Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured or Symptomatic Thoracoabdominal and Pararenal Aortic Aneurysms Using Octopus Endograft Technique: Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using off-the-shelf "Octopus" technique to treat ruptured or symptomatic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAAA). METHODS AND RESULTS: All cases who underwent "Octopus" technique from May 2016 to May 2019 at our center were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 10 cases (8 males) were included. The mean age was 54.5±14.2 years (range: 31-80 years). Eight cases presented as aneurysm rupture or impending rupture accepted emergency repair. Technical success, defined by placement of all endografts as planned, was achieved in all cases. A total of 30 target visceral branches were successfully cannulated, 9 celiac arteries were covered intentionally. Intraoperative endoleak was observed in 6 patients, all of them were gutter leak. During hospital stay, there was no death, no side branch occlusion or spinal cord ischemia. Median follow-up was 30 months (range: 12-50 months). One patient died of lung cancer at 14-month follow-up. There was no secondary endoleak. The primary endoleak were found spontaneously resolved in 3 cases at 7 days, 3-month, and 1-year imaging. One persistent endoleak totally resolved after sealing of gutter spaces at 4-month follow-up. The other 2 persistent endoleak decreased during follow-up, which are still under observation. The branch patency rate was 90.3% (28/31). All the 3 occluded branches were renal arteries. Branch occlusion occurred in 2 cases at 1-month follow-up and 1 case at 2-year follow-up, but renal insufficiency was not observed in these cases. Obvious aneurysm sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) was observed in all cases. The aneurysm size shrunk from 7.6±1.9 to 5.5±1.4 cm. No spinal cord ischemia occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Treatment of ruptured TAAA and PRAAA with "Octopus" technique is feasible and safe for high surgical risk patients in the absence of fenestrated and branched devices. The long-term clinical outcomes needed to be investigated.

Comparative Analysis of Patch Angioplasty Versus Selective Primary Closure during Carotid Endarterectomy Performed at a Single Vascular Center in China.

BACKGROUND: One of the ongoing debates about carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the closure technique of arterial wall in the operation. Current guidelines recommend routine patch closure (PAC); this recommendation is based on the evidence reported 10-20 years ago. Therefore, the exact role of PAC and primary closure (PRC) remains uncertain. The objectives of this study were to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent CEA with different closure techniques. METHODS: From January 2013 and December 2018, one senior vascular surgeon performed CEA for 126 patients in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. The closure technique (PAC or PRC) was determined on the characteristics (diameter and level) of carotid arteries. Patient demographics and clinical data were retrospectively collected by two research fellows by reviewing the hospital medical records and relevant radiologic studies, as were carotid duplex reports, indications, intraoperative data, closure technique, and perioperative complications. Data of long-term outcomes were gathered by reviewing outpatient clinic visits and associated supplementary examinations. RESULTS: PRC was performed in 78 operations (61.9%), and PAC was performed in 48 operations (38.1%). There were no statistical differences in demographic and clinical data between the two groups. Carotid clamp time (P < 0.001) and operating time (P < 0.001) were significantly longer when performing PAC (P < 0.001), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly more when performing PAC than that of PRC (P < 0.001). The postoperative outcome and the follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the short-term and middle-term overall survival rate and restenosis-free survival rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in postoperative and middle-term outcomes between PAC and selective PRC, whereas PRC technique can save operation time and shorten the intraoperative carotid clamp time. PRC can be safely applied in patients with a greater than 5 mm internal carotid artery (ICA).

Treatment of High Surgical Risk Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Stent Graft and Multilayer Bare Stents Joint Technique: Mid-Long-Term Clinical Results.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to present the performance data on stent-graft and multilayer bare stents (MBS) joint technique in the treatment of high-risk thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). METHODS: From May 2012 to December 2015, 8 selective TAAA cases (ages 46-75 years) ineligible for surgical repair underwent the stent-graft and MBS joint procedure, and were closely followed up for a median of 32 months (range 14-58). Using computed tomography images, the aneurysm size, luminal blood flow diameter, and the covered visceral branches were analyzed. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%, 8/8). Twenty-four visceral branches were covered by MBS in total. There was no complication or death during hospital stay. During follow-up period, no death or complication occurred. Aneurysm shrinkage (maximum diameter decrease ≥5 mm) was observed in 7 patients. No aneurysm expansion was observed. Total aneurysm sac thrombosis was observed in all patients. The majority of covered side branches (23/24) were successfully preserved. No visceral ischemia or bleeding complications was observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Total endovascular repair of TAAA using stent-graft and MBS joint technique may be a safe and effective alternative in high surgical risk patients. More approving clinical evidences about the safety and efficacy of this procedure are anticipated.

[Ultrasonic monitoring foam sclerotherapy for serious varicosis of lower extremity].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of foam sclerotherapy for lower extremity varicosis in C4 to C6 patients. METHODS: A total of 32 patients (32 limbs) with serious lower extremity varicosis classified as C4 to C6 were enrolled. Ultrasonic monitoring of foam sclerotherapy was performed after subfascial endoscopic perforator suture and saphenous vein ligation. They were followed up monthly at outpatient department. Duplex Doppler scan was performed during each interview. RESULTS: All patients were treated successfully. An average of 3.2 perforators were ligated per leg (1-5 perforators). The average volume of foam sclerosing agent was 27.5 ml per leg. Mild chest tightness was observed in one patient but computed tomography (CT) scan excluded pulmonary embolism. Obvious local inflammatory reaction was observed in 4 patients. Residual vein mass without blood signal was seen in 3 patients. No such serious complication as cerebral ischemia was observed. The average follow-up period was 4.8 (1-10) months. Obvious varicose veins and clinical symptoms disappeared at 1 month. And venous ulcers in patients classified as C5 healed within 3 months. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic monitoring of foam sclerotherapy, incorporation with saphenous vein ligation and subfascial endoscopic perforator suture, is both safe and effective in the treatment of serious lower extremity varicosis classified as C4 to C6.

High-density lipoprotein regulates angiogenesis by long non-coding RNA HDRACA.

Normal high-density lipoprotein (nHDL) can induce angiogenesis in healthy individuals. However, HDL from patients with coronary artery disease undergoes various modifications, becomes dysfunctional (dHDL), and loses its ability to promote angiogenesis. Here, we identified a long non-coding RNA, HDRACA, that is involved in the regulation of angiogenesis by HDL. In this study, we showed that nHDL downregulates the expression of HDRACA in endothelial cells by activating WW domain-containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2, which catalyzes the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of its transcription factor, Kruppel-like factor 5, via sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor 1. In contrast, dHDL with lower levels of S1P than nHDL were much less effective in decreasing the expression of HDRACA. HDRACA was able to bind to Ras-interacting protein 1 (RAIN) to hinder the interaction between RAIN and vigilin, which led to an increase in the binding between the vigilin protein and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) mRNA, resulting in a decrease in the expression of PCNA and inhibition of angiogenesis. The expression of human HDRACA in a hindlimb ischemia mouse model inhibited the recovery of angiogenesis. Taken together, these findings suggest that HDRACA is involved in the HDL regulation of angiogenesis, which nHDL inhibits the expression of HDRACA to induce angiogenesis, and that dHDL is much less effective in inhibiting HDRACA expression, which provides an explanation for the decreased ability of dHDL to stimulate angiogenesis.

MicroRNA-21 regulates vascular smooth muscle cell function via targeting tropomyosin 1 in arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower extremities.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the expression signature and the potential role of microRNAs in human arteries with arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO). METHODS AND RESULTS: The expression profiles of microRNAs in human arteries with ASO and in normal control arteries were determined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction array. Among the 617 detected microRNAs, multiple microRNAs were aberrantly expressed in arteries with ASO. Some of these dysregulated microRNAs were further verified by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Among them, microRNA-21 (miR-21) was mainly located in arterial smooth muscle cells (ASMCs) and was increased by more than 7-fold in ASO that was related to hypoxia inducible factor 1-α. In cultured human ASMCs, cell proliferation and migration were significantly decreased by inhibition of miR-21. 3'-Untranslated region luciferase assay confirmed that tropomyosin 1 was a target of miR-21 that was involved in miR-21-mediated cellular effects, such as cell shape modulation. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that miR-21 is able to regulate ASMC function by targeting tropomyosin 1. The hypoxia inducible factor-1 α/miR-21/tropomyosin 1 pathway may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of ASO. These findings might provide a new therapeutic target for human ASO.

[Potential causes and optimal treatment strategy of recurrent venous ulceration in lower limb].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential causes and the optimal treatments of recurrent venous ulceration of lower limbs after initial operation. METHODS: Data of patients admitted between January 2000 and June 2010 for recurrent ulceration in lower limbs after previous operation were retrospectively analyzed. Altogether 81 limbs in 73 patients were recruited. There were 55 male patients (60 limbs) and 18 female patients (21 limbs). The average age was 52.6 years (ranging from 31 to 73 years). All the patients had received at least one surgery procedures before recurrence. The average time between ulceration recurrence and the last operation was 10.6 months (ranging from 5 to 37 months). Average diameter of ulcers was 3.7 cm (ranging from 1.3 to 6.5 cm). Color duplex sonography before re-treatment revealed incompetent calf perforators in 57 limbs (70.4%), primary deep vein insufficiency in 38 limbs (46.9%), post-DVT syndrome in 16 limbs (19.8%), reflux of accessory saphenous veins in 11 limbs (13.6%) and residual/re-opened great saphenous vein in 8 limbs (9.9%). Managements including stripping of great saphenous vein, ligation around the ulcer, percutanous ligation of varicose veins, valvoplasty, and adjuvant compressive therapy were adopted according to different venous abnormality. RESULTS: All the patients were followed. All the ulcers healed and hemodynamic indexes were greatly improved 6 months after re-operation. Only 3 limbs (3.7%) suffered again from recurrence 1 year after re-operation. CONCLUSIONS: Incompetent perforators in calf, primary or secondary deep vein insufficiency and incorrectly treated saphenous veins are main causes for recurrent venous ulceration in our series. Management of residual vein abnormalities can still achieve satisfying clinical outcome.

[Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a clinical report of 81 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and to compare the prognosis between patients of different ages. METHODS: The hospitalization and follow-up data of 81 AAA patients treated by EVAR from May 2005 to May 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into advanced age group (age ≥ 75 years, 24 cases) and relatively young group (age < 75 years, 57 cases). General conditions, comorbidity, procedure, in-hospital complications, and follow-up were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: All covered stents were successfully deployed, a technical success rate of 91.4% (74/81) was achieved. There was no intraoperative death. In-hospital mortality was 1.2% (1/81). The follow-up rate was 91.4% (74/81), with a mean follow-up of 47.5 months. Twelve deaths were recorded during follow-up, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-year survival rates were 98.6%, 92.2%, 80.8%, 58.7%, and 44.1%, respectively. When compared with relatively young group, the advanced age group had a lower rate of abdominal pain as the major symptom, but a higher rates of renal diseases and coronary artery diseases. Furthermore, the advanced age group had a longer stay in intensive care unit and higher morbidity of endoleaks, and also tended to have increased rates of pulmonary infection and access site hematoma, while the other parameters were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR of AAA is less invasive, safe, and effective during short to mid-tern follow-up. The patients of advanced age suffer from higher rates of some complications, thus careful perioperative preparation and intensive monitor are mandatory for preventing or treating potential complications and improving prognosis for these patients.

[Risk factors and therapeutic management of deep venous thrombosis in hospitalized children].

OBJECTIVE: The incidence and treatment regimen for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalized children in China are rarely reported. This report was to assess the incidence, risk factors and treatment strategy for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) among hospitalized children admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, a single tertiary-care hospital. METHODS: In twenty years between 1989 and 2009, 12 DVTs in hospitalized children (< 17 years old) were identified in this hospital. Clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The incidence of DVT in hospitalized children was low, however, it demonstrated increasing trend from 0.52 per 10 000 admissions between 1989 and 1999 to 3.18 per 10 000 admissions between 2000 and 2009 in this hospital. Infection and trauma were the mostly frequent causes of DVT in hospitalized children. The catheter-related DVT was increasingly prevalent cause for DVT in hospitalized children. The other causes included nephritic syndrome, tumor, systemic lupus, and congenital plasma C protein deficiency. Two patients were complicated with pulmonary embolism. Only one neonate died due to kernicterus. Anticoagulation therapy was the first recommended treatment choice in hospitalized children with DVT, especially more low-molecular-weight heparin in recent 10 years. Antithrombotic treatment was used in 9 children older than 30 days through peripheral venous access, its application should be meticulously cautious in dosage. No bleeding occurred in all the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cautions should be given to DVT among hospitalized children due to its increasing incidence and special treatment pattern compared with adult patients.

