In the screening colonoscopy group, the polyp detection rate was 38.98% and 22 (1.44%) adenocarcinomas were identified. In the FIT group, the FIT uptake rate was 71% with a positivity rate of 21.7%. The colonoscopy compliance rate for positive FIT patients was 29.4%, with only 2 adenocarcinomas detected. Conclusions: Following data analysis, the need for improvement of uptake rate and colonoscopy compliance rate was suggested, due to the lower acceptance of FIT tests and colonoscopies, especially among men. Moreover, special efforts should be made in order to improve quality indicators for screening colonoscopies (especially adenoma detection rate) with the purpose of decreasing interval CRC.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Pólipos Adenomatosos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Heces , Colonoscopía , Heces/química , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rumanía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) allows the delivery of radiation with high precision to a target lesion while minimizing toxicity to surrounding tissues. EUS provides excellent visualization of GI tumors and consequently is being used for fiducial placement with increased frequency. Our goal was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the technical aspects, safety, and efficacy of EUS fiducial placement for IGRT in GI malignancies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in the following databases: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, using Medical Subject Headings terms combined with text words. A random effects model was used to determine pooled proportions of technical success, migration, and adverse event rates. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed visually using a funnel plot and by the Begg and Egger tests. RESULTS: Nine full articles and 5 abstracts reporting on 1155 patients, 49% from a single study by Dhadham et al, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled rate of technical success was 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96-99). Moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 34.18) was present, which appeared to be due to variable sample sizes. Publication bias was present, suggesting that studies with less-substantial outcomes may have not been reported (Begg test, P = .87; Egger test, P < .01). Pooled rates for fiducial migration and adverse events were 3% (95% CI, 1.0-8.0) and 4% (95% CI, 3-7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that EUS-guided insertion of gold fiducials for IGRT is technically feasible and safe. Further controlled studies assessing its long-term effectiveness in GI malignancies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Endosonografía , Marcadores Fiduciales , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/radioterapia , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen , Endosonografía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Malignant transformation of ectopic pancreas tissue is a diagnostic challenge as clinical symptoms and radiographic features of these tumors are non-specific. Given the rarity of these lesions, it is usually neither suspected nor included in the diagnostic workup of different tumors. We conducted a comprehensive literature review regarding malignancy arising from ectopic pancreas for a better understanding of its frequency, clinicopathological features, and prognosis. A literature search was performed in three major databases: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Fifty-four well-documented cases of malignant ectopic pancreas were identified in the published literature. Our analysis provided the following observations: (1) there was a slight predominance of males over females; (2) most patients with malignant transformation of ectopic pancreas were middle-aged; (3) most commonly, the tumor was located in the stomach; (4) most tumors were adenocarcinomas; (5) most frequently, the malignancy arose within a type I heterotopia according to Heinrich classification; (6) macroscopically, a subepithelial-like appearance was most frequently observed; and (7) improved prognosis for ectopic pancreatic malignancies in comparison with reported survival data for orthotopic pancreatic cancer. Even if the majority of cases of ectopic pancreas are incidental findings and malignant transformation is a rare event, pancreatic heterotopy should be considered as a source of potentially malignant lesions.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/patología , Coristoma/patología , Neoplasias Intestinales/patología , Páncreas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Coristoma/mortalidad , Coristoma/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Intestinales/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapiaRESUMEN
We conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study to determine whether a psychoeducational intervention for patients undergoing screening mammography could influence the level of anxiety related to the procedure. Fifty women undergoing mammography for the first time were included in the study and randomized to two groups. In the study group, patients received a psychoeducational session before mammography. In the control group, psychoeducation was not applied. To evaluate the level of anxiety, we used the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. State Anxiety Scale (S-Anxiety) score and Trait Anxiety Scale (T-Anxiety) scores were assessed before and after mammography in both groups. After evaluating the S-Anxiety score in the study group before mammography and after the procedure, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.043) was observed. In contrast, no statistically significant changes were noticed in the control group (p = 0.886). Our study showed that psychoeducation reduced state anxiety among the participants of a breast cancer screening.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Mamografía/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas PsicológicasAsunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Deglución , Perforación del Esófago/etiología , Esófago/fisiopatología , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos de Deglución/fisiopatología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Perforación del Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Perforación del Esófago/cirugía , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Esófago/cirugía , Femenino , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/diagnóstico por imagen , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the patterns of analgesic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to assess their preventability and contributing factors. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive study conducted on ADRs of analgesics and other drugs indicated as analgesics, spontaneously reported to the Bordeaux pharmacovigilance center from January 2011 to June 2012. RESULTS: The 141 cases selected for the analysis included 16 cases of medication errors (11.3%) and 15 addiction cases (10.6%). In total, 214 ADRs were registered, for which 173 analgesic medicines were suspected. The most frequent ADRs reported were nervous system disorders (26.6%), psychiatric disorders (15.0%), and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (12.1%). Tramadol alone or in combination (17.3%), followed by morphine (15%), fentanyl (9.8%), and paracetamol (8.7%) were the most frequently involved analgesics. More than half of the cases (54.6%) were serious and led to hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. Preventability was determined for 134 cases (95%): 51.5% were considered as preventable, 26.1% not preventable, and 22.4% not assessable. The main contributing factors for the preventable cases included negligence of recommendations for analgesic use and failure to consider patients' risk factors when prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of analgesic ADRs could be prevented, and being aware of their contributing factors promotes efficient analgesia with minimum risks to the patients.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacovigilancia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Platinum derivatives play a very important role in cancer therapy. Despite their outstanding results in the treatment of tumors with different locations, the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions raises issues when it comes to therapy decision, because the changing of chemotherapy line could influence the tumor's evolution. Over the years the scientific community has paid particular attention to the mechanism by which this occurs and to identification of predictive factors. The purpose of this case-control, retrospective study was to find new predictive markers for the occurrence of allergic reactions to platinum derivatives. METHODS: We identified 59 cases of allergic reactions to platinum derivatives in the Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" from Cluj-Napoca city in 2013. Blood tests data were analyzed before the administration of the cycle on which the allergic reaction occurred, along with the mandatory analyses for the patients and we focused on the values of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. RESULTS: When these values were compared with the values of the control group (,which was made at a ratio of 1:2 or 1:3, matched for age, tumor location and chemotherapy cycle) we found that each increase of lymphocytes or doses of platinum and each drop in monocytes number increased the risk for allergic reactions to occur. CONCLUSION: These findings are of a great value for the physicians and represent a starting point for more detailed studies.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Platino/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Humanos , Oxaliplatino , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Divertículo de Zenker/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Endosonografía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Liquid biopsies can accurately identify molecular alterations in patients with colorectal cancer with high concordance with tissue analysis and shorter turnaround times. Circulating tumor (ct) DNA analysis can be used for diagnosing and monitoring tumor evolution in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who are treated with EGFR inhibitors. In this article, we reported three clinical cases to illustrate the relevance of RAS mutations identified in ctDNA samples of patients with wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer who received an EGFR inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The identification of RAS mutations in these patients is one of the most frequently identified mechanisms of acquired resistance. However, detecting a KRAS mutation via liquid biopsy can be caused by inter-tumor heterogeneity or it can be a false positive due to clonal hematopoiesis. More research is needed to determine whether ctDNA monitoring may help guide therapy options in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We performed a literature review to assess the technologies that are used for analysis of RAS mutations on ctDNA, the degree of agreement between tissue and plasma and the importance of tissue/plasma discordant cases.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the third cause of cancer-related deaths. Early detection and interception of premalignant pancreatic lesions represent a promising strategy to improve outcomes. We evaluated risk factors of focal pancreatic lesions (FPLs) in asymptomatic individuals at hereditary high risk for PC. Methods: This is an observational single-institution cohort study conducted over a period of 5 years. Surveillance was performed through imaging studies (EUS or magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography) and serum biomarkers. We collected demographic characteristics and used univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to evaluate associations between potential risk factors and odd ratios (ORs) for FPL development. Results: A total of 205 patients completed baseline screening. Patients were followed up to 53 months. We detected FPL in 37 patients (18%) at baseline; 2 patients had lesions progression during follow-up period, 1 of them to PC. Furthermore, 13 patients developed new FPLs during the follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that new-onset diabetes (NOD) is strongly associated with the presence of FPL (OR, 10.94 [95% confidence interval, 3.01-51.79; P < 0.001]; OR, 9.98 [95% confidence interval, 2.15-46.33; P = 0.003]). Follow-up data analysis revealed that NOD is also predictive of lesions progression or development of new lesions during screening (26.7% vs. 2.6%; P = 0.005). Conclusions: In a PC high-risk cohort, NOD is significantly associated with presence of FPL at baseline and predictive of lesions progression or new lesions during surveillance.
RESUMEN
Accurate delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to pancreatic tumors relies on successful EUS-guided placement of fiducial markers. The aim of this study is to report the technical feasibility and safety of EUS-guided fiducial placement and to evaluate the characteristics and technical benefit of SBRT in a cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). A retrospective chart review was performed for all (n = 82) PC patients referred for EUS-guided fiducial placement by a single endosonographer at a tertiary cancer center. Data regarding EUS-related technical details, SBRT characteristics, adverse events, and continuous visibility of fiducials were recorded and analyzed. Most patients included in the study had either locally advanced disease (32 patients, 39%) or borderline resectable disease (29 patients, 35%). Eighty-two PC patients underwent the placement of 230 fiducial markers under EUS guidance. The technical success rate of the fiducial placement was 98%. No immediate EUS-related adverse events were reported. The average time to the simulation CT after fiducial placement was 3.1 days. Of the 216 fiducial markers used for the SBRT delivery, 202 fiducial markers were visible on both the simulation CT and the cone beam CT scan. A median dose of 40cGY was given to all the patients in five fractions. Of these, 41% of the patients reported no SBRT-related toxicities during the follow-up. Fatigue and nausea were the most reported SBRT-related toxicities, which were seen in 35% of the patients post-SBRT. Our results demonstrate that EUS-guided fiducial placement is safe and effective in target volume delineation, facilitating SBRT delivery in PC patients. Further clinical trials are needed to determine the SBRT-related survival benefits in patients with pancreatic cancer.