RESUMEN
Sporadic hemophilia A (HA) enables the persistence of HA in the population. F8 gene inversion originates mainly in male germ cells during meiosis. To date, no studies have shown the origin and timing of HA sporadic noninversion variants (NIVs); herein, we assume that HA-sporadic NIVs are generated as a de novo variant. Of the 125 registered families with HA, 22 were eligible for inclusion. We conducted a linkage analysis using F8 gene markers and amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative polymerase chain reaction to confirm the origin of the sporadic NIVs (~0% mutant cells) or the presence of a mosaic variant, which requires further confirmation of the origin in the parent. Nine mothers, four maternal grandmothers, and six maternal grandfathers were confirmed to be the origin of sporadic NIVs, which most likely occurred in the zygote within the first few cell divisions and in single sperm cells, respectively. Three mothers had mosaic variants, which most likely occurred early in postzygotic embryogenesis. All maternal grandparents were free from sporadic NIV. In conclusion, F8 NIVs in sporadic HA were found to be caused primarily by de novo variants. Our studies are essential for understanding the genetic pathogenesis of HA and improving current genetic counseling.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Masculino , Humanos , Hemofilia A/genética , Hemofilia A/patología , Linaje , Semen , Mutación , Inversión Cromosómica , Factor VIII/genéticaRESUMEN
Very few studies have shown the real origin and timing of de novo variants (DNV) implicated in von Willebrand disease (VWD). We investigated four families with type 2 VWD. First, we conducted linkage analysis using single nucleotide variant genotyping to recognize the possible provenance of DNV. Second, we performed amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative polymerase chain reaction to confirm the real origin of variant (~0% mutant cells) or presence of a genetic mosaic variant (0%-50% mutant cells) in three embryonic germ layer-derived tissues and sperm cells. Then, three possible timings of DNV were categorized based on the relative likelihood of occurrence according to the number of cell divisions during embryogenesis. Two each with type 2B VWD (proband 1 p.Arg1308Cys, proband 4 p.Arg1306Trp) and type 2A VWD (proband 2 p.Leu1276Arg, proband 3 p.Ser1506Leu) were identified. Variant origins were identified for families 1, 2 and 3 and confirmed to originate from the mother, father and father, respectively. However, the father of family 4 was confirmed to have isolated germline mosaicism with 2.2% mutant sperm cells. Further investigation confirmed the paternal grandfather to be the origin of variant. Thus, we proposed that DNV originating from the two fathers most likely occurred at the single sperm cell, the one originating from the mother occurred at the zygote during the first few cellular divisions; alternatively, in family 4, the DNV most likely occurred at the early postzygotic development in the father. Our findings are essential for understanding genetic pathogenesis and providing accurate genetic counselling.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de von Willebrand Tipo 2 , Enfermedades de von Willebrand , Masculino , Humanos , Factor de von Willebrand/genética , Linaje , Semen/metabolismo , Enfermedades de von Willebrand/genéticaRESUMEN
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a powerful tool to tackle the transmission of monogenic inherited disorders in families carrying the diseases from generation to generation. It currently remains a challenging task, despite PGD having been developed over 25 years ago. The major difficulty is it does not have an easy and general formula for all mutations. Different gene locus needs individualized, customized design to make the diagnosis accurate enough to be applied on PGD, in which the quantity of DNA is scanty, whereas timely laboratory diagnosis is mandatory if fresh embryo transfer is desired occasionally. Indicators for outcome assessment of a successful PGD program include the successful diagnosis rate on blastomeres (Day 3 cleavage-stage embryo biopsy) or trophectoderm cells (Day 5/6 blastocyst biopsy), the implantation rate per embryo transferred, and the livebirth rate per oocyte retrieval cycle. Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by various types of pathological defects in the factor VIII gene (F8). The mutation spectrum of the F8 is complex, according to our previous report, including large segmental intra-gene inversions, large segmental deletions spanning a few exons, point mutations, and total deletion caused by chromosomal structural rearrangements. In this review, the molecular methodologies used to tackle different mutants of the F8 in the PGD of HA are to be explained, and the experiences of successful use of amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) and linkage analysis for PGD of HA in our laboratory are also provided.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is not uncommon in Taiwan. In type 2 or type 3 VWD hemorrhagic symptoms are severer and laboratory data relatively more distinctive. De novo mutation and somatic mosaicism of type 2 VWD gene were rarely reported. Therefore clinical, laboratory and genetic studies of only type 2A, 2B and 2M VWD will be presented and issues of de novo mutation and somatic mosaicism will be explored. METHODS: Fifty-four patients belonging to 23 unrelated families from all around the country in whom type 2 VWD exclusive of type 2N has been diagnosed not only by clinical and routine laboratory studies but also by genetic confirmation during 1990-2015 were investigated. A novel technique named amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) was used to confirm the presence of somatic mosaicism. Informed consent was obtained for study. RESULTS: De novo mutation was identified in 4 families among 15 families (26.7 %) in whom family members including parents were available for examination. All their parents were free from bleeding symptoms and had no similar mutation as their respective affected daughter. An interesting example of somatic mosaicism of VWF gene mutation was found in a large family with type 2A VWD. The father carrying a mutated VWF gene, p.Arg1597Trp, transmitted this mutation to his 3 daughters, 1 son, 3 granddaughters and 2 grandsons. However, the father had normal laboratory findings and experienced no abnormal bleeding, while his offspring who inherited the mutation showed abnormal laboratory findings compatible with type 2A VWD and had history of abnormal bleedings. ARMS-qPCR revealed that the father had only 25.5 % mutant in his blood cells and 31.1 % mutant in his oral mucosal cells, while all his offspring had about 49 % mutant in their blood cells. CONCLUSION: De novo mutation of type 2 VWD gene was identified in 4 out of 15 families (26.7 %) examined. Since only one child was affected in each family, germline mosaicism was not likely. A somatic mosaicism of type 2A VWD gene was documented in a big family by a newly in-house developed technique ARMS-qPCR.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result suspicious of trisomy 13, a chorionic villus sampling (CVS) result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome. CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation because of a positive NIPT result (Z-score = 20.9, positive ≥3) suspicious of trisomy 13 at 11 weeks of gestation and a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13 at 14 weeks of gestation. At 14 weeks of gestation, CVS revealed the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) result of rea X,Y (P095) × 1, 13 (P095) × 3, 18,21 (P095) × 2/X,Y (P095) × 1, 13,18,21 (P095) × 2 and a karyotype of 48,XY,+13,+mar [9]/47,XY,+mar[16]. She was referred to the hospital for genetic counseling at 15 weeks of gestation, and cytogenetic analysis of parental blood revealed 47,XY,+mar in the father and 46, XX in the mother. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on the paternal blood showed that the extra dicentric marker was derived from chromosome 15 without the locus SNRPN (15q11.2), and the result was 47,XY,+mar.ish dic(15) (D15Z1++, SNRPN-, PML-)[20]. Amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar pat (20/20). Simultaneous interphase FISH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 32% (32/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 13. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis using the DNA extracted from the parental bloods and uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 13. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 2708-g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation, The cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta had the karyotypes of 47,XY,+mar pat and did not have UPD 13. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells detected 5.3% (5/95 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 13, compared with 0% in the normal control. CONCLUSION: Low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis can be associated with a positive NIPT result suspicious of trisomy 13, a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome.
Asunto(s)
Amniocentesis , Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica , Embarazo , Femenino , Masculino , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13/diagnóstico , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13/genética , Proteínas Nucleares snRNP/genética , Análisis Citogenético , Mosaicismo , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Trisomía/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) are X-linked recessive disorders that mainly affect males born from a mother carrier. Females are rarely affected but a number of mechanisms have been suggested in symptomatic females, such as skewed X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), chromosomal rearrangements, and hermaphrodites. Different methodologies are required to elucidate the underlying causes of such diseases in female patients. METHODS: Three families with female hemophilia patients, including two HA and one HB, were enrolled for genetic analyses. Cytogenetics, molecular examinations on F8 and F9 genes, XCI assay, and linkage analysis were performed. RESULTS: All three female patients are demonstrated to be heterozygous for an F8, or F9 mutation: one patient is inherited from her unaffected mother and the other two are sporadic cases. All three patients exhibit skewed XCI. The inherited patient is found to be unmethylated in the maternal X chromosome, which increases the potential for the expression of the mutant allele. The two sporadic cases are hypomethylated or unmethylated in the paternal X chromosome, suggesting that paternal gonadal mosaicism may exist in these families. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to screening for coagulation function, different genetic analyses are mandatory to explore the nature of mechanisms responsible for the X-linked recessive disorders in female patients as shown in this study. Our results confirm that skewed XCI is responsible for hemophilia in heterozygous female patients. Likewise, our results implicate that parental gonadal mosaicism, followed by skewed XCI, contributes to hemophilia in "sporadic" female patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a familial small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from the acrocentric chromosome 14/22. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar. Prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance. Cytogenetic analysis of the parental bloods revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,inv (9) (p12q13),+mar in the father and a karyotype of 46, XX in the mother. The sSMC was investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on cultured amniocytes using the CEP 13/21 α-satellite specific gene probe labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) fluorophore and the CEP 14/21 α-satellite specific gene probe labeled with Texas Red fluorophore (Cytocell Inc.). The result showed that the sSMC was derived from the chromosome 14/22, or+mar.ish dic (14/22) (D13Z1/D21Z1-, D14Z1/D22Z1+)[20]. A healthy male baby was delivered at term with no phenotypic abnormality. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on parental bloods and the child's peripheral blood was used to exclude uniparental disomy (UPD) (14) and UPD(22). CONCLUSION: FISH analysis is useful for the determination of an sSMC derived from an acrocentric chromosome under the circumstance of no genomic imbalance at amniocentesis. QF-PCR analysis is useful for excluding the possible associated UPD.
Asunto(s)
Cromosomas Humanos Par 14 , Mosaicismo , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Análisis Citogenético , Femenino , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Masculino , Embarazo , Diagnóstico PrenatalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We present molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 15 in a pregnancy with incidental detection of a maternal Robertsonian translocation of 45,XX,der(13; 14) (q10; q10). CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes showed the result of no genomic imbalance or arr (1-22) × 2, (X,Y) × 1. Cytogenetic analysis of the parents showed a karyotype of 45,XX,der(13; 14) (q10; q10) in the mother and a karyotype of 46,XY in the father. Prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. At 38 weeks of gestation, a 2790-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered. The cord blood had a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis showed the result of +mar.ish dic(15) (D15Z1++, SNRPN-, PML-) (18/20). The extra chromosome was derived from chromosome 15. CONCLUSION: Metaphase FISH analysis is useful for the identification of the origin of an sSMC in the presence of no genomic imbalance at aCGH analysis. Prenatal diagnosis of a de novo sSMC may be associated with a Robertsonian translocation in the parents, and parental cytogenetic analysis is necessary under such a circumstance.
Asunto(s)
Cromosomas Humanos Par 15/genética , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ/métodos , Mosaicismo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Translocación Genética , Adulto , Amniocentesis , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Análisis Citogenético , Femenino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Masculino , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Sensorineural hearing impairment is a common sensory deficit in children and more than 50% of these cases are caused by genetic etiologies, that is, hereditary hearing impairment (HHI). Recent advances in genomic medicine have revolutionized the diagnostics of, and counseling for, HHI, including preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), thus providing parents-to-be with better reproductive choices. Over the past decade, we have performed PGD using the amplification refractory mutation system quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) technique in 11 couples with a history of HHI, namely eight with GJB2 variants, one with OTOF variants, one with SLC26A4 variants, and one with an MITF variant. We demonstrated that PGD can be successfully applied to HHI of different inheritance modes, namely autosomal dominant or recessive, and phenotypes, namely syndromic or non-syndromic HHI. However, certain ethical concerns warrant scrutiny before PGD can be widely applied to at-risk couples with a history of HHI.
