Comparison of insulin glargine and liraglutide added to oral agents in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To compare safety and efficacy of insulin glargine and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: This randomized, multinational, open-label trial included subjects treated for T2DM with metformin ± sulphonylurea, who had glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7.5-12%. Subjects were assigned to 24 weeks of insulin glargine, titrated to target fasting plasma glucose of 4.0-5.5 mmol/L or liraglutide, escalated to the highest approved clinical dose of 1.8 mg daily. The trial was powered to detect superiority of glargine over liraglutide in percentage of people reaching HbA1c <7%. RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation (s.d.)] age of the participants was 57 (9) years, the duration of diabetes was 9 (6) years, body mass index was 31.9 (4.2) kg/m(2) and HbA1c level was 9.0 (1.1)%. Equal numbers (n = 489) were allocated to glargine and liraglutide. Similar numbers of subjects in both groups attained an HbA1c level of <7% (48.4 vs. 45.9%); therefore, superiority of glargine over liraglutide was not observed (p = 0.44). Subjects treated with glargine had greater reductions of HbA1c [-1.94% (0.05) and -1.79% (0.05); p = 0.019] and fasting plasma glucose [6.2 (1.6) and 7.9 (2.2) mmol/L; p < 0.001] than those receiving liraglutide. The liraglutide group reported a greater number of gastrointestinal treatment-emergent adverse events (p < 0.001). The mean (s.d.) weight change was +2.0 (4.0) kg for glargine and -3.0 (3.6) kg for liraglutide (p < 0.001). Symptomatic hypoglycaemia was more common with glargine (p < 0.001). A greater number of subjects in the liraglutide arm withdrew as a result of adverse events (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adding either insulin glargine or liraglutide to subjects with poorly controlled T2DM reduces HbA1c substantially, with nearly half of subjects reaching target levels of 7%.

A direct comparison of long- and short-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (taspoglutide once weekly and exenatide twice daily) on postprandial metabolism after 24 weeks of treatment.

AIMS: T-emerge 2 was a randomized, open-label, 24-week trial comparing subcutaneous taspoglutide 10 mg weekly (Taspo10), taspoglutide 20 mg weekly (Taspo20; titrated after 4 weeks of Taspo10), with exenatide 10 mcg BID (Exe; after 4 weeks of Exe 5 mcg) in patients inadequately controlled on metformin, a thiazolidinedione, or both. T-emerge 2 showed that once-weekly Taspo provided better glycaemic control than Exe. This report focuses on a subset of T-emerge 2 participants undergoing a standardized liquid meal comparing Taspo to Exe, which has been previously shown to lower postprandial glucose. METHODS: Meal tolerance tests (MTT) were performed at baseline and at week 24 in a subset of Taspo10, Taspo20 and Exe patients (n = 42, 39 and 67, respectively). Blood samples for glucose, insulin, glucagon and C-peptide were obtained before and after (30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 min) ingestion of a standardized liquid meal. RESULTS: The 2-h postprandial, mean 0-3 h and iAUC0-3 h glucose during the MTT was reduced to a similar extent in all groups and the time profile of the postprandial glucose showed a similar pattern. Taspo10 and Taspo20, but not Exe, significantly increased insulin from baseline (both mean and iAUC0-3 h). Although changes from baseline in C-peptide were not significant within any treatment group, the mean change from baseline (both mean 0-3 h and iAUC0-3 h) was significantly increased in Taspo10 vs. Exe. Mean glucagon showed significant decreases in all groups. CONCLUSION: Taspoglutide and Exe improved postprandial glucose tolerance to a similar extent but possibly with different intimate mechanisms.

Efficacy and safety over 26 weeks of an oral treatment strategy including sitagliptin compared with an injectable treatment strategy with liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin: a randomised clinical trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this work was to compare treatment intensification strategies based on orally administered vs injectable incretin-based antihyperglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin monotherapy. METHODS: In a 26 week, open-label study, 653 patients (baseline HbA1c = 8.2% [66 mmol/mol]) were randomised at 111 sites in 21 countries in a 1:1 ratio to a strategy using oral agents (starting with sitagliptin 100 mg/day) or a strategy using the injectable drug liraglutide starting at a dose of 0.6 mg/day, up-titrated to 1.2 mg/day after 1 week. The following patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited for the study: those aged 18-79 years, on a stable dose of metformin monotherapy ≥1,500 mg/day for ≥12 weeks, with an HbA1c ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and ≤11.0% (97 mmol/mol) and a fasting fingerstick glucose (FFG) <15 mmol/l (<270 mg/dl) at the randomisation visit, deemed capable by the investigator of using a Victoza pen injection device (containing 6 mg/ml liraglutide; Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark). Women taking part in the study agreed to remain abstinent or use an acceptable method of birth control during the study. Randomisation was performed via a computer-generated allocation schedule using an interactive voice response system. After 12 weeks, patients on sitagliptin with HbA1c ≥ 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and fasting glucose >6.1 mmol/l had their treatment intensified with glimepiride; patients on liraglutide with HbA1c ≥ 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) had the dose up-titrated to 1.8 mg/day. The primary analysis assessed whether the strategy using oral drugs was non-inferior to that using an injectable drug regarding HbA1c change from baseline at week 26 using a per-protocol (PP) population and a non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. RESULTS: In the PP population (522 patients included: oral strategy, n = 269; injectable strategy, n = 253) antihyperglycaemic therapy was intensified at week 12 in 50.2% and 28.5%, respectively. HbA1c decreased over 26 weeks in both treatment strategy groups, with a larger initial reduction at week 12 in the injectable strategy group. The LS mean change in HbA1c at week 26 was -1.3% (95% CI -1.4, -1.2) in the oral strategy group and -1.4% (95% CI -1.5, -1.3) in the injectable strategy group; the study met the non-inferiority criterion. Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated; hypoglycaemia was reported more often with the oral strategy, while nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal pain were reported more often with the injectable strategy. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: An oral, incretin-based treatment strategy with sitagliptin and, if needed, glimepiride may be a good approach in many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for managing inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy, as compared with an injectable treatment strategy with liraglutide. The oral and injectable strategies had similar effects on HbA1c and had good overall tolerability. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01296412 Funding The study was sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.

Pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes: the potential of incretin-based therapies.

Management guidelines recommend metformin as the first-line therapy for most patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by diet and exercise. Efficacy with metformin therapy is usually of limited duration, which necessitates the early introduction of one or two additional oral agents or the initiation of injections, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists or insulin. Although safe and effective, metformin monotherapy has been associated with gastrointestinal side effects (≈20% of treated patients in randomized studies) and is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency or severe liver disease. Patients treated with a sulphonylurea are at increased risk for hypoglycaemia and moderate weight gain, whereas those receiving a thiazolidinedione are subject to an increased risk of weight gain, oedema, heart failure or fracture. Weight gain and hypoglycaemia are associated with insulin use. Thus, there is an unmet need for a safe and efficacious add-on agent after initial-therapy failure. Evidence suggests that incretin-based agents, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, can successfully achieve glycaemic targets and potentially provide cardiovascular and ß-cell-function benefits. This review will examine current approaches for treating type 2 diabetes and discuss the place of incretin therapies, mainly GLP-1 agonists, in the type 2 diabetes treatment spectrum.

High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and not HbA1c was directly related to cardiovascular outcome in PROactive.

AIM: In PROactive, pioglitazone reduced the incidence of death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and significantly improved HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol relative to placebo. As these glycaemic and lipid parameters are major cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, we assessed their separate contribution to the reduced incidence of CV outcomes. METHODS: Patients (n = 5238) with type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease were randomized to 45 mg pioglitazone or placebo. Relationships among treatment, outcome (time to first event of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke) and 10 laboratory measurements and vital signs were investigated using log-linear models. Continuous variable measurements (percent changes from baseline to average of all postbaseline values prior to censoring) were made discrete by categorizing into tertiles. Log-linear models were fitted to multiway tables of discrete data and analysis of deviance used to summarize sources of variation in the data. RESULTS: Although pioglitazone treatment was associated with a decrease in HbA1c and an increase in HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), only the change from baseline HDL-C predicted the outcome (χ(2) = 28.89, p < 0.0001). No other variables, including HbA1c, triglycerides and systolic blood pressure, showed significant direct associations with outcome. When the analysis was extended to include baseline statin use, this was associated with an improved outcome independently of HDL-C changes. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis suggests that HDL-C, but probably not HbA1c, is a driver of pioglitazone's favourable influence on CV outcome.

Comparative pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of subcutaneous insulin glulisine and insulin aspart prior to a standard meal in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: A multinational, randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover trial to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of bolus, subcutaneously administered insulin glulisine (glulisine) and insulin aspart (aspart) in insulin-naÏve, obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Thirty subjects [9/21 females/males; mean ± SD age: 60.7 ± 7.7 years; body mass index (BMI): 33.5 ± 3.3 kg/m(2) ; duration of diabetes: 6.8 ± 4.6 years; HbA1c: 7.1 ± 0.8%] were included in the analysis. They fasted overnight and then received a 0.2 U/kg subcutaneous dose of glulisine or aspart 2 min before starting a standardized test meal, 7 days apart, according to a randomization schedule. Blood samples were taken every 15 min, starting 20 min before the meal and ending 6 h postprandially. RESULTS: The area under the absolute glucose concentration-time curve between 0 and 1 h after insulin injection and maximal glucose concentration was significantly lower with glulisine than with aspart (p = 0.0455 and 0.0337, respectively). However, for the total study period, plasma glucose concentration was similar for glulisine and aspart. Peak insulin concentration was significantly higher for glulisine than for insulin aspart (p < 0.0001). Hypoglycaemic events (≤ 70 mg/dl with or without symptoms) occurred in 13 and 16 subjects treated with glulisine and aspart, respectively, but there were no cases of severe hypoglycaemia requiring intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Glulisine was associated with lower glucose levels during the first hour after a standard meal; the remaining glucose profiles were otherwise equivalent, with higher insulin levels observed throughout the study period.

Is the ADA/EASD algorithm for the management of type 2 diabetes (January 2009) based on evidence or opinion? A critical analysis.

The ADA and the EASD recently published a consensus statement for the medical management of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. The authors advocate initial treatment with metformin monotherapy and lifestyle modification, followed by addition of basal insulin or a sulfonylurea if glycaemic goals are not met (tier 1 recommendations). All other glucose-lowering therapies are relegated to a secondary (tier 2) status and only recommended for selected clinical settings. In our view, this algorithm does not offer physicians and patients the appropriate selection of options to individualise and optimise care with a view to sustained control of blood glucose and reduction both of diabetes complications and cardiovascular risk. This paper critically assesses the basis of the ADA/EASD algorithm and the resulting tiers of treatment options.

Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL: A patient-level meta-analysis examining older and younger adults with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: Older people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are at an increased risk of hypoglycaemia and its consequences. However, efficacy and safety data for basal insulin therapy are limited in these individuals. This patient-level meta-analysis assessed the treatment effects of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in people with T2DM ≥ 65 years old. METHODS: Data were pooled for patients randomised to receive Gla-300 or Gla-100 in the Phase 3a, treat-to-target EDITION 1, 2 and 3 trials. Glycaemic efficacy, hypoglycaemia, changes in body weight and insulin dosage and adverse events were examined over 6 months' treatment with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 for participants aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years. RESULTS: Of 2496 participants randomised, 662 were ≥ 65 years (Gla-300, n = 329; Gla-100, n = 333). Glycaemic control was comparable for Gla-300 and Gla-100 in participants ≥ 65 years (LS mean [95% CI] difference in HbA1c change from baseline to month 6: 0.00 [-0.14 to 0.15] %; 0.00 [-1.53 to 1.64] mmol/mol) and < 65 years (0.00 [-0.09 to 0.08] %; 0.00 [-0.98 to 0.87] mmol/mol). Fewer participants receiving Gla-300 versus Gla-100 experienced nocturnal confirmed (≤ 3.9 mmol/L [≤ 70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia (relative risk: ≥ 65 years: 0.70 [0.57 to 0.85]; < 65 years: 0.77 [0.68 to 0.87]). Annualised rates of nocturnal confirmed or severe hypoglycaemia were lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100 for both age groups. CONCLUSION: Gla-300 was associated with a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia versus Gla-100, accompanied by comparable glycaemic improvement, for people aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years with T2DM.

Long-term glycaemic effects of pioglitazone compared with placebo as add-on treatment to metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy in PROactive (PROactive 18).

AIMS: To assess the long-term glycaemic effects, concomitant changes in medications and initiation of permanent insulin use (defined as daily insulin use for a period of > or = 90 days or ongoing use at death/final visit) with pioglitazone vs. placebo in diabetic patients receiving metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy at baseline in the PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial in macroVascular Events (PROactive). METHODS: In PROactive, patients with Type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease were randomized to pioglitazone (force titrated to 45 mg/day) or placebo, in addition to other existing glucose-lowering therapies. In a post-hoc analysis, we categorized patients not receiving insulin at baseline and treated by oral monotherapy into two main cohorts: add-on to metformin alone (n = 514) and sulphonylurea alone (n = 1001). The follow-up averaged 34.5 months. RESULTS: There were significantly greater reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) with pioglitazone than with placebo and more pioglitazone-treated patients achieved HbA(1c) targets, irrespective of the baseline oral glucose-lowering regimen and despite a decrease in the use of other glucose-lowering agents. Approximately twice as many in the placebo groups progressed to permanent insulin use than in the pioglitazone groups across the two cohorts: 3.4% for pioglitazone and 6.5% for placebo when added to metformin monotherapy and 6.3% and 14.8%, respectively, when added to sulphonylurea monotherapy. The overall safety of both dual therapies was good. CONCLUSIONS: Intensifying an existing oral monotherapy regimen to a dual oral regimen by adding pioglitazone resulted in sustained improvements in glycaemic control and reduced progression to insulin therapy. The efficacy and safety of adding pioglitazone to either metformin monotherapy or sulphonylurea monotherapy were good.

Long-term glycaemic control with metformin-sulphonylurea-pioglitazone triple therapy in PROactive (PROactive 17).

AIMS: We assessed the long-term glycaemic effects and the safety profile of triple therapy with the addition of pioglitazone vs. placebo in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with combined metformin-sulphonylurea therapy in the PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROactive). METHODS: In a post-hoc analysis, we identified patients treated with metformin plus sulphonylurea combination therapy and not receiving insulin at baseline (n = 1314). In those patients, we compared the effects of pioglitazone (force-titrated to 45 mg/day, n = 654) vs. placebo (n = 660) on glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) reduction, concomitant changes in medications and initiation of permanent insulin use (defined as daily insulin use for a period of > or = 90 days or ongoing use at death/final visit). RESULTS: Significantly greater reductions in HbA(1c) and greater proportions of patients with HbA(1c) at target were noted with pioglitazone vs, placebo, despite a decrease in the use of other oral glucose-lowering agents. There was an approximate twofold increase in progression to permanent insulin use in the placebo group vs. the pioglitazone group: 31.1 vs. 16.1%, respectively, when added to combination therapy. The overall safety of the metformin-sulphonylurea-pioglitazone triple therapy was good. CONCLUSIONS: Intensifying an existing dual oral therapy regimen to a triple oral regimen by adding pioglitazone to the classical metformin-sulphonylurea combination resulted in sustained improvements in glycaemic control and reduced progression to insulin therapy. The advantages and disadvantages of adding pioglitazone instead of adding basal insulin should be assessed further.

Efficacy and adherence of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in real-life settings.

Despite the availability of a large number of therapeutic options throughout the world, rates of optimal glycaemic control in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus remain low. Delays in treatment intensification to insulin and low adherence to insulin regimes, which are well-documented contributors to poor glycaemic control, are in many cases driven by fear of hypoglycaemic events, weight gain and injections. Over the last 10 years, injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have emerged as alternatives to basal insulin for treatment intensification in patients inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs. As a class, GLP1-RAs are associated with weight loss and fewer hypoglycaemic events than insulin. In addition, some of them are available in once-a-week formulations and therefore require fewer injections. However, as randomized controlled trials are not representative of everyday practice, physicians should consider the results of real-life studies to guide their treatment decisions. In this review, while significant variations in efficacy, tolerability and adherence data were noted from one study to another, rates of glycaemic control overall were low. Indeed, our present analysis has suggested that regular re-evaluations of treatment, including response, tolerability, adherence, cost and quality of life, are necessary.

Effect of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a model-based approach.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this exploratory analysis was to assess the effect of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on pancreatic beta-cell function using a model-based analysis. METHODS: Data for this analysis were from three large, placebo-controlled clinical studies that examined sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. as add-on to metformin therapy or as monotherapy over 18 or 24 weeks. In these studies, subsets of patients consented to undergo extensive blood sampling as part of a nine-point meal tolerance test performed at baseline and study end-point. Blood samples were collected at -10, 0, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 min relative to the start of a meal and subsequently were assayed for plasma glucose and serum C-peptide concentrations. Parameters for beta-cell function were calculated using the C-peptide minimal model, which estimates insulin secretion rate (ISR) and partitions the ISR into basal (Phi(b); ISR at basal glucose concentrations), static (Phi(s); ISR at above basal glucose concentrations following a meal) and dynamic (Phi(d); ISR in response to the rate of increase in above basal glucose concentrations following a meal) components. The total responsivity index (Phi(total); average ISR over the average glucose concentration) is calculated as a function of Phi(s), Phi(d )and Phi(b. )Insulin sensitivity was assessed with a validated composite index (ISI). Disposition indices (DI), which assess insulin secretion in the context of changes in insulin sensitivity, were calculated as the product of Phiand ISI. RESULTS: When administered in combination with ongoing metformin therapy or as monotherapy, sitagliptin was associated with substantial reductions in postprandial glycaemic excursion following a meal challenge relative to placebo. Sitagliptin produced significant (p < 0.05 vs. placebo) improvements in Phi(s )and Phi(total), regardless of treatment regimen (add-on to metformin or as monotherapy). For Phi(d), there was a numerical, but not statistically significant, improvement with sitagliptin relative to placebo. Treatment with sitagliptin increased Phi(b), but the difference relative to placebo was only significant with monotherapy. ISI was not significantly different between sitagliptin and placebo. The DIs for the static, dynamic and total measures were significantly (p < 0.05) increased with sitagliptin treatment relative to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this model-based analysis, sitagliptin improved beta-cell function relative to placebo in both fasting and postprandial states in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Fulminant type 1 diabetes in Caucasians: A report of three cases.

CONTEXT: Fulminant type 1 diabetes is a new clinical entity in which the process of beta-cell destruction, and the subsequent progression of hyperglycaemia and ketoacidosis, are extremely rapid. Until now, this subtype of type 1 diabetes has only been reported in the Asian population, especially Japanese and Koreans. CASES: We report here on three cases of fulminant type 1 diabetes in Caucasian French women. Both the clinical and biological characteristics of these patients are similar to those reported in Japanese studies. Notably, all patients experienced severe ketoacidosis (pH<7.1) that occurred abruptly after the onset of hyperglycaemic symptoms (<6 days), with near-normal HbA(1c) values at diagnosis (5.6, 6.4 and 6.8%). Patients were treated in the intensive care unit with basal-bolus insulin therapy with no remission of their diabetes; pancreatic islet-related autoantibodies were all negative. Fasting C-peptide levels were undetectable, suggesting complete destruction of pancreatic beta-cells. HLA phenotyping of these Caucasian patients did not find the specific HLA haplotype (DRB1*0405-DQB1*0401) previously found to be linked to fulminant type 1 diabetes in Japanese patients. CONCLUSION: These are the first cases of fulminant type 1 diabetes reported in Caucasians. These cases reveal new perspectives as regards the worldwide distribution of this intriguing clinical entity.

Abdominal obesity is associated with ineffective control of cardiovascular risk factors in primary care in France.

AIM: Insufficient control of cardiovascular risk factors is observed in primary care. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the association of abdominal obesity with achievement of treatment targets for HbA(1c), LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol and blood pressure in primary care. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational epidemiological study, primary-care practitioners completed a questionnaire covering demographic and socioeconomic data, medical history, drug treatment, and clinical and biological characteristics for 3351 patients (1630 men and 1721 women). Therapeutic targets were HbA(1c) <7%, LDL cholesterol <1.6g/L, triglycerides <1.5 g/L and SBP/DBP <140/90 mmHg. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the relationship between waist circumference and a lack of cardiovascular risk-factor control. RESULTS: The patients' mean ages were 58+/-14 years and 55+/-16 years for men and women, respectively. A large waist circumference was positively and significantly (P<0.0001 for all) associated with diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, low HDL cholesterol and hypertension. The prevalence of patients not achieving therapeutic targets increased across waist-circumference quartiles. For treated patients, the odds ratios (95% CI) (adjusted for age, gender, education, smoking status and medical specialty) for not achieving treatment targets were 17.6 (2.2-142) for triglycerides, 2.8 (1.3-6.1) for HbA(1c) and 1.4 (0.9-2.0) for blood pressure on comparisons with extreme quartiles of waist-circumference distribution. CONCLUSION: In primary care, a lack of control of triglycerides, HbA(1c) and, to a lesser extent, blood pressure increases with waist circumference independently of confounders. This suggests that abdominal obesity is associated of poor results in the treatment of diabetes and hypertriglyceridaemia.

After the LEADER trial and SUSTAIN-6, how do we explain the cardiovascular benefits of some GLP-1 receptor agonists?

Recent cardiovascular outcome trials - the LEADER with liragutide and SUSTAIN-6 with semaglutide - have shown significant reductions of major cardiovascular (CV) events with these glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists. Progressive separation of the treatment and placebo curves, starting clearly between 12 and 18 months of the trial period, and significant reductions in the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, indicate that the beneficial CV effects observed with GLP-1 receptor agonists could be due to an antiatherogenic effect. So far, the reasons for such an effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists have not been entirely clear, although several hypotheses may be proposed. As the reductions in glycated haemoglobin and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in these trials were modest, and both trials lasted only a short period of time, reductions in hyperglycaemia and SBP are unlikely to be involved in the beneficial CV effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists. On the other hand, their effect on lipids and, in particular, the dramatic decrease in postprandial hypertriglyceridaemia may explain their beneficial CV actions. Reduction of body weight, including a significant decrease in visceral fat in patients using GLP-1 receptor agonists, may also have beneficial CV effects by reducing chronic proatherogenic inflammation. In addition, there are in-vitro data showing a direct anti-inflammatory effect with these agents that could also be involved in their beneficial CV effects. Moreover, studies in humans have shown significant beneficial effects on ischaemic myocardium after a very short treatment period, suggesting a direct effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on myocardium, although the precise mechanism remains unclear. Finally, as a reduction in insulin resistance has been associated with a decrease in CV risk, it cannot be ruled out that the lowering of insulin resistance induced by GLP-1 receptor agonists might also be involved in their beneficial CV actions.

Which oral antidiabetic drug to combine with metformin to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia when initiating basal insulin?: A randomized controlled trial of a DPP4 inhibitor versus insulin secretagogues.

We conducted a pilot study to evaluate two therapeutic strategies at the time of insulin initiation in type 2 diabetic patients insufficiently controlled with metformin+insulin-secretagogues (IS, sulfonylureas or glinides). Patients were randomized to remain under the same dual therapy or to receive metformin+DPP4 inhibitors while starting insulin. Similar glycemic control was achieved in both groups. However less hypoglycemia was observed with DPP4 inhibitors despite higher doses of insulin.

High frequency of bone/bone marrow involvement in advanced medullary thyroid cancer.

