Effects of nomifensine on growth hormone and prolactin secretion in normal subjects and in pathological hyperprolactinemia.

We have studied the effect of the oral administration of 200 mg nomifensine (nom), a drug which activates the dopaminergic system, on GH and PRL secretion in 15 normal subjects, 18 patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and 17 patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. GH levels increased significantly after nom in normal subjects (basal, 0.96 +/- 0.76 ng/ml; peak 4.6 +/- 0.61 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) and patients with hyperprolactinemia, both idiopathic (basal, 1.0 +/- 0.38 ng/ml; peak, 4.2 +/- 1.0 ng/ml; P less than 0.05) and tumoral (basal 0.88 +/- 0.3 ng/ml, peak 6.68 +/- 1.2 ng/ml; P less than 0.01). Peak GH levels higher than 5 ng/ml were observed in 8 of 15 normal subjects, 6 of 18 patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and 8 of 17 patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. PRL levels decreased in response to nom in normal subjects, but not in patients with idiopathic or tumoral hyperprolactinemia. A reduction in plasma PRL levels of at least 30% below the baseline was observed only in two patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and in none of the patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. These results demonstrate that nom does not discriminate between idiopathic and tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Since nom probably requires a hypothalamic pool of dopamine to bring about its GH stimulatory effect, the suggestion that the lack of a PRL-lowering effect of the drug is attributable to a dopamine deficiency is not supported by our data.

Bromocriptine does not alter growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone in acromegaly.

GHRH (100 micrograms) and TRH (200 micrograms) were administered to 24 active acromegalic patients before and during chronic bromocriptine (Br) treatment (Br, 10-15 mg/day for 3-5 months) to evaluate the possible effects of the dopamine agonist on GH release induced by these releasing hormones. Mean daily plasma GH levels were reduced by Br treatment from 34 +/- 40 (SD) to 16 +/- 19 ng/ml (P less than 0.01). No significant changes were found when comparing the GH response to GHRH as mean area under the response curve (nanograms per min/ml above the basal) (pretreatment, 5453 +/- 7843; during Br, 7017 +/- 12763 ng/ml . min), and as mean individual peak GH values (pretreatment, 130 +/- 148; during Br, 126 +/- 187 ng/ml) before and during treatment. The percentage GH increase (pretreatment, 340 +/- 354; during Br, 617 +/- 539%) was however significantly higher during Br. Br treatment significantly reduced the GH response to TRH in terms of mean of individual peak levels (from 136 +/- 134 to 60 +/- 52 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) and area under the response curve (from 3142 +/- 3998 to 1331 +/- 1646 ng/min . ml; P less than 0.01). However, the percentage GH increase was not significantly different (pretreatment, 486 +/- 729; during Br, 1059 +/- 1862%). When the patients were divided into Br responders, i.e. mean daily GH reduction during Br of at least 50% below baseline, and nonresponders, the initial response to GHRH was significantly higher in the latter group, but was unaffected by Br treatment in either group. On the contrary, the response to TRH, statistically significant initially only in the Br responder group, was reduced by Br treatment. We suggest that cells sensitive to Br and TRH but not to GHRH (lactotroph-like) and cells sensitive to GHRH but not to Br (pure somatotrophs) may coexist in GH-secreting adenomas.

Changes in growth hormone (GH) secretion induced by human pancreatic GH releasing hormone-44 in acromegaly: a comparison with thyrotropin-releasing hormone and bromocriptine.

We studied the effects of 100 micrograms human pancreatic GH releasing hormone-44 (GRH) in 35 acromegalic patients. Plasma GH levels significantly increased [basal, 30 +/- 10 (SE) ng/ml; peak, 82 +/- 21 ng/ml; P less than 0.01], but a wide intersubject variability of the responses was found (range, 20-1602%). No relationship was found between the percentage GH increase after GRH and basal values of GH, PRL, or somatomedin-C. All patients also underwent an acute test with bromocriptine (2.5 mg orally) and TRH (200 micrograms iv). When dividing the patients according to their GH responsiveness to bromocriptine (Br), an inverse correlation (r = -0.42, P less than 0.05) was found between percentage of GH changes after GRH and after Br; moreover Br responder patients had a lesser (P less than 0.001) GH increase after GRH (124 +/- 27%) than nonresponders (562 +/- 116%). No relationship was found between the GH response to TRH and GRH, and no differences were found between the percentage GH increase after TRH (513 +/- 117%) and after GRH (349 +/- 71%). We conclude that the tumoral somatotrophs are sensitive to their specific releasing hormone and we suggest that the presence in the adenoma of cells with surface membrane receptors similar to those on the lactotropes may explain the lower sensitivity to GRH of Br responders compared to nonresponders.

Relationship between somatomedin-C and growth hormone levels in acromegaly: basal and dynamic evaluation.

The relationship between basal and stimulated plasma GH and somatomedin-C (SmC) levels in acromegalic patients was evaluated. The basal plasma SmC levels of 66 patients were significantly correlated (P less than 0.01) with mean daily plasma GH levels, but not with the percent GH increase after GH-releasing hormone or TRH or the GH decrease after acute bromocriptine administration. Bromocriptine (7.5-15 mg/day) administration for 9.2 +/- 0.9 (+/- SD) months in 20 patients significantly (P less than 0.05) decreased GH levels. SmC decreased significantly [from 9.8 +/- 1.9 to 5.1 +/- 0.7 U/ml (mean +/- SE)] only in the 10 patients who had the more marked GH inhibition. The administration of a somatostatin analog, SMS 201-995 (100 micrograms twice daily), to 12 patients for 16 weeks significantly decreased plasma GH and SmC levels beginning on the second day of therapy; normal SmC levels were achieved in 5 of 12 patients. Pituitary adenomectomy resulted in normal GH and SmC levels in 10 of 12 and 8 of 12 patients, respectively. Our data indicate an overall dependency of plasma SmC levels on plasma GH levels in acromegaly, although similar GH levels may have differing somatomedin-stimulating activities. A derangement in the feedback mechanisms controlling GH secretion is indicated by the failure of elevated SmC levels to influence the GH responsiveness to releasing hormones. In evaluating pharmacological or surgical treatments of acromegaly, a single plasma SmC value can reliably replace several plasma GH determinations.

Homogeneity in the growth hormone-lowering effect of dopamine and somatostatin in acromegaly.

We have studied the effect of maximally inhibiting doses of dopamine (DA) or somatostatin on GH levels in 39 acromegalic patients. The GH-lowering effects of the two drugs were highly variable in different patients. A significant correlation (r = 0.45; P < 0.01) was found between the percent changes obtained during the infusions of DA (500 microgram/min) and somatostatin (3.33 microgram/min). Pretreatment with L-sulpiride markedly blunted the inhibitory effect of DA but did not affect the response to somatostatin. We conclude that the GH-secreting cells of acromegalic patients contain separate receptors for DA and somatostatin. We hypothesize that the partial or total lack of responsiveness to DA or somatostatin may be due to the loss of receptors for these agents on the GH-secreting neoplastic cells.

Stable reduction of plasma growth hormone (hGH) levels during chronic administration of 2-Br-alpha-ergocryptine (CB-154) in acromegalic patients.

In 7 acromegalic patients in whom plasma hGH concentrations had dropped acutely after a single dose of 2-B r-alpha-ergocryptine (CB-154, 2.5 mg orally) chronic CB-154 treatment (10 mg orally for 30 days) was also accompanied by a significant and stable reduction of hGH. Withdrawal of the drug was followed by a rapid return of hGH to pretreatment values. Reinstatement of oral CB-154 treatment resulted again in suppression of hGH levels measured 30 and 60 days later. In 5 patients, unresponsive to acute administration of CB-154, no appreciable variation in hGH levels was present after 30 days of treatment. These results suggest that 2-Br-alpha-ergocryptine offers a new approach to the medical treatment of acromegaly.

Medical treatment of acromegaly with SMS 201-995, a somatostatin analog: a comparison with bromocriptine.

We studied the effects of acute and chronic sc administration of SMS 201-995 (SMS), a long-acting somatostatin analog, in acromegalic patients. The results were compared with those obtained in the same patients treated with oral bromocriptine (Brc). A single dose of 50 micrograms SMS administered to 28 patients induced a more rapid, greater, and more prolonged reduction in plasma GH levels than did 2.5 mg Brc. Chronic treatment [60-330 days; mean 208 +/- 23 (+/- SEM)] with SMS (100-300 micrograms/day) induced in 16 patients a significantly greater decrease in mean plasma GH and somatomedin-C levels than did 20 mg Brc. Combined treatment with the 2 agents had an additional effect. The clinical and metabolic parameters of acromegaly dramatically improved in all patients whose plasma GH and somatomedin-C levels decreased even if they were not normalized by SMS. Reduction in tumor size occurred in 3 of the 10 patients examined by computed tomography before and during SMS treatment. We conclude that SMS is more effective than Brc and that the 2 drugs may be complementary in the medical treatment of acromegaly.

Lisuride hydrogen maleate: evidence for a long lasting dopaminergic activity in humans.

In 12 acromegalics a single oral dose of 0.2 mg lisuride, an ergoline derivative, significantly reduced plasma PRL but not GH concentrations. Three-tenths milligram of the drug significantly reduced plasma levels of the two hormones. Four-tenths milligram of lisuride did not augment this inhibitory effect. Plasma PRL levels were suppressed in all patients, whereas GH levels were reduced by more than 50% of the base-line values in only seven patients who also responded to the administration of 2.5 mg bromocriptine (CB154). In the patients unresponsive to lisuride, CB154 also failed to change GH levels. The suppressive effect of lisuride started at 60 min (at 150 min for CB154) and plasma GH and PRL levels were still markedly suppressed at 300 min. Plasma GH and PRL concentrations were consistently reduced in two acromegalic patients during 2 weeks of chronic treatment with 0.3 mg lisuride four times a day. In six normal subjects, TRH-induced PRL release was significantly inhibited by pretreatment with 0.3 mg of the drug. The similarity in the effects of lisuride and CB154 suggests that the observed effects of lisuride on GH and PRL are attributable to the known dopaminergic activity of the drug. This conclusion is supported by the data showing that pimozide effectively counteracted the inhibitory action of lisuride on GH and PRL release. We suggest that lisuride may be of value in the medical treatment of acromegaly and hyperprolactinemic states.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone infusion in patients with active acromegaly.

To determine GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in patients with active acromegaly, nine patients received a 50-microgram GHRH-(1-44) bolus dose followed by a 2-h infusion with 100 micrograms GHRH/h, after which a second 50-microgram GHRH bolus dose was given. Serum GH, PRL, and immunoreactive GHRH levels were measured from 2 h before to 1 h after the end of the infusion and compared with hormone levels in six normal subjects subjected to the same protocol. In addition, seven of the nine acromegalic patients received 100 micrograms GHRH as an iv bolus dose, followed by a 2-h saline infusion on a different day. After the 100-micrograms GHRH bolus dose, the mean GH level increased from 55.9 +/- 18.0 (+/- SE) to 148.5 +/- 40.0 ng/ml within 15 min. Thereafter, GH levels decreased and were significantly lower at 90 and 120 min compared to the peak level 15 min after GHRH injection. After the 50-micrograms GHRH bolus dose, all acromegalic patients except two also had a clear-cut rise of GH levels, with the mean GH level increasing from 37.5 +/- 13.2 to 108.4 +/- 55.0 ng/ml at 60 min. Thereafter, elevated GH levels were sustained in the acromegalic patients throughout the GHRH infusion. In contrast, normal subjects had a significant decrease in the initially elevated GH levels, despite continuous GHRH infusion. There were no significant differences between PRL secretion and immunoreactive GHRH levels in either group. These findings suggest that patients with active acromegaly not only have elevated basal GH levels, but also have a greater ready releasable GH pool and/or accelerated GH turnover compared to those of normal subjects, which cannot be exhausted by a 2-h GHRH infusion.

Inhibitory effect of an ergoline derivative, methergoline, on growth hormone and prolactin levels in acromegalic patients.

Plasma levels of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) were measured in twelve acromegalic patients after acute administration of an ergoline derivative (methergoline) which has been proposed as a specific serotoninergic blocking agent. The administration of methergoline (4 mg p.o.) was followed by a significant decrease in plasma GH and PRL concentrations. The administration to the same subjects of CB 154 (2.5 mg p.o.), a known stimulator of dopaminergic receptors, led to results almost superimposable to those obtained with methergoline although the suppressive effect of CB 154 on GH and PRL levels was more sustained. Also on the ground of results obtained in these patients with the use of cyproheptadine, phentolamine, or pimozide, we have concluded that methergoline inhibition of GH and PRL release is, in acromegalic patients, most probably due to a dopaminergic mechanism of action.

Persistence of somatostatinergic tone in acromegaly.

It is a matter of debate whether hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIH) secretion in acromegaly is preserved and still regulated by the physiological feedback mechanisms of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I. To gather further information on this, the reproducibility of plasma GH changes induced by growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) administration was evaluated in 15 acromegalic patients. There was a highly significant correlation between the peak/basal ratio (P/B) GH response in the 15 patients administered GHRH on two separate occasions (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). The test was performed also before and after the administration of drugs able to inhibit or stimulate hypothalamic SRIH release, by activating (pyridostigmine) or inhibiting (pirenzepine) cholinergic pathways, respectively. The GHRH-induced GH response (P/B = 2, range 1.1-26.1) was increased significantly by pyridostigmine pretreatment in 30 patients (P/B = 2.6, range 1.3-34.8; p = 0.0045). In nine out of 30 patients an increase of greater than 2 SD of within-subject GHRH variability was observed in response to GHRH plus pyridostigmine when compared to GHRH alone. An inverse correlation (r = -0.37, p < 0.05) was observed between GH response to GHRH alone and after pyridostigmine pretreatment. On the contrary, no change of GHRH-induced GH response was observed in 12 patients after pirenzepine pretreatment (P/B = 1.9, range 1.1-5 and P/B = 2, range 1.3-6 without and after pirenzepine pretreatment, respectively). These data suggest that in acromegaly the somatostatinergic tone does not seem to fluctuate, and that it can be inhibited often by cholinergic pathway activation but not increased further by cholinergic suppression.

[Medical treatment of acromegaly with dopaminergic agents]. / Il trattamento medico dell'acromegalia con farmaci dopaminergici.

The medical treatment of acromegaly with dopaminergic drugs has its physiopathological premise in the observation that agents capable of stimulating dopaminergic receptors directly are capable of determining GH secretion inhibition in a large percentage of acromegalic patients. Chronic administration of 5-20 mg/die of bromocryptin, long acting dopaminergic agonist, leads to a stable reduction in the levels of GH and somatomedin C (SmC) in about 50% of patients. However, these are only normalised in 20%. Treatment induces marked improvement in the clinical and metabolic changes typical of acromegalic disease. The therapeutic effect of dopaminergics may be maintained for periods of treatment lasting years but upon suspension of treatment pH levels return quickly to pretreatment levels. The antitumoral effect of the dopaminergic frequently encountered in prolactinomas is a rarer event in acromegaly and occurs more readily in patients with mixed secreting GH and PRL tumours than in pure GH. Currently octractide, a long lasting somatostatin analogue, is the most effective drug in the medical treatment of acromegaly; however the dopaminergic agonists remain a valid alternative.