Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(4): 507-513, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581655

RESUMEN

METHODS: The use of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) remains the standard of care for treatment of acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity and overdose. Currently, there is growing evidence to suggest that massive acetaminophen overdose is associated with increased hepatotoxicity despite timely administration of NAC. This raises the question as to whether an increased dose of intravenous (IV) NAC should be used in the setting of massive APAP ingestion. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of hepatotoxicity after massive APAP overdose treated with 3 different NAC treatment regimens. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted by electronic medical record review of cases reported to a statewide poison control system between 2007 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were single APAP or APAP combination-medication ingestion; acute massive acetaminophen (APAP) ingestion (defined as APAP concentration ≥ 2 times above the Rumack-Matthew 150 nomogram); received one of the three NAC regimens: standard dose IV NAC, oral (PO) NAC, or high dose IV NAC. The risk of hepatotoxicity was evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model with standard dose IV NAC as the base variable for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 373 patients met inclusion for the study. Of those, 135 cases were treated with standard dose IV NAC, 121 cases treated with PO NAC, and 117 cases treated with high dose IV NAC. The risk of developing hepatotoxicity was not statistically significant between the high dose IV NAC (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.52 - 2.09) or oral NAC (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.33 - 1.46) when compared to standard dose IV NAC. When adjusted for APAP combination medications, initial APAP ratio, initial elevated AST/ALT, and treatment within 8 h, there remained no difference between treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: This study was unable to detect a large absolute reduction in the rate of hepatotoxicity after massive APAP ingestion in patients treated with high dose IV NAC or PO NAC when compared to standard dose IV NAC; even when treatment was initiated within 8 h of ingestion.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos no Narcóticos , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas , Sobredosis de Droga , Acetaminofén , Acetilcisteína/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Ingestión de Alimentos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Med Toxicol ; 11(1): 115-20, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25048606

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, there has been a sharp increase in the number of newly identified synthetic drugs. These new drugs are often derivatives of previously abused substances but have unpredictable toxicity. One of these drugs is gacyclidine, a derivative of phencyclidine (PCP). Gacyclidine has been studied as a neuroprotective agent in trauma and as a therapy of soman toxicity. There are no previous reports of its use as a drug of abuse. CASE REPORTS: During a two-month period in the summer of 2013, a series of patients with severe agitation and end-organ injury were identified in an urban academic Emergency Department (ED). A urine drug of abuse screen was performed on all patients, and serum samples were sent for comprehensive toxicology analysis. A total of five patients were identified as having agitation, rhabdomyolysis, and elevated troponin (Table 1). Three of the five patients reported use of methamphetamine, and all five patients had urine drug screens positive for amphetamine. Comprehensive serum analysis identified methamphetamine in three cases, cocaine metabolites in one case, and a potential untargeted match for gacyclidine in all five cases. No other drugs of abuse were identified. DISCUSSION: This is the first series of cases describing possible gacyclidine intoxication. The possible source of the gacyclidine is unknown but it may have been an adulterant in methamphetamine as all patients who were questioned reported methamphetamine use. These cases highlight the importance of screening for new drugs of abuse when patients present with atypical or severe symptoms. Gacyclidine has the potential to become a drug of abuse both by itself and in conjunction with other agents and toxicity from gacyclidine can be severe. It is the role of the medical toxicology field to identify new agents such as gacyclidine early and to attempt to educate the community on the dangers of these new drugs of abuse.


Asunto(s)
Ciclohexenos/toxicidad , Drogas de Diseño/toxicidad , Drogas Ilícitas/toxicidad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/etiología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/terapia , Piperidinas/toxicidad , Psicotrópicos/toxicidad , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Ciclohexenos/sangre , Ciclohexenos/orina , Drogas de Diseño/análisis , Consumidores de Drogas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/sangre , Drogas Ilícitas/orina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/sangre , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/fisiopatología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/orina , Piperidinas/sangre , Piperidinas/orina , Agitación Psicomotora/etiología , Psicotrópicos/sangre , Psicotrópicos/orina , Rabdomiólisis/etiología , Toxicocinética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA