Editorial Commentary: Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Remain Important Today Despite Responder Burden, but With Further Refinement, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Could Replace Legacy Instruments in the Future.

Measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is a key tenet in the drive toward value-based care. A more detailed understanding of outcomes has traditionally been obtained with increasingly frequent and more in-depth patient questionnaires. Legacy PROs require patients to complete a predetermined set of questions. Administering lengthy surveys repeatedly can generate respondent fatigue that compromises quality of the survey responses and overall compliance. In addition, these legacy scales have notable ceiling and floor effects, which limit their capacity to describe the condition of patients who are functioning at relatively high or low levels. Modern computer adaptive instruments, such as PROMIS, strive to minimize responder burden and mitigate floor and ceiling effects associated with many legacy instruments. However, although these new newer instruments correlate (moderately) with legacy scores, PROMIS also shows floor and ceiling effects, and PROMIS responsiveness is currently understudied. Today, we collect both PROMIS and legacy scores for tracking patient outcomes and for research purposes. We predict that with further refinement, PROMIS will replace legacy patient-reported outcome measures.

Total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a B2 glenoid addressed with corrective reaming: mean 8-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The management of Walch B2 glenoid deformities in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is frequently debated. Previous literature has shown that the treatment of B2 glenoids with high-side reaming and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) perform well in the short-term but is associated with an increased glenoid component failure rate in severe deformities. Therefore, many have explored alternative options, including augmented anatomic glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Our goal in this study is to provide mid-term radiographic and clinical outcomes after high-side reaming and aTSA for B2 glenoids. METHODS: Patients were followed both clinically and radiographically. Preoperative computed tomography scans were used for retrospective analysis of deformity. Both preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were collected. Radiographs were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively for humeral head decentering relative to the glenoid vault, immediate glenoid seating, and final glenoid peg radiolucency. RESULTS: Of the original cohort of 59 patients (6 now deceased) reported at a mean radiographic follow-up of 3.4 years, 34 shoulders in 33 patients with B2 glenoids (mean retroversion 18.9°, range 4°-32°) were available for follow-up at a mean of 8.6 years (range 5.5-11.2) after high-side glenoid reaming with aTSA. Three (5.1%) of the original 59 shoulder were revised. At final follow-up, 3 of 30 (10.0%) shoulders had radiographic glenoid component failure, but were unrevised. Glenoid component failure was associated with worse initial glenoid component seating (mean Lazarus score 1.2 vs. 2.0, P = .002). Glenoid failure was also associated with increased posterior humeral head subluxation at 2-4 year follow-up (mean 5.6% vs. 12.6%, P = .045) and at final follow-up (mean 7.0% vs. 21%, P = .002). There was no association between glenoid component failure and preoperative retroversion, inclination, or humeral head subluxation (all P > .05). Glenoid component failure was associated with worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (88 vs. 73) and visual analog scale pain (0.8 vs. 2.1) scores (both P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: At a mean of 8.6 years, 88% of shoulders available for follow-up had well-fixed glenoid components. Glenoid component failure was associated with poor initial glenoid component seating, with failed components having an average of 25% of the glenoid component not seated. Preoperative deformity such as glenoid retroversion, inclination, or humeral head subluxation did not predict glenoid component failure. This study supports that initial glenoid component seating and recurrence of posterior humeral head subluxation may be the most important factors for mid-term glenoid component survival in aTSA in patients with B2 glenoids.

Active physical therapy does not improve outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-center, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between a structured home exercise program (HEP) and active, supervised physiotherapy (PT) after primary Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) by performing a multicenter randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary RTSA at 2 centers were randomized to either a HEP group, in which they were given a handout and a rope pulley, or a PT group, in which they were given a standardized prescription. Surgical technique and implants were standardized. At baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively, we obtained American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Scores, visual analogue scale for pain scores, and measured ROM via videotape. On video, ROM was then measured by blinded observers. At all study visits, patients were asked how many days per week they were in PT and how many days a week they completed HEP to determine compliance and crossover. An a priori power analysis suggested 29 patients per group, 56 patients total to detect a difference of 30° in active forward elevation with a power of 0.8 at a 2-sided alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: 89 patients were randomized, 43 to PT, and 46 to HEP. We obtained 1-year PRO follow-up on 83 patients (93%) and ROM follow-up on 73 patients (82%). Nine patients (20%) crossed over from HEP to PT and 2 patients (4%) crossed over from PT to HEP. Complications occurred in 13% of HEP and 17% of PT patients (P = .629). Using mixed models that account for baseline values, there were no significant differences between groups in PROs or ROM at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this 2-center, randomized clinical trial, there were no significant differences in patient outcomes or ROM between HEP and PT after RTSA. These findings suggest that it may not be necessary to recommend PT as a protocol for all patients after RTSA.

The relationship between glenoid inclination and instability following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Despite advances in implant design and surgical technique, instability remains the most common early complication and reason for early revision after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the glenoid implant inclination, as measured by the ß-angle, as an independent risk factor for instability after primary RSA. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted matching cases with instability after primary RSA using a single implant to controls without instability. Controls were matched to age, sex, body mass index, and baseplate type (1:3 ratio of cases to controls). The preoperative, postoperative, and the change in pre- to postoperative glenoid inclination (ß-angle) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-four cases (mean age, 66.2 years) were matched to 102 controls (mean age, 67.0 years). There was a wide range of postoperative (63° to 100°) and pre- to postoperative change (-16.5° to +30.5°) in ß-angles collectively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative ß-angle (mean, 80.8° vs. 82.7°, P = .19) or the change in ß-angle (mean, +1.7° vs. +3.4°, P = .35) between cases and controls, respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated no increased odds of instability with the postoperative ß-angle, odds ratio 0.965 (confidence interval [CI] = 0.916-1.02, P = .19). Likewise, for the preoperative to postoperative change in ß-angle, there was no significantly increased odds of instability, odds ratio 0.978 (CI = 0.934-1.03, P = .35). Finally, there was no difference in risk of instability in patients whose implant positioning resulted in a net superior increase in inclination, relative risk 0.85 (95% CI = 0.46-1.56, P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: Neither the final prosthetic glenoid inclination nor the change in glenoid inclination, as measured by the ß-angle, significantly influences the risk of prosthetic instability after primary RSA.

Scapular motion in the presence of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) remain a significant source of pain and disability in the shoulder. Although much work has been done in the study of the effects of rotator cuff tears on glenohumeral joint motion, much less has been done in understanding the effect of rotator cuff tearing on scapular motion or activation. It remains unknown whether scapular dyskinesis is causative or adaptive. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine the relationship between rotator cuff tear presence and size on scapular motion, and if rotator cuff repair restored normal motion. METHODS: A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was accomplished to include all studies with biomechanical or clinical outcomes of scapular motion in the presence of RCTs. Studies were excluded if they involved shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff tendinopathy, or shoulder impingement without an RCT. From 530 initial references, 42 manuscripts were selected for full review and cross referenced. All studies were evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Sixteen studies including 335 rotator cuff tears were included in the final review. There were several findings of interest in the literature. First, although all studies demonstrated scapular dyskinesis, they did not report a consistent pattern of motion in the presence of an RCT. In general, scapular posterior tilt was decreased, and scapular upward rotation was increased, especially in large tears, but the literature was unclear as to whether this was a result of the RCT or an adaptive attempt to maintain elevation. Larger RCTs resulted in more pronounced scapular dysfunction, but there was significant variability within studies. Further, dyskinesis was confounded by pain with more abnormal movement in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic RCTs, the latter of which were not different from normal healthy controls. Four studies addressed the effect of RCT on scapular mechanics and found that repair consistently improved it compared to the normal side, but the time to normalization varied between 5 months and 2 years. CONCLUSION: Scapular motion is abnormal in the presence of an RCT, but the literature is inconsistent regarding a universally affected variable or consistent degree of scapular dysfunction in this setting. Furthermore, it remains unknown which changes are adaptive vs. pathologic. Understanding the relationship between rotator cuff tearing and scapular dyskinesis will require better biomechanical models that consider scapular dyskinesis in their design.

