Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Psychiatr Q ; 95(2): 233-252, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38639873

RESUMEN

This study investigated the healthcare utilization and medical expenditure of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and identified the associated factors. The healthcare utilization and expenditure of T2DM patients with (case group) and without (control group) GAD between 2002 and 2013 were examined using the population-based Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Healthcare utilization included outpatient visits and hospitalization; health expenditure included outpatient, inpatient, and total medical expenditure. Moreover, nonpsychiatric healthcare utilization and medical expenditure were distinguished from total healthcare utilization and medical expenditure. The average healthcare utilization, including outpatient visits and hospitalization, was significantly higher for the case group than for the control group (total and nonpsychiatric). The results regarding differences in average outpatient expenditure (total and nonpsychiatric), inpatient expenditure (total and nonpsychiatric), and total expenditure (total and nonpsychiatric) between the case and control groups are inconsistent. Sex, age, income, comorbidities/complications, and the diabetes mellitus complication severity index were significantly associated with outpatient visits, medical expenditure, and hospitalization in the case group (total and nonpsychiatric). Greater knowledge of factors affecting healthcare utilization and expenditure in comorbid individuals may help healthcare providers intervene to improve patient management and possibly reduce the healthcare burden in the future.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Gastos en Salud , Hospitalización , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Adulto , Taiwán/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Ambulatoria/economía
2.
J Affect Disord ; 364: 108-115, 2024 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39111347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression is a major psychiatric disorder associated with maternal suicide and child developmental disturbances. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether general anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with a higher rate of new-onset depression after delivery than neuraxial anesthesia. METHODS: This is a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data retrieved from the National Health Insurance Research Database between 2014 and 2018. Women who had cesarean delivery under general or neuraxial anesthesia were enrolled. After 1:4 propensity score matching, there were 4544 and 18,176 women under the general and neuraxial anesthesia groups, respectively. The primary outcome was new-onset depression diagnosed after delivery in a time-to-event analysis setting. RESULTS: After propensity-score matching, the rate of new-onset depression diagnosed within 1 year was 1.10 % (50/4488) and 0.86 % (157/18176) after cesarean delivery under general and neuraxial anesthesia, respectively. For depression diagnosed within 90 days of delivery, significant difference between the two groups was noted (0.51 % vs. 0.30 %, P = 0.031). In the time-to-event analysis with Cox regression model, women who delivered under general anesthesia were associated with significantly higher risk of postpartum depression within 90 days (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95 % CI, 1.05-2.79) compared with those under neuraxial anesthesia. LIMITATIONS: The observational design only allows asserting association, rather than establishing causality between exposure and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Women who underwent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia had a higher risk of subsequent depression within 90 days than those under neuraxial anesthesia. Early screening for depressive disorders might facilitate timely management.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA