The association between socioeconomic characteristics and consumption of food items among Brazilian industry workers.

BACKGROUND: Dietary pattern plays a causative role in the rising of noncommunicable diseases. The SESI (Serviço Social da Indústria) study was designed to evaluate risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. We aimed to describe food items consumed by Brazilian workers and to assess their association with socioeconomic status. METHODS: Cross-sectional study was carried out among Brazilian industrial workers, selected by multistage sampling, from 157 companies. Interviews were conducted at the work place using standardized forms. RESULTS: 4818 workers were interviewed, aged 35.4 ± 10.7 years, 76.5% were men. The workers had an average of 8.7 ± 4.1 years of schooling and 25.4 ± 4.1 kg/m² of BMI. Men and individuals with less than high school education were less likely to consume dairy products, fruits, and vegetables daily, even after control for confounding factors. Men consumed rice and beans daily more often than women. In comparison to workers aged 50-76 years, those under 30 years old consumed less fruits and green leafy vegetables daily. CONCLUSION: The food items consumed by Brazilian workers show that there are insufficient consumption according to the guidelines of healthy foods, particularly of dairy products, vegetables, and fruits.

Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus: results from the PREVER-treatment randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of a chlorthalidone/amiloride combination pill with losartan, during initial management of JNC 7 Stage I hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In an a priori subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, volunteers aged 30-70 years, with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus, were randomized to 12.5/2.5 mg of chlorthalidone/amiloride (N = 47) or 50 mg of losartan (N = 50), and followed for 18 months in 21 clinical centers. If BP remained uncontrolled after three months, study medication dose was doubled, and if uncontrolled after six months, amlodipine (5 and 10 mg) and propranolol (40 and 80 mg BID) were added as open label drugs in a progressive fashion. RESULTS: Systolic BP decreased to a greater extent in participants allocated to diuretics compared to losartan (P < 0.001). After 18 months of follow-up, systolic BP was 128.4 ± 10.3 mmHg in the diuretic group versus 133.5 ± 8.0 in the losartan group (P < 0.01). In the diuretic group, 36 out of 43 participants (83.7%) had a JNC 7 normal BP, compared to 31/47 (66%) in the losartan group (P = 0.089). Serum cholesterol was higher in the diuretic arm at the end of the trial. Other biochemical parameters and reports of adverse events did not differ by treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of hypertension based on a combination of chlorthalidone and amiloride is more effective for BP lowering compared to losartan in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registration number: NCT00971165.

Spironolactone Versus Clonidine as a Fourth-Drug Therapy for Resistant Hypertension: The ReHOT Randomized Study (Resistant Hypertension Optimal Treatment).

The aim of this study is to compare spironolactone versus clonidine as the fourth drug in patients with resistant hypertension in a multicenter, randomized trial. Medical therapy adherence was checked by pill counting. Patients with resistant hypertension (no office and ambulatory blood pressure [BP] monitoring control, despite treatment with 3 drugs, including a diuretic, for 12 weeks) were randomized to an additional 12-week treatment with spironolactone (12.5-50 mg QD) or clonidine (0.1-0.3 mg BID). The primary end point was BP control during office (<140/90 mm Hg) and 24-h ambulatory (<130/80 mm Hg) BP monitoring. Secondary end points included BP control from each method and absolute BP reduction. From 1597 patients recruited, 11.7% (187 patients) fulfilled the resistant hypertension criteria. Compared with the spironolactone group (n=95), the clonidine group (n=92) presented similar rates of achieving the primary end point (20.5% versus 20.8%, respectively; relative risk, 1.01 [0.55-1.88]; P=1.00). Secondary end point analysis showed similar office BP (33.3% versus 29.3%) and ambulatory BP monitoring (44% versus 46.2%) control for spironolactone and clonidine, respectively. However, spironolactone promoted greater decrease in 24-h systolic and diastolic BP and diastolic daytime ambulatory BP than clonidine. Per-protocol analysis (limited to patients with ≥80% adherence to spironolactone/clonidine treatment) showed similar results regarding the primary end point. In conclusion, clonidine was not superior to spironolactone in true resistant hypertensive patients, but the overall BP control was low (≈21%). Considering easier posology and greater decrease in secondary end points, spironolactone is preferable for the fourth-drug therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01643434.

