Dosimetry during iodine-131 therapy - a technical point of view from a single centre's own experience.

BACKGROUND: Nuclear medicine uses radionuclides in medicine for diagnosis, staging, therapy, and monitoring the response to therapy. The application of radiopharmaceutical therapy for the treatment of certain diseases is well-established, and the field is expanding. Internal dosimetry is multifaceted and includes different workflows, as well as various calculations based on patient- specific dosimetry. AIM: The objective of this study was to introduce the technical issues which might occur during iodine-131 (¹³¹I) dosimetry performed in nuclear medicine departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 44 patients with papillary thyroid cancer who between May 2021 and October 2021 underwent a 131I treatment: 80-100 mCi (2200-3700 MBq, based on the previous medical history and stage of the disease). Patients underwent a series of ¹³¹I therapy scans using gamma camera Discovery NM 670 CT. Whole body scan (WBS) was performed 2, 4, 24 and 48 hours after ¹³¹I administration. Additionally, after 24 hours of single photon emission computed tomography/ computed tomography, two fields of view (SPECT/CT 2-FOV) were performed from the mid-head to the bladder. RESULTS: During the dosimetry procedure, several issues arise. Firstly, after receiving therapeutic doses of ¹³¹I, patients should remain in their rooms until the appropriate activity is achieved before being transported to the diagnostic room. Secondly, the walls between examination rooms meet the requirements for accurate diagnosis but not for therapy, leading to the occurrence of artefacts in patients examined behind the wall, potentially influencing the examination results. Thirdly, personnel in the control room also experience additional exposure (10 times greater than in the case of standard diagnostic procedure). CONCLUSIONS: The dosimetry in patients in whom therapeutic procedures are performed with the use of isotopes is mandatory according to Polish and European law, technical issues which occur during the dosimetry procedures might influence the organization of the work in departments.

Identification of the Optimal Cut-Off Value of PSA for Assessing Severity of Disease in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Study in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the optimal cut-off value of prostate specific antigen (PSA) to assess the extent of the disease in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT study in patients after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 215 patients who underwent a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT examination because of suspected recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients were divided into four groups: 1, no active lesions suggesting recurrence (n = 92); 2, suspected isolated local recurrence (n = 19); 3, oligometastatic disease (n = 82); and 4, polymetastatic disease (n = 22). RESULTS: In group 1, the mean PSA level was 0.962 ng/mL (median: 0.376; min: 0.004; max: 25 ng/mL); in group 2, it was 4.970 ng/mL (median 1.320; min: 0.003; max: 40.350 ng/mL); in group 3, it was 2.802 ng/mL (median: 1.270; min: 0.020; max: 59.670 ng/mL); and in group 4, it was 4.997 ng/mL (median: 3.795; min: 0.007; max 21.110 ng/mL). Statistically significant differences were shown in PSA levels when comparing groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.0025) and groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.0474). The PSA cut-off point for discriminating groups 1 and 2 was 0.831 (sensitivity: 0.684; specificity: 0.772; area under the curve (AUC): 0.775), and for groups 3 and 4, it was 2.51 (sensitivity: 0.682; specificity: 0.780; AUC: 0.720). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggested that the PSA level has an essential influence on determining the extent of disease in a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT study in patients after radical prostatectomy. Identification of the optimal cut-off values for the oligo- and polymetastatic diseases might be helpful in stratifying these patients.