Screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults carrying a BMPR2 mutation.

BACKGROUND: Heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is most commonly due to heterozygous mutations of the BMPR2 gene. Based on expert consensus, guidelines recommend annual screening echocardiography in asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the characteristics of asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers, assess their risk of occurrence of PAH and detect PAH at an early stage in this high-risk population. METHODS: Asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers underwent screening at baseline and annually for a minimum of 2 years (DELPHI-2 study; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01600898). Annual screening included clinical assessment, ECG, pulmonary function tests, 6-min walk distance, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, chest radiography, echocardiography and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal (NT)-proBNP level. Right heart catheterisation (RHC) was performed based on predefined criteria. An optional RHC at rest and exercise was proposed at baseline. RESULTS: 55 subjects (26 males; median age 37 years) were included. At baseline, no PAH was suspected based on echocardiography and NT-proBNP levels. All subjects accepted RHC at inclusion, which identified two mild PAH cases (3.6%) and 12 subjects with exercise pulmonary hypertension (21.8%). At long-term follow-up (118.8 patient-years of follow-up), three additional cases were diagnosed, yielding a PAH incidence of 2.3% per year (0.99% per year in males and 3.5% per year in females). All PAH cases remained at low-risk status on oral therapy at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers have a significant risk of developing incident PAH. International multicentre studies are needed to confirm that refined multimodal screening programmes with regular follow-up allow early detection of PAH.

A systematic review of invasive, high-fidelity pressure studies documenting the amplification of blood pressure from the aorta to the brachial and radial arteries.

It is commonly accepted that systolic blood pressure (SBP) is significantly higher in the brachial/radial artery than in the aorta while mean (MBP) and diastolic (DBP) pressures remain unchanged. This may have implications for outcome studies and for non-invasive devices calibration. We performed a systematic review of invasive high-fidelity pressure studies documenting BP in the aorta and brachial/radial artery. We selected articles published prior to July 2015. Pressure amplification (Amp = peripheral minus central pressure) was calculated (weighted mean). The six studies retained (n = 294, 76.5% male, mean age 63.5 years) mainly involved patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). In two studies at the aortic/brachial level (n = 64), MBP and DBP were unchanged (MPAmp = 0.1 mmHg, DPAmp = -1.3 mmHg), while SBP increased (SPAmp = 4.2 mmHg; relative amplification = 3.1%). In four studies in which MBP was not documented (n = 230), brachial DBP remained unchanged and SBP increased (SPAmp = 6.6 mmHg; 4.9%). One of these four studies also reported radial SBP and DBP, not MBP (n = 12). Few high-fidelity pressure studies were found, and they have been performed mainly in elderly male patients with suspected CAD. Counter to expectations, the mean amplification of SBP from the aorta to brachial artery was < 5%. Further studies on SPAmp phenotypes (positive, null, negative) are advocated. Non-invasive device calibration assumptions were confirmed, namely unchanged MBP and DBP from the aorta to the brachial artery. Data did not allow for firm conclusions on the amount of BP changes from the aorta to the radial artery, and from the aorta to the brachial/radial arteries in other populations.

Volume Infusion Markedly Increases Femoral dP/dtmax in Fluid-Responsive Patients Only.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the preload dependence of femoral maximal change in pressure over time (dP/dtmax) during volume expansion in preload dependent and independent critically ill patients. DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. SETTING: Two adult polyvalent ICUs. PATIENTS: Twenty-five critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-five fluid infusions of 500 mL normal saline. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Changes in femoral dP/dtmax, systolic, diastolic, and pulse femoral arterial pressure were obtained from the pressure waveform analysis using the PiCCO2 system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany). Stroke volume index was obtained by transpulmonary thermodilution. Statistical analysis was performed comparing results before and after volume expansion and according to the presence or absence of preload dependence (increases in stroke volume index ≥ 15%). Femoral dP/dtmax increased by 46% after fluid infusion in preload-dependent cases (mean change = 510.6 mm Hg·s; p = 0.005) and remained stable in preload-independent ones (mean change = 49.2 mm Hg·s; p = 0.114). Fluid-induced changes in femoral dP/dtmax correlated with fluid-induced changes in stroke volume index in preload-dependent cases (r = 0.618; p = 0.032), but not in preload-independent ones. Femoral dP/dtmax strongly correlated with pulse and systolic arterial pressures and with total arterial stiffness, regardless of the preload dependence status (r > 0.9 and p < 0.001 in all cases). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral dP/dtmax increased with volume expansion in case of preload dependence but not in case of preload independence and was strongly related to pulse pressure and total arterial stiffness regardless of preload dependence status. Therefore, femoral dP/dtmax is not a load-independent marker of left ventricular contractility and should be not used to track contractility in critically ill patients.

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Usefulness of Inferior Vena Cava Measurements and 2016 EACVI/ASE Recommendations.

CONTEXT: The left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is correlated to right atrial pressure (RAP) in heart failure. We compared diagnostic value of the inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements to the one of the 2016 echocardiographic recommendations to estimate LVFP in patients with suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: Invasive hemodynamics and echocardiography were obtained within 48 hours in 132 consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, and suspected pulmonary hypertension. Increased LVFP was defined by a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) >15 mmHg. RESULTS: Of 83 patients in sinus rhythm, a score of the 2016 recommendations ≥ 2 (E/e' ratio >14 and/or tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8 m/s and/or indexed left atrial volume>34 mL /m²) had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 63% for PAWP>15 mmHg, whereas a dilated IVC (>2.1 cm) and/or non-collapsible (≤50%) had a PPV of 82%. The net reclassification improvement was 0.39 (P < .05). In atrial fibrillation (AF), a dilated and/or non-collapsible IVC had an 86% PPV for PAWP>15 mmHg. The correlation between RAP and PAWP was 0.60, with 75.7% concordance (100/132) between dichotomized pressures (both RAP>8 mmHg and PAWP>15 mmHg and vice versa). CONCLUSION: The IVC size and collapsibility is valuable to identify patients with HFpEF with high LVFP in both sinus rhythm and AF.

Arterial Pulse Pressure Variation with Mechanical Ventilation.

Fluid administration leads to a significant increase in cardiac output in only half of ICU patients. This has led to the concept of assessing fluid responsiveness before infusing fluid. Pulse pressure variation (PPV), which quantifies the changes in arterial pulse pressure during mechanical ventilation, is one of the dynamic variables that can predict fluid responsiveness. The underlying hypothesis is that large respiratory changes in left ventricular stroke volume, and thus pulse pressure, occur in cases of biventricular preload responsiveness. Several studies showed that PPV accurately predicts fluid responsiveness when patients are under controlled mechanical ventilation. Nevertheless, in many conditions encountered in the ICU, the interpretation of PPV is unreliable (spontaneous breathing, cardiac arrhythmias) or doubtful (low Vt). To overcome some of these limitations, researchers have proposed using simple tests such as the Vt challenge to evaluate the dynamic response of PPV. The applicability of PPV is higher in the operating room setting, where fluid strategies made on the basis of PPV improve postoperative outcomes. In medical critically ill patients, although no randomized controlled trial has compared PPV-based fluid management with standard care, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend using fluid responsiveness indices, including PPV, whenever applicable. In conclusion, PPV is useful for managing fluid therapy under specific conditions where it is reliable. The kinetics of PPV during diagnostic or therapeutic tests is also helpful for fluid management.

Prognostic Value of Follow-Up Hemodynamic Variables After Initial Management in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic variables such as cardiac index and right atrial pressure have consistently been associated with survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at the time of diagnosis. Recent studies have suggested that pulmonary arterial compliance may also predict prognosis in PAH. The prognostic importance of hemodynamic values achieved after treatment initiation is less well established. METHODS: Our objective was to evaluate the prognostic importance of clinical and hemodynamic variables during follow-up, including pulmonary arterial compliance, after initial management in PAH. We evaluated incident patients with idiopathic, drug- and toxin-induced, or heritable PAH enrolled in the French pulmonary hypertension registry between 2006 and 2016 who had a follow-up right-sided heart catheterization (RHC). The primary outcome was death or lung transplantation. We used stepwise Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method to assess variables obtained at baseline and at first follow-up RHC. RESULTS: Of 981 patients, a primary outcome occurred in 331 patients (33.7%) over a median follow-up duration of 2.8 years (interquartile range, 1.1-4.6 years). In a multivariable model considering only baseline variables, no hemodynamic variables independently predicted prognosis. Median time to first follow-up RHC was 4.6 months (interquartile range, 3.7-7.8 months). At first follow-up RHC (n=763), New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute walk distance, stroke volume index (SVI), and right atrial pressure were independently associated with death or lung transplantation, adjusted for age, sex, and type of PAH. Pulmonary arterial compliance did not independently predict outcomes at baseline or during follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratio for SVI was 1.28 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.49; P<0.01) per 10-mL/m2 decrease and for right atrial pressure was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.09; P<0.01) per 1-mm Hg increase. Among patients who had 2 (n=355) or 3 (n=193) low-risk prognostic features at follow-up, including a cardiac index ≥2.5 L·min-1·m-2, 6-minute walk distance >440 m, and New York Heart Association class I or II functional class, lower SVI was still associated with higher rates of death or lung transplantation (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SVI and right atrial pressure were the hemodynamic variables that were independently associated with death or lung transplantation at first follow-up RHC after initial PAH treatment. These findings suggest that the SVI could be a more appropriate treatment target than cardiac index in PAH.

Validation and Critical Evaluation of the Effective Arterial Elastance in Critically Ill Patients.

OBJECTIVES: First, to validate bedside estimates of effective arterial elastance = end-systolic pressure/stroke volume in critically ill patients. Second, to document the added value of effective arterial elastance, which is increasingly used as an index of left ventricular afterload. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Medical ICU. PATIENTS: Fifty hemodynamically stable and spontaneously breathing patients equipped with a femoral (n = 21) or radial (n = 29) catheter were entered in a "comparison" study. Thirty ventilated patients with invasive hemodynamic monitoring (PiCCO-2; Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany), in whom fluid administration was planned were entered in a " dynamic" study. INTERVENTIONS: In the "dynamic" study, data were obtained before/after a 500 mL saline administration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: According to the "cardiocentric" view, end-systolic pressure was considered the classic index of left ventricular afterload. End-systolic pressure was calculated as 0.9 × systolic arterial pressure at the carotid, femoral, and radial artery level. In the "comparison" study, carotid tonometry allowed the calculation of the reference effective arterial elastance value (1.73 ± 0.62 mm Hg/mL). The femoral estimate of effective arterial elastance was more accurate and precise than the radial estimate. In the "dynamic" study, fluid administration increased stroke volume and end-systolic pressure, whereas effective arterial elastance (femoral estimate) and systemic vascular resistance did not change. Effective arterial elastance was related to systemic vascular resistance at baseline (r = 0.89) and fluid-induced changes in effective arterial elastance and systemic vascular resistance were correlated (r = 0.88). In the 15 fluid responders (cardiac index increases ≥ 15%), fluid administration increased end-systolic pressure and decreased effective arterial elastance and systemic vascular resistance (each p < 0.05). In the 15 fluid nonresponders, end-systolic pressure increased (p < 0.05), whereas effective arterial elastance and systemic vascular resistance remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, effective arterial elastance may be reliably estimated at bedside (0.9 × systolic femoral pressure/stroke volume). We support the use of this validated estimate of effective arterial elastance when coupled with an index of left ventricular contractility for studying the ventricular-arterial coupling. Conversely, effective arterial elastance should not be used in isolation as an index of left ventricular afterload.

RV Fractional Area Change and TAPSE as Predictors of Severe Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Pulmonary Hypertension: A CMR Study.

BACKGROUND: The right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) is a surrogate marker of right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension (PH), but its measurement is complicated and time consuming. The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) measures only the longitudinal component of RV contraction while the right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) takes into account both the longitudinal and the transversal components. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between RVEF, RVFAC, and TAPSE according to hemodynamic severity in two groups of patients with PH: pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four patients with PAH (n = 15) and CTEPH (n = 39) underwent right heart catheterization and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The ventricular volumes and areas, TAPSE, and eccentricity index were measured. The RVFAC was more strongly correlated with the RVEF (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001) than the TAPSE (r = 0.63, p < 0.0001). RVEF < 35% was better predicted by the RVFAC than the TAPSE (TAPSE: AUC = 0.77 and RVFAC: AUC = 0.91; p = 0.042). In the group with the worse hemodynamic status, the RVFAC correlated much better with the RVEF than the TAPSE. There were no significant differences in the CMR data analyzed between the groups of PAH and CETPH patients. CONCLUSIONS: The RVFAC is a good index to estimate RVEF in PH patients; even better than the TAPSE in patients with more severe hemodynamic profile, possibly for including the transversal component of right ventricular function in its measurement. Furthermore, RVFAC performance was similar in the two PH groups (PAH and CTEPH).

An official European Respiratory Society statement: pulmonary haemodynamics during exercise.

There is growing recognition of the clinical importance of pulmonary haemodynamics during exercise, but several questions remain to be elucidated. The goal of this statement is to assess the scientific evidence in this field in order to provide a basis for future recommendations.Right heart catheterisation is the gold standard method to assess pulmonary haemodynamics at rest and during exercise. Exercise echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing represent non-invasive tools with evolving clinical applications. The term "exercise pulmonary hypertension" may be the most adequate to describe an abnormal pulmonary haemodynamic response characterised by an excessive pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) increase in relation to flow during exercise. Exercise pulmonary hypertension may be defined as the presence of resting mean PAP <25 mmHg and mean PAP >30 mmHg during exercise with total pulmonary resistance >3 Wood units. Exercise pulmonary hypertension represents the haemodynamic appearance of early pulmonary vascular disease, left heart disease, lung disease or a combination of these conditions. Exercise pulmonary hypertension is associated with the presence of a modest elevation of resting mean PAP and requires clinical follow-up, particularly if risk factors for pulmonary hypertension are present. There is a lack of robust clinical evidence on targeted medical therapy for exercise pulmonary hypertension.

A Clinical and Echocardiographic Score to Identify Pulmonary Hypertension Due to HFpEF.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a frequent cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) that is not easy to differentiate from precapillary PH. We aimed to determine whether the characteristic features of the patients may help differentiate between HFpEF and precapillary PH. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were analyzed in 156 patients referred to our PH referral center. Right heart catheterization identified 78 PH-HFpEF patients and 78 with precapillary PH. Compared with precapillary PH, PH-HFpEF patients were older, with a smaller proportion of women, a higher proportion of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation and sleep apnea syndrome, and a higher body mass index. On echocardiography, PH-HFpEF patients had higher left ventricular mass index, higher left atrial area, and smaller right ventricular end-diastolic area. Following multivariate analysis, a model predicting the probability of PH-HFpEF was built with history of diabetes mellitus, presence of atrial fibrillation, left atrial area, right ventricular end-diastolic area, and left ventricular mass index. The score was internally validated using bootstrap method (area under the curve 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.918-0.938]). A score <5 ruled out PH-HFpEF. CONCLUSION: A score including clinical and echocardiographic criteria may help physicians to identify PH-HFpEF from precapillary PH.

Resting pulmonary artery pressure of 21-24†mmHg predicts abnormal exercise haemodynamics.

A resting mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of 21-24 mmHg is above the upper limit of normal but does not reach criteria for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH). We sought to determine whether an mPAP of 21-24 mmHg is associated with an increased risk of developing an abnormal pulmonary vascular response during exercise.Consecutive patients (n=290) with resting mPAP <25 mmHg who underwent invasive exercise haemodynamics were analysed. Risk factors for pulmonary vascular disease or left heart disease were present in 63.4% and 43.8% of subjects. An abnormal pulmonary vascular response (or exercise PH) was defined by mPAP >30 mmHg and total pulmonary vascular resistance >3 WU at maximal exercise.Exercise PH occurred in 74 (86.0%) out of 86 versus 96 (47.1%) out of 204 in the mPAP of 21-24 mmHg and mPAP <21 mmHg groups, respectively (OR 6.9, 95% CI: 3.6-13.6; p<0.0001). Patients with mPAP of 21-24 mmHg had lower 6-min walk distance (p=0.002) and higher New York Heart Association functional class status (p=0.03). Decreasing levels of mPAP were associated with a lower prevalence of exercise PH, which occurred in 60.3%, 38.7% and 7.7% of patients with mPAP of 17-20, 13-16 and <13 mmHg, respectively.In an at-risk population, a resting mPAP between 21-24 mmHg is closely associated with exercise PH together with worse functional capacity.

Does exercise pulmonary hypertension exist?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The exercise definition of pulmonary hypertension using a mean pulmonary artery pressure threshold of greater than 30 mmHg was abandoned following the 4th World Pulmonary Hypertension Symposium in 2008, as this definition was not supported by evidence and healthy individuals frequently exceed this threshold. Meanwhile, the clinical value of exercise pulmonary hemodynamic testing has also been questioned. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent data support the notion that an abnormal pulmonary hemodynamic response during exercise (or exercise pulmonary hypertension) is associated with symptoms and exercise limitation. Pathophysiologic mechanisms accounting for the development of exercise pulmonary hypertension include increased vascular resistance, excessive elevation in left atrial pressure and/or increased volume of trapped air during exercise, resulting in a steep rise in pulmonary artery pressure relative to cardiac output. Recent evidence suggests that exercise pulmonary hypertension may be defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure surpassing 30 mmHg together with a simultaneous total pulmonary resistance exceeding 3 WU. SUMMARY: Exercise pulmonary hypertension is a clinically relevant entity and an improved definition has been suggested based on new evidence. Exercise pulmonary hemodynamics may help unmask early or latent disease, particularly in populations that are at high risk for the development of pulmonary hypertension.

Pulmonary vascular resistance and compliance relationship in pulmonary hypertension.

Right ventricular adaptation to the increased pulmonary arterial load is a key determinant of outcomes in pulmonary hypertension (PH). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and total arterial compliance (C) quantify resistive and elastic properties of pulmonary arteries that modulate the steady and pulsatile components of pulmonary arterial load, respectively. PVR is commonly calculated as transpulmonary pressure gradient over pulmonary flow and total arterial compliance as stroke volume over pulmonary arterial pulse pressure (SV/PApp). Assuming that there is an inverse, hyperbolic relationship between PVR and C, recent studies have popularised the concept that their product (RC-time of the pulmonary circulation, in seconds) is "constant" in health and diseases. However, emerging evidence suggests that this concept should be challenged, with shortened RC-times documented in post-capillary PH and normotensive subjects. Furthermore, reported RC-times in the literature have consistently demonstrated significant scatter around the mean. In precapillary PH, the true PVR can be overestimated if one uses the standard PVR equation because the zero-flow pressure may be significantly higher than pulmonary arterial wedge pressure. Furthermore, SV/PApp may also overestimate true C. Further studies are needed to clarify some of the inconsistencies of pulmonary RC-time, as this has major implications for our understanding of the arterial load in diseases of the pulmonary circulation.

Criteria for diagnosis of exercise pulmonary hypertension.

The previous definition of exercise pulmonary hypertension (PH) with a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >30 mmHg was abandoned because healthy individuals can exceed this threshold at high cardiac output (CO). We hypothesised that incorporating assessment of the pressure-flow relationship using the mPAP/CO ratio, i.e. total pulmonary resistance (TPR), might enhance the accuracy of diagnosing an abnormal exercise haemodynamic response.Exercise haemodynamics were evaluated in 169 consecutive subjects with normal resting mPAP ≤20 mmHg. Subjects were classified into controls without heart or lung disease (n=68) versus patients with pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) (n=49) and left heart disease (LHD) (n=52).TPR and mPAP at maximal exercise produced diagnostic accuracy with area under the receiver operating curve of 0.99 and 0.95, respectively, for discriminating controls versus patients with PVD and LHD. The old criterion of mPAP >30 mmHg had sensitivity of 0.98 but specificity of 0.77. Combining maximal mPAP >30 mmHg and TPR >3 mmHg·min·L(-1) retained sensitivity at 0.93 but improved specificity to 1.0. The accuracy of the combined criteria was high across different age groups, sex, body mass index and diagnosis (PVD or LHD).Combining mPAP >30 mmHg and TPR >3 mmHg·min·L(-1) is superior to mPAP >30 mmHg alone for defining a pathological haemodynamic response of the pulmonary circulation during exercise.

Changes in ventricular-arterial coupling during decongestive therapy in acute heart failure.

AIMS: Coupled arterial and left ventricular properties are poorly documented in acute heart failure. The aim of this prospective noninvasive study was to document early changes in ventricular-arterial coupling in patients with acutely decompensated HF (ADHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 19 patients hospitalized for ADHF (age 62 ± 15 years, NYHA class 3 or 4). Patients with shock and sustained arrhythmias were excluded. All the patients received intravenous loop diuretics, and none received intravenous vasodilators or inotropes. Ongoing chronic treatments were maintained. Echocardiography and radial artery tonometry were performed simultaneously on admission and after clinical improvement (day 4 ± 1 after admission). Classical echocardiographic parameters were measured, including stroke volume (SV). End-systolic pressure (Pes) was derived from reconstructed central aortic pressure, and arterial elastance (Ea) was calculated as Ea = Pes/SV. End-systolic LV elastance (Ees) was calculated with the single-beat method. Ventricular-arterial coupling was quantified as the Ea/Ees ratio. Following IV diuretic therapy, mean weight loss was 5 ± 2 kg (P < 0·01) and BNP fell from 1813 (median) (IQR = 1284-2342) to 694 (334-1053) pg/mL (P < 0·01). Ea fell by 29%, from 2·46 (2·05-2·86) to 1·78 (1·55-2·00) mmHg/mL (P < 0·01), while Ees remained unchanged (1·28 (1·05-1·52) to 1·13 (0·92-1·34) mmHg/mL). The Ea/Ees ratio therefore fell, from 2·13 (1·70-2·56) to 1·81 (1·56-2·08) (P < 0·02). CONCLUSION: An early improvement in ventricular-arterial coupling was observed after diuretic-related decongestive therapy in ADHF patients and was related to a decrease in effective arterial elastance rather than to change in LV contractility.

Beneficial hemodynamic effects of prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

RATIONALE: The effects of prone positioning during acute respiratory distress syndrome on all the components of cardiac function have not been investigated under protective ventilation and maximal alveolar recruitment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the hemodynamic effects of prone positioning. METHODS: We included 18 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with protective ventilation and an end-expiratory positive pressure titrated to a plateau pressure of 28-30 cm H2O. Before and within 20 minutes of starting prone positioning, hemodynamic, respiratory, intraabdominal pressure, and echocardiographic data were collected. Before prone positioning, preload reserve was assessed by a passive leg raising test. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In all patients, prone positioning increased the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure over inspired oxygen fraction, the intraabdominal pressure, and the right and left cardiac preload. The pulmonary vascular resistance decreased along with the ratio of the right/left ventricular end-diastolic areas suggesting a decrease of the right ventricular afterload. In the nine patients with preload reserve, prone positioning significantly increased cardiac index (3.0 [2.3-3.5] to 3.6 [3.2-4.4] L/min/m(2)). In the remaining patients, cardiac index did not change despite a significant decrease in the pulmonary vascular resistance. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under protective ventilation and maximal alveolar recruitment, prone positioning increased the cardiac index only in patients with preload reserve, emphasizing the important role of preload in the hemodynamic effects of prone positioning.