Feasibility and safety of magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent insertion and removal in children.

PURPOSE: The need for surgical removal of a double-J ureteral stent (DJUS) is considered one of its disadvantages. Apart from increased cost, repeated exposure to general anesthesia is a concern in children. Alternative techniques have been described, all failing to become integrated into mainstream practice. Stents with a distal magnetic end, although introduced in the early 1980s, have only recently gained acceptance. We report the feasibility and safety of insertion and removal of a magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent (MEDJUS) in a pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the use of the Magnetic Black-Star Urotech® MEDJUS between 11/2016 and 12/2019 in children. Stents were removed in the outpatient clinic using a transurethral catheter with a magnetic tip. RESULTS: MEDJUS insertion was attempted in 100 patients (65 boys). Mean age was 7.8 years (0.5-18). The stent was placed in an antegrade procedure (n = 47), by a retrograde route (n = 10), and during open surgery (n = 43). Stent insertion was successful in 84 cases (84%). All 16 failures occurred during the antegrade approach in laparoscopic pyeloplasty, with inability to push the stent and its magnet through the ureterovesical junction in 14. Magnetic removal was attempted in 83 patients, successful in 81 (98%). There was no added morbidity with the MEDJUS. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MEDJUS is a safe and effective strategy that obviates the need for additional general anesthesia in children. Its insertion is similar to that with regular DJUS, and its easy and less time-consuming removal benefits both the patient and the hospital and validates its clinical use.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Applied to Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Simple Cholelithiasis: Feasibility and Teaching Insights.

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge after a cholecystectomy is a common practice in the adult population and has been demonstrated as safe and viable for children as well. However, there is a lack of comprehensive teaching models for pediatric cholecystectomy. Drawing inspiration from standardized outpatient procedures, this study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and feasibility of teaching programs and an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol following ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pediatric patients. METHODS: In 2015, an ERAS pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was implemented, focusing on admission procedures, surgery timing, anesthetic choices, analgesia, postoperative feeding, mobilization, and pain assessment. Day-case surgery was not applicable for acute cholecystitis, choledochal lithiasis, sickle cell disease, and hereditary spherocytosis cases. The protocol was employed for a group of attending surgeons and fellows, as well as a group of residents under the supervision of experienced surgeons. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of ambulatory cholecystectomy in children and its utilization in training pediatric surgical trainees. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, a total of 33 patients were included from a cohort of 162 children who underwent LC, with 15 children operated on by senior surgeons and 18 by young surgeons. The primary diagnoses were symptomatic gallbladder lithiasis (n = 32) and biliary dyskinesia (n = 1). The median age at the time of surgery was 11.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 4.9-18), and the median duration of surgery was 54 min (IQR 13-145). One intraoperative complication occurred, involving gallbladder rupture and the dissemination of lithiasis into the peritoneal cavity. Three patients (9%) required an overnight stay, while no postoperative complications or readmissions within 30 days were observed. ERAS was successfully implemented in 30 patients (91%). No significant differences in surgical outcomes were noted between senior and young surgeons. At an average follow-up of 55 months, no long-term sequelae were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These findings align with the current trend of increasing use of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underscore its feasibility in the pediatric population. The application of a structured ERAS protocol appears viable and practical for training the next generation of pediatric surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The role of smartphone game applications in improving laparoscopic skills.

BACKGROUND: Virtual games (VGs) have a positive impact on laparoscopic skills. Time spent playing, the console and the type of game used correlate with the speed of acquisition of laparoscopic skills and their preservation. METHODS: A total of 45 university medical students with no previous surgical experience were divided into three groups: gamers (n=20), control (n=10) and intervention (n=15). They passed the laparoscopic skills testing and training model, developed by the European Academy of Gynecological Surgery, over two sessions. Every 5 intervention participants were asked to play a different smartphone application game daily for 2 months between the two sessions. Scores were calculated at both sessions and used to calculate the evolution ratio between sessions. RESULTS: Significant advantage was found at session 1 of gamers over non-gamers (p=0.002). No significant difference existed between the two non-gamer groups (p=0.96), or between the three intervention sub-groups (p>0.05). All participants' performances improved between sessions. No significant difference existed in evolution between control and gamers (p=0.121), nor between intervention and gamers (p=0.189). Significant advantage was found in evolutions of the intervention group over control group (p=0.035). CONCLUSION: Previous VG experience is a significant factor in showing better laparoscopic skills when virtual reality simulator is used for the first time. Recent and regular smartphone gaming practice significantly improves laparoscopic skills in non-gamers independently of the type of game practiced. Smartphone gaming practice appears to influence positively some specific laparoscopic skills more than others.