Initial Outcomes of the Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis for Endovascular Repair of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) has dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality of intervention. Injuries requiring zone 2 coverage of the aorta traditionally require left subclavian artery (LSA) sacrifice or open revascularization. Furthermore, these injuries are associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and long-term morbidity. Here we report 1-year outcomes of total endovascular repair of BTAI with the GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis for LSA preservation. METHODS: Across 34 investigative sites, 9 patients with BTAI requiring LSA coverage were enrolled in a nonrandomized, prospective study of a single-branched aortic endograft. The thoracic branch endoprosthesis device allows for graft placement proximal to the LSA and incorporates a single side branch for LSA perfusion. RESULTS: This initial cohort included 8 male and 1 female patient with a median age of 43 (22, 76) and 12 months of follow-up. Five total years of follow-up are planned. All participants had grade 3 BTAI. All procedures took place between 2018 and 2019. The median injury severity score was 2 (0, 66). The median procedure time was 109 min (78, 162). All aortic injuries were repaired under general anesthesia and with heparinization. A spinal drain was used in one patient. Post-deployment balloon angioplasty was conducted in one case at the distal landing zone. There was one asymptomatic LSA branch occlusion 6 months after repair. It was attributed to the purposeful proximal deployment of the branch stent to accommodate an early vertebral takeoff. The occlusion did not require revascularization. There were no strokes, mortalities, or aortic adverse events (migration, endoleak, native aortic expansion, dissection, or thrombosis) through 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Initial cohort outcomes suggest that endovascular repair of zone 2 BTAI is feasible and has favorable outcomes using the thoracic branch device with LSA preservation. Additional cases and longer-term follow-up are required for a definitive assessment of the device's safety and durability in traumatic aortic injuries.

Aortic endograft sizing and endoleak, reintervention, and mortality following endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endograft sizing for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is not consistent despite published instructions for use (IFU). We sought to identify factors associated with over/undersizing, determine sex influence on sizing, and examine sizing effects on endoleak, reintervention, and mortality by analyzing data obtained from the W.L. Gore & Associates Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT). METHODS: All patients enrolled in GREAT undergoing EVAR were included for analysis. Proximal/distal aortic landing zones were compared with device implanted to assess sizing as related to IFU. χ2/Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate associations between IFU sizing and demographics. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors of outside IFU sizing. Cox proportional hazards regression analyzed the relationship between sizing and endoleak, device-related reinterventions, and all-cause/aortic mortality. RESULTS: There were 3607 EVAR subjects enrolled in GREAT as of March 2020. Of them, 1896 (53%) were within IFU for sizing, 791 (22%) were oversized, 540 (15%) were undersized, and 380 (10%) had both over- and undersized components. Factors predictive of use outside of IFU included female sex (P = .001), non-white race (P = .0003), decreased proximal neck length (P < .061), or larger iliac diameters (P < .0001). Women were more likely than men to have proximal neck undersizing and iliac limb oversizing, and men were more likely to have iliac limb undersizing. On multivariate analysis, undersizing of the proximal graft was associated with endoleak (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8) and aortic (HR, 60.5) and all-cause (HR, 18.0) mortality. Undersizing of iliac limbs was associated with endoleak (HR, 1.5) and device-related reintervention (HR, 1.4). Iliac limb outside IFU sizing was associated with aortic (HR, 2.6) and all-cause (HR, 1.3) mortality. Proximal and distal oversizing was not associated with adverse outcomes. Female sex was associated with mortality on univariate but not multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing EVAR with GORE EXCLUDER abdominal aortic aneurysm Endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore & Associates Inc, Flagstaff, Ariz) are more likely to have proximal stent-graft undersizing and iliac limb oversizing, whereas men are more likely to have undersized iliac limbs. Proximal aortic graft undersizing is associated with endoleak and all-cause/aortic mortality, whereas undersizing of iliac limbs is associated with endoleak and device-related reintervention. Oversizing was not associated with adverse outcomes.

In-hospital outcomes and long-term survival of women of childbearing age with aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we defined the outcomes and effects of pregnancy in a cohort of women of childbearing age with acute aortic dissection (AAD). METHODS: We reviewed our database of AAD to identify all eligible female patients. Women aged <45 years were included. Data on pregnancy timing with respect to the occurrence of dissection, the demographic data, dissection extent, dissection treatment, dissection-related outcomes, overall maternal and fetal mortality, and genetic testing results were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 62 women aged <45 years had presented to us with AAD from 1999 to 2017. Of the 62 women, 37 (60%) had had a history of pregnancy at AAD. Of these 37 patients, 10 (27%) had had a peripartum aortic dissection, defined as dissection during pregnancy or within 12 months postpartum. Of the 10 AADs, 5 were type A and 5 were type B. Three patients had presented with AAD during pregnancy (one in the second and two in the third trimester). Five patients (50%) had developed AAD in the immediate postpartum period (within 3 months) and two (20%) in the late postpartum period. For the immediate postpartum AADs (<3 months), four of the five patients delivered via cesarean section. Of these 10 peripartum AADs, 3 (30%) had occurred in patients with known Marfan syndrome. In-hospital mortality for those with peripartum AAD was 10% (1 of 10). Fetal mortality was 20% (2 of 10). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of aortic dissection in women of childbearing age at our institution was low. However, pregnancy might increase the risk of those young women genetically predisposed to dissection events. From these data, this risk appears to be greatest in the immediate postpartum period, even for those who undergo cesarean section. Close clinical and radiographic surveillance is required for all women with suspected aortopathy, especially in the third trimester and early postpartum period.

Differences in quality of life outcomes after paraclavicular decompression for thoracic outlet syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) results from compression of the neurovascular structures in the thoracic outlet. Decompression provides relief of TOS symptoms. However, little is known about long-term function and quality of life (QoL) from a patient's perspective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical and QoL outcomes after surgical decompression of the thoracic outlet using a paraclavicular approach. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was used to conduct a retrospective review of patients who underwent thoracic outlet decompression between August 2004 and August 2018. We excluded patients without complete follow-up data. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Derkash classification (poor, fair, good, excellent) using contingency table methods, and QoL was assessed by the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) using general linear models. SF-12 was scored by published criteria, and scale-specific and aggregate mental and physical health-related QoL scores were computed. Aggregate QoL scores range from 0 (terrible) to 100 (perfect). Secondary outcomes included mortality, complications, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: We performed 105 operations for TOS, and 100 patients with complete follow-up data were included in the study. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Median age was 35 (interquartile range, 24-47) years, and 58 (58%) were female. The median duration of hospital stay was 4 (interquartile range, 3-5.5) days. Of these patients, 46 had venous etiology, 8 arterial, 42 neurogenic, and 4 mixed vascular and neurogenic. Good or excellent Derkash results were reported in 77 (77%) patients, 46 of 54 (85%) of those with vascular TOS vs 31 of 46 (67%) of those with neurogenic etiology (P < .036). SF-12 score was obtained in 93 of 100 (93%) with a median duration from surgery of 6.1 (3.3-9.3) years. Patients with neurogenic TOS (NTOS) reported significantly lower aggregate mental health QoL than patients with vascular-only TOS (57 vs 59; P < .016). This effect persisted across the entire duration of follow-up and was unaffected by time from surgery (regression P for time = .509). In contrast, aggregate physical function QoL was unaffected by neurogenic etiology (P = .303), and all patients improved linearly with time (0.5 scale unit/y; P < .009). Three patients with incomplete relief of symptoms after paraclavicular decompression for NTOS underwent pectoralis minor decompression. There were no deaths or injuries to the long thoracic nerve. Complications included pleural effusion or hemothorax requiring evacuation (n = 6), neurapraxia (n = 6), and lymph leak (n = 2) treated with tube thoracostomy. CONCLUSIONS: NTOS is associated with significantly worse functional outcome assessed by the Derkash classification. NTOS also demonstrated worse composite mental health QoL, which did not improve over time. In contrast, composite physical health QoL improved linearly with time from surgery regardless of etiology of TOS.

Managing central venous access during a health care crisis.

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, central venous access line teams were implemented at many hospitals throughout the world to provide access for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the structure, practice patterns, and outcomes of these vascular access teams during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-reported study of central venous access line teams in hospitals afflicted with the COVID-19 pandemic. To participate in the study, hospitals were required to meet one of the following criteria: development of a formal plan for a central venous access line team during the pandemic; implementation of a central venous access line team during the pandemic; placement of central venous access by a designated practice group during the pandemic as part of routine clinical practice; or management of an iatrogenic complication related to central venous access in a patient with COVID-19. RESULTS: Participants from 60 hospitals in 13 countries contributed data to the study. Central venous line teams were most commonly composed of vascular surgery and general surgery attending physicians and trainees. Twenty sites had 2657 lines placed by their central venous access line team or designated practice group. During that time, there were 11 (0.4%) iatrogenic complications associated with central venous access procedures performed by the line team or group at those 20 sites. Triple lumen catheters, Cordis (Santa Clara, Calif) catheters, and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters were the most common types of central venous lines placed by the teams. Eight (14%) sites reported experience in placing central venous lines in prone, ventilated patients with COVID-19. A dedicated line cart was used by 35 (59%) of the hospitals. Less than 50% (24 [41%]) of the participating sites reported managing thrombosed central lines in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-three of the sites managed 48 iatrogenic complications in patients with COVID-19 (including complications caused by providers outside of the line team or designated practice group). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a dedicated central venous access line team during a pandemic or other health care crisis is a way by which physicians trained in central venous access can contribute their expertise to a stressed health care system. A line team composed of physicians with vascular skill sets provides relief to resource-constrained intensive care unit, ward, and emergency medicine teams with a low rate of iatrogenic complications relative to historical reports. We recommend that a plan for central venous access line team implementation be in place for future health care crises.

Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Midaortic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Midaortic syndrome (MAS) is a rare congenital or acquired condition marked by segmental or diffuse stenosis of the distal thoracic and/or abdominal aorta and its branches. The optimal approach to medical or interventional management of MAS and long-term outcomes in adults are not well defined. We reviewed MAS cases to characterize the natural history of aortic disease, identify prognostic factors, and evaluate the durability of invasive interventions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with MAS who presented to Memorial Hermann Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine between 1997 and 2018. We categorized cases according to demographic and clinical manifestations, etiologies, the extent of aortic involvement, interventions, and vascular outcomes. RESULTS: We identified a cohort of 13 patients with MAS. The etiology of MAS was identified in 6 cases, including genetic syndromes (neurofibromatosis type 1 (2/13), Williams syndrome (1/13), fibromuscular dysplasia (2/13), and Takayasu arteritis (1/13)). Mean age at first documented clinical event was 25.2 (2-67) years, but cases with genetic etiologies presented significantly younger (18.2 years). The most common primary anatomic site was the suprarenal and infrarenal aorta (zones 5-8). Extra-aortic locations involved the renal (4/13), celiac (3/13), and superior mesenteric (3/13) arteries. Clinical manifestations included hypertension (13/13), claudication (9/13), and postprandial abdominal pain (5/13). All patients with available follow-up data underwent at least one surgical or endovascular intervention (range: 1-8). Postoperative complications included renal failure requiring postdischarge hemodialysis and respiratory failure. There were no deaths in long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MAS is a complex vasculopathy with substantial variability in clinical presentation and anatomic distribution. Extensive disease frequently requires multiple invasive interventions and results in refractory hypertension, which may predict subsequent clinical events. A multidisciplinary approach with long-term monitoring is essential for preservation of end-organ function and quality of life in this debilitating disease.

The role of ascending aortic size in outcomes of patients with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies demonstrate that uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (uATBAD) patients with enlarged descending thoracic aortic diameters are at high risk for development of complications. This study aimed to determine the association of maximum ascending aortic diameter and area and outcomes in patients with uATBAD. METHODS: All patients admitted with uATBAD from June 2000 to January 2015 were reviewed, and those with available imaging were included. All measurements were obtained by a specialized cardiovascular radiologist, including the maximum ascending aortic diameter and area. Outcomes, including the need for intervention and mortality, were tracked over time. Data were analyzed by stratified Kaplan-Meier and multiple Cox regression analyses using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: During the study period, 298 patients with uATBAD were admitted, with 238 having available computed tomography and 131 having computed tomography angiography imaging and adequate follow-up available for analysis. The cohort had an average age of 60.96 ± 13.4 years (60% male, 53% white). Ascending aortic area >12.1 cm2 and ascending aortic diameter >40.8 mm were associated with subsequent arch and proximal progression necessitating open ascending aortic repair (P < .027 and P < .033, respectively). Ascending diameter >40.8 mm predicted lower intervention-free survival (P = .01). However, it failed to predict overall survival (P = .12). Ascending aortic area >12.1 cm2 predicted lower intervention-free survival (P = .005). However, this was not predictive of mortality (P = .08). Maximum aortic diameter along the length of the aorta >44 mm persisted as a risk factor for mortality (P < .001). Neither maximum ascending aortic diameter >40.8 mm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-2.83; P = .85) nor area >12.1 cm2 (HR, 0.992; 95% CI, 0.38-2.61; P = .99) significantly predicted mortality when controlling for maximum aortic diameter along the length of the aorta >44 mm (HR, 7.34; 95% CI, 2.3-23.41; P < .001), diabetes mellitus (HR, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.17-18.93; P < .001), age (HR, 1.06/y; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10; P < .001), history of stroke (HR, 5.03; 95% CI, 1.52-16.63; P = .008), and syncope on admission (HR, 21.11; 95% CI, 2.3-193.84; P = .007). Ascending aortic diameter >40.8 mm (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.03-3.95; P = .04) and maximum ascending aortic area >12.1 cm2 (HR, 1.988; 95% CI, 1.02-3.87; P = .04) on admission persisted as predictors of decreased intervention-free survival after controlling for maximum aortic diameter along the length of the aorta >44 mm (HR, 3.142; 95% CI, 1.47-6.83; P < .004), syncope on admission (HR, 26.3; 95% CI, 2.81-246; P < .004), and pleural effusion on admission (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.58-5.77; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: uATBAD patients with ascending aortic area >12.1 cm2 or maximum ascending aortic diameter >40.8 mm are at high risk for development of subsequent arch and proximal progression and may require closer follow-up or earlier intervention. Ascending aortic size (diameter and area) is predictive of decreased intervention-free survival in patients with uATBAD.

Imaging characteristics of acute type A aortic dissection and candidacy for repair with ascending aortic endografts.

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAD) remains associated with substantial short-term mortality, and despite increasing rates of surgical repair, as many as 10% to 20% of patients do not undergo surgery because of comorbidities and dissection-related complications. For patients unable to undergo open repair, previous attempts at endovascular treatment of ATAD used devices originally designed for deployment in the descending thoracic aorta. Industry has begun to support early investigational devices meant specifically for placement within the ascending aorta. We evaluated relevant aortic parameters to examine which patients may be candidates for repair with an ascending aortic endograft. METHODS: We reviewed 100 consecutive patients in our institutional ATAD database with contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging on an Aquarius iNtuition workstation (TeraRecon, San Mateo, Calif), using curved planar reformatting (vessel tracking) and orthogonal views for measurements. We compared relevant aortic measurements against proposed criteria for future ascending endografts, including various landing zone diameters and intimal tear distances from the distal coronary ostium. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients examined, 39% had proximal intimal tears located outside the tubular ascending aorta. In all, 30% were excluded on the basis of either the presence of a prosthetic aortic valve or significant aortic insufficiency, and 6% were excluded on the basis of the presence of patent coronary artery bypass grafts from the ascending aorta. Many patients had multiple exclusion criteria, and based on various proposed criteria, overall candidacy ranged from 2% to 23%. If a maximum landing zone diameter of 42 mm and intimal tears as little as 20 mm distal to the distalmost coronary were considered treatable, only 8% of patients would have been candidates compared with 20% candidacy if aortic diameters up to 46 mm and intimal tears as little as 10 mm distal to the distalmost coronary were considered treatable. The most frequent single cause for exclusion was inadequacy of the proximal landing zone. Iliofemoral vascular access was also assessed and deemed adequate in >90% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of patients suffering ATAD would currently qualify for ascending aortic endografting on the basis of anatomic criteria alone. Future device designs should take into account these common anatomic exclusion criteria so that more versatile devices may be developed and commercially available to treat a larger number of patients.

Predictors of poor outcome in infrainguinal bypass for trauma.

BACKGROUND: Trauma remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Vascular injuries are present in approximately 1% to 2% of trauma patients, with the majority of injuries occurring to the extremities. Trauma patients with vascular injuries have been shown to have increased morbidity and mortality as well as the need for increased resources compared with those without vascular injuries. This study aimed to determine predictors of poor outcomes in infrainguinal bypasses performed for traumatic arterial injury. METHODS: All patients admitted between September 1999 and July 2015 who underwent infrainguinal arterial bypass for trauma at a single level I trauma center were included for analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of thrombosis leading to graft abandonment, revision, amputation, or death. Data were analyzed by univariate descriptive and multiple logistic regression analyses. Long-term data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: During the study period, 108 patients presented with and underwent infrainguinal arterial bypass for traumatic arterial injury. The cohort had a mean age of 35.8 years (16/108 female [15%]). The average Injury Severity Score was 15.2; admission glomerular filtration rate, 79.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), 6; and injury to operating room time, 5.1 hours. Of 108 patients, 37 (34%) had penetrating injury, 71 (66%) had blunt injury, 10 (9.3%) had diabetes mellitus, and 76 (70.4%) had a below-knee target for bypass. Univariate risk factors for poor outcome included age >40 years (odds ratio [OR], 3.27 [1.40-7.65]; P < .01), MESS ≥7 (OR, 5.19 [2.08-19.97]; P < .01), blunt mechanism (OR, 3.35 [1.24-9.07]; P = .02), popliteal artery injury (OR, 3.04 [1.22-7.6]; P = .02), and below-knee target vessel (OR, 4.32 [1.37-13.58]; P = .01). Concomitant orthopedic injuries (P = .08) were not associated with poor outcome. Baseline renal function, type of repair performed (end-to-side vs interposition bypass), injury to surgery time, surgeon's specialty, and associated venous injuries were not significantly predictive of poor outcome. MESS was strongly predictive of poor outcome, with probability rising as high as 95% when MESS reached 12. A score ≥7 (high MESS) was 73% sensitive and 70% specific to predict poor outcomes. Age (OR, 1.03/y; P < .05) and MESS ≥7 (OR, 3.6; P < .03) were persistent predictors of poor outcome in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Poor outcomes in infrainguinal bypass for trauma are significantly predicted by the MESS, with poor outcomes occurring >50% of the time when MESS is ≥9 and >75% of the time when MESS is ≥11. Whereas amputation vs revascularization is a decision that also depends on nerve and soft tissue damage and other comorbidities, the MESS helps frame the data for the clinician and can aid in decision-making. Patients and family should understand that poor outcomes are more likely when MESS is ≥9. For patients with MESS ≥11, primary amputation can be considered.

Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion Reduces Aortofemoral Bypass Graft Patency.

OBJECTIVES: The effect of superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusion on long-term patency of aortofemoral bypasses (AFBs) for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) was examined. METHODS: The AIOD database was reviewed to identify risk factors for AFB failure. The status of the SFA at AFB procedure was categorised as patent; diseased treated (DT), if the SFA occlusion was intervened on concomitant to AFB; or diseased untreated (DU), if the SFA was occluded but not revascularised. Censoring hierarchies for primary patency and patent graft survival time were constructed. Data were analysed by contingency table, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2015, 122 AFB (9 unifemoral, 113 bifemoral) for AIOD were performed. Seventy-five (61%) were female and the mean age was 60 ± 10 years. At the time of AFB, 50 (41%) had occluded SFAs (DT/DU). Of these, 15 had concomitant SFA revascularisation (i.e., DT) at the time of AFB. Patients with occluded SFAs had greater history of prior aortoiliac/infrainguinal procedures (aortoiliac 54% vs. 22%, infrainguinal 58% vs. 25%, both p < 0.001), Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification of femoropopliteal type D lesions (78 vs. 10%, p < 0.001), Rutherford 4-6 categories (80% vs. 57%, p = 0.011), and longer hospital stay (median 11 vs. 7 days, p < 0.004). SFA status did not affect 30 day mortality (overall 9%); however, sub-analysis showed DT had significantly higher mortality than DU (p < 0.03). Over a median follow up of 7.7 (IQR 4.3-11.4) years, primary patency at one and five years was 98.3% and 91.2% in patients with patent SFAs, 87.9% and 82.7% in DU, and 72.7% and 43.6% in DT (p < 0.001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, low baseline glomerular filtration rate (HR 1.01, p = 0.022), DT (HR 3.7, p = 0.020), Rutherford 4-6 (HR 9.1, p = 0.048), and occluded SFA (HR 3.9, p = 0.009) adversely affected primary patency of AFBs. Long-term mortality was not different between the SFA status groups (p = 0.279). CONCLUSION: Baseline SFA occlusion predicted a fourfold increased hazard of primary AFB failure. Concomitant SFA revascularisation did not improve AFB durability and was associated with increased in hospital mortality.

Determinants and outcomes of nonoperative management for blunt traumatic aortic injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The natural history and parameters for successful nonoperative management of blunt traumatic aortic injuries (BTAIs) involving the descending aorta are poorly understood. We examined our experience with nonoperative BTAI treatment (anti-impulse, blood pressure) and evaluated for determinants of successful outcomes. METHODS: We performed a review of our institutional prospective trauma registry database for all BTAI patients from 1999 to 2015. Computed tomography angiography was used to classify aortic injuries on the basis of severity: grade I, intimal tear; grade II, intramural hematoma; grade III, aortic pseudoaneurysm; and grade IV, free rupture. Grade IV injuries were excluded from nonoperative management. Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and follow-up lesion resolution were compared within the medically managed cohort and between surgical and nonoperative groups using univariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Among 338 BTAI patients admitted between 1999 and 2015, 67 BTAI patients were managed nonoperatively; 26 (54%) had grade I BTAI, 22 (46%) had grade II, and 2 (4%) had grade III. Both grade III injuries required a late thoracic endovascular aortic repair after initial medical management and were excluded from analysis. In all, 48 were managed with initial medical therapy, and the remaining 19 died on admission or before definitive treatment. Among the 48 medically managed, the median age was 34 years, and 14 (29%) were female. Six of the 48 (12%) were transferred from other facilities. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics or early outcomes between BTAI grades. Median injury resolution time was 39 days for grade I and 62 days for grade II (P = .03). Compared with a surgical cohort, BTAI grade and Abbreviated Injury Scale score for the chest were the only significant determinants of propensity to operate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these limited data, it appears that patients with minimal aortic injuries (grades I and II) may be managed medically, with the majority resolving within 8 weeks. Minimal aortic injury is associated with low mortality and excellent intermediate-term outcomes. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

New type A dissection after acute type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic dissection is a dynamic process that can progress both proximal and distal to the initial entry tear. We sought to determine associations for development of proximal progression or new type A aortic dissection (NTAD) after acute type B dissection (ATBD) and its effect on survival of the patient. METHODS: We reviewed all cases of acute aortic dissection that we managed from 1999 to 2014. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed to identify correlates of NTAD. Multivariable regression and proportional hazards regression analysis was done to determine the effect of dissection progression on long-term survival. RESULTS: Among 477 cases of ATBD managed, 19 (4.0%) patients developed NTAD during a median follow-up of 4.1 (interquartile range, 1.4-7.7) years. Median time from diagnosis of ATBD to NTAD was 124 (interquartile range, 23-1201) days. Baseline predictors for development of NTAD at initial ATBD admission included bicuspid aortic valve (P = .006) and age <60 years (P = .012). Although not statistically significant, point estimates indicate that thoracic endovascular aortic repair was twice as frequent in NTAD cases as in non-NTAD cases. Overall 5-year survival was 70.2%. Patients who had repair of NTAD appear to have longer survival, although this effect is on the margin of statistical significance (P = .051). After risk factor and correlates of NTAD adjustment, this effect was no longer apparent (P = .089). CONCLUSIONS: The natural history of ATBD is such that there is a persistent risk of NTAD, with the highest risk in the first 6 months. Factors associated with NTAD include bicuspid aortic valve and young age. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair did not have a large effect on risk. Timely diagnosis and repair of NTAD are associated with good survival rates. Lifelong surveillance is warranted in all cases of descending thoracic aortic dissection regardless of initial treatment modality.

Metabolic Syndrome but not Obesity Adversely Affects Outcomes after Open Aortoiliac Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although the incident risk of peripheral artery disease increases in patients with metabolic syndrome, several authors report favorable outcomes in obese patients after arterial bypass surgery. We examine the effect of the so-called "obesity paradox" and metabolic syndrome on outcomes after open aortoiliac bypass surgery. METHODS: We identified patients between 2004 and 2015 who had open surgical bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease. We excluded patients with endovascular repair and those treated primarily for aneurysmal disease. Variables that were analyzed included preoperative medical history, Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease II classification, Rutherford classification, intra-operative, and postoperative outcomes. Metabolic syndrome was defined by World Health Organization criteria: diabetes and 2 or more of dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m2). Data were analyzed by stratified Kaplan-Meier and multiple Cox regression for outcomes including long-term mortality and reintervention rate. RESULTS: There were 154 open bypass surgery patients during the study period with a median age of 60 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53-68), median glomerular filtration rate 76.1 mL/min (IQR 54-102), and 58% female prevalence. In all, 53 patients had metabolic syndrome (4%), and 14 patients (9%) were obese but did not have metabolic syndrome. Primary bypass graft patency was 89.0 ± 2.7% at 1 year and 77.4 ± 4.1% at 5 years and was not significantly different between metabolic syndrome, obese, and nonmetabolic syndrome patients. Reintervention rate for the entire cohort was 25.3 ± 3.7% at 1 year and 40.6 ± 4.7% at 5 years. In those with and without metabolic syndrome, reintervention rate at 1 and 5 years was 33.0 ± 6.8% vs. 21.1 ± 4.2% and 56.1 ± 7.9% vs. 30.7 ± 5.4%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.003). In multivariable analyses, metabolic syndrome (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, P = 0.036) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) (HR: 3.2, P = 0.001) were the only independent predictors of reintervention. Neither obesity nor the individual components comprising metabolic syndrome was a risk for reintervention. Multivariate analysis demonstrated age, female gender, CLI, and nonobesity as the independent risk factors for long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the "obesity paradox" that obesity by itself is not a risk factor for reintervention and was a protective factor for mortality after open aortoiliac bypass surgery. Bypass graft patency and major amputation rates were not affected. Although the individual components do not predispose to worse outcome, metabolic syndrome is a constellation of factors that, together, are associated with adverse events.

Indications and Outcomes of Open Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal.

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations for retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, most are not removed in a timely manner. Longer IVC filter dwell times are associated with caval wall perforation and tilting that make percutaneous retrieval more difficult. Open IVC filter removal is generally reserved for patients with symptoms referable to the filter, such as chronic back and abdominal pain. We present our management algorithm and review of cases of open IVC filter removal. METHODS: Patients referred for management of implanted IVC filters from May 2010 to May 2016 were included. Demographic and imaging were reviewed for cases requiring open surgical removal. RESULTS: There were 221 percutaneous retrieval attempts in 218 patients. Successful retrieval occurred in 196 (89%) attempts. There were 7 patients who had open surgical IVC filter removal after failure of percutaneous retrieval. One patient had 2 filters and another had 3 filters. Except for 1 case with complications during the percutaneous retrieval procedure, the remaining patients all suffered from back or abdominal pain. All had significant filter strut penetration through the caval wall into adjacent structures. Postoperatively, all patients had relief of pain. There were no deaths and 1 patient had a minor ileus that spontaneously resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who fail percutaneous IVC filter retrieval can expect low morbidity and prompt resolution of symptoms after open surgical removal via minilaparotomy.

Medical therapy and intervention do not improve uncomplicated isolated mesenteric artery dissection outcomes over observation alone.

OBJECTIVE: Isolated dissection of the mesenteric vessels is rare but increasingly recognized. This study aimed to evaluate patient characteristics, primary treatment, and subsequent outcomes of mesenteric dissection using multi-institutional data. METHODS: All patients at participant hospitals between January 2003 and December 2015 with dissection of the celiac artery (or its branches) or dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were included. Patients with an aortic dissection were excluded. Demographic, treatment, and follow-up data were collected. The primary outcomes included late vessel thrombosis (LVT) and aneurysmal degeneration (AD). RESULTS: Twelve institutions identified 227 patients (220 with complete treatment records) with a mean age of 55 ± 12.5 years. Median time to last follow up was 15 months (interquartile range, 3.8-32). Most patients were men (82% vs 18% women) and symptomatic at presentation (162 vs 65 asymptomatic). Isolated SMA dissection was more common than celiac artery dissection (n = 158 and 81, respectively). Concomitant dissection of both arteries was rare (n = 12). The mean dissection length was significantly longer in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients in both the celiac artery (27 vs 18 mm; P = .01) and the SMA (64 vs 40 mm; P < .001). Primary treatment was medical in 146 patients with oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (n = 76 and 70, respectively), whereas 56 patients were observed. LVT occurred in six patients, and 16 patients developed AD (3% and 8%, respectively). For symptomatic patients without evidence of ischemia (n = 134), there was no difference in occurrence of LVT with medical therapy compared with observation alone (9% vs 0%; P = .35). No asymptomatic patient (n = 64) had an episode of LVT at 5 years. AD rates did not differ among symptomatic patients without ischemia treated with medical therapy or observed (9% vs 5%; P = .95). Surgical or endovascular intervention was performed in 18 patients (3 ischemia, 13 pain, 1 AD, 1 asymptomatic). Excluding the patients treated for ischemia, there was no difference in LVT with surgical intervention vs medical management (one vs five; P = .57). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic patients with isolated mesenteric artery dissection may be observed and followed up with intermittent imaging. Symptomatic patients tend to have longer dissections than asymptomatic patients. Symptomatic isolated mesenteric artery dissection without evidence of ischemia does not require anticoagulation and may be treated with antiplatelet therapy or observation alone.

A multi-institutional experience in adventitial cystic disease.

BACKGROUND: Adventitial cystic disease (ACD) is an unusual arteriopathy; case reports and small series constitute the available literature regarding treatment. We sought to examine the presentation, contemporary management, and long-term outcomes using a multi-institutional database. METHODS: Using a standardized database, 14 institutions retrospectively collected demographics, comorbidities, presentation/symptoms, imaging, treatment, and follow-up data on consecutive patients treated for ACD during a 10-year period, using Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards for limb ischemia. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing treatment methods and factors associated with recurrent intervention. Life-table analysis was performed to estimate the freedom from reintervention in comparing the various treatment modalities. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (32 men, 15 women; mean age, 43 years) were identified with ACD involving the popliteal artery (n = 41), radial artery (n = 3), superficial/common femoral artery (n = 2), and common femoral vein (n = 1). Lower extremity claudication was seen in 93% of ACD of the leg arteries, whereas patients with upper extremity ACD had hand or arm pain. Preoperative diagnosis was made in 88% of patients, primarily using cross-sectional imaging of the lower extremity; mean lower extremity ankle-brachial index was 0.71 in the affected limb. Forty-one patients with lower extremity ACD underwent operative repair (resection with interposition graft, 21 patients; cyst resection, 13 patients; cyst resection with bypass graft, 5 patients; cyst resection with patch, 2 patients). Two patients with upper extremity ACD underwent cyst drainage without resection or arterial reconstruction. Complications, including graft infection, thrombosis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence, occurred in 12% of patients. Mean lower extremity ankle-brachial index at 3 months postoperatively improved to 1.07 (P < .001), with an overall mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 0.33-9 years). Eight patients (18%) with lower extremity arterial ACD required reintervention (redo cyst resection, one; thrombectomy, three; redo bypass, one; balloon angioplasty, three) after a mean of 70 days with symptom relief in 88%. Lower extremity patients who underwent cyst resection and interposition or bypass graft were less likely to require reintervention (P = .04). One patient with lower extremity ACD required an above-knee amputation for extensive tissue loss. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional, contemporary experience of ACD examines the treatment and outcomes of ACD. The majority of patients can be identified preoperatively; surgical repair, consisting of cyst excision with arterial reconstruction or bypass alone, provides the best long-term symptomatic relief and reduced need for intervention to maintain patency.

Patterns in the Management of Acute Limb Ischemia: A VESS Survey.

BACKGROUND: Treatment strategies for acute limb ischemia (ALI) are abundant with few established guidelines. We sought to determine nationwide ALI treatment patterns in the modern era. METHODS: Anonymous electronic surveys examining the management of ALI involving native vessel and bypass occlusion were sent to all members of the Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society (n = 738). Treatment options included catheter-directed lysis (CDL) or pharmacomechanical (PMT) thrombolysis and open surgery. CDL management strategies were evaluated for lytic and heparin dosing, fibrinogen monitoring, and treatment duration. Influence of Rutherford category (RC), time from training, practice type, hospital size, region, and protocol use was assessed. Data were analyzed by univariate contingency tables and multinomial regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 117 (response rate of 16%) surveys were completed. The most common management strategy RC 2a ischemia in all conduit occlusions was endovascular (prosthetic graft, 96 [82%] respondents; vein graft 96 [82%] respondents; native artery occlusion 79 [68%] respondents), while those with RC 3 ischemia were more commonly treated with open techniques (prosthetic graft, 96 [83%]; vein graft 94 [81%]; native artery occlusion 94 [80%]). Of those respondents using endovascular therapy, CDL was most commonly used in RC 2a patients, while PMT was most commonly used in RC 3 patients. Multivariate analysis identified prosthetic and vein graft occlusion were more likely to be treated via endovascular approach (odds ratio, 2.45 and 2.78, respectively; P < 0.001), while those with RC 2b (odds ratio, 0.19; P < 0.001), RC 3 (odds ratio, 0.01; P < 0.001), or in centers without a hybrid operating room (odds ratio, 0.49; P = 0.017) were more likely to be treated by open approach. Tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) dosing during catheter directed therapy was usually 1 mg/hr (77%) with variable concentrations and duration of the initial treatment of 8-24 hr (78%). Most respondents indicated having developed their own protocols and patterns of treatment varied but were influenced by training and practice environment variables. CONCLUSIONS: Management strategies vary widely in ALI. Some effects of provider training and individual protocol development were observed, and TPA protocols were influenced by increased institutional responsibility for thrombolysis. Further efforts are needed to develop consensus guidelines for ALI management.

Outcomes of Patients With Acute Type B (DeBakey III) Aortic Dissection: A 13-Year, Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection remains the most common aortic catastrophe. In the endovascular era, the management of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is undergoing dramatic changes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with ATBAD who were treated at our center over a 13-year period. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed patients with ATBAD between 2001 and 2014, analyzing variables based on status (complicated [c] versus uncomplicated [u]) and treatment modalities. We defined cATBAD as rupture, expansion of diameter on imaging during the admission, persistent pain, or clinical malperfusion leading to a deficit in cerebral, spinal, visceral, renal, or peripheral vascular territories at presentation or during initial hospitalization. Postoperative outcomes were defined as deficits not present before the intervention. Outcomes were compared between the groups by use of Kaplan-Meier and descriptive statistics. We treated 442 patients with ATBAD. Of those 442, 60.6% had uATBAD and were treated medically, and 39.4% had cATBAD, of whom 39.0% were treated medically to 30.0% with open repair, 21.3% with thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and 9.7% with other open peripheral procedures. Intervention-free survival at 1 and 5 years was 84.8% and 62.7% for uATBAD, 61.8% and 44.0% for cATBAD-medical, 69.2% and 47.2% for cATBAD-open, and 68.0% and 42.5% for cATBAD-thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively (P=0.001). Overall survival was significantly related primarily to complicated presentation. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, early and late outcomes of ATBAD were dependent on the presence of complications, with cATBAD faring worse. Although uATBAD was associated with favorable early survival, late complications still occurred, mandating radiographic surveillance and open or endovascular interventions. Prospective trials are required to better determine the optimal therapy for uATBAD.

Utility of a tubularized extracellular matrix as an alternative conduit for arteriovenous fistula aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of segmental arteriovenous fistula aneurysms (AVFAs) remains a challenge in dialysis access preservation. We examined our experience with the use of tubularized extracellular matrix (ECM; CorMatrix, Roswell, Ga) for AVFA repair. METHODS: Between October 2013 and January 2015, we conducted a prospective study of CorMatrix ECM for AVFA repair. All patients underwent intraoperative fistulography. Patients with central venous stenosis or occlusion had simultaneous angioplasty and stenting as indicated. The aneurysm and overlying skin were then resected, and an ECM patch was fashioned into a tube for interposition repair. Patients with multiple AVFAs underwent staged repair. Cannulation of the repaired segments was allowed after 6 weeks. RESULTS: During the study period, 15 patients (40% male; mean age, 49.5 years) underwent 18 AVFA repairs using ECM (3 staged repairs). Six patients (40%) underwent simultaneous treatment of central vein lesions, whereas eight patients (53%) had associated skin erosion. Treated sites included radiocephalic (2), brachiobasilic (1), and brachiocephalic (15) AVFAs. All patients had hemodialysis at an alternative location on the same extremity without the need for catheter placement. Five patients underwent a follow-up ultrasound examination at a mean of 6 weeks. All studies demonstrated patency of the ECM segments without stenosis. At a mean follow-up time of 6.9 months, two thrombosis events were observed, both in patients with known refractory central venous stenosis treated with previous angioplasty (2) and stenting (1). Both patients required new access placement. No complications were attributable to ECM sites. CONCLUSIONS: ECM is an alternative conduit for salvage of an autologous AVFA. This technique may help avoid the use of prosthetic grafts and hemodialysis catheters. Patients with associated central venous stenosis are at risk of thrombosis.

Injury grade is a predictor of aortic-related death among patients with blunt thoracic aortic injury.

OBJECTIVE: The current Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines suggest urgent (<24 hours) thoracic endovascular aortic repair for grade (G) II to G IV blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether some patients may require more emergency treatment. METHODS: We reviewed imaging variables of prospectively collected BTAI patients between 1999 and 2014. We used computed tomographic angiography to classify BTAIs into four categories: G I, intimal tear; G II, intramural hematoma; G III, aortic pseudoaneurysm; and G IV, free rupture. Specific examination of G III injuries was undertaken in an effort to predict aortic-related mortality (ARM) before repair. For this subset, we examined pseudoaneurysm size, lesion/normal aortic diameter ratio, and mediastinal hematoma location and size. RESULTS: Among 331 patients with BTAIs, 86 died before imaging. Admission computed tomographic angiography was available for 205 patients (71.2% male; mean age, 39.3 years) with BTAIs (24 G I, 49 G II, 124 G III, 8 G IV). The mean Injury Severity Score was 35.6, and 22.4% had hypotension (<90 mm Hg). Overall mortality was 11.2% (G I/G II, 4.1%; G III/G IV, 15.3%; P = .02). ARM was 2.4% (G I/G II, 0%; G III/G IV, 3.8%; P = .09). ARM was significantly greater in G IV (3 of 8 [37.5%]) than G III (2 of 124 [1.6%]) vs G I/II (0 of 73 [0%]) injuries (P < .0001). Medical management alone was used in 53 (20 G I, 18 G II, 13 G III, and 2 G IV). Open repair was performed in 51 (3 G I, 9 G II, 36 G III, and 3 G IV) at a mean time to repair (TTR) of 10.6 hours. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair was conducted for 101 patients (1 G I, 22 G II, 75 G III, and 3 G IV) at a mean TTR of 9.4 hours. Median TTR for the overall population of BTAI patients was 24.0 hours from admission. (G I, 64.5 hours; G II, 24.0 hours; G III, 19.7 hours; and G IV, 3.5 hours). ARM occurred in four of five patients before planned repair (2 G III and 2 G IV), 7.0 ± 3.6 hours from admission. No G I/II ARM occurred. Among eight G IV injuries, there were three ARMs. Focus on G III injuries through regression analysis demonstrated that early clinical/imaging variables (eg, mediastinal hematoma dimensions and lesion/normal aortic diameter ratio) were not significant predictors of ARM. CONCLUSIONS: Injury grade is a predictor of ARM among patients with BTAIs. Aggressive use of the current Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines at a busy level I trauma center resulted in low rates of ARM. In this setting, identification of additional physiologic and radiographic criteria indicating the need for emergency (vs urgent) repair of aortic pseudoaneurysms remains elusive.