[Etiological analysis and treatment of the complications of hybrid procedure in the treatment of aortic arch diseases].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the reasons of complications after hybrid procedure in the treatment of aortic arch diseases. METHODS: Data from 34 consecutive patients (28 male and 6 female) of aortic arch diseases treated with hybrid procedure between January 2001 and December 2008 was analyzed retrospectively. The mean age of the patients was 56.7 years (ranged from 34 to 75 years). Of the 34 patients, 27 were aortic dissections (21 cases of Stanford type A dissections and 6 cases of Stanford type B dissections) and 7 were aortic arch aneurysms. Hybrid procedure included ascending aorta (AA)-innominate artery-left common carotid artery (LCCA) bypass (n = 3), AA-LCCA-left subclavian artery (LSA) bypass (n = 2), AA-LCCA bypass and coronary artery bypass (n = 1), LCCA-right common carotid artery (RCCA) bypass (n = 13), RCCA-LCCA and LCCA-LSA bypass (n = 3), LSA-LCCA-RCCA bypass (n = 2) and LCCA-LSA bypass (n = 9). All the patients received single stage (n = 26) or staged (n = 8) endovascular repairs. RESULTS: The complications occurred in 32.4% (11/34), with 11.8% (4/34) of all patients having lethal complications. The complications included 1 case of rupture of aortic dissection (2.9%), 2 cases of stroke (5.9%), 2 cases of stomal leak and pseudoaneurysm (5.9%), 1 case of myocardial infarct (2.9%), 1 case of pulmonary embolism (2.9%), 1 case of neck hematoma (2.9%) and 3 cases of endoleak (8.8%). In the period of follow-up (6 to 50 months), all patients were alive except for 4 perioperative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Complication rate of hybrid procedure in the treatment of aortic arch diseases is higher than that of simple endovascular repair of descending aortic diseases. Reducing the lethal complications is the key to disseminate this technique.

[Early to mid-term results of endovascular repair of aortic dissection: report of 165 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early and midterm outcomes of endovascular repair of aortic dissection (AD). METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2006, 165 patients (145 male and 20 female) with AD were treated with endovascular repairing. The mean age of the patients was 52.8 years (range, 30-82 years). Among them, 36 patients had Stanford type A dissection, 121 had type B dissection and 8 had aortic ulcer. Among the dissection patients, 47 were acute AD (the interval between onset and surgery was < or = 7 days), 69 were subacute AD (the interval between onset and surgery was 8-30 days) and 41 were chronic AD (the interval between onset and surgery was > 30 days). RESULTS: The stents were placed technically successfully in 164 patients (99.4%). The rate of endoleak within 30 days after placement of stents was 7.3% (12/165) and neurologic complication rate was 2.5% (4/165). The mortality rate within 30 days was 6.1% (10/165), and the mortality of acute, subacute and chronic AD was 12.8%, 1.4% and 7.3%, respectively. One hundred and forty-five cases were followed up for 6 to 75 months (median, 28.2 months). Complete thrombosis in false lumen was achieved in 62 patients (42.8%), while partial thrombosis was achieved in 83 patients (57.2%). Nine patients died during fellow-up. CONCLUSION: It's indicated that endovascular repair of AD is a microinvasive, safe and effective methods for aortic dissection. However, the long-term efficacy needs to be evaluated further.

MiR-140-3p is Involved in In-Stent Restenosis by Targeting C-Myb and BCL-2 in Peripheral Artery Disease.

AIM: In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) is the major reason for recurrent ischemia and amputation after endovascular treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). Our previous study demonstrated that miR-140-3p is significantly down-regulated in PAD arteries. However, expression and function of miR-140-3p in ISR of human PAD are currently unclear.The aim of this study is to determine the miR-140-3p expression and its regulative role in ISR of PAD. METHODS: The RNA level was determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) and in situ hybridization. Primary cultured ASMCs were isolated from human femoral arterial of the healthy donors or ISR patients. Cell proliferation was determined by Edu incorporation and CCK-8 assay. Apoptosis was determined by Annexin-Ⅴ/PI Double-Staining assay and TUNEL assay. A rat carotid artery balloon angioplasty model was used to investigate the effect of miR-140-3p on restenosis. RESULTS: MiR-140-3p was significantly down-regulated in PAD and ISR arteries than normal arteries. Primary cultured ISR ASMCs exhibited elevated proliferation and down-regulated miR-140-3p than normal ASMCs. Transfection of miR-140-3p mimic attenuated PDGF-BB-induced proliferation in cultured ASMCs and induced apoptosis. Luciferase reporter assay indicated that miR-140-3p transfection significantly down-regulated C-Myb and BCL-2 in ISR ASMCs by targeting to their 3'-UTRs. MiR-140-3p transfection induced anti-proliferation and apoptosis in ASMCs, which were ameliorated by over-expression of C-Myb or BCL-2. Moreover, the animal study showed that miR-140-3p can reduce restenosis following angioplasty via targeting C-Myb and BCL-2. CONCLUSIONS: The result suggests that miR-140-3p regulates ASMC function via targeting C-Myb and BCL-2 in the process of ISR in PAD. The novel findings may offer a hopeful therapeutic target for human PAD.

[Endovascular stent-graft repair for Stanford type A aortic dissection with extra-anatomic bypass].

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of endovascular stent-graft repair for Stanford type A aortic dissection combined with extra-anatomic bypass. METHODS: To perform endovascular repair for Stanford type A aortic dissection, we tried to extend the landing zone by extra-anatomic bypass to reconstruct the innominate artery, the left common carotid artery or the left subclavian artery, and then achieved the process immediately or at a secondary stage via either the carotid or the femoral approach. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with ascending aortic dissection (n=8) and aortic arch dissection (n=26) were treated with this technique. Thirty three patients were successfully done aortic endovascular repair, only one died during the operation. The thirty-day mortality rate was 8.8% (3/34), endoleak incidence rate was 11.8% (4/34) and incidence rate of cerebral infarction was 5.9% (2/34). Twenty-nine patients were followed-up for 6-70 months (mean, 24. 5 months). Complete (n=16) and partial (n=13) thrombosis of the false lumen were showed with CT angiography and/or vascular color Doppler ultrasound scanning. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular stent-graft repair combined with extra-anatomic bypass can be a novel option for Stanford type A aortic dissection; it is safe, less invasive, and with fewer complications. Nevertheless, indications need further consideration.

[Endovascular stent-graft treatment for DeBakey I aortic dissection].

OBJECTIVE: To study endovascular treatment of DeBakey type I aortic dissecting aneurysm. METHODS: Seven patients with DeBakey I aortic dissecting aneurysms were treated. Diagnoses were confirmed by MRA, CT and angiography. The intimal tear entry was in the ascending aorta, 2.5 approximately 6.0 cm from the ostia of the coronary arteries, and 0.5 approximately 4.0 cm from the brachiocephalic trunk opening. Endovascular stent-grafts were deployed via a left common carotid artery (LCCA) approach in 2 cases and right femoral artery (RFA) approach in 5 cases. Prior to treatment, a left subclavicular artery (LSA)-LCCA shunt was established to ensure blood supply to the LCCA during surgery in 2 cases via LCCA approach, and a LSA-LCCA-right common carotid artery (RCCA) synthetic bypass was established to ensure blood supply to the brain in 2 cases in RFA approach. RESULTS: The operative success rate was 100%. In 3 cases, endoleak persisted after the first stent was placed, but this was eliminated by placement of a second stent. All patients survived except one who died of acute massive hemorrhage from the upper gastrointestinal tract one month postoperatively. The false lumen in all 6 cases became thrombosed and no endoleak or new aortic dissecting aneurysms developed. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of DeBakey type I aortic dissecting aneurysm is feasible, minimally invasive, and effective. Case selection depends on the distance of the coronary artery ostia from the tear entry.

[Endografting for refractory aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety and feasibility of endograft repair in refractory aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm. METHODS: The clinical data of 13 refractory cases of aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm, 11 males and 2 females, aged 52 (38-82), out of the 68 consecutive patients with aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm who underwent endograft repair from Jan 2001 to Oct 2004, were analyzed. Nine of the 13 cases were diagnoses as with aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm of Stanford type A, 3 of which had tears in the ascending aorta (DeBakey type I), 3 had tears in aortic arch, and 3 had tears on the distal aortic arch with ascending aorta involved; and the other four out of the 13 cases were diagnosed as Stanford type B, one with Marfan's syndrome. Eight of the 13 cases had more than 2 entries, 3 of which had suffered from shock and hemathorax due to rupture preoperatively. Follow-up ranging 2 months to 3 years was carried out after the operation. RESULTS: Transluminal placement of stentgratf was technically successful in all patients. Three patients with DeBakey type I dissections received stent-grafts introduced through the left common carotid or right femoral artery, of which one case died from gastrointestinal hemorrhage 1 month postoperatively. For the patients with tears in aortic arch preliminary Y type bypass from ascending aorta to left common carotid artery and left subclivian artery was performed in 2 cases, and carotid-carotid artery bypass was performed in one case, and then stent-grafts were deployed through right femoral artery. The 3 cases with tears in the distal arch and ruptured aneurysm, received stent-grafts implantation through the femoral artery emergently, and closed thoracic drainage and anti-shock treatment, one of which died from another aneurysm rupture 27 hours postoperatively. Out of the 4 cases with Stanford type B dissection with multiple tear entries, 3 underwent multiple stent-grafts repair and 1 underwent emergent abdominal-bilateral iliac arteries Y-type graft bypass due to rupture of iliac dissecting aneurysm. During the follow-up CT, MRI and color Doppler sonography showed that all 11 patients remained healthy with the former tears well closed and thrombosis in the false lumen. CONCLUSION: Endograft repair for refractory aortic dissecting aneurysm is feasible and technically successful, especially for the patients with tears in the ascending aorta or aortic arch.

[Endovascular stent-graft exclusion of giant and long-segment thoracic aortic aneurysms].

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the availability of endovascular stent-graft exclusion in giant and long-segment thoracic aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Endovascular stent-graft exclusion was performed on 3 male patients with giant and long-segment thoracic aortic aneurysm. Multiple stent-grafts were connected as a long stent-graft to repair these thoracic aortic aneurysms, of which one with 28 cm in length and 7.3 cm in maximum diameter was excluded by 4 stent-grafts with different diameters and same length of 130 mm. The preliminary bypass between right common carotid artery and left common carotid artery or left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery was performed on 2 patients. RESULTS: Three patients underwent the operation successfully, and achieved the good results. There was no endoleak at the conjunction of stent-grafts in 2 cases, and a little endoleak in 1 case, which disappeared 1 year after operation. One case presented temporal cerebral ischemia, which disappeared after 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: The endovascular deployment with multiple stent-grafts connection is a safe, mini-invasive and effective therapeutic method for giant and long-segment thoracic aortic aneurysm, but long-term outcomes will be gotten after the follow-up study.

[Single or staged endovascular stent-graft repair for aortic dissection with multi-tears].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the single or staged endovascular stent-graft repair for aortic dissection with multi-tears. METHODS: The stent-grafts were inserted through the femoral artery to seal the tears of dissection. RESULTS: Between January 2001 and June 2004, 8 patients with aortic dissection underwent stent-graft placement. There were 5 tears in one patient, 4 tears in two patients, 3 tears in two patients and 2 tears in three patients. There were 11 tears located at descending thoracic aorta, 11 at abdominal aorta and 4 at iliac artery. Six patients underwent operation in single stage, and 2 in staged maneuver. Total 23 stent-grafts were used, including 20 straight type grafts and 3 bifurcated grafts. Placement of the stent-graft was technically successful in all patients. Follow-up with CT or MRA examination after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively showed the dissection disappeared with thrombosis in the false lumen, no endoleak occurred. All patients survived to present. CONCLUSION: Single or staged endovascular stent-graft repair is a promising, safe and effective procedure for aortic dissection with multi-tears.

Endovascular stent-graft repair of aortic dissection.

Between October 2000 and January 2002, 9 consecutive male patients with subacute or chronic aortic dissection underwent stent-graft placement. The indication for surgery was continuous pain or aneurysm development. One patient had a type A dissecting aortic aneurysm with a primary tear in the ascending thoracic aorta; the other 8 had type B dissection. Placement of an endovascular stent-graft was technically successful in 8 patients, and one underwent an open procedure for abdominal aortic fenestration. The entry site was sealed and the false lumen disappeared in 8 cases, and thrombosis of the false lumen was obtained. Rupture of an iliac artery dissecting aneurysm occurred in one patient 2 days after stent-graft placement; abdominal aortic fenestration with prosthetic replacement of the distal abdominal aorta was performed. One patient died of myocardial infarction 3 days after the stent-graft procedure. During a mean follow-up period of 7 months (1-16 months), one patient died of acute myocardial infarction at 11 months. It was concluded on the basis of these short-term results that endovascular repair of aortic dissection is a promising treatment, and abdominal aortic fenestration is a useful adjuvant procedure.