Global increase of colorectal cancer in young adults over the last 30 years: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

OBJECTIVES: The US Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended starting age for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk adults from 50 to 45 years. We aimed to estimate the global burden and trends of colorectal cancer in adults aged 20-49 years (early-onset CRC). METHODS: This is an analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019 (GBD 2019). The GBD 2019 estimation methods were used to describe the incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of early CRC from 1990 to 2019. Data from 204 countries and geographic areas were available. RESULTS: The global incidence rate of early-onset CRC increased from 4.2/100 000 to 6.7/100 000 from 1990 to 2019. Mortality and DALYs of early-onset CRC also increased. The CRC incidence rate increased faster in younger adults (1.6%) than in adults aged 50-74 years (0.6%) as measured by the annual percentage change. The increase in early-onset CRC incidence was consistently observed in all five socio-demographic index (SDI) regions and 190 out of 204 countries and territories. Middle and high-middle SDI regions had faster annual increases in early-onset CRC, which warrants further attention. CONCLUSIONS: The global incidence, mortality, and DALYs of early-onset CRC increased from 1990 to 2019. The increase in early-onset CRC incidence was prevalent worldwide. Several countries were found to have higher incidence rates than the United States or fast increase in early-onset CRC, which warrants further attention.

Dieulafoy's lesion of the upper GI tract: a comprehensive nationwide database analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We sought to determine the incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion of the upper GI tract (UDL) hemorrhage among adult patients in the United States. METHODS: UDL and non-Dieulafoy upper GI bleeding (UGIB) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Readmission Database using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification and Procedure Coding System codes. Multivariate logistic (binary) and linear (continuous) regressions were used to model dependent variables. RESULTS: The incidence of UDL hemorrhage was 1.6 of 100,000 persons. Patients with UDL and UGIB who required endoscopic therapeutic intervention had similar in-hospital (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], .77; 95% confidence interval [CI], .42-1.43; P = .41) mortality rates. UDL was associated with more severe systemic illness, including higher rates of mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.07-2.15; P < .05), hypovolemic shock (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.08-2.08; P < .05), acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.54; P < .05), and multiple endoscopies (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.28-1.93; P < .05) compared with other UGIB patients who required endoscopic therapeutic intervention. UDL was also associated with higher 30-day all-cause (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.35; P < .05) and recurrent bleeding-related (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.45-2.06; P < .05) readmissions. The rate of successful endoscopic treatment was 96.81%. CONCLUSIONS: UDL hemorrhage is an uncommon but highly morbid condition. Current UDL treatment modalities are effective in reducing mortality. Further investigations are warranted to lower recurrent bleeding rates.

Cancer-specific survival in non-mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas after local resection versus right hemicolectomy: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database study.

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinomas of the appendix are rare cancers for which no National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines exist, and for patients who undergo resection with curative intent, there is a paucity of data on prognostic factors affecting long-term cancer-specific survival. We aimed to compare the cancer-specific survival outcomes in adult patients with appendiceal non-mucinous adenocarcinoma undergoing either local resection versus right hemicolectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results of patients who underwent curative resection over a 15-year period (2004-2019) for primary appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Out of 16,699 patients, 14,945 were excluded (exclusion criteria were non-adenocarcinoma histological types and patients with regional or distant metastasis as per National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results stage). Effects of factors (age, race, tumor biology [mucinous versus non-mucinous tumors], the extent of resection of the primary lesion, and lymph nodes) on cancer-specific long-term survival were studied. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival outcomes were reported as mean survival (months). RESULTS: Of 1,754 patients, 827 (47.1%) were women, and 927 (52.1%) were men. The mean age in years (± standard deviation) was 62.43 ± 14.3. The racial distribution was as follows: Black 237 (13.5%), White 1,398 (79.7%), and Other 119 (6.8%). A total of 771 (44.6%) underwent local resection (appendectomy or segmental resection of colon without lymph node resection), and 983 (55.4%) underwent hemicolectomy with lymph node resection. Favorable survival prognosticators were age <50 years, White race, and well-differentiated histology. Patients with mucinous tumors experienced better survival. Patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with lymph node resection experienced better survival compared with those who had an appendectomy or segmental colonic resection for non-mucinous tumors rather than mucinous tumors. CONCLUSION: We report novel demographic, tumor-related, and operative prognostic factors impacting long-term cancer-specific survival in patients who undergo resection for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. The extent of resection of the primary lesion with draining lymph nodes determines long-term cancer-specific survival in non-mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in relation to risk of gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used, with studies showing a lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), but overall data for GIB risk remains debatable. The objective was to assess non-fatal and fatal GIB risk in patients on DOACs compared with warfarin from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS: RCTs comparing warfarin and DOACs for various indications (atrial fibrillation, thromboembolism, insertion of mechanical heart valves) were included. The primary endpoint was any GIB event. Other clinical events, such as fatal GIB, and effects of age (≤60 years or older), time in therapeutic range for warfarin, and choice of individual DOACs on GIB risk, were also assessed. RESULTS: 14 RCTs were included, comprising 87,407 participants (DOACs n=46,223, warfarin control n=41,184). The risk of GIB with DOACs was similar to that of warfarin (relative risk [RR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.27). Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban (RR 1.23, 95%CI 1.03-1.48) and dabigatran (RR 1.38, 95%CI 1.12-1.71) had a higher risk of any GIB, whereas fatal GIB risk was lower in the DOACs group (RR 0.36, 95%CI 0.15-0.82). The risk of DOAC-related fatal GIB was lower in patients aged ≤60 years and in those with poor coagulation control (RR 0.39, 95%CI 0.15-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: DOACs compared with warfarin have a lower risk of fatal GIB, especially in those aged <60 years and those with poor coagulation control. However, the risk of GIB was comparable with warfarin and DOACs, except for rivaroxaban and dabigatran.