Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BJOG ; 129(3): 336-344, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35014160

RESUMEN

Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/normas , Economía Médica/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Lista de Verificación , Guías como Asunto , Humanos
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 146(4): 496-507, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29446343

RESUMEN

Simulation models are used widely in pharmacology, epidemiology and health economics (HEs). However, there have been no attempts to incorporate models from these disciplines into a single integrated model. Accordingly, we explored this linkage to evaluate the epidemiological and economic impact of oseltamivir dose optimisation in supporting pandemic influenza planning in the USA. An HE decision analytic model was linked to a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) - dynamic transmission model simulating the impact of pandemic influenza with low virulence and low transmissibility and, high virulence and high transmissibility. The cost-utility analysis was from the payer and societal perspectives, comparing oseltamivir 75 and 150 mg twice daily (BID) to no treatment over a 1-year time horizon. Model parameters were derived from published studies. Outcomes were measured as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the integrated model's robustness. Under both pandemic scenarios, compared to no treatment, the use of oseltamivir 75 or 150 mg BID led to a significant reduction of influenza episodes and influenza-related deaths, translating to substantial savings of QALYs. Overall drug costs were offset by the reduction of both direct and indirect costs, making these two interventions cost-saving from both perspectives. The results were sensitive to the proportion of inpatient presentation at the emergency visit and patients' quality of life. Integrating PK/PD-EPI/HE models is achievable. Whilst further refinement of this novel linkage model to more closely mimic the reality is needed, the current study has generated useful insights to support influenza pandemic planning.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/economía , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos Económicos , Modelos Teóricos , Oseltamivir/economía , Oseltamivir/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 177(4): 1102-1112, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28346659

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A strong association has been documented between HLA-B*15:02 and carbamazepine-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in Asians. Human leucocyte antigen testing is potentially valuable in many countries to facilitate early recognition of patient susceptibility to SCARs. OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of universal HLA-B*15:02 screening in preventing carbamazepine-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in an ethnically diverse Malaysian population. METHODS: A hybrid model of a decision tree and Markov model was developed to evaluate three strategies for treating newly diagnosed epilepsy among adults: (i) carbamazepine initiation without HLA-B*15:02 screening (current practice); (ii) universal HLA-B*15:02 screening prior to carbamazepine initiation; and (iii) alternative treatment [sodium valproate (VPA)] prescribing without HLA-B*15:02 screening. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analyses were performed over a lifetime time horizon. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Both universal HLA-B*15:02 screening and VPA prescribing were dominated by current practice. Compared with current practice, universal HLA-B*15:02 screening resulted in a loss of 0·0255 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an additional cost of 707 U.S. dollars (USD); VPA prescribing resulted in a loss of 0·2622 QALYs at an additional cost of USD 4127, owing to estimated differences in antiepileptic treatment efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Universal HLA-B*15:02 screening is unlikely to be a cost-effective intervention in Malaysia. However, with the emergence of an ethnically diverse population in many other countries, this may render HLA-B*15:02 screening a viable intervention when an increasing proportion of the population is at risk and an equally effective yet safer antiepileptic drug is available.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Carbamazepina/efectos adversos , Antígeno HLA-B15/metabolismo , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico/etnología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Eficiencia , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/etnología , Humanos , Malasia/etnología , Cadenas de Markov , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/economía , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etnología , Adulto Joven
4.
J Postgrad Med ; 62(2): 109-14, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27089110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening dermatologic conditions. Although, the incidence of SJS/TEN in Thailand is high, information on cost of care for SJS/TEN is limited. This study aims to estimate healthcare resource utilization and cost of SJS/TEN in Thailand, using hospital perspective. METHODS: A retrospective study using an electronic health database from a university-affiliated hospital in Thailand was undertaken. Patients admitted with SJS/TEN from 2002 to 2007 were included. Direct medical cost was estimated by the cost-to-charge ratio. Cost was converted to 2013 value by consumer price index, and converted to $US using 31 Baht/ 1 $US. The healthcare resource utilization was also estimated. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included with average age of 45.3±23.0 years. About 146 patients (93.0%) were diagnosed as SJS and the remaining (7.0%) were diagnosed as TEN. Most of the patients (83.4%) were treated with systemic corticosteroids. Overall, mortality rate was 8.3%, while the average length of stay (LOS) was 10.1±13.2 days. The average cost of managing SJS/TEN for all patients was $1,064±$2,558. The average cost for SJS patients was $1,019±$2,601 while that for TEN patients was $1,660±$1,887. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare resource utilization and cost of care for SJS/TEN in Thailand were tremendous. The findings are important for policy makers to allocate healthcare resources and develop strategies to prevent SJS/TEN which could decrease length of stay and cost of care.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/economía , Tailandia
5.
Public Health ; 129(7): 899-906, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26027451

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to conduct an economic analysis of the transition of the conventional vaccine supply and logistics systems to the vendor managed inventory (VMI) system in Thailand. STUDY DESIGN: Cost analysis of health care program. METHODS: An ingredients based approach was used to design the survey and collect data for an economic analysis of the immunization supply and logistics systems covering procurement, storage and distribution of vaccines from the central level to the lowest level of vaccine administration facility. Costs were presented in 2010 US dollar. RESULTS: The total cost of the vaccination program including cost of vaccine procured and logistics under the conventional system was US$0.60 per packed volume procured (cm(3)) and US$1.35 per dose procured compared to US$0.66 per packed volume procured (cm(3)) and US$1.43 per dose procured under the VMI system. However, the findings revealed that the transition to the VMI system and outsourcing of the supply chain system reduced the cost of immunization program at US$6.6 million per year because of reduction of un-opened vaccine wastage. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrated that the new supply chain system would result in efficiency improvement and potential savings to the immunization program compared to the conventional system.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Vacunación/economía , Vacunas/economía , Vacunas/provisión & distribución , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Tailandia
6.
J Med Econ ; 25(1): 571-582, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416095

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: (1) To descriptively compare the selected elements of valuation methods for EQ-5D-5L value set studies, (2) to compare the characteristics of the value sets, and (3) to examine the associations between the selected elements of valuation methods and the EQ-5D-5L value sets. METHODS: A systematic literature search of EQ-5D-5L valuation studies from 1 January 2009 to 22 April 2021 was conducted in selected databases. Following the initial search, we also explored additional studies published during the completion of the final version of the manuscript. Similarities and variations for selected elements of valuation methods were descriptively compared. The relative importance of dimensions, utility decrements between the levels, and distribution of the utility scores were used to compare value sets. A meta-regression analysis examined the associations between the selected methodological elements and the utility scores and dimension levels of EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies were included in this review. Methodological similarities centered around data collection and preference elicitation method. On the other hand, variations include sampling technique, sample size, and value set modeling. The variations in value sets based on the relative importance of dimension, decrement in utility score, and distribution of utility score across countries were observed. Although the distribution of the utility scores differed across countries, higher levels of each dimension tended to have a larger decrement in the utility scores. Mean utility scores for the experience-based value sets were higher than those estimated using stated choice methods. The selected methodological elements were not significantly associated with the mean predicted utility scores or most dimension-level coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: EQ-5D-5L health state valuation methods and characteristics of value sets differed across studies. The impact of the variation of methodological elements on the value sets should be further investigated.


Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Análisis de Regresión , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Trop Med Int Health ; 16(7): 802-10, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21481108

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to examine the effectiveness of citronella preparation used as a mosquito repellent. METHODS: Multiple computerized databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, and AMED, were searched for controlled laboratory experiments that compared the effectiveness of citronella products to control in repelling Aedes, Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes using the cage or room methods. Outcomes measures were protection time and percentage repellency. The weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval were calculated comparing the outcomes in the citronella and control groups. Meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird method under a random-effects model. RESULTS: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Based on a meta-analysis of studies using the cage method, protection time of the citronella oil for preventing Aedes mosquitoes was less than that in the DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) group, with a difference in protection time of 253 min (95% confidence interval: 169-336). The combination of citronella oil and vanillin is likely to have a longer protection time compared with citronella oil alone. In studies using the room method, citronella oil and/or the combination of citronella oil and vanillin provided complete repellency at least 3 h. In Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes, a combination of citronella oil and vanillin product demonstrated a comparable protection time against DEET; however, it remained inconclusive due to a limited number of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Citronella products are less effective than DEET products in terms of duration of protection. Adding vanillin to citronella oil products could prolong the protection time.


