Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Respir J ; 43(3): 852-62, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24176994

RESUMEN

The effect of employing severity scores to identify severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) cases for early aggressive resuscitation is unknown. Optimising pre-intensive care unit (ICU) care may improve outcomes in patients at risk of SCAP. We conducted a before-and-after study of patients classified into control and intervention groups (January 2004 to December 2007 and January 2008 to December 2010, respectively). Our intervention was two-pronged, using the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) minor criteria to identify SCAP for aggressive emergency department resuscitation. Patients with SCAP, defined as those with three or more IDSA/ATS minor criteria, were targeted. Differences in mortality, triage and compliance with emergency department resuscitation were compared between the groups. The hospital mortality rate was lower in the intervention versus the control group (5.7% versus 23.8%, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the intervention group was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.67). ICU admission rates decreased from 52.9% to 38.6% (p=0.008) and inappropriately delayed ICU admissions decreased from 32.0% to 14.8% (p<0.001). There was increased compliance with the aggressive resuscitation protocol after the intervention. A combined intervention, using a pneumonia score to identify those at risk of SCAP early and an aggressive pre-ICU resuscitation protocol may reduce mortality and ICU admissions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Infectología/normas , Neumonía/terapia , Neumología/normas , Resucitación/métodos , Anciano , Medicina de Emergencia , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Admisión del Paciente , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
2.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ; 15: 100100, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31720426

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Early diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains fundamental in reducing transmissions and death. Sputum induction is recommended for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in patients who are unable to expectorate or smear negative. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pooling two induced sputum specimens into one microbiological test over a single day for the diagnosis of PTB. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive hospitalized adults with suspected PTB from 2009-2016. Two induced sputum specimens were obtained on the same day and pooled together for AFB smear, culture and Xpert MTB/RIF testing. The final diagnosis of PTB was based on a positive culture from any respiratory specimen. All patients were followed up for 3 months. RESULTS: Of 420 patients, 86(20.5%) were diagnosed with PTB based on a positive respiratory culture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for pooled induced sputum were 98.8% (CI 93.7-100%), 100% (CI 98.9-100%) and 100% (94.6-100%) and 99.7% (CI 98.1-100%) respectively. Xpert MTB/RIF in pooled induced sputum was positive in 88.4% of the PTB patients. CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of PTB, testing two induced sputum specimens which were pooled together for one microbiological testing process may be comparable to repeat testing.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA