A study of the characteristics of the dementia patients and caregivers in dementia-nonspecific adult day care programs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if basic differences exist between the patients and caregivers of a representative group of dementia-nonspecific medical versus social adult day care centers with specific programs for dementia patients. DESIGN: A telephone interview questionnaire survey. SETTING: North Central North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 242 adult day care dementia patients and caregivers from three medical and three social nondementia-specific adult day care centers. MEASUREMENTS: Dementia patient variables: Day care subtype (medical or social); length of stay; number of days attended; age; sex; race; educational level; marital status; religious affiliation; income; living status; number of medical conditions; number of prescription medications; function; ADL status (walking, eating, bathing, dressing, grooming, toileting); continence status; number and type of abnormal behaviors; formal help status (hospitalization during day care, part or full-time nursing home attendance, or home healthcare assistance); transportation; and financial assistance. Caregiver variables: day care subtype; age; sex; race; educational level; marital status; religious affiliation; income; number of medical conditions; number of prescription medications; informal help (family friends or other non-paid help); paid help (friend, other, home health, or nursing home); relationship to patient; employment status; and level of caregiver burden. MAIN RESULTS: There were 144 medical and 62 social adult day care dementia patients and caregivers who agreed to participate. The average age of the patient was 77.9 years (SD +/- 8.4), and that of the caregiver was 57.7 years (SD +/- 13.9); 68.4% of the patients and 75.4% of the caregivers were females. Dementia patients in the medical subtype day care had a shorter length of stay than social day care patients; this did not reach statistical significance. There were significantly more white patients and caregivers in the medical than in the social subtype day care, 83.1% versus 50% and 83.3% versus 50.8%, respectively. Dementia patients of the medical subtype also had significantly more education, income, less function, and more symptoms of depression than dementia patients in the social subtype. Dementia patients of the medical subtype also had more abnormal psychological behaviors than their social subtype counterparts, with borderline significance (P = .071). There were more married caregivers in the medical subtype than in the social subtype day care. Caregivers of dementia patients in the medical subtype had significantly more paid help and caregiver burden than did caregivers of dementia patients in the social subtype. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there appear to be key differences between the dementia patients and caregivers of medical versus social adult day care centers as to demographic and health-related variables. The differences in demographic variables appear to be associated with socioeconomic factors, whereas the decreased function and greater number of depressive symptoms of the medical dementia patients may reflect poorer health as reflected by the greater amount of paid help and increased caregiver burden experienced by the caregivers of medical dementia patients. These findings should be verified in prospective studies.

A university-affiliated community hospital inpatient geriatrics program functioning in an administrative and educational capacity.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an unusual form of inpatient geriatric assessment with unique outcomes. DESIGN: A prospective evaluation of patients admitted to a community hospital-based inpatient geriatrics unit utilizing traditional members of the assessment team along with educational assessment of nurses and satisfaction profiles of patients and/or families. SETTING: A non-profit community hospital in Northeast Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: All patients older than age 62 admitted to the 42-bed Geriatric Unit during a 4 1/2 year time period. MEASUREMENTS: Number of total and category recommendations taken by attending physicians from the Inpatient Geriatric Assessment Team, periodic evaluation of unit nurses' geriatric knowledge base and certification, and patient satisfaction through periodic surveys. RESULTS: More than 4500 patients have been evaluated during the past 4 1/2 years. The number of recommendations taken by attending physicians has averaged 31.3 to 50.7% during four consecutive chart reviews involving the first 25 consecutive patients for the month each performed every six months (n = 100). The average age of patients evaluated was 77.2 (minimum of 62 and maximum of 97); 67% were females and 33% males. The average number of recommendations communicated per patient was 4.1, and the average number adhered to 1.6/patient. The overall knowledge base and certification in geriatric nursing has increased significantly over a 2.5-year period. Composite monthly unit patient satisfaction survey scores increased as well. CONCLUSIONS: The program is unique in its development, limitations, and outcomes. Other than the cost of limited geriatric nurse practitioner and faculty salary support, the program has been implemented using only current hospital department personnel. The role of the assessment team is to educate attending nurses and staff physicians. It has not yet been possible to measure objective outcomes. However, the current program also serves the purpose of introducing a new medical program to a community hospital in a nonthreatening way and offers opportunities for research. In addition, the program offers further opportunity for expansion and change.

Nursing homes: what you need to know for quality patient care.

The United States has 20,000 nursing homes and 1.5 to 2 million nursing home beds. Your choice of a nursing home often depends on its distance from the office and the preferences of colleagues and patients. The quality of care in a particular facility may be suggested by the bacteria found in urine, blood, and skin cultures from symptomatic patients. Communication with the nursing home staff is key to a well-organized practice. For quality of care and efficient reimbursement, limit the number of patients seen per visit. Federal law controls the use of physical restraints and drugs to manage problem behaviors.

Adhering to inpatient geriatric consultation recommendations.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of and factors associated with attending physicians' adherence to geriatric consultation recommendations in an urban community hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the charts of 47 patients referred for inpatient geriatric consultation over the previous 1 1/2-year period. Study variables included patient and attending physician demographics, length of stay in hospital before geriatric consultation, status of patient on discharge, level of expertise of consultant, number of diagnoses per patient, and types and number of recommendations per patient made by consultant and acted upon by attending physicians. RESULTS: The recommendations made included medical (23.4%), medication (28.6%), laboratory (15.8%), radiological (2.6%), nutritional (11.7%), psychosocial (7.7%), skin care (1.6%), rehabilitative (6.4%), and other (2.2%). The percentage of total recommendations acted upon was 55.5%. By multivariate analysis, decreasing length of time prior to consultation was statistically associated with referring physician adherence to consultation recommendations (P=.03). Slightly more than 40% of the variability in adherence was explained by this single variable. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient geriatric consultations are aimed at providing a comprehensive assessment for attending physicians. Recommendations are acted upon more than 50% of the time. Physician adherence to recommendations does not appear to be dependent on patient or physician demographic variables, but to some extent, adherence is associated with less time in the hospital prior to consultation. This is a relatively new concept in hospital medicine.

The female menopause--now and in the millennium: new treatment options for a better quality of life.

Estrogen has traditionally been the only agent effective for the prevention and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Estrogen's positive effects are often outweighed by negative ones. Newer agents provide safer alternatives that should increase compliance and improve quality of life.

Follow-up of comprehensive geriatric assessment in a family medicine residency clinic.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of outpatient geriatric consultation by referring academic physicians and to verify the results of a previous study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of charts of 37 patients referred for geriatric consultation during a 7-month period of a university- and community-hospital-affiliated family practice residency clinic in urban northeast Washington, DC. The consultation involved team assessment, which led to formal recommendations to the attending physician. Main outcome measures included total number and category of recommendations made, as well as a total number and category of recommendations adhered to by referring physicians. RESULTS: There were 29 women and 8 men with an average age of 79.1 years; 5 were white and 32 were African-American. For the 23 patients for whom follow-up could be determined, the mean number of total diagnoses per patient was 11.4 (SD 3.5). The mean total number of recommendations made per patient was 18.1 (SD 5.9). The mean total number of recommendations acted upon per patient by referring physicians was 9.5 (SD 4.4). The recommendations fell into the following categories: rehabilitative 64 percent, radiologic 57.1 percent, laboratory 56.9 percent, total medication 55.6 percent, medical 50 percent, health maintenance 47.1 percent, social service 46.2 percent, sensory 33 percent, other 28.6 percent, educational 20 percent, and nutritional 14.3 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary geriatric assessment in an academic outpatient setting provides a comprehensive assessment for faculty and resident physicians in training. Recommendations will be adhered to only 50 to 70 percent of the time, possibly because of the demographic and socioeconomic mix and overall health of the patient population, health care priorities of the referring physician, and costs and availability of various interventions. Physicians in training should be exposed through continuing medical education to various aspects of geriatric assessment.