Text messages by wireless mesh network vs voice by two-way radio in disaster simulations: A crossover randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Communication failures secondary to damaged infrastructure have caused difficulties in coordinating disaster responses. Two-way radios commonly serve as backup communication for hospitals. However, text messaging has become widely adopted in daily life and new technologies such as wireless mesh network (WMN) devices allow for text messaging independent of cellular towers, Wi-Fi networks, and electrical grids. OBJECTIVE: To examine the accuracy of communication using text-based messaging transmitted over WMN devices (TEXT-WMN) compared to voice transmitted over two-way radios (VOICE-TWR) in disaster simulations. Secondary outcomes were patient triage accuracy, perceived workload, and device preference. METHODS: 2 × 2 Latin square crossover design: 2 simulations (each involving 15 min of simulated hospital-wide disaster communication) by 2 modalities (TEXT-WMN and VOICE-TWR). Physicians were randomized to one of two sequences: VOICE-TWR first and TEXT-WMN second; or TEXT-WMN first and VOICE-TWR second. Analyses were conducted using linear mixed effects modeling. RESULTS: On average, communication accuracy significantly improved with TEXT-WMN compared to VOICE-TWR. Communication accuracy also significantly improved, on average, during the second simulation compared to the first. There was no significant change in triage accuracy with either TEXT-WMN or VOICE-TWR; however, triage accuracy significantly improved, on average, during the second simulation compared to the first. On average, perceived workload was significantly lower with TEXT-WMN compared to VOICE-TWR, and was also significantly lower during the second simulation compared to the first. Most participants preferred TEXT-WMN to VOICE-TWR. CONCLUSION: TEXT-WMN technology may be more effective and less burdensome than VOICE-TWR in facilitating accurate communication during disasters.

A Paper-Based Car Seat Safety Educational Intervention in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: Motor vehicle crashes are a leading source of pediatric morbidity and mortality in children younger than 13 years. Proper car seat safety device (CSD) markedly reduces mortality, but the majority of families misuse them. Emergency department (ED)-based educational interventions can improve knowledge patient regarding proper CSD use but historically have been resource intensive. Our study evaluated the utility of a novel educational intervention in improving patient knowledge of proper CSD use and in evaluating for proper CSD installation. METHODS: Parents of children younger than 14 years presenting to the ED were given a paper-based quiz followed by a CSD-educational handout. Improvement in patient knowledge and evaluation for proper CSD installation were evaluated by repeat quiz and a phone-based survey 2 to 4 weeks later. RESULTS: Parents exhibited an 18% improvement in quiz answers evaluating knowledge of proper CSD use (P value < 0.0001). Eighty-two percent and 72% of families felt that the intervention improved their understanding of proper CSD use and increased their awareness of their importance, respectively, but only 18% had their CSD checked by a professional. CONCLUSIONS: A paper-based educational intervention in the pediatric ED is well received by parents, may improve patient knowledge surrounding proper CSD use, and encourages some families to get their CSDs checked for proper installation.

Patient Factors Associated With the Decision to Transfer Adult Patients From a Pediatric Emergency Department for Definitive Care.

OBJECTIVE: Adults presenting to pediatric emergency departments are transferred to general emergency departments in proportions between 20% and 60%. How illness severity is related to the decision to transfer is poorly understood. We compared the proportion of adults with emergent and nonemergent conditions with respect to their final disposition. We also determined characteristics associated with transfer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the electronic medical record and identified all patients 25 years and older presenting to a large urban freestanding pediatric emergency department from 2008 to 2013. We collected demographic and clinical information and used a preexisting algorithm to classify visits as emergent or nonemergent. We created a multivariate logistical regression model to determine independent variables associated with transfer. RESULTS: Among 246,694 encounters, 1182 (0.5%) patients were older than 25 years. We excluded 402 (34%) because they were not categorized. Of the 780 categorized, 32% had an emergent and 68% had a nonemergent condition. Only 22% were transferred. Compared with nonurgent patients, the proportion transferred was twice as high for emergent patients (36% vs 15%), but even for emergent patients, most (63%) were retained for definitive care and/or disposition. Emergent diagnosis, age 45 to 64 years, and higher triage acuity were independently associated with the decision to transfer. CONCLUSION: Regardless of illness severity, a minority of adult patients were transferred away for definitive care. Factors independently associated with transfer were emergent condition, higher triage acuity, and older age.

Resident perspectives on professionalism lack common consensus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize and understand the residents' perspective on how professionalism develops through pediatric emergency medicine experiences. METHODS: Qualitative methods (freelisting--listing words associated with professionalism--and semistructured interviews) were conducted with senior emergency medicine and pediatric residents about their experiences rotating in the emergency department of a large, urban, tertiary care, freestanding children's hospital. All senior residents were eligible, with purposive sampling to maximize demographic variability. Saliency (importance) of words was analyzed with Smith S scores and consensus analysis. Interviews were conducted until content saturation was achieved; transcripts were coded by independent investigators to reach thematic consensus. RESULTS: Twenty-five interviews (36% emergency, 64% pediatrics) were conducted. Common words associated with professionalism were "respect," "compassion," "empathy," and "integrity"; however, residents did not share a common consensus. The framework for how residents described the development of their professionalism includes observations, interactions, and environment. Examples include resident observation of role models; interactions with patients, families, and coworkers; self-reflection; and the unique environment of the ED. Residents believed that role modeling was the most influential factor. Few reported receiving sufficient observation by attending physicians during their interactions with patients and most reported receiving little direct feedback on their professionalism. Residents' descriptions of professionalism crossed multiple Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. CONCLUSION: Residents displayed high variability in their understanding of professionalism, which was frequently at variance with the corresponding ACGME competency definition. The resident perspective and understanding of professionalism may usefully inform refinements in ACGME milestones and entrustable professional activities.

Parental asthma education and risks for nonadherence to pediatric asthma treatments.

OBJECTIVES: Targeted parental education reduces acute visits for pediatric asthma. Whether the use of education sources readily available to parents relates to nonadherence to asthma treatments is uncertain. This study describes asthma education sources and assesses for a relationship to risks for nonadherence. METHODS: Caregivers of children with asthma completed a cross-sectional survey at 2 sites: a pediatric emergency department (ED) and an asthma clinic (AC). Measured items included the use of 7 education sources (primary care, ED, AC, friends/family, TV, internet, and printed materials), scores of child asthma morbidity, parental asthma knowledge, and risks for nonadherence, the primary outcome. Recruitment site, preferred language (English/Spanish), and demographics were recorded. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and multivariate regressions were performed. RESULTS: A total of 260 participants, 158 from ED and 102 from AC, used a variety of education sources. They reported 4.1 (2.0) of 13 risk factors for nonadherence, with more risks in ED parents than AC parents (4.8 vs 3.9, P < 0.001). The ED parents worried more about medications and had worse access to primary care. The regression did not show a significant relationship between education sources and risks for nonadherence, but ED recruitment, Spanish language, and worse morbidity contributed to higher risks. CONCLUSIONS: The use of more asthma education sources was not associated with reduced risks for nonadherence. Of the education sources, a primary care provider may benefit ED parents, who also need refills and education about medications. Spanish-speaking parents report more risks for nonadherence, warranting further study of Spanish-language asthma education.

Brief resolved unexplained events: practical evaluation and management in the emergency department.

In a 2016 clinical practice guideline, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) created and introduced the term brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE). This guideline defined specific criteria for diagnosis of BRUE and provided a set of guidelines for evaluation of these infants as well as characteristics that indicate a BRUE will have a low risk for a repeat event or a serious underlying disorder. This issue reviews the definition and broad differential diagnosis of a BRUE, highlights the criteria for risk stratification of infants who experience a BRUE, summarizes the management recommendations for patients with a lower-risk BRUE, and examines the available literature that evaluates the impact of the AAP guidelines in the years since its publication.

Examining trust between supervisors and trainees in the pediatric emergency department.

Objective: Lack of trust between supervisors and trainees can have harmful consequences. Trust has been examined between physicians, patients, and staff in multiple settings but has not been examined in a bidirectional manner in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Debra Meyerson in 1996 discussed the theory of swift trust, a type of trust that develops quickly between temporary groups through reliance on categories. Meyerson describes categories as groups unified by social identities such as gender or profession. We explored the applicability of swift trust in the relationship between supervisors and trainees in the PED. Methods: This multimethods study used qualitative interviews and the validated interpersonal mistrust trust measure (IMTM) to assess baseline trusting style. PED attendings from a single institution and residents from various training levels, specialties, and institutions rotating through the same PED were sampled until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis. IMTM scores were triangulated with interviewee's reported trusting styles. Results: Seventeen PED attendings and 16 residents participated. Residents and attendings emphasized different factors that influence trust. Common factors across groups included affect, the need for vulnerability, and appropriate communication. Most described reliance on certain categories (level of training, specialty, etc.) when making trusting decisions. Categories such as gender and race were noted to be unimportant when making trusting decisions about others, although some participants believed these attributes played into decisions made by others. Quantitative data from the IMTM supported qualitative conclusions regarding trusting style. Conclusions: The trusting relationship between supervisors and trainees in the PED dovetails with the swift trust theory. Common factors that influence trust reveal entry points for attendings and residents to improve trust and ultimately prevent negative patient outcomes. Future studies may examine how reliance on categories influences an individual's trust in their colleagues.

A Mixed Methods Needs Assessment for a Debriefing Intervention Following Critical Cases.

OBJECTIVE: The emergency department (ED) is a demanding environment, and critical events have been identified as contributors to stress. Debriefing is a possible intervention for staff, but there is little information regarding formulation and implementation. A needs assessment was conducted to describe the emotions of pediatric ED (PED) staff following critical events and assess opinions regarding debriefing. METHOD: This mixed methods study used convergent design for triangulation. After critical cases, PED staff members were given the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI). Additionally, a questionnaire with 2 open-ended questions on debriefing was administered. Themes were extracted from the questionnaire using directed content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 719 responses were collected for 142 critical cases. Physical reactions were often endorsed in the PDI, and these reactions were mirrored in the qualitative data, which included physiological responses such as stress, adrenaline high, anxiety, fatigue, and overwhelm. Helplessness and grief were 2 of the emotional PDI items frequently endorsed, which were reflected in the qualitative strand by themes such as helplessness, sadness, disheartenment, and regret. There was considerable variability between critical cases such that not every critical case elicited a desire for a debrief. CONCLUSIONS: PED staff report measurable levels of stress after critical patient cases that warrant follow-up. Formal debriefing immediately after critical patient cases with specific caveats may be valuable for the reduction of stress. Any formal debriefing program will need to balance various goals with attention to the session length, setting, and timing.

A national depiction of children with return visits to the emergency department within 72 hours, 2001-2007.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to estimate the frequency of pediatric 72-hour return visits (RVs) to the emergency department (ED) between 2001 and 2007 and to determine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with these RVs. METHODS: Data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2001 and 2007 were analyzed to estimate the frequency of RVs to EDs by children. Patient demographics and clinical variables were compared for RVs and non-RVs using the χ² test; RVs were further characterized using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2007, there was an annual average of 698,000 RVs by children (2.7% of all ED visits). The RV rate significantly increased from 2001 to 2007. Factors associated with an RV included age younger than 1 year or 13 to 18 years, arrival to the ED between 7 A.M. and 3 P.M., recent discharge from the hospital, and western region of the United States. During ED RVs, a complete blood count was more likely to be obtained, and the patient was more likely to be admitted. Insurance was not associated with an RV to the ED. On RV, patients were less likely to have a diagnosis related to trauma or injury. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database offers a national perspective into ED RVs in children. In this era of increasing utilization, these results can help physicians and policy makers address the unique needs of this population and create interventions that will optimize patient service while attempting to control potentially unnecessary RVs.

Neonatal resuscitation in the emergency department.

Although most neonates will not require resuscitation, emergency clinicians must be prepared to manage neonates who require respiratory assistance. This issue reviews current expert recommendations and consensus updates of the best practices in resuscitation of neonates. An overview of neonatal physiology provides a framework for understanding how neonatal resuscitation differs from that of children and adults. A step-wise, systematic approach is provided for identifying and managing newborns who require resuscitation. The treatment, management, and over-arching goals for neonatal resuscitation and newborn care are also reviewed.

Pediatricians' perspectives on the impact of MRSA in primary care: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) has rapidly increased among children in primary care settings since the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Recent treatment recommendations emphasize CA-MRSA as the primary cause, performing incision and drainage (I&D) as the primary therapy, and not prescribing antibiotics for uncomplicated cases. It is unknown how this epidemic has impacted primary care pediatricians in terms of their practice patterns and barriers they face to providing recommended therapies. METHODS: 3 Focus groups among 29 primary care pediatricians in the San Francisco Bay Area were conducted. Transcripts were reviewed and coded into major themes by two investigators using modified grounded theory. RESULTS: Substantial changes in clinical practice have occurred since the emergence of CA-MRSA. These include increased office visits for SSTIs, patients with multiple recurrences and transmission within households. Additionally, our participants reported increased visits for mild skin problems due to media reports contributing to fears about CA-MRSA. Participants routinely prescribed antibiotics for SSTIs, however, few performed I&D. Few were aware of recent SSTI treatment recommendations. Barriers to prescribing antibiotics with CA-MRSA activity included concerns about side-effects and lack of local epidemiologic data showing that it is the primary etiology. Barriers to performing I&D included lack of training, resources and skepticism about its necessity. Important clinical challenges included increased time demands for follow-up visits and patient education along with the lack of evidence-based strategies for preventing recurrent infections and household transmission. CONCLUSION: CA-MRSA has influenced the presentation and treatment of SSTIs especially in terms of case numbers and recurrences. Barriers to providing recommended therapies can be addressed through improved dissemination of treatment guidelines and epidemiologic data. Studies are urgently needed to improve the evidence-base for treatment and prevention strategies.

Resident exposure to critical patients in a pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that nonpediatric and pediatric residents are exposed to a very low percentage of critically ill patients in a high-volume children's hospital emergency department (ED). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of resident-patient encounters during a 1-year period using a patient tracking system. Critically ill patients included those who were triaged as "critical," died in the ED, or admitted to the intensive care unit. Descriptive data are presented as means +/- SD, frequencies, and percentages. Analysis of variance was used for continuous data and the chi test for categorical data. RESULTS: A total of 3048 (4.2% of the total ED volume) critically ill patients with a mean age of 6 (+/- 5.6) years were evaluated. One hundred four emergency medicine (EM) residents were involved in the care of 903 (30%), 136 pediatric residents managed 2003 (65%), and 36 family medicine residents managed 142 (5%) critically ill patients. There was no significant difference in the mean age of evaluated patients compared by type of training program. On average, EM residents evaluated 5 patients per 10 shifts compared with pediatric residents ([9 patients per 10 shifts] P < 0.0001). Unlike pediatric residents, the number of patients cared for by EM or family medicine residents did not increase with the level of resident training. Sixty-seven life-saving procedures were performed, of which 32 (48%) were cardiopulmonary resuscitations and 35 (52%) were intubations. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric and nonpediatric residents who rotate through a high-volume children's hospital ED are exposed to a very low number of critically ill children. Other educational formats, such as mock resuscitations or standardized patient encounters, may be required to correct this deficit.

The "zing factor"-how do faculty describe the best pediatrics residents?

BACKGROUND: Faculty in graduate medical education programs may not have uniform approaches to differentiating the quality of residents, and reviews of evaluations suggest that faculty use different standards when assessing residents. Standards for assessing residents also do not consistently map to items on evaluation forms. One way to improve assessment is to reach consensus on the traits and behaviors that are (or should be) present in the best residents. METHODS: A trained interviewer conducted semistructured interviews with faculty affiliated with 2 pediatrics residency programs until content saturation was achieved. Interviewees were asked to describe specific traits present in residents they identify as the best. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. We used an iterative, inductive approach to generate a coding scheme and identify common themes. RESULTS: From 23 interviews, we identified 7 thematic categories of traits and behaviors: personality, energy, professionalism, team behaviors, self-improvement behaviors, patient-interaction behaviors, and medical knowledge and clinical skills (including a subcategory, knowledge integration). Most faculty interviewees focused on traits like passion, enthusiasm, maturity, and reliability. Examination score or intelligence was mentioned less frequently than traits and behaviors categorized under personality and professionalism. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty identified many traits and behaviors in the residents they define as the best. The thematic categories had incomplete overlap with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and CanMEDS competencies. This research highlights the ongoing need to review our assessment strategies, and may have implications for the ACGME Milestone Project.

Randomized controlled trial of spaced education for pediatric residency education.

BACKGROUND: Spaced education (SE) has shown promise as an instructional tool that uses repeated exposure to the same questions, but information on its utility in graduate medical education is limited, particularly in assessing knowledge gain with outcome measures that are different from repeat exposure to the intervention questions. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether SE is an effective instructional tool for pediatrics residents learning dermatology using an outcome measure that included both unique and isomorphic questions. METHODS: We randomized 81 pediatrics residents into 2 groups. Group A completed an SE course on atopic dermatitis and warts and molluscum. Group B completed an SE course on acne and melanocytic nevi. Each course consisted of 24 validated SE items (question, answer, and explanation) delivered 2 at a time in 2 e-mails per week. Both groups completed a pretest and posttest on all 4 topics. Each group served as the comparison for the other group. RESULTS: Fifty residents (60%) completed the study. The course did not have a statistically significant effect on the posttest scores for either group. Overall, test scores were low. Eighty-eight percent of residents indicated that they would like to participate in future SE courses. CONCLUSIONS: Using primarily novel posttest questions, this study did not demonstrate the significant knowledge gains that other investigators have found with SE.

Defining the ideal qualities of mentorship: a qualitative analysis of the characteristics of outstanding mentors.

OBJECTIVE: The study's objective was to identify the important qualities of outstanding mentors as described by their mentees' letters of nomination for a prestigious lifetime achievement award in mentorship. METHODS: The Lifetime Achievement in Mentorship Award at the University of California, San Francisco, recognizes a faculty member who has demonstrated sustained mentoring excellence in the academic health sciences. Recommendation letters in support of the top 10 nominees in 2008 (n=53 letters) were analyzed using grounded theory and constant comparative technique until thematic saturation was achieved. RESULTS: In 2008, 29 faculty members (of>1000 eligible senior faculty) were nominated. Nominees were 53 to 78 years old, and 30% were women. The nominees represented 4 schools (Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy and Dentistry) and 22 departments/divisions. Five themes emerged from the analysis. Outstanding mentors: 1) exhibit admirable personal qualitites, including enthusiasm, compassion, and selflessness; 2) act as a career guide, offering a vision but purposefully tailoring support to each mentee; 3) make strong time commitments with regular, frequent, and high-quality meetings; 4) support personal/professional balance; and 5) leave a legacy of how to be a good mentor through role modeling and instituting policies that set global expectations and standards for mentorship. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to describe the qualities of admired mentors by analyzing nomination letters for a prestigious mentoring award. Our results give new insight into how mentors foster the careers of junior faculty in the academic health sciences. The results can guide academic leaders on how to train and evaluate mentors.

Pediatric syncope: cases from the emergency department.

Pediatric syncope is a common presentation in the emergency department. Most causes are benign, but an evaluation must exclude rare life-threatening disorders. The lack of objective findings can pose a challenge. This case-based review emphasizes the importance of a detailed history and physical examination with electrocardiogram in determining high-risk patients.

Categorizing urgency of infant emergency department visits: agreement between criteria.

BACKGROUND: The lack of valid classification methods for emergency department (ED) visit urgency has resulted in large variation in reported rates of nonurgent ED utilization. OBJECTIVES: To compare four methods of defining ED visit urgency with the criterion standard, implicit criteria, for infant ED visits. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of a prospective birth cohort of Medicaid-enrolled infants who made at least one ED visit in the first six months of life. Complete ED visit data were reviewed to assess urgency via implicit criteria. The explicit criteria (adherence to prespecified criteria via complete ED charts), ED triage, diagnosis, and resources methods were also used to categorize visit urgency. Concordance and agreement (kappa) between the implicit criteria and alternative methods were measured. RESULTS: A total of 1,213 ED visits were assessed. Mean age was 2.8 (SD +/- 1.78) months, and the most common diagnosis was upper respiratory infection (21.0%). Using implicit criteria, 52.3% of ED visits were deemed urgent. Urgent visits using other methods were as follows: explicit criteria, 51.8%; ED triage, 60.6%; diagnosis, 70.3%; and resources, 52.7%. Explicit criteria had the highest concordance (78.3%) and agreement (kappa = 0.57) with implicit criteria. Of limited data methods, resources demonstrated the best concordance (78.1%) and agreement (kappa = 0.56), while ED triage (67.9%) and diagnosis (71.6%) exhibited lower concordance and agreement (kappa = 0.35 and kappa = 0.42, respectively). Explicit criteria and resources equally misclassified urgency for 11.1% of visits; ED triage and diagnosis tended to overclassify visits as urgent. CONCLUSIONS: The explicit criteria and resources methods best approximate implicit criteria in classifying ED visit urgency in infants younger than six months of age. If confirmed in further studies, resources utilized has the potential to be an inexpensive, easily applicable method for urgency classification of infant ED visits when limited data are available.