RESUMEN
This study examined the molecular characterization of a prenatal case with true fetal mosaicism of small supernumerary marker chromosome 16 (sSMC(16)). A 41-year-old female underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation due to advanced maternal age. Chromosomal analysis for cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar[4]/46,XY[16]. Spectral karyotyping and metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated that the sSMC was derived from chromosome 16 (47,XY,+mar.ish der(16)(D16Z1+)[13/20]). Confined placental mosaicism was initially suspected because the prenatal ultrasound revealed a normal structure and the pregnancy was uneventful. However, interphase FISH of cord blood performed at 28 weeks of gestation showed 20% mosaicism of trisomy chromosome 16 (nuc ish(D16Z2×3)[40/200]). Chromosome microarray analysis further demonstrated 55% mosaicism of an 8.02 Mb segmental duplication at the subcentromeric region of 16p12.1p11.1 (arr[GRCh37] 16p12.1p11.1(27021975_35045499)×3[0.55]). The results demonstrated a true fetal mosaicism of sSMC(16) involving chromosome16p12.1p11.1 that is associated with chromosome 16p11.2 duplication syndrome (OMIM #614671). After non-directive genetic counseling, the couple opted for late termination of pregnancy. This case illustrated the use of multiple molecular cytogenetic tools to elucidate the origin and structure of sSMC, which is crucial for prenatal counseling, decision making, and clinical management.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaicism for trisomy 16 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a favorable outcome. CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 24 weeks of gestation because of IUGR. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [3]/46,XX [22]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed gene dosage increase in chromosome 16 consistent with 28% mosaicism for trisomy 16. Uniparental disomy (UPD) 7 and UPD 11 were excluded. She underwent repeat amniocentesis at 27 weeks of gestation. Repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [1]/46,XX [24]. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed 25%-35% (log2 ratio = 0.17-0.25) mosaicism for trisomy 16. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis detected trisomy 16 signals in 28/100 (28%) uncultured amniocytes. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis excluded UPD 16. Level II ultrasound revealed no fetal abnormalities except symmetric IUGR. The pregnancy was continued to 37 weeks of gestation, and a 2306-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46, XX in 50/50 lymphocytes. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [14]/46,XX [36]. Interphase FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells and urinary cells at age three days revealed trisomy 16 signals in 3.8% (4/106) buccal mucosal cells and 6.5% (7/107) urinary cells, compared with 1% in the normal control. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on placenta confirmed trisomy 16 in the placenta and a maternal origin of the extra chromosome 16. CONCLUSION: Cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes may present in mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis. Low-level mosaicism for trisomy 16 at amniocentesis without maternal UPD 16 can be associated with a favorable outcome despite the presence of IUGR.
Asunto(s)
Amniocentesis , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/genética , Mosaicismo/embriología , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Adulto , Cromosomas Humanos Par 16/genética , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Femenino , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Cariotipo , Cariotipificación , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Trisomía/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A prenatal diagnosis of partial monosomy 21q(21q22.1â qter) in fetus with intrauterine growth restriction and corpus callosum dysgenesis but escaped from the detection by cell free DNA testing was reported. CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old, primigravida women, presented with intrauterine growth restriction and corpus callosum dysgenesis at 23 weeks of gestational age by anatomic ultrasound screening. The interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on amniocytes revealed monosomy 21, while the cytogenetic analysis and array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) with CytoScan gene chip ascertained a 12.35 Mb deletion at 21q22.1q22.3. CONCLUSION: Although noninvasive prenatal testing is used extensively and can be applied to certain microdeletion diseases, the application for uncommon deletion disorders such as the present case remains limited. Prenatal examination with detailed ultra-sonography combined with different modalities of invasive prenatal testing can provide a more comprehensive information.
Asunto(s)
Agenesia del Cuerpo Calloso/diagnóstico , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico , Monosomía/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Adulto , Agenesia del Cuerpo Calloso/embriología , Agenesia del Cuerpo Calloso/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 21/genética , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/genética , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Monosomía/genética , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Skeletal dysplasia (SD) is a complex group of bone and cartilage disorders often detectable by fetal ultrasound, but the definitive diagnosis remains challenging because the phenotypes are highly variable and often overlap among different disorders. The molecular mechanisms underlying this condition are also diverse. Hundreds of genes are involved in the pathogenesis of SD, but most of them are yet to be elucidated, rendering genotyping almost infeasible except those most common such as fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1), collagen type I alpha 2 chain (COL1A2), diastrophic dysplasia sulfate transporter (DTDST), and SRY-box 9 (SOX9). Here, we report the use of trio-based whole exome sequencing (trio-WES) with comprehensive gene set analysis in two Taiwanese non-consanguineous families with fetal SD at autopsy. A biparental-origin homozygous c.509G>A(p.G170D) mutation in peptidylprolyl isomerase B (PPIB) gene was identified. The results support a diagnosis of a rare form of autosomal recessive SD, osteogenesis imperfecta type IX (OI IX), and confirm that the use of a trio-WES study is helpful to uncover a genetic explanation for observed fetal anomalies (e.g., SD), especially in cases suggesting autosomal recessive inheritance. Moreover, the finding of an identical PPIB mutation in two non-consanguineous families highlights the possibility of the founder effect, which deserves future investigations in the Taiwanese population.
RESUMEN
Autosomal recessive renal tubular dysgenesis (ARRTD) is a rare and lethal disorder that causes stillbirth or early neonatal death. Most of the reported cases are diagnosed postnatally by a histopathological hallmark of the absence or paucity of differentiated proximal tubules in kidneys. Prenatal diagnosis of ARRTD is challenging because only a few fetal features (e.g., oligohydramnios/anhydramnios, anuria) are associated with this condition. In this study, we report a fetus with ARRTD, which showed anhydramnios and invisible urinary bladder since the second trimester, followed by growth restriction and reversed end diastolic flow in the middle cerebral artery (MCA-REDF). No morphological anomaly was detected on the fetal kidneys during an ultrasound scan. The baby died of refractory hypotension the day after their birth. Genetic analysis of genes that are involved in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), which are the known genetic causes of ARRTD, identified a novel, biparental-origin homozygous c.857-619_1269+243delinsTTGCCTTGC mutation in the AGT gene. The mutation is considered as pathogenic because it is cosegregated with ARRTD and detected in other unrelated ARRTD families. Our findings link the fetal ultrasound manifestations to the ARRTD, highlighting clues that are useful for prenatal diagnosis, which warrants confirmatory genotyping of the RAAS genes including oligohydramnios/anhydramnios, anuria (absent filling of a fetal urinary bladder), MCA-REDF, and a morphologically normal kidney.
RESUMEN
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become a crucial approach in helping carriers of inherited disorders to give birth to healthy offspring. In this study, we review PGD methodologies and explore the use of amplification refractory mutation system quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) and/or linkage analysis for PGD in neurodegenerative diseases that are clinically relevant with typical features, such as late onset, and which are severely debilitating. A total of 13 oocyte retrieval cycles were conducted in 10 cases with various neurodegenerative diseases. Among the 59 embryos analyzed, 49.2% (29/59) were unaffected and 50.8% (30/59) were affected. Of the 12 embryo transfer cycles, three resulted in pregnancy, and all pregnancies were delivered. The implantation rate and livebirth rate were 23.1% (3/13) per oocyte retrieval cycle and 25.0% (3/12) per embryo transfer cycle. Allele dropout (ADO) was noted in two embryos that were classified as unaffected by ARMS-qPCR but were evidenced as affected after prenatal diagnosis, rendering the false negative rate as 6.3% (2/32). Four among the 13 cycles underwent PGD by ARMS-qPCR coupled with linkage analysis, and all were correctly diagnosed. We conclude that PGD by ARMS-qPCR and/or linkage analysis is a feasible strategy, whereas ADO is a concern when ARMS-qPCR is used as the sole technology in PGD, especially in autosomal dominant diseases.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 11. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old, gravida 3, para 2, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+mar[18]/46,XX[4]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Level II ultrasound findings were unremarkable. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on the DNA extracted from cultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance. The sSMC was characterized by spectral karyotyping (SKY) using 24-color SKY probes and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a whole chromosome paint (wcp) probe and a CEP11 (D11Z1) probe. The result was 47,XX,+mar.ish(11)(SKY+, wcp11+, D11Z1+)[16]/46,XX[4], indicating that the sSMC was derived from chromosome 11. A healthy female baby was delivered at 37 weeks of gestation with no phenotypic abnormalities. The cord blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+mar[32]/46,XX[8]. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis of the blood excluded uniparental disomy 11. The female infant was normal in growth and psychomotor development during follow-ups at two months of age. CONCLUSION: aCGH, SKY and FISH are useful in prenatal diagnosis of an sSMC derived from the centromeric region of a non-acrocentric chromosome.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de los Cromosomas/diagnóstico , Cromosomas Humanos Par 11 , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Mosaicismo , Adulto , Amniocentesis , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/genética , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Femenino , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Cariotipificación EspectralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We present the association of paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 9 with mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome 9 [sSMC(9)] and a supernumerary ring chromosome 9 [r(9)]. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 38-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar [25]/48,XY,+mar,+r(9) [4]/47,XY,+r(9) [1]/46,XY [6]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) of cultured amniocytes revealed a result of de novo 9p13.1q21.11 (38,792,472-71,026,063) × 2.64. The marker chromosome was determined to be an sSMC(9) by spectral karyotyping and aCGH. A phenotypically normal baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. During pediatric follow-ups at age two years, the neonate manifested normal psychomotor and growth development. Cytogenetic analysis, metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) aCGH and polymorphic DNA marker analysis were performed on the peripheral blood of the neonate. RESULTS: The neonate's blood had the following results. Metaphase FISH confirmed coexistence of the sSMC(9) and the supernumerary r(9). The karyotype was 47,XY,+sSMC(9) [14]/48,XY, +sSMC(9),+r(9) [10]/47,XY,+r(9) [6]/46,XY [10]. SNP aCGH revealed arr 9p22.3q21.11 (14,234,165-71,035,608) × 2-3, arr 9p24.3p22.3 (216,123-14,629,321)hmz, arr 9p21.3p13.2 (24,769,722-36,732,597)hmz and arr 9q21.11q34.3 (71,013,799-141,011,581)hmz. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis showed paternal isodisomy 9. CONCLUSION: Individuals with mosaicism for sSMC(9) and supernumerary r(9) may be associated with paternal UPD 9.
Asunto(s)
Cromosomas Humanos Par 9/genética , Marcadores Genéticos , Mosaicismo/embriología , Herencia Paterna/genética , Disomía Uniparental/diagnóstico , Adulto , Amniocentesis , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Femenino , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ/métodos , Recién Nacido , Cariotipo , Cariotipificación , Masculino , Fenotipo , Embarazo , Cromosomas en Anillo , Disomía Uniparental/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 21q11.2-q21.1, and we review the literature of an sSMC(21) with a duplication of 21q11.2-q21.1. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+mar [18]/46,XX [4]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. aCGH analysis of cultured amniocytes revealed a 2.855-Mb duplication of 21q11.2-q21.1 encompassing the genes of LIPI, ABCC13 and NRIP1. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on cultured amniocytes revealed a result of 47,XX,+mar .ish der(13/21) (D13/21Z1+) [10]. Spectral karyotyping analysis determined the origin of chromosome 21 in the sSMC. A female fetus was delivered with no phenotypic features of Down syndrome and no structural abnormalities. We discuss the genotype-phenotype correlation of LIPI, ABCC13 and NRIP1, and review the literature of an sSMC(21) associated with dup(21)(q11.2q21.1). CONCLUSION: aCGH is useful for identification of the nature and genetic component of a prenatally detected sSMC.
Asunto(s)
Duplicación Cromosómica/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 21/genética , Mosaicismo/embriología , Transportadoras de Casetes de Unión a ATP/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Adulto , Amniocentesis , Antígenos de Neoplasias/genética , Análisis Citogenético , Femenino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Cariotipo , Cariotipificación , Edad Materna , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Proteína de Interacción con Receptores Nucleares 1 , Fosfolipasas A1/genética , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 2. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar[10]/46,XY[12]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of the DNA extracted from cultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance. Spectral karyotyping analysis failed to identify the sSMC. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using the satellite probes CEP1/5/19, CEP2, CEP3, CEP4, CEP6, CEP7, CEP8, CEP9, CEP10, CEP12, CEP13/21, CEP14/22, CEP15, CEP16, and CEP20 revealed a result of 47,XY,+mar .ish der(2)(D2Z+)[10]. The sSMC was derived from the α satellite of chromosome 2. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis using the markers specific for chromosome 2 on the DNAs extracted from cultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy 2. At 39 weeks of gestation, a healthy 3394-g male baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormality. The cord blood had a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar[21]/46,XY[19]. CONCLUSION: Array comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping may fail to detect an sSMC derived from α satellite, which needs satellite probes for confirmation.