High hematological toxicity has been observed with anti-carcinoembryonic antigen radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), suggesting metastatic bone involvement (BI). This retrospective study evaluated the rate of BI in MTC patients enrolled in two phase-I/II RIT trials using anti-carcinoembryonic antigen x anti-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid bispecific antibodies and [(131)I]di-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid hapten. Thirty-five patients underwent bone scintigraphy, bone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and post-RIT immunoscintigraphy (IS). IS performed in MTC patients was compared with IS conducted in 12 metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients. Quantitative analysis of bone uptake was performed in three MTC and three CRC patients. In the MTC group, bone scintigraphy detected BI in 56.6% of patients, MRI in 75.8%, and IS in 88.6%. BI was confirmed by undirected (random) bone marrow biopsy, by bone surgery, or by two positive imaging methods in 74.3% of the patients. Sensitivity per patient of bone scintigraphy, MRI, and IS were 72.7, 100, and 100%, respectively. In contrast, IS visualized BI in only 33.3% of CRC patients; bone uptake was lower in CRC than in MTC patients. Bone MRI combined with post-RIT IS disclosed a much higher BI rate in advanced MTC than previously reported in the literature.

Cytoadherence of lymphocytes from type I diabetic subjects to insulin-secreting cells. Marker of anti-beta-cell cellular immunity.

We studied the ability of lymphocytes from type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients to adhere to murine beta-cells. Lymphocytes from 17 recent-onset type I diabetic subjects (less than 6 mo) displayed enhanced ability to form rosettes with RINm5F cells (P less than .001) compared with lymphocytes from 27 healthy subjects forming background rosettes, whereas the number of RIN cytoadherent lymphocytes was unimpaired in 12 type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects. This phenomenon tended to decline in 21 subjects with long-standing diabetes (greater than 1 yr) who taken as a group presented a normal number of RIN rosetting lymphocytes. The islet specificity of these diabetic rosettes was confirmed because, compared with controls, lymphocytes from recent-onset type I diabetic subjects also displayed a greater intensity of adherence to normal mouse islets but not to unrelated K562 and TS cell lines. As demonstrated by indirect immunofluorescence studies, these diabetic rosettes contained 54% of T-lymphocytes (OKT3+, OKT4+, or OKT8+), whereas only 20% of T-lymphocytes were found in background rosettes. The high percentage (66%) of la+ cells found in diabetic rosettes suggests that at least some of the cytoadherent T-lymphocytes from recent-onset type I diabetic subjects are activated. Natural killer (NK) cells do not seem to be the major cell type implicated in this phenomenon, because Leu 11+ cells were less represented in diabetic rosettes (25%) than in background rosettes (53%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In vitro relationship of CD4 cells from type I diabetic patients and xenogeneic beta-cell membranes.

In a rosette assay, 63 patients with recent-onset type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus had a higher (P less than .001) number of lymphocytes adhering to rat insulinoma RINm5F cells (diabetic rosettes) than 153 healthy control (background rosettes) or 20 nondiabetic subjects with other organ-specific autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, lymphocytes from diabetic patients displayed a highly correlated (r = .97, P less than .001) binding on two different xenogeneic beta-cell lines (RIN and hamster insulinoma HIT cells). This phenomenon was not found on a panel of seven non-beta-cell lines (e.g., exocrine pancreatic cells, endocrine cells). By increasing lymphocyte-to-RIN ratios (0.25:1 to 30:1), the supernumerary RIN-adherent lymphocytes from diabetic patients, expressed as the percentage of lymphocytes involved conjugates, were only detectable at lower ratios (0.25:1 to 4:1), and their binding efficiency was two times higher than that of control lymphocytes. This efficiency fell at higher ratios (greater than 4:1) to the level of background rosettes that remained constant through the ratio scale. This specific RIN-rosette formation was abrogated when lymphocytes from diabetic patients were preabsorbed on beta-cells (either HIT or RIN) but not on non-beta-cells, whereas preabsorption of control lymphocytes did not modify the number of background rosettes. In addition, diabetic rosettes, but not background rosettes, were inhibited by competition with RIN membrane extracts but not by non-beta-cell extracts. Moreover, diabetic rosettes were inhibited during blocking experiments with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) but not with unrelated MoAbs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)