Effectiveness of low-dose diuretics for blood pressure reduction to optimal values in prehypertension: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effectiveness of low-dose diuretic therapy to achieve an optimal level of blood pressure (BP) in adults with prehypertension. METHODS: The PREVER-prevention trial was a randomized, parallel, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, with 18 months of follow-up, conducted at 21 academic medical centers in Brazil. Of 1772 individuals evaluated for eligibility, 730 volunteers with prehypertension who were aged 30-70 years, and who did not reach optimal blood pressure after 3 months of lifestyle intervention, were randomized to a fixed association of chlorthalidone 12.5 mg and amiloride 2.5 mg or placebo once a day. The main outcomes were the percentage of participants who achieved an optimal level of BP. RESULTS: A total of 372 participants were randomly allocated to diuretics and 358 to placebo. After 18 months of treatment, optimal BP was noted in 25.6% of the diuretic group and 19.3% in the placebo group (P < 0.05). The mean net reduction in SBP and DBP for the diuretic group compared with placebo was 2.8 mmHg (95% CI 1.1 to 4.5) and 1.1 mmHg (95% CI -0.09 to 2.4), respectively. Most participants in the active treatment group (74.5%) and in the placebo group (80.7%) continued to have BP in the prehypertension range or progressed to hypertension. CONCLUSION: Low-dose diuretic therapy increased the probability of individuals with prehypertension to achieve optimal BP but most of those treated continued to have a BP in the prehypertension range or progressed to having overt hypertension.

Effectiveness of Chlorthalidone Plus Amiloride for the Prevention of Hypertension: The PREVER-Prevention Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Prehypertension is associated with higher cardiovascular risk, target organ damage, and incidence of hypertension. The Prevention of Hypertension in Patients with PreHypertension (PREVER-Prevention) trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose diuretic for the prevention of hypertension and end-organ damage. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 21 Brazilian academic medical centers. Participants with prehypertension who were aged 30 to 70 years and who did not reach optimal blood pressure after 3 months of lifestyle intervention were randomized to a chlorthalidone/amiloride combination pill or placebo and were evaluated every 3 months during 18 months of treatment. The primary outcome was incidence of hypertension. Development or worsening of microalbuminuria, new-onset diabetes mellitus, and reduction of left ventricular mass were secondary outcomes. Participant characteristics were evenly distributed by trial arms. The incidence of hypertension was significantly lower in 372 study participants allocated to diuretics compared with 358 allocated to placebo (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.82), resulting in a cumulative incidence of 11.7% in the diuretic arm versus 19.5% in the placebo arm (P=0.004). Adverse events; levels of blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, creatinine, and microalbuminuria; and incidence of diabetes mellitus were no different between the 2 arms. Left ventricular mass assessed through Sokolow-Lyon voltage and voltage-duration product decreased to a greater extent in participants allocated to diuretic therapy compared with placebo (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of low-dose chlorthalidone and amiloride effectively reduces the risk of incident hypertension and beneficially affects left ventricular mass in patients with prehypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, www.ensaiosclinicos.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00970931, RBR-74rr6s.

Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension: results from the PREVER-treatment randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of a chlorthalidone/amiloride combination pill with losartan, during initial management of stage I hypertension. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 655 participants were followed for 18 months in 21 Brazilian academic centers. Trial participants were adult volunteers aged 30-70 years with stage I hypertension (BP 140-159 or 90-99 mmHg) following 3 months of a lifestyle intervention. Participants were randomized to 12.5/2.5 mg of chlorthalidone/amiloride (N = 333) or 50 mg of losartan (N = 322). If BP remained uncontrolled after 3 months, study medication dose was doubled, and if uncontrolled after 6 months, amlodipine (5 and 10 mg) and propranolol (40 and 80 mg twice daily) were added as open-label drugs in a progressive fashion. At the end of follow-up, 609 (93%) participants were evaluated. RESULTS: The difference in SBP during 18 months of follow-up was 2.3 (95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 3.3) mmHg favoring chlorthalidone/amiloride. Compared with those randomized to diuretic, more participants allocated to losartan had their initial dose doubled and more of them used add-on antihypertensive medication. Levels of blood glucose, glycosilated hemoglobin, and incidence of diabetes were no different between the two treatment groups. Serum potassium was lower and serum cholesterol was higher in the diuretic arm. Microalbuminuria tended to be higher in patients with diabetes allocated to losartan (28.5 ±â€Š40.4 versus 16.2 ±â€Š26.7 mg, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Treatment with a combination of chlorthalidone and amiloride compared with losartan yielded a greater reduction in BP. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00971165.

The reproducibility of dipping status: beyond the cutoff points.

A limited reproducibility has been ascribed to 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, especially in relation to the dipper and nondipper phenomena. This study examined the reproducibility of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in three recordings of pressure at intervals of 8-15 days in 101 study participants (73% treated hypertensive patients) residing in the city of Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. SpaceLabs 90207 monitors were used, and the minimum number of valid measurements was 80. No significant differences were found between the mean systolic and diastolic pressures, between the second and third recordings when the normotensive and hypertensive patients were assessed jointly (P=0.44). Likewise, no significant differences were present when the normotensive patients were analyzed separately (P=0.96). In the hypertensive group, a significant difference existed between only the first and second ambulatory blood pressure readings (135.1 vs. 132.9 mmHg, respectively; P=0.0005). Regarding declines in pressure during sleep, no significant differences occurred when continuous percentage values were considered (P=0.27). The values obtained from 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are reproducible when tested at intervals of 8-15 days. Small differences, when significantly present, always involved the first ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The reproducibility of the dipper and nondipper patterns is of greater complexity because it considers cutoff points rather than continuous ones to characterize these states.

Renal dysfunction and inflammatory markers in hypertensive patients seen in a university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Today, chronic kidney diseases represent a great challenge to public health as regards the acquisition of knowledge to support interventions that can slow the progression of renal function loss. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the magnitude of the renal function deficit in hypertensive adult patients and its relationship with the following inflammatory markers: high-sensitivity C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including 1,273 adult hypertensive patients of both genders, of whom 1,052 had renal function deficit, and 221 had no deficit, as diagnosed by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. The odds ratio (OR) and the prevalence ratio (PR) were used to determine the probability of the occurrence of inflammatory activity in renal disease. RESULTS: Renal function deficit was diagnosed in 82.6% of the patients assessed, and most of the sample (70.8%) was classified as in stage 2 of chronic kidney disease. In the regression model, metabolic syndrome (PR adjusted = 1.09 [95%CI: 1.04-1.14]), high-sensitivity C reactive protein (PR adjusted = 1.54 [95%CI: 1.40-1.69]) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (PR adjusted = 1.20 [95%CI: 1.12-1.28]) remained independently associated with the renal function deficit. However, considering the individuals classified as in stage 2 of renal function deficit, the chance of abnormalities in inflammatory markers were OR = 10.25 (95%CI: 7.00-15.05) for high-sensitivity C reactive protein, OR = 8.50 (95%CI: 5.70-12.71) for neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and OR = 7.18 (95%CI: 4.87-10.61) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CONCLUSION: The results show an association of inflammatory activity and metabolic syndrome with renal function deficit.

Prevention of hypertension in patients with pre-hypertension: protocol for the PREVER-prevention trial.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) within pre-hypertensive levels confers higher cardiovascular risk and is an intermediate stage for full hypertension, which develops in an annual rate of 7 out of 100 individuals with 40 to 50 years of age. Non-drug interventions to prevent hypertension have had low effectiveness. In individuals with previous cardiovascular disease or diabetes, the use of BP-lowering agents reduces the incidence of major cardiovascular events. In the absence of higher baseline risk, the use of BP agents reduces the incidence of hypertension. The PREVER-prevention trial aims to investigate the efficacy, safety and feasibility of a population-based intervention to prevent the incidence of hypertension and the development of target-organ damage. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, with participants aged 30 to 70 years, with pre-hypertension. The trial arms will be chlorthalidone 12.5 mg plus amiloride 2.5 mg or identical placebo. The primary outcomes will be the incidence of hypertension, adverse events and development or worsening of microalbuminuria and of left ventricular hypertrophy in the EKG. The secondary outcomes will be fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, evidence of new sub-clinical atherosclerosis, and sudden death. The study will last 18 months. The sample size was calculated on the basis of an incidence of hypertension of 14% in the control group, a size effect of 40%, power of 85% and P alpha of 5%, resulting in 625 participants per group. The project was approved by the Ethics committee of each participating institution. DISCUSSION: The early use of blood pressure-lowering drugs, particularly diuretics, which act on the main mechanism of blood pressure rising with age, may prevent cardiovascular events and the incidence of hypertension in individuals with hypertension. If this intervention shows to be effective and safe in a population-based perspective, it could be the basis for an innovative public health program to prevent hypertension in Brazil. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00970931.

A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in Brazil, and hypertension is its major risk factor. The benefit of its drug treatment to prevent major cardiovascular events was consistently demonstrated. Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) have been the preferential drugs in the management of hypertension worldwide, despite the absence of any consistent evidence of advantage over older agents, and the concern that they may be associated with lower renal protection and risk for cancer. Diuretics are as efficacious as other agents, are well tolerated, have longer duration of action and low cost, but have been scarcely compared with ARBs. A study comparing diuretic and ARB is therefore warranted. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial, comparing the association of chlorthalidone and amiloride with losartan as first drug option in patients aged 30 to 70 years, with stage I hypertension. The primary outcomes will be variation of blood pressure by time, adverse events and development or worsening of microalbuminuria and of left ventricular hypertrophy in the EKG. The secondary outcomes will be fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, evidence of new subclinical atherosclerosis and sudden death. The study will last 18 months. The sample size will be of 1200 participants for group in order to confer enough power to test for all primary outcomes. The project was approved by the Ethics committee of each participating institution. DISCUSSION: The putative pleiotropic effects of ARB agents, particularly renal protection, have been disputed, and they have been scarcely compared with diuretics in large clinical trials, despite that they have been at least as efficacious as newer agents in managing hypertension. Even if the null hypothesis is not rejected, the information will be useful for health care policy to treat hypertension in Brazil. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00971165.

Abordagem das emergências hipertensivas / Approach of the hypertensive emergencies

As emergências hipertensivas são situações clínicas de extrema gravidade que são observadas com frequência na prática clínica em pronto atendimento ou unidades de terapia intensiva. O reconhecimento das principais emergências hipertensivas, que incluem edema agudo dos pulmões, síndrome coronária aguda, encefalopatia hipertensiva, acidente vascular cerebral e dissecção de aorta, entre outras, é de extrema importância para uma abordagem terapêutica mais adequada e redução da morbidade e mortalidade associadas. História e exame físico bem orientados para os principais órgãos-alvo da hipertensão, seguidos de exames complementares específi cos, auxiliam para um diagnóstico correto e um tratamento mais efi caz.

Hypertensive emergencies are extremely severe clinical situations frequently observed in clinical practice in intensive care unit or emergency room. The knowledge of main hypertensive emergencies, including acute pulmonary edema, acute coronary syndrome, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebral vascular accident and aortic dissection, among others, is extremely important for a more adequate therapeutic approach and for a reduction in associated morbidity and mortality. History and physical examination well directed to the main target organ of hypertension, followed by complementary specifi c exams, are helpful for a correct diagnosis and effective treatment.

Fosinopril em dose única diária na hipertensäo leve e moderada: estudo multicêntrico brasileiro / Fosinopril once a day in mild and moderate hypertension. Brazilian Multicenter Trial

Objetivo - Avaliar a eficácia e segurança do fosinpril administrado isoladamente em dose única diária (10mg/dia ou 20mg/dia) durante 12 semanas a pacientes com hipertensäo essencial leve e moderada näo complicada, segundo esquema aberto, comparativo com placebo. Métodos - Cento e dezenove pacientes (idade 52 ñ 11 anos, média ñ dp, limites: 17 a 76 anos), 86 mulheres e 33 homens, 57// brancos, 26// negros e 17// mestiços, 71 hipertensos leves (95 ó pressäo diastólica ó 104mmHg) e 48 hipertensos moderados (104 < pressäo diastólica ó 115mmHg). Resultados - Houve reduçäo significativa (p < 0,05) da pressäo arterial sistólica/diastólica na 6ª semana de tratamento com fosinopril em relaçäo ao início do tratamento (de 161 ñ 16/103 ñ 7 antes do tratamento para 148 ñ 16/94 ñ 9mmHg na 6ª semana de tratamento, n = 114 pacientes). Na 12ª semana de tratamento verificou-se reduçäo adicional significativa da pressäo arterial sistólica/diastólica em relaçäo à avaliaçäo da 6ª semana (de 148 ñ 16/94 na 6ª semana de tratamento para 145 ñ 17/89 ñ 8mmHg na 12ª semana de tratamento, n = 113 pacientes). Houve resposta favorável em 71// dos pacientes estudados na 12ª semana de tratamento, sendo normalizaçäo da pressäo arterial diastólica (ó 90mmHg) em 62// dos pacientes e queda ò 10// em 9// dos pacientes. Näo houve diferenças significantes nos índices de normalizaçäo da pressäo diastólica ao se comparar pacientes brancos aos näo brancos, hipertensos leves e moderados, obesos e näo obesos, acima e abaixo de 50 anos e nos que recebiam de 1 a 3 drogas antes do estudo. Näo foram varificadas variaçöes clinicamente signficativas nas avaliaçöes laboratoriais antes e ao final do tratamento. Houve reduçäo muito importante do número de reaçöes adversas relatadas nas avaliaçöes realizadas na 6ª e 12ª semanas de tratamento com fosinopril em relaçäo ao tratamento anterior. Conclusäo - O fosinopril mostra-se seguro e eficaz no tratamento da hipertensäo arterial tendo sido igualmente eficaz em hipertensos leves e moderados, brancos e näo brancos, obesos e näo obesos, acima e abaixo de 50 anos e nos que recebiam de 0 a 3 drogas antes do estudo

Purpose - To evaluate during 12 weeks the effectiveness and safety of once-a-day fosinopril (10 or 20mg/day comparative to placebo) in mild to moderate hypertensives according to an open design comparative to placebo. Methods - One hyndred and nineteen patients were studied; 52 ± 11 years (mean ± sd) range 18 a 76 years, 86 women and 33 men, 57% whites, 26% blacks and 17% mulattos, 71 mild hypertensives (95 £ diastolic pressure £ 104mmHg) e 48 moderate hypertensives (101 < diastolic pressure £ 115mmHg). Results - There was a significant reduction in systolic/diastolic pressure on the 6th week of treatment (from 161 ± 16/103 ± 7 before to 148 ± 16/94 ± 9mmHg on the 6th week). On the 12th week of treatment there was an additional significant reduction in systolic/diastolic pressure (from 148 ± 16/94 ± 9 on the 6th week to 145 ± 17/89 ± 8mmHg on the 12th week). There was a "favorable" response in 71% of the patients on the 12th week; 62% showed diastolic pressure £ 90mmHg and 9% presented diastolic reduction ³ 10mmHg. There was no difference in the normalization rates between whites and non-whites, mild and moderate hypertensive, obese and non-obese patients, under or above 50 years of age and those patients from no drug-treatment to those on 3 drug before the study. There was no clinically relevant changes in laboratory evaluations before and at the end of the study. The number of adverse reactions was reduced in comparison with previous treatment. Conclusion - Fosinopril, according to our and others data, is effective and safe for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertensives, in whites or non-whites, obese or non-obese, younger or older than 50 years and receiving 0 or 3 drugs before the study