Asunto(s)
Benzaldehídos/administración & dosificación , Culicidae , DEET/administración & dosificación , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/prevención & control , Repelentes de Insectos/administración & dosificación , Aceites de Plantas/administración & dosificación , Aedes , Animales , Anopheles , Culex , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
8.
Public Health ; 124(3): 131-5, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20171705

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the outcome of the recent implementation of a smoke-free policy in drugstores in Thailand, comparing participants and non-participants of the 100% smoke-free drugstore campaign promoted by the Thai Pharmacy Network for Tobacco Control (TPNTC). STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of 3600 drugstores in Thailand. METHOD: Smoking prevalence on the premises, the number of stores displaying no-smoking signs, and the number of stores selling cigarettes were examined. RESULTS: In total, 1001 questionnaires were returned (27.8% response rate). Smoking prevalences inside and outside drugstores in the past month were 26.4% and 84.7%, respectively. Seven percent of drugstores had at least one staff member who smoked tobacco. Overall, 63.3% of drugstores displayed no-smoking signs, as required by law. Compared with non-participating drugstores, those which participated in the TPNTC smoke-free campaign more frequently reported that they had asked smokers to stop smoking/leave the premises, in addition to possessing and displaying no-smoking signs. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of drugstores in this survey did not meet the terms of the recent smoke-free regulation. The TPNTC campaign improved the compliance of drugstores with the law in various aspects. This study was considered a pilot study, and despite the low response rate, the findings suggest a need for further action to ensure that all drugstores comply with the law and are 100% smoke-free.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Organizacional , Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/prevención & control , Lugar de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Legislación como Asunto , Farmacias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevalencia , Fumar/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tailandia/epidemiología , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia
19.
Tob Control ; 17(3): 177-82, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18285385

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of a structured community pharmacist-based smoking cessation programme compared with usual care. DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness study using a healthcare system perspective Population: Two simulated cohorts of smokers: male and female aged 40, 50 and 60 years who regularly smoke 10-20 cigarettes per day. Intervention and comparator: A structured community pharmacist-based smoking cessation (CPSC) programme compared to usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost per life year gained (LYG) attributable to the smoking cessation programme. RESULTS: The CPSC programme results in cost savings of 17,503.53 baht ( pound250; euro325; $500) to the health system and life year gains of 0.18 years for men and; costs savings of 21,499.75 baht ( pound307; euro399; $614) and life year gains of 0.24 years for women. A series of sensitivity analyses demonstrate that both cost savings and life year gains are sensitive to variations in the discount rate and the long-term smoking quit rate associated with the intervention. CONCLUSION: From the perspective of the health system, the CPSC programme yields cost savings and life year gains. This finding provides important information for health policy decision-makers when determining the magnitude of resources to be allocated to smoking cessation service in community pharmacy.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Esperanza de Vida , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Fumar/economía , Adulto , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Cardiopatías/economía , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Fumar/efectos adversos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Tailandia
20.
Int J Cardiol ; 211: 88-95, 2016 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26991555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors) may be associated with increased risk of heart failure (HF), but evidence was inconclusive. We aimed to determine the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on risk of HF. METHODS: An extensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, IPA, Cochrane, ClinicalTrial.gov and the manufacturers' websites for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of all DPP-4 inhibitors was performed up to June 2015. All RCTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors to any comparators with minimum follow-up of 12 weeks were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of HF. RESULTS: A total of 54 studies with 74,737 participants were included for analysis. Overall, DPP-4 inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of HF compared to comparators (relative risk (RR) 1.106; 95% CI 0.995-1.228; p=0.062). When analyzed individually, saxagliptin was significantly associated with the increased risk of HF (RR 1.215; 95% CI, 1.028-1.437; p=0.022), while others were not. Age ≥ 6 5 years, diabetes duration of ≥ 10 years and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) were associated with an increased risk of HF among patients using saxagliptin. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested a differential effect of each DPP-4 inhibitor on the risk of HF. Use of saxagliptin significantly increases the risk of HF by 21% especially among patients with high CV risk while no signals were detected with other agents. This information should be taken into consideration when prescribing DDP-4 inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adamantano/efectos adversos , Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Dipéptidos/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA