Risk factors of chronic kidney disease in cisplatin-based hyperthermia intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin is commonly prescribed in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancy. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is regarded as a common complication after HIPEC combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, post-HIPEC chronic kidney disease (CKD) is scarce and less investigated. This study aims to investigate the incidence of CKD following cisplatin-based HIPEC and to analyse the associated risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to August 2021, a total of 55 patients treated with CRS and cisplatin-based HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis were categorized retrospectively into groups, with and without CKD. Demographics, comorbidity, surgery, postoperative management, and complications were collected to evaluate risk factors for cisplatin-based HIPEC-related CKD. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to confirm the correlation between different variables and CKD occurrence. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients, 24 (43.6%) patients developed AKI and 17 (70.8%) patients of these AKI patients progressed to CKD. Multivariate regression analysis identified intraoperative use of parecoxib (Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.39) and intraoperative maximum temperature > 38.5°C (OR = 6.40) as major risk factors for cisplatin-based HIPEC-related CKD occurrence. Though type II diabetes mellitus and intraoperative complications were the independent risk factors of AKI following cisplatin-based HIPEC, but they were not shown in CKD analysis. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative use of parecoxib during cisplatin-based HIPEC emerged as a significant risk factor for postoperative CKD. Clinicians should exercise caution in prescribing parecoxib during HIPEC procedures. Additionally, maintaining intraoperative body temperature below 38.5°C might be crucial to mitigate the risk of CKD development. This study underscores the importance of identifying and preventing specific risk factors to improve long-term renal outcomes in patients undergoing cisplatin-based HIPEC.

Acupuncture May Help to Prevent Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Single-Blind Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the efficacy of acupuncture in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This single center, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial randomly assigned patients with stage 3 CRC attending outpatient clinics in China Medical University Hospital to either verum or sham acupuncture treatment concurrently with chemotherapy. Primary outcomes were nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and touch thresholds of limb terminals. Secondary outcomes were total and subdomain scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), and scores on the FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale and the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), at baseline, weeks 12, 36, and follow-up (week 48). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and received verum acupuncture (N = 16) or sham acupuncture (N = 16). Under the -intent-to-treat principle, 26 participants were analyzed. Significant changes from baseline for questionnaire scores and sensory NCV were observed in both study groups. Sham acupuncture was associated with significant reductions from baseline in motor NCV and sensory touch thresholds; no such changes were observed with verum acupuncture. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic acupuncture may exert neuroprotective effects on mechanical or tactile touch thresholds during chemotherapy regimens in patients with CRC, with evidence of this protectiveness persisting at 6 months' follow-up. The lack of change in motor NCV values with verum acupuncture indicates neuroprotective effects. Sensory NCV values and patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the study groups.

Laparoscopic total pelvic peritonectomy for colorectal cancer pelvic carcinomatosis: a retrospective case series and photographic/videographic step-by-step guide.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis has been shown to prolong survival with acceptable morbidity rates. Total pelvic peritonectomy (TPP), or complete removal of all pelvic peritoneum, constitutes an important and technically challenging component of CRS. Here we report our experience and describe our technique of laparoscopic total pelvic peritonectomy (LTPP), using a photographic/videographic step-by-step guide. METHODS: All patients who underwent LTPP for pelvic carcinomatosis from a colorectal origin were included in the study. Only patients with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score of ≤ 10 were selected for CRS with LTPP. Patients who had extra-abdominopelvic cavity metastases were excluded. The final decision to proceed with CRS was made following laparoscopic assessment. RESULTS: From January 2017 to December 2020, 15 consecutive patients underwent LTPP for colorectal cancer pelvic carcinomatosis. Median patient age and PCI score was 53 years (range 33-78) and 8 (range 3-10), respectively. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. Thirteen patients (87%) underwent concomitant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The median operative duration was 748 min (interquartile range [IQR] 681-850). Median intra-operative blood loss and length of hospital stay was 100 ml (IQR 50-300) and 10 days (IQR 8-12), respectively. Five patients (33%) experienced 30-day post-operative morbidity, with one (6.7%) experiencing a higher grade (Clavien-Dindo IIIa) complication. Median follow-up duration was 13 months (IQR 3-19), during which four (27%) had systemic recurrence and one (6.7%) died after 15 months following peritoneal and systemic recurrences. CONCLUSION: LTPP is a feasible option for low-volume pelvic carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer, offering the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. Strict patient selection is essential, and the procedure should be converted if the PCI score cannot be assessed or complete cytoreduction cannot be achieved. Proficiency at laparoscopic pelvic surgery is mandatory for performing LTPP.

Peritoneal contamination and associated post-operative infectious complications after natural orifice specimen extraction for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal contamination is a major concern during natural orifice specimen extraction after laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR-NOSE), but few data are available. We explored the prevalence, risk factors, and association between clinical outcomes and infectious complications in patients with positive peritoneal drain fluid culture (PDFC) after LCR-NOSE. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed patient records in our prospectively maintained registry database who underwent LCR-NOSE between 2011and 2020. Peritoneal drain fluid was collected within 12 h post-operative and cultures for microorganisms were obtained. The relationships between PDFC, clinical variables, and infectious complications were examined by univariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Of 241 consecutive patients who underwent LCR-NOSE and drainage fluid culture, 59 (24.5%) had PDFC. Anterior resection (Odds ratio OR 2.40) was identified as an independent predictor for PDFC. Twenty-eight patients (11.6%) developed infectious complications. Multivariable analysis identified low anterior resection (OR 2.74), prolonged operative time (OR 3.20), and PDFC (OR 5.14) as independent risk factors. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently found microorganism (OR 5.19) responsible for infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Microorganisms are commonly present in the peritoneum after LCR-NOSE and play a critical role in the development of infectious complications and related morbidity. Specific caution is warranted in patients contaminated with specific types of microorganisms.

Natural orifice versus conventional mini-laparotomy for specimen extraction after reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: propensity score-matched comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Although reduced port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS), defined as laparoscopic surgery performed with the minimum possible number of ports and/or small-sized ports, is less invasive than conventional laparoscopic surgery by reducing the number of surgical wounds, an extension of the incision is still needed for specimen extraction, which can undermine the merits of RPLS. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in patients undergoing RPLS for colorectal cancer. The endpoints were perioperative outcome and oncologic safety at 3 years. SETTING: Single-center experience (2013-2019). PATIENTS: We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected patient records (American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-III sigmoid or upper rectal cancer (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm) who underwent curative anterior resection via RPLS. We excluded patients who did not undergo intestinal anastomosis. INTERVENTIONS: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between patients undergoing natural orifice (RPLS-NOSE) or conventional (mini-laparotomy) specimen extraction (RPLS-CSE). Patients were matched by propensity scores 1:1 for tumor diameter, AJCC stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and tumor location. RESULTS: Of 119 eligible patients, 104 were matched (52 RPLS-NOSE; 52 RPLS-CSE) by propensity scores. Compared with RPLS-CSE, RPLS-NOSE was associated with longer operative time (223.9 vs. 188.7 min; p = 0.003), decreased use of analgesics (morphine dose 33.9 vs. 43.4 mg; p = 0.011) and duration of hospital stay (4.2 vs. 5.1 days; p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in morbidity or wound-related complication rates between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 34.3 months, no local recurrence was observed in RPLS-NOSE. The 3-year disease-free survival did not differ statistically significantly between groups (90.9 vs. 90.5%; p = 0.610). CONCLUSION: NOSE enhances the advantages of RPLS by avoiding the need for abdominal wall specimen extraction in patients with tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm. Surgical and oncologic safety are comparable to RPLS with CSE.

Laparoscopic Reintervention for Intraperitoneal Leaks After Colonic Surgery: Do We Need a Routine Stoma?

INTRODUCTION: No universal consensus exists on the management of intraperitoneal anastomosis leakage after colonic surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic reintervention without stoma creation for intraperitoneal leaks after colonic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single tertiary center study conducted from January 2010 to December 2020. 54 patients with intraperitoneal leakage were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received a stoma (n = 37) or not (n = 17) during laparoscopic reintervention. Short term outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients in the no stoma group had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = .009), lower Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (5 vs. 10; P < .001) compared with the stoma group. Intensive care unit admission (43.2% vs. 5.8%; P = .006) and major complications (35.1% vs. 5.8%; P = .015) occurred more in the stoma group compared to the no stoma group. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial surgical procedure (P = .001) and APACHE II score (P = .039) were significant predictors of no stoma. The APACHE II score(P = .035) was an independent predictor of major complications. Finally, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of APACHE II score for no stoma was 7.5. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, APACHE II score was an independent predictor of stoma formation and the cutoff value of APACHE II score for no stoma was 7.5. Our results need to be confirmed by larger and randomized studies. In particular, a specific APACHE II threshold to omit a stoma in this setting remains to be determined.

Uncomplicated Sigmoid Volvulus Is Ideal for Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy With Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction.

INTRODUCTION: Natural orifice specimen extraction is the next step in minimally invasive colorectal surgery but can be technically challenging, with additional risks, especially for oncologic surgery. For several key reasons, sigmoid volvulus is well suited for natural orifice specimen extraction surgery. We describe our method and experience with double-stapled anastomosis transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction for sigmoid volvulus. TECHNIQUE: Using 3- or 4-port laparoscopy, the mesentery is separated from the long sigmoid loop. After the distal bowel is tied off and washed out, the rectum is completely transected and the proximal bowel delivered transrectally through a wound protector. Proximal transection is performed externally, and the circular stapler anvil is set before the bowel is returned into the abdominal cavity. The rectum stump is closed with an endoscopic linear stapler, and a circular-stapled anastomosis is performed. RESULTS: After successful endoscopic decompression, 6 patients underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction for volvulus at China Medical University Hospital from 2015 to 2020. The median operative time was 179 minutes (range, 151-236 min). No intraoperative complications were encountered. The median postoperative length of stay was 4 days (range, 2-9 d). One patient experienced postoperative small-bowel ileus resulting in readmission. The median follow-up duration was 12 months (range, 2-49 mo). One recurrence of volvulus was recorded 27 months postsurgery. CONCLUSION: Uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus can be treated effectively with sigmoidectomy and natural orifice specimen extraction. Surgeons who attempt this procedure should be well versed with conventional laparoscopy but do not necessarily need to be experienced with natural orifice specimen extraction for successful surgery.

Laparoscopic retrojejunal trans-mesenteric anastomosis for extended left-sided colorectal resections - a new solution to an old problem.

AIM: Following extended left-sided colorectal resection, creation of the anastomosis can be challenging due to insufficient length of the remaining proximal and distal bowel. Retroileal pull-through and the Deloyers procedure are feasible but require ligation of the middle colic vessels and additional right colonic mobilization. The aim of this study was to describe our initial experience with an alternative technique for performing tension-free anastomosis following minimally invasive left-sided resection. METHOD: This was a retrospective case series of all patients who underwent a retrojejunal trans-mesenteric pull-through following elective laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery between September 2019 and September 2020. Placing the retrojejunal window 15-20 cm distal to the duodenojejunal junction allows the transverse colon to pass via the most direct route through the base of the proximal jejunal mesentery to the distal colon or rectal stump instead of passing over the small bowel, yielding additional length for the anastomosis. An accompanying video demonstrates this technique for three different case scenarios. RESULTS: Seven consecutive patients underwent this approach following colorectal resection; three had inherently shorter left colons, two had synchronous left-sided tumours and two had inadvertent intraoperative marginal artery injury. There were no anastomotic complications or early postoperative morbidity related to the mesenteric window. The additional time taken for the procedure ranged from 5 to 35 min. The risk of complications related to extended left-sided resections may possibly be reduced, although further studies are required to evaluate this. CONCLUSION: Retrojejunal trans-mesenteric pull-through is a novel, but straightforward, safe and useful option for reducing tension in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal anastomoses.

Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anterior Resections for Cancer with Natural Orifice Versus Conventional Specimen Extraction: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Although the short-term advantages of natural orifice specimen extraction are widely recognized, controversy exists concerning oncologic safety after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of natural orifice specimen extraction on local recurrence and long-term survival of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. DESIGN: This is a propensity score-matched comparative study. SETTING: This study presents a single-center experience. PATIENTS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent curative laparoscopic anterior resection for American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I to III sigmoid or upper rectal cancer in 2011 to 2014, based on prospectively collected data. INTERVENTIONS: Oncologic outcomes were compared between patients undergoing natural orifice or conventional specimen extraction by minilaparotomy. Patients were matched 1:1 according to propensity scores calculated by logistic regression analysis with the following covariates: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, tumor diameter, age, sex, BMI, and T stage. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine the impact on oncologic outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were local recurrence and disease-free survival rates at 5 years. RESULTS: Of 392 eligible patients, 188 were matched (94 undergoing natural orifice specimen extraction and 94 undergoing conventional extraction by minilaparotomy). Median follow-up was 50.3 months. The cumulative local recurrence risk at 5 years was 2.3% and 3.5% (p = 0.632), whereas 5-year disease-free survival for all tumor stages combined was 87.3% and 82.0% (p = 0.383) in laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional extraction groups. T3 and T4 stages were the only variables independently associated with disease-free survival. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited because it focused on a single center, was a retrospective analysis, contained no long-term anorectal function testing, and had a small sample size. CONCLUSION: Long-term oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction for sigmoid and upper rectal cancer do not differ from those undergoing conventional extraction. Thus, natural orifice specimen extraction could be a viable alternative to reduce abdominal wall insult in laparoscopic colorectal operations for malignancy in selected patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B241. RESULTADOS ONCOLÓGICOS A LARGO PLAZO DE RESECCIONES ANTERIORES LAPAROSCÓPICAS PARA CÁNCER A TRAVÉS DE ORIFICIO NATURAL FRENTE A EXTRACCIÓN CONVENCIONAL DEL ESPÉCIMEN: UN ESTUDIO DE CASOS Y CONTROLES: Si bien las ventajas a corto plazo de la extracción de especímenes por orificio natural son ampliamente reconocidas, existe controversia con respecto a la seguridad oncológica después de la cirugía laparoscópica para el cáncer colorrectal.Investigar el impacto de la extracción de especímenes por orificio natural en la recurrencia local y la supervivencia a largo plazo de pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer colorrectal.Estudio comparativo con emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión.Experiencia en un centro único.Analizamos retrospectivamente los registros de pacientes que se sometieron a resección anterior laparoscópica curativa para cáncer sigmoideo o rectal superior AJCC en estadio I-III en 2011-2014, con base en datos recolectados prospectivamente.Los resultados oncológicos se compararon entre pacientes sometidos a extracción por orificio natural o convencional mediante minilaparotomía de especímenes. Los pacientes fueron emparejados 1:1 de acuerdo con los puntajes de propensión calculados por análisis de regresión logística con las siguientes covariables: estadio AJCC, diámetro del tumor, edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal y estadio T. Se realizó un análisis de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Cox para determinar el impacto en el resultado oncológico.Recurrencia local y tasas de supervivencia libre de enfermedad a los 5 años.De 392 pacientes elegibles, 188 fueron emparejados (94 sometidos a extracción de espécimen por orificio natural y 94 a extracción convencional por minilaparotomía). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 50.3 meses. El riesgo cumulativo de recurrencia local a 5 años fue de 2.3% y 3.5% (p = 0.632), mientras que la supervivencia libre de enfermedad a 5 años para todas las etapas tumorales combinadas fue de 87.3% y 82.0% (p = 0.383) en los grupos de resección anterior laparoscópica con extracción de espécimen por orificio natural y extracción convencional, respectivamente. Las etapas T3 y T4 fueron las únicas variables asociadas independientemente con la supervivencia libre de enfermedad.Centro único, análisis retrospectivo, ausencia de pruebas de función anorrectal a largo plazo y tamaño de muestra pequeño.Los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo de los pacientes sometidos a resección anterior laparoscópica con extracción de espécimen por orificio natural para cáncer sigmoideo y rectal superior no difieren de los de aquellos sometidos a extracción convencional. Por lo tanto, la extracción de especímenes por orificio natural podría ser una alternativa viable para reducir el insulto a la pared abdominal en operaciones colorrectales laparoscópicas por malignidad en pacientes selectos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B241.

Combined repeat laparoscopy and transanal endolumenal repair (hybrid approach) in the early management of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leaks: technique and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Few clear recommendations exist for the management of colorectal anastomotic leaks, often based on surgeon preferences or institutional protocols. The primary goal was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the combined laparoscopic and transanal (hybrid) approach to treat postoperative colorectal anastomotic leaks. The secondary goals included comparison of outcomes following early (< 5 days after initial resection) versus late (≥ 5 days) detection of leaks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen hemodynamically stable patients, with anastomotic dehiscence < 50% of the circumference after laparoscopic anterior resection underwent repeat laparoscopy (lavage/drainage) and transanal endolumenal repair (7 low (< 5 cm from the anal verge) with an ordinary anoscope and 9 high (≥ 5 cm from the anal verge) with a transanal endoscopic operations (TEO®) platform). RESULTS: The median delay to detection and management was 4.5 days. The procedure was feasible in 13/16 patients (3 patients required conversion to laparotomy). Primary healing of the anastomosis was obtained in 14 patients (13 with the combined procedure, one after conversion). Two patients (1 early, 1 late) sustained persistent purulent discharge via their drain, but the repair healed secondarily. All patients requiring conversion to laparotomy (n = 3) or sustaining intra-operative complications (n = 3) were in the delayed group. No patients required further intervention or died. Protective stomas, created either at index surgery (n = 7) or at re-operation (n = 9), were closed in 14/16 patients within 6 months and no anastomotic sinus, persistent or recurrent fistula, was noted at 1-year follow-up. LIMITATIONS: This is a single-center study consisting of small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Combined repeat laparoscopy and transanal endolumenal repair is feasible and safe, potentially reducing postoperative morbidity associated with repeat laparotomy and anastomotic leaks. Early detection and re-intervention are fundamental to success. Currently missing from the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer recommendations, laparoscopy and endolumenal repair could be added as a therapeutic option in Grade B.

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction With Single Stapling Colorectal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Anterior Resection: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Technical Considerations.

BACKGROUND: Double and triple stapling techniques to close the rectal stump in laparoscopic anterior resection are fraught with technical drawbacks that could possibly be avoided with the use of the single stapling technique. However, little is known of its safety in laparoscopic surgery or outcomes when combined with natural orifice specimen extraction. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the feasibility and the operative and immediate postoperative outcomes of single-stapled anastomosis and natural orifice specimen extraction with conventional techniques. It intends to evaluate technical variations related to colon, mesentery, and pelvic anatomy characteristics. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A consecutive series of 188 patients underwent elective surgery for benign or malignant lesions between 10 and 40 cm from the anal verge, 5 cm or less in diameter on radiological examination, stage T1 to T3, Nx, M0, with 2 different methods of rectal stump closure (pursestring vs linear-stapled closure) associated with single or double stapling and per anus vs conventional specimen extraction. SETTING: This study was conducted at China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan, a tertiary referral center, between January 2012 and April 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes measured are feasibility and operative and immediate postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Single-stapled resection with natural orifice specimen extraction was feasible in 94% patients with an 11% perioperative morbidity rate. The patients required statistically significantly less analgesia, had earlier return of bowel movements, and shorter hospital stay, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the overall readmission rate and overall morbidity, including anastomotic leakage. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center, retrospective case-matched study. CONCLUSION: Anatomic variations (short colon and short mesentery) can be managed adequately with intracorporeal anvil head fixation. The single stapling technique is feasible and as safe as conventional double stapling techniques, although it is technically more demanding. The transanal endoscopic operation platform can be useful when the rectal stump is long.

Association Between Genetic Polymorphism of the MIF Gene and Colorectal Cancer in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the highest leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Taiwan. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) has recently been defined as a novel protumorigenic factor that promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. The aim of the present study is to identify the association between MIF gene polymorphism and CRC. METHODS: A case-control study was designed to test the hypothesis. A total of 192 biopsy-diagnosed CRC patients (CRC) and 256 healthy subjects (control) were recruited. Genotyping of four single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs; rs755662, rs11548059, rs1049829, rs1803976) at chromosome positions 755662 (5' UTR), 11548059 (exon2), 1049829 (exon2), 1803976 (exon3) was performed using a Taqman SNP genotyping assay. RESULTS: There is a significant difference in genotype frequency distribution of rs755662 polymorphism between CRC patients and controls (P = 0.011). No significant difference was found in the frequency distribution of rs11548059, rs1049829, rs1803976 polymorphism in CRC patients and controls (P = 0.660, P = 0.700, and P = 0.959, respectively). Moreover, the MIF-173 SNP was also significantly associated with young patients (age < 50 years, P = 0.026) late stage (Stage IV, P = 0.038) and poor differentiation group (P = 0.040). Compared to the control group, the MIF-173 SNP also significantly associated with patients with stages III and IV (P = 0.034 and 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: The presence of MIF-173 (G/C) gene polymorphism (rs755662) was associated with susceptibility, patient age, and stages of CRC in Taiwanese.

Effect of autologous dendritic cell cytokine-induced killer on refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparative study.

Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are refractory to two or more lines of systemic chemotherapy have limited therapeutic options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of autologous dendritic cell cytokine-induced killer (DC-CIK) transfer on the survival of patients with mCRC who are refractory or intolerant to at least two lines of systemic chemotherapies. Methods: A matched case-control comparative study was conducted with patients who received DC-CIK immunotherapy in addition to standard chemotherapy (cases) and those with standard chemotherapy alone (controls). The primary objective was to compare the duration of oncologic survival, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), between the two groups. Results: A total of 27 cases and 27 controls were included. The median OS in the DC-CIK case group was 18.73 ± 5.48 months, which was significantly longer than that in the control group (14.23 ± 1.90 months, p = 0.045). However, there was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups (p = 0.086). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with liver or extra-regional lymph node metastasis, DC-CIK cases had longer OS than controls (17.0 vs. 11.87 months, p = 0.019; not match vs. 6.93 months, p = 0.002, respectively). In patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale 0 or wild RAS/BRAF, DC-CIK cases showed a significant increase in OS duration compared to controls (28.03 vs. 14.53 months, p = 0.038; 18.73 vs. 11.87 months, p = 0.013, respectively). Conclusions: The addition of autologous DC-CIK to standard chemotherapy had a positive effect on OS of patients with refractory mCRC, especially those with liver or extra-regional lymph node metastasis, ECOG = 0, and wild RAS/BRAF status.

Re-evaluating the role of pelvic radiation in the age of modern precision medicine and systemic therapy.

The efficacy of pelvic radiation in the management of locally advanced stage rectal cancer has come under scrutiny in the context of modern precision medicine and systemic therapy as evidenced by recent clinical trials such as FOWARC (J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 3223-3233), NCT04165772 (N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 2363-2376), and PROSPECT (N Engl J Med 2023; 389: 322-334). In this review, we comprehensively assess these pivotal trials and offer additional insights into the evolving role of pelvic radiation in contemporary oncology.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With/Without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who have undergone neoadjuvant systemic therapy has been the subject of recent debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified eligible rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 using data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. In our primary analysis, we applied propensity score weighting (PSW) to balance observable potential confounders. We then compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death the neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy (nCT) group. Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of other outcomes and performed various supplementary analyses. RESULTS: The primary analysis included 2,298 patients. The overall survival did not exhibit statistically significant differences, with a PSW-adjusted HR of 0.72 (95% confidence interval=0.33-1.56, p=0.40) when comparing the nCCRT group to the nCT group. These findings were consistent with those of other long-term outcomes and supplementary analyses. CONCLUSION: In patients with LARC who have undergone neoadjuvant systemic therapy, the addition of radiotherapy did not yield statistically significant differences in long-term clinical outcomes.

Pelvic Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Stage M1a Rectal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated With Systemic Therapy Followed by Proctectomy and Metastasectomy: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The effect of pelvic neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) for stage M1a rectal adenocarcinoma patients treated with systemic therapy followed by proctectomy and metastasectomy was scarcely investigated in the literatures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The eligible rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 2011-2019 were identified via the Taiwan Cancer Registry. In the primary analysis, we used propensity score weighting to balance observable potential confounders and compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death for the nRT group vs. without RT group. We also compared the incidence of rectal cancer mortality (IRCM) and performed various supplementary analyses. RESULTS: Our primary analyses included 145 patients. nRT was associated with improved OS (HR=0.51, p=0.01). The numerical trends remained similar for IRCM and in supplementary analyses. CONCLUSION: nRT was associated with improved OS in our study population.

Short and long-term outcomes of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal and appendiceal cancer peritoneal metastasis: Propensity score-matched comparison between laparoscopy vs. open approaches.

BACKGROUND: In light of today's role of minimally access surgery in colorectal oncologic treatment, we analyzed the impact of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) originating from colorectal and appendiceal cancer (CRAC). METHODS: Postoperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between patients with CRAC-PM treated by CRS/HIPEC undergoing laparoscopic (L-CRS/HIPEC) or open (O-CRS/HIPEC) procedures according to data collected from our tertiary referral hospital prospective database from April 2016 to April 2021. We excluded patients who did not undergo operation with curative intent. L-CRS was performed in patients who had no multifocal mesenteric lesions, no large abdominal mass, nor massive adhesions. Patients were matched by propensity scores 1:1 for peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction score, concomitant resectable distal metastasis, primary tumor location, RAS mutation status and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. RESULTS: Of 106 eligible patients, 68 were matched (34 L-CRS/HIPEC; 34 O-CRS/HIPEC) by propensity scores. Compared with the open approach, L-CRS/HIPEC was associated with less overall surgical morbidities (14.7% vs. 38.2%; p = 0.028), shorter median hospital stay (10 [5-15] vs. 12 [8-33] days; p < 0.001) and reduced median waiting time before adjuvant chemotherapy (4.7 [3.0-13.2] vs. 5.7 [4.1-24.1] weeks; p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found in operative time or major morbidity rates between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 33.2 months, the rate of early peritoneal loco-regional recurrence, location of initial recurrence or 3-year survival outcomes were not statistically significantly related to the type of access (L-CRS/HIPEC vs. O-CRS/HIPEC). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy for CRS/HIPEC is technically feasible and oncologically safe to treat selected patients with CRAC-PM. Further randomized control trials are required to confirm the benefits of minimal access surgery for the management of PM.

Laparoscopic versus open emergent colectomy for ischemic colitis: a propensity score-matched comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic colectomy is rarely performed for ischemic colitis. The aim of this propensity score-matched study was to compare preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details and short-term outcomes for emergent laparoscopic colectomy versus the traditional open approach for patients with ischemic colitis. METHODS: Retrospective review of 96 patients who underwent emergent colectomy for ischemic colitis between January 2011 and December 2020 (39 via laparoscopy, 57 via laparotomy) was performed. We compared short-term outcomes after using a one-to-one ratio and nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to obtain similar preoperative and intraoperative parameters in each group. RESULTS: Patients in the open group experienced more surgical site complications (52.6% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.004), more intra-abdominal abscesses (47.3% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.003), longer need for ventilator support (20 days vs. 0 days, p < 0.001), more major complications (77.2% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.001), higher mortality (49.1% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.004), and longer hospital stay (32 days vs. 19 days, p = 0.001). After propensity score matching (31 patients in each group), patients undergoing open (vs. laparoscopy) had more surgical site complications (45.1% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.030) and required longer ventilator support (14 vs. 3 days, p = 0.039). After multivariate analysis, Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.024), APACHE II score (p = 0.001), and Favier's classification (p = 0.023) were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic emergent colectomy for ischemic colitis is feasible and is associated with fewer surgical site complications and better respiratory function, compared to the open approach.

Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of laparoscopic colectomy, improved short-term surgical results have been noted in the literature. Therefore, efforts have shifted to reducing the invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery, resulting in the invention of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). Due to its comparable capabilities and feasibility, the implementation of SILS has rapidly grown in different fields. However, few studies discuss its true benefit compared with conventional laparoscopy. This study is the first to use SILS colectomy as an approach for malignant colon cancer. The goal of this cohort series is to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between SILS and conventional right hemicolectomy. METHODS: This was a case-control study comparing SILS right hemicolectomy patients to traditional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The inclusion criteria were only ascending colon cecal lesions. Cases of obstruction or perforation that required emergent operation or previous abdominal surgery were excluded. These patients were specifically matched in regard to patient's age, gender, perioperative condition, surgical indication, and tumor size. No consideration or analysis of operative parameters and outcomes was made until this group was definitively selected as the best comparison cohort based on preoperative variables only. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included for SILS and the other 21 patients were completed by conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The SILS and traditional laparoscopic groups were similar in regard to age, gender, body mass index, and perioperation outcomes. Initial oncologic results were no different, including equal length of distal cut margin, numbers of harvested lymph nodes, and TMN stage. Three patients in the SILS colectomy group were converted (16.6%), and there were no conversions in the traditional laparoscopic colectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience with SILS right hemicolectomy demonstrated the safety of the procedure and its feasibility in malignant colon cancer. Although SILS right hemicolectomy may provide a subjective cosmetic advantage, there was no benefit in the short-term surgical outcomes. SILS is very situational, requires more effort from the surgeon, and may not offer more patient comfort. More experience with SILS and prospective trials are needed to validate it as a more favorable alternative to conventional laparoscopic colectomy.

Ultrasound Acupuncture for Oxaliplatin-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin is frequently used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. However, peripheral neuropathy is a severe adverse effect of oxaliplatin that may persist and impact quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential effects of ultrasound acupuncture for the alleviation of symptoms related to oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Prospective cohort pilot study. SETTING: Education and research hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of stage II-IV colorectal cancer undergoing oxaliplatin-based treatment regimens who experienced OIPN symptoms (n = 17). INTERVENTIONS: Pulsed therapeutic ultrasound (1 MHz) at bilateral acupuncture points of PC6, PC7, BL60, and KI1 was administered for 5 minutes per point daily for 12 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS), Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (CINQ), quantitative touch-detection threshold, cold-trigger pain withdrawal latency, and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) were measured at baseline (day 0), pre-intervention (day 12, post wash-out period), post-intervention (day 24), and final follow-up (day 54). A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Scores of PQAS and CINQ significantly improved after ultrasound acupuncture at post-intervention and follow-up compared to both baseline and pre-intervention. Similar trends were also observed for the quantitative sensory testing, where touch-detection threshold significantly decreased and cold-trigger pain withdrawal latency significantly increased after ultrasound acupuncture. Patients also showed an improvement on quality of life outcomes as measured by QLQ-C30 post-intervention and at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound acupuncture could be an effective intervention for OIPN symptoms for patients with colorectal cancer. However, larger and randomized clinical trials with placebo controls are needed to confirm such effects.