Factors associated with choice for surgery in newly symptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The patient-related factors for the perceived need for surgery for degenerative rotator cuff tears are not known. The purpose of this study is to examine patient- and tear-specific factors leading to surgery in newly painful degenerative rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Asymptomatic, degenerative rotator cuff tears were followed prospectively to identify the onset of pain and tear enlargement. Newly painful tears were continually monitored with a focus on identifying patient-specific (age, occupation, activity level) and tear-specific (tear type and size, tear progression, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, muscle degeneration) factors that are associated with surgical intervention. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 169 newly painful shoulders were eventually managed surgically. Factors associated with surgical treatment included younger age (P = .0004), pain development earlier in surveillance (P = .0002), a greater increase in pain (P = .0001), a decline in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P < .0001), and a history of contralateral shoulder surgery (P = .0006). Eighty-five of the 169 tears (50%) enlarged either before or within 2 years of pain development. Neither tear type (P = .13), tear enlargement (P = .67) nor tear size (P = .51) was associated with surgery. Neither the severity of muscle degeneration, occupational status, hand dominance, Shoulder Activity Score, nor changes in RAND-12 mental or physical scales differed between groups. DISCUSSION: For newly painful rotator cuff tears, patient-specific factors such as younger age and prior surgery on the contralateral shoulder are more predictive of future surgery than tear-specific factors or changes in tear size over time.

Functional Measures of Grip Strength and Gait Remain Altered Long-term in a Rat Model of Post-traumatic Elbow Contracture.

Post-traumatic joint contracture (PTJC) is a debilitating condition, particularly in the elbow. Previously, we established an animal model of elbow PTJC quantifying passive post-mortem joint mechanics and histological changes temporally. These results showed persistent motion loss similar to what is experienced in humans. Functional assessment of PTJC in our model was not previously considered; however, these measures would provide a clinically relevant measure and would further validate our model by demonstrating persistently altered joint function. To this end, a custom bilateral grip strength device was developed, and a recently established open-source gait analysis system was used to quantify forelimb function in our unilateral injury model. In vivo joint function was shown to be altered long-term and never fully recover. Specifically, forelimb strength in the injured limbs showed persistent deficits at all time points; additionally, gait patterns remained imbalanced and asymmetric throughout the study (although a few gait parameters did return to near normal levels). A quantitative understanding of these longitudinal, functional disabilities further strengthens the clinical relevance of our rat PTJC model enabling assessment of the effectiveness of future interventions aimed at reducing or preventing PTJC.

The influence of mental health on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and traditional outcome instruments in patients with symptomatic glenohumeral arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) assessment includes computerized adaptive tests (CATs) that assess function, pain, depression, and anxiety. The influence of mental health on patients' self-reported pain and function has not been explored using PROMIS in patients with symptomatic glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 284 shoulders in 276 patients presenting with isolated glenohumeral osteoarthritis. All patients completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS), and PROMIS CATs at the time of presentation. PROMIS anxiety and depression scores were converted into Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores, respectively, using the PROsetta Stone "crosswalk" tool. Mean pain and functional scores were compared between patients with and without PROMIS-converted scores corresponding to a diagnosis of anxiety or depression, as well as between scores corresponding to varying degrees of anxiety or depression. RESULTS: Patients with scores corresponding to a diagnosis of anxiety or depression reported lower functional and higher pain scores compared to those with scores in the normal range (P < .001). Analysis of variance showed progressively lower functional and higher pain scores as anxiety severity increased (P < .001). Similar results were seen with ASES, upper extremity CAT, and pain scores as depression severity increased (P < .001). Functional ASES (P = .004), SST (P < .001), and physical function CAT (P = .002) scores were statistically significantly lower in patients with moderate to severe depression than those without depression or with mild depression. DISCUSSION: In patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, PROMIS-reported anxiety and depression scores, particularly in those with moderate-to-severe scores, correlate with lower functional and higher pain scores. Further investigation is necessary to examine the influence that mental health has on outcomes after operative intervention in this population.

Muscle does not drive persistent posttraumatic elbow contracture in a rat model.

INTRODUCTION: Posttraumatic elbow contracture is clinically challenging because injury often disrupts multiple periarticular soft tissues. Tissue specific contribution to contracture, particularly muscle, remains poorly understood. METHODS: In this study we used a previously developed animal model of elbow contracture. After surgically inducing a unilateral soft tissue injury, injured limbs were immobilized for 3, 7, 21, and 42 days (IM) or for 42 IM with 42 days of free mobilization (42/42 IM-FM). Biceps brachii active/passive mechanics and morphology were evaluated at 42 IM and 42/42 IM-FM, whereas biceps brachii and brachialis gene expression was evaluated at all time points. RESULTS: Injured limb muscle exhibited significantly altered active/passive mechanics and decreased fiber area at 42 IM but returned to control levels by 42/42 IM-FM. Gene expression suggested muscle growth rather than a fibrotic response at 42/42 IM-FM. DISCUSSION: Muscle is a transient contributor to motion loss in our rat model of posttraumatic elbow contracture. Muscle Nerve 58:843-851, 2018.

Temporal Patterns of Motion in Flexion-extension and Pronation-supination in a Rat Model of Posttraumatic Elbow Contracture.

BACKGROUND: The elbow is highly susceptible to contracture, which affects up to 50% of patients who experience elbow trauma. Previously, we developed a rat model to study elbow contracture that exhibited features similar to the human condition, including persistently decreased ROM and increased capsule thickness/adhesions. However, elbow ROM was not quantitatively evaluated over time throughout contracture development and subsequent mobilization of the joint. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to quantify the time-dependent mechanics of contracture, including comparison of contracture after immobilization and free mobilization; and (2) to determine what changes occur in capsule and joint surface morphology that may support the altered joint mechanics. METHODS: A total of 96 male Long-Evans rats were randomized into control and injury (unilateral soft tissue injury/immobilization) groups. Flexion-extension and pronation-supination joint mechanics (n = 8/group) were evaluated after 3, 7, 21, or 42 days of immobilization (IM) or after 42 days of IM with either 21 or 42 days of free mobilization (63 or 84 FM, respectively). After measuring joint mechanics, a subset of these limbs (n = 3/group) was prepared for histologic analysis and blinded sections were scored to evaluate capsule and joint surface morphology. Joint mechanics and capsule histology at 42 IM and 84 FM were reported previously but are included to demonstrate the full timeline of elbow contracture. RESULTS: In flexion-extension, injured limb ROM was decreased compared with control (103° ± 11°) by 21 IM (70° ± 13°) (p = 0.001). Despite an increase in injured limb ROM from 42 IM (55° ± 14°) to 63 FM (83° ± 10°) (p < 0.001), injured limb ROM was still decreased compared with control (103° ± 11°) (p = 0.002). Interestingly, ROM recovery plateaued because there was no difference between injured limbs at 63 (83° ± 10°) and 84 FM (73° ± 19°) (p > 0.999). In pronation-supination, increased injured limb ROM occurred until 7 IM (202° ± 32°) compared with control (155° ± 22°) (p = 0.001), representative of joint instability. However, injured limb ROM decreased from 21 (182° ± 25°) to 42 IM (123° ± 47°) (p = 0.001), but was not different compared with control (155° ± 22°) (p = 0.108). Histologic evaluation showed morphologic changes in the anterior capsule (increased adhesions, myofibroblasts, thickness) and nonopposing joint surfaces (surface irregularities with tissue overgrowth, reduced matrix), but these changes did not increase with time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, flexion-extension and pronation-supination exhibited distinct time-dependent patterns during contracture development and joint mobilization. Histologic evaluation showed tissue changes, but did not fully explain the patterns in contracture mechanics. Future work will use this rat model to evaluate the periarticular soft tissues of the elbow to isolate tissue-specific contributions to contracture to ultimately develop strategies for tissue-targeted treatments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A rat model of posttraumatic elbow contracture quantitatively described contracture development/progression and reiterates the need for rehabilitation strategies that consider both flexion-extension and pronation-supination elbow motion.

Risk of Perforation Is High During Corrective Reaming of Retroverted Glenoids: A Computer Simulation Study.

BACKGROUND: Corrective anterior reaming is an accepted method for addressing retroversion in a biconcave retroverted (Walch classification, type B2) glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. However, concern still exists regarding early glenoid component failure in the setting of severe retroversion, which may be related to loss of component containment and/or violation of subchondral bone resulting from reaming. The goal of this study was to determine what characteristics of B2 glenoids are less amenable to corrective reaming by virtually implanting anatomic glenoid components. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How much medial reaming is required to correct the version of a B2 glenoid to an acceptable position? (2) Are glenoids with more severe retroversion (> 25°) at higher risk of component perforation than less retroverted glenoids? (3) Is correcting to 10° of retroversion associated with greater risk as compared with reaming to 15°? (4) How does corrective reaming affect the underlying bone density on the glenoid face of B2 glenoids? METHODS: A series of 71 patients with B2 glenoids (posterior subluxation of the humeral head with posterior bone loss) with CT scans who were indicated for shoulder arthroplasty were reviewed. Forty-four of 71 glenoids (62.5%) had < 25° of native retroversion. Anatomic glenoid implants were then virtually implanted using three-dimensional CT software that allows for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning to correct native retroversion to 15° or 10° of retroversion using both a central peg with an inverted triangle peg configuration or a keel. The amount of reaming of the anterior glenoid required to correct retroversion, perforation of peripheral pegs, or keel was compared. Additionally, assessment of the surface area of the glenoid that had poor bone density (defined as cancellous bone under the subchondral plate) was analyzed by the software after correction. RESULTS: Correction to 15° of retroversion required 5 ± 3 mm of reaming, and correction to 10° of retroversion required 8 ± 3 mm of reaming to obtain at least 80% seating. Peripheral peg perforation with correction to 15° occurred in 15 of 27 (56%) glenoids with > 25° of retroversion compared with 10 of 44 (23%) of glenoids with < 25° of retroversion (relative risk [RR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.6; p = 0.006). There was no difference in perforation with keeled components. Increased correction to 10° did not increase the risk of component perforation. When correction to 15°, glenoids with higher native version (> 25°) had a greater risk of poor bone quality support (10 of 27 [37%]) when compared with glenoids with less version (four of 44 [9%]; RR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-12.8; p = 0.006). Increased correction resulted in 13 of 27 (48%) glenoids with version > 25° having poor bone density versus 10 of 44 (23%) with ≤ 25° of version (RR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high risk of vault perforation after corrective reaming. Glenoid retroversions > 25° are at a higher risk of having poor bone quality supporting the component. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When contemplating options for patients with severe retroversion, surgeons should consider alternatives other than corrective reaming if achieving normal glenoid version is desired.

Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our study purpose was to determine the optimal glenoid and humeral reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) component design and position in osteoarthritic shoulders with severe glenoid retroversion deformities. METHODS: Computed tomography scans from 10 subjects were analyzed with advanced software including RSA range of motion (ROM) analysis. Variables included glenoid component retroversion of 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20° and baseplate lateralization of 0, 5, and 10 mm. Humeral variables included 135°, 145°, and 155° angle of inclination (AOI) combined with variable humeral offset. RESULTS: Glenoid component lateralization had the greatest influence on ROM. In comparing each ROM direction among all lateralization options independently, there were significantly greater adduction, abduction, external rotation, extension, and flexion motions with progressively greater lateralization. Internal rotation motion was greater at 10 mm only. In analyzing the effects of glenoid version independently, no differences in adduction or abduction ROM were seen. With greater retroversion, decreased external rotation and extension motion was noted; however, greater internal rotation and flexion motion was seen with the exception of flexion at 10 mm of lateralization. For adduction, external rotation, and extension, a more valgus AOI resulted in less ROM at each progressively greater AOI independent of humeral lateralization. Internal rotation and flexion motions were greater with a more varus AOI but not significant between each inclination angle. Abduction ROM was maximized with a more valgus AOI. Humeral lateralization had no effect on ROM. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of RSA for advanced glenoid osteoarthritic deformities, optimal ROM is achieved with 10-mm baseplate lateralization and neutral to 5° of retroversion mated to a humeral implant with a varus (135°) inclination angle.

Total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a B2 glenoid addressed with corrective reaming.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the short-term functional and radiographic outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in shoulders with a B2 glenoid deformity addressed with corrective reaming. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective series of consecutive patients who underwent TSA with a Walch B2 glenoid quantified by computed tomography scan. All glenoid deformities were addressed using partially corrective glenoid reaming. Radiographic and functional outcome measures, including scores on the visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Standardized Shoulder Assessment, and Simple Shoulder Test were collected. RESULTS: Functional outcome scores were available for 59 of 92 eligible subjects (64%) at a mean of 50 months. The mean preoperative retroversion measured 18° (range, -1° to 36°), superior inclination was 8° (range, -11° to 27°), and posterior subluxation was 67% (range, 39%-91%). Mean visual analog scale improved from 7.4 to 1.4, the American Shoulder and Elbow Shoulder Standardized Assessment improved from 35.4 to 84.3, and the SST improved from 4.5 to 9.1. Radiographs were evaluated at a mean of 31 months: 38 had no glenoid radiolucent lines, 13 glenoids had grade 1, 2 had grade 2, and 5 had grade 3 lucencies. There was no difference in the rate of progression of glenoid radiolucencies between shoulders with a preoperative glenoid version of ≤20° (27.8%) compared with glenoids with >20° of retroversion (22.7%, P = .670). No shoulders were revised due to glenoid loosening or instability. CONCLUSION: TSA with partial corrective glenoid reaming in selected shoulders with a B2 glenoid deformity resulted in excellent functional and radiographic outcomes at short-term follow-up, with a low risk of revision surgery.

Does prosthetic humeral articular surface positioning associate with outcome after total shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of humeral articular component positioning on changes in patient-reported outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: This was a retrospective series of consecutive patients at 2 high-volume referral centers. The study included patients with (1) a preoperative and postoperative radiograph demonstrating a perfect or nearly perfect profile of the humerus and implant and (2) Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog scale for pain, and American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment scores preoperatively and at greater than 2 years postoperatively. Head height, head diameter, tuberosity-to-head height distance, inclination, and medial offset of the center of rotation (COR) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Distance and direction from the ideal COR to the reconstructed center of rotation was measured. Measurements were correlated with improvement in functional outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 95 patients, aged 66 ± 9 years, with a mean follow-up of 4.3 ± 1.7 years. An a priori power analysis suggested that a sample size of 95 patients provided 80% power to detect correlations of R2 = 0.07. The COR shift was >2 mm in 62% of patients and >4 mm 15%. Thirty-two percent had a change of ASES of <21 points. On multivariate analysis, there were no significant associations between any change in measured prosthetic radiographic parameters and changes in the visual analog scale, Simple Shoulder Test, or ASES scores (P > .05). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis of total shoulder arthroplasty in which most components were well positioned, humeral component positioning did not associate with change in postoperative outcomes. These findings should be prospectively confirmed.

Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores with legacy patient-reported outcome scores in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is being used to assess outcomes in many patient populations despite limited validation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores and PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Upper Extremity (UE) function scores collected preoperatively in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed 164 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Study inclusion required preoperative completion of the ASES and SST evaluations, as well as the PROMIS PF, UE, and Pain Interference computerized adaptive tests. Descriptive statistics were produced, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between each of the outcome measures. RESULTS: Average PROMIS UE scores indicated greater impairment than PROMIS PF scores (34 vs 44). Three percent of patients reached the PROMIS UE ceiling score of 56. PROMIS PF scores demonstrated a weak correlation with ASES scores (r = 0.43, P < .001) and a moderate correlation with SST scores (r = 0.51, P < .001). PROMIS UE scores demonstrated a moderate correlation with both ASES scores (r = 0.59, P < .001) and SST scores (r = 0.62, P < .001). PROMIS Pain Interference scores demonstrated weak negative correlations with both ASES scores (r = -0.43, P < .001) and SST scores (r = -0.41, P < .001). Patients answered fewer questions on average using the PROMIS PF and UE instruments as compared with the ASES and SST instruments. CONCLUSION: PROMIS UE scores indicate greater impairment and demonstrate a stronger correlation with the legacy shoulder scores than PROMIS PF scores in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears. PROMIS computerized adaptive tests allow for more efficient patient-reported outcome data collection compared with traditional outcome scores.

Pronation-Supination Motion Is Altered in a Rat Model of Post-Traumatic Elbow Contracture.

The elbow joint is highly susceptible to joint contracture, and treating elbow contracture is a challenging clinical problem. Previously, we established an animal model to study elbow contracture that exhibited features similar to the human condition including persistent decreased range of motion (ROM) in flexion-extension and increased capsule thickness/adhesions. The objective of this study was to mechanically quantify pronation-supination in different injury models to determine if significant differences compared to control or contralateral persist long-term in our animal elbow contracture model. After surgically inducing soft tissue damage in the elbow, Injury I (anterior capsulotomy) and Injury II (anterior capsulotomy with lateral collateral ligament transection), limbs were immobilized for 6 weeks (immobilization (IM)). Animals were evaluated after the IM period or following an additional 6 weeks of free mobilization (FM). Total ROM for pronation-supination was significantly decreased compared to the uninjured contralateral limb for both IM and FM, although not different from control limbs. Specifically, for both IM and FM, total ROM for Injury I and Injury II was significantly decreased by ∼20% compared to contralateral. Correlations of measurements from flexion-extension and pronation-supination divulged that FM did not affect these motions in the same way, demonstrating that joint motions need to be studied/treated separately. Overall, injured limbs exhibited persistent motion loss in pronation-supination when comparing side-to-side differences, similar to human post-traumatic joint contracture. Future work will use this animal model to study how elbow periarticular soft tissues contribute to contracture.

Does the Critical Shoulder Angle Correlate With Rotator Cuff Tear Progression?

BACKGROUND: The critical shoulder angle (CSA) has been reported to be associated with rotator cuff disease and has been suggested as an etiology for cuff tears. However, it is unclear whether acromial morphologic characteristics such as CSA are a cause or effect because all studies to date have been retrospective. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How often can the CSA be reliably measured? (2) Is the CSA associated with rotator cuff disease? (3) Is the CSA correlated with baseline tear size or tear enlargement? (4) Does the CSA change with time? METHODS: In this retrospective comparison of longitudinally collected data, patients with asymptomatic rotator cuff tears underwent ultrasonography and standardized AP radiographs at enrollment and yearly thereafter during a median of 4 years. Three hundred ninety-five patients were included, of whom 14 were excluded as they were not yet eligible for 2-year followup and 68 (18%) were lost to followup, leaving 313 study patients who were evaluated with 1433 radiographs. Patients with adhesive capsulitis with normal rotator cuffs and radiographically normal scapulae were included as control subjects (119 subjects). Two observers (PNC, DS) measured the CSA in a blinded fashion. Radiographs that met Suter-Henninger criteria for CSA measurement reliability were included. For the study group, 179 of the 313 (57%) patients with radiographs that met Suter-Henninger criteria were further analyzed; the remainder were excluded from this study. For the control group, 50 of 119 (42%) subjects met criteria and were further analyzed. Tear enlargement was found in 94 patients, and the CSA was compared in patients with tears and control subjects, and in tears with or without enlargement, and was correlated with tear size. In a subgroup of the study group in which 59 of 179 patients had a minimum of 3 years between initial and followup radiographs, two CSA measurements were performed to measure change. RESULTS: In total, of the 1552 radiographs evaluated, only 326 (21%) were of sufficient quality to measure the CSA. The CSA was higher among patients with cuff tears than control subjects (34° ± 4° versus 32° ± 4°; mean difference, 2.0°; 95% CI, 0.7°-3.2°; p = 0.003). The CSA did not correlate with baseline tear length (ρ = 0.22, p = 0.090) or width (ρ = 0.16, p = 0.229). The CSA was not different between tears that enlarged and those that were stable (34° ± 3° versus 34° ± 4°; mean difference, 0.2°; 95% CI, -0.9° to -1.4°; p = 0.683). The CSA did not change over time (CSA Time 1: mean 33° ± 4° SD; CSA Time 2: mean 33° ± 4° SD; mean difference, -0.2°; 95% CI, -0.6° to 0.1°; p = 0.253). CONCLUSIONS: Even with a longitudinal protocol, most radiographs are of insufficient quality for CSA measurement. Although patients with a history of degenerative cuff disease have higher CSA values than control subjects, the difference is small enough that it could be influenced by measurement error in practice; in any case, a difference of the magnitude we observed is likely to be clinically unimportant. The CSA is not correlated with tear size or tear progression, and does not seem to change with time. These results suggest that the CSA is unlikely to be related to rotator cuff disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Versus Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Tests (CATs) in Upper Extremity Clinics.

PURPOSE: To examine the performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) relative to the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT in patients seeking specialty care for upper extremity conditions. METHODS: This observational trial analyzed prospectively collected PROMIS UE and PF CAT scores from 5,202 adult patients with 10,344 outpatient clinic visits presenting to a tertiary orthopedic clinic. Pearson correlation coefficient was utilized to evaluate the association between initial PF and UE scores as well as the association between changes in PF and UE scores between visits. Differences in scores between populations presenting with hand conditions versus shoulder and elbow conditions were evaluated via Student t test, as were differences in scores between new and return patient visits. RESULTS: The PROMIS UE CAT scores were strongly correlated with PROMIS PF CAT scores. However, patients averaged 8 points lower scoring on UE CAT testing than on PF CAT scores. The UE CAT demonstrated a ceiling effect at a score of 56 that affected 7% of patients with a secondary ceiling at 50. Changes in PF and UE scores between visits were moderately correlated with a mean difference of less than 1 point. Patients presenting for hand conditions achieved better PF and UE scores than patients presenting for shoulder and elbow conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS UE module appears responsive to changes over time. However, the current UE CAT has a ceiling score of 56, which does not allow for improvement of scores 0.6 SD higher than the presumptive normative population mean of 50. Although a specific assessment of upper extremity function is desirable, continued refinement of the PROMIS UE CAT is required to better assess patients with higher levels of function. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Dislocation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to describe the shared characteristics, etiologies, and outcomes of early and late dislocations requiring operative revision. METHODS: We identified all patients at our institution who underwent operative revision of an RTSA for instability. Baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were collected. Standardized outcome scores were collected preoperatively and at final follow-up. Characteristics of dislocations that occurred less than 3 months postoperatively (early) were compared with those that occurred more than 3 months postoperatively (late). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients met the criteria, and follow-up was obtained on 19 patients at 4.9 ± 2.5 years, with 14 early and 5 late dislocations. Most patients in both groups were men, were aged over 70 years, and had a history of shoulder surgery. On analysis of instability etiology, 68% had inadequate soft-tissue tensioning (10% due to partial axillary nerve injuries). The remaining patients had asymmetric liner wear, mechanical liner failure, or impinging heterotopic ossification. Asymmetric liner wear accounted for 60% of late dislocations. Recurrent instability after revision was present in 29% of early and 40% of late dislocators. DISCUSSION: No significant differences in outcomes or recurrence rates were found for early and late dislocations. Of the late dislocations, 80% had evidence of adduction impingement, via either heterotopic ossification or asymmetric polyethylene wear. Post-RTSA instability had 2 distinct etiologies: (1) instability due to inadequate soft-tissue tensioning and/or axillary nerve palsy and (2) instability due to impingement or liner failure.

Persistent motion loss after free joint mobilization in a rat model of post-traumatic elbow contracture.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic joint contracture (PTJC) in the elbow is a challenging clinical problem due to the anatomical and biomechanical complexity of the elbow joint. METHODS: We previously established an animal model to study elbow PTJC, wherein surgically induced soft tissue damage, followed by 6 weeks of unilateral immobilization in Long-Evans rats, led to stiffened and contracted joints that exhibited features similar to the human condition. In this study, after 6 weeks of immobilization, we remobilized the animal (ie, external bandage removed and free cage activity) for an additional 6 weeks, after which the limbs were evaluated mechanically and histologically. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether this decreased joint motion would persist after 6 weeks of free mobilization (FM). RESULTS: After FM, flexion-extension demonstrated decreased total range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone length, and increased ROM midpoint for injured limbs compared with control and contralateral limbs. Specifically, after FM total ROM demonstrated a significant decrease of approximately 22% and 26% compared with control and contralateral limbs for injury I (anterior capsulotomy) and injury II (anterior capsulotomy with lateral collateral ligament transection), respectively. Histologic evaluation showed increased adhesion, fibrosis, and thickness of the capsule tissue in the injured limbs after FM compared with control and contralateral limbs, which is consistent with patterns previously reported in human tissue. CONCLUSION: Even with FM, injured limbs in this model demonstrate persistent joint motion loss and histologic results similar to the human condition. Future work will use this animal model to investigate the mechanisms responsible for PTJC and responses to therapeutic intervention.