Quantitative elastography of liver fibrosis and spleen stiffness in chronic hepatitis B carriers: comparison of shear-wave elastography and transient elastography with liver biopsy correlation.

PURPOSE: To document utility of shear-wave (SW) elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B and to compare its performance with that of transient elastography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethics committee approved the study, and informed consent was obtained. Patients with liver biopsy correlation (n = 226) and healthy patients (n = 171) were analyzed. Results of SW elastography of liver, SW elastography of spleen, and transient elastography of liver were compared and correlated according to METAVIR scores. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), binary logistic regression, and Delong test were used. RESULTS: AUC for SW elastography of liver, transient elastography of liver, and SW elastography of spleen was, respectively, 0.86, 0.80, and 0.81 for fibrosis (≥ F1 stage); 0.88, 0.78, and 0.82 for moderate fibrosis (≥ F2 stage); 0.93, 0.83, and 0.83 for severe fibrosis (≥ F3 stage); and 0.98, 0.92, and 0.84 for cirrhosis (F4 stage). SW elastography of liver showed significantly higher accuracy than transient elastography of liver and SW elastography of spleen in all fibrosis stages (P = .01-.04). SW elastography of spleen showed similar accuracy with transient elastography of liver (P = .21-.99). Combination SW elastography of liver and SW elastography of spleen to predict fibrosis staging showed diagnostic accuracy not further improved compared with SW elastography of liver alone (similar AUC; ≥ F1, P = .87; ≥ F2, P = .81; ≥ F3, P = .84; ≥ F4, P = .88). SW elastography of liver had higher successful rate than transient elastography of liver (98.9% vs 89.6%). Prevalence of discordance in at least two stages with liver histologic staging was 10.2% (23 of 226) for SW elastography of liver and 28.2% (58 of 206) for SW elastography of spleen. CONCLUSION: SW elastography provides more accurate correlation of liver elasticity with liver fibrosis stage compared with transient elastography, especially in identification of stage F2 or greater.

Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced fibrosis in Hong Kong Chinese: a population study using proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and transient elastography.

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of the epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is incomplete because liver biopsy cannot be performed on the general population to assess disease severity. New non-invasive tests allow accurate and safe assessment in healthy individuals. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis in the general Hong Kong Chinese population. METHODS: Subjects were recruited from the community by random selection from the government census database. Liver fat and fibrosis were assessed by proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and transient elastography, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 264 of 922 (28.6%) subjects had intrahepatic triglyceride content ≥5%. Excluding 12 subjects with significant alcohol consumption, the population prevalence of NAFLD was 27.3% (95% CI 24.5% to 30.2%). Each component of the metabolic syndrome increased the risk of fatty liver in a dose-dependent manner (prevalence of 4.5% in subjects without any component and 80.0% in those with all five components). 8 (3.7%) patients with fatty liver had liver stiffness ≥9.6 kPa, a level suggestive of advanced fibrosis. Body mass index and alanine aminotransferase level were independent factors associated with liver stiffness. Together with other clinical prediction scores, the estimated prevalence of advanced fibrosis in patients with fatty liver in the community was <10%. Compared with non-drinkers, modest drinkers (<10 g per day) did not have higher risk of fatty liver after adjustment for demographic and metabolic factors. The liver stiffness was 4.7±1.9 kPa in modest drinkers and 4.6±1.7 kPa in non-drinkers (p=0.54). CONCLUSION: NAFLD is found in over a quarter of the general adult Chinese population, but the proportion of patients with advanced fibrosis is low. Modest alcohol consumption does not increase the risk of fatty liver or liver fibrosis.

Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement: comparison between M and XL probe of FibroScan®.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Unreliable results of liver stiffness measurement are obtained in 16% of cases and are independently associated with body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m(2). A new FibroScan® probe (XL probe) was designed specifically for obese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement using M and XL probes of Fibroscan® for the diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing liver biopsies for chronic liver disease were prospectively recruited. Liver stiffness measurement was performed within 1 week before liver biopsy using both M and XL probes of FibroScan®. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients were evaluated. A reliable liver stiffness measurement using M probe was obtained in 79.7% of cases. In the other 21.3%, liver stiffness measurement using XL probe was obtained in 56.9% of patients. A strong correlation was found between M and XL values, regardless of BMI. In all groups, median liver stiffness measurement using the XL probe was significantly lower than liver stiffness measurement using the M probe. By multivariate analysis, unsuccessful liver stiffness examination with M probe was independently associated with age >50 years and BMI >30 kg/m(2). By univariate analysis, only BMI >30 kg/m(2) was associated with unsuccessful liver stiffness measurement with XL probe. No significant difference was observed between the M and XL probes for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Liver stiffness measurement with either M or XL probe is possible in 91.2% of patients with comparable diagnostic accuracy. In clinical practice, the M probe could be used as first step for liver stiffness measurement. In case of no valid shot or unreliable measurement, the XL probe could be used. This result could be useful for the assessment of liver fibrosis in NAFLD and/or obese patients.

Hepatitis B virus infection and fatty liver in the general population.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In animal studies, expression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) proteins causes hepatic steatosis. We aimed to study the prevalence of fatty liver in people with and without HBV infection in the general population. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional population study in Hong Kong Chinese. Intrahepatic triglyceride content (IHTG) was measured by proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: One thousand and thirteen subjects (91 HBV patients and 922 controls) were recruited. The median IHTG was 1.3% (0.2-33.3) in HBV patients and 2.1% (0-44.2) in controls (p <0.001). Excluding subjects with significant alcohol consumption, the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease was 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4%, 20.6%) in HBV patients and 28.3% (95% CI 25.3%, 31.2%) in controls (p=0.003). The fatty liver prevalence differed in HBV patients and controls aged 40-59 years but was similar in those aged 60 years or above. After adjusting for demographic and metabolic factors, HBV infection remained an independent factor associated with lower risk of fatty liver (adjusted odds ratio 0.42; 95% CI 0.20, 0.88; p=0.022). HBV patients also had a lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome (11.0% vs. 20.2%; p=0.034), but the difference was mainly attributed to lower triglyceride levels. Among HBV patients, viral genotypes, HBV DNA level and hepatitis B e antigen status were not associated with fatty liver. CONCLUSIONS: HBV infection is associated with a lower prevalence of fatty liver, hypertriglyceridemia and metabolic syndrome. Viral replication may affect lipid metabolism and this warrants further studies.

Liver stiffness measurement using XL probe in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

OBJECTIVES: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography is a noninvasive test of liver fibrosis, but cannot be performed in a significant proportion of obese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the new XL probe in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: Liver biopsy and paired LSM by both the original M probe and XL probe were performed on 193 consecutive NAFLD patients in France and Hong Kong. RESULTS: Compared with M probe, XL probe was more likely to achieve 10 valid measurements (95% vs. 81%; P<0.001) and a success rate of over 60% (90% vs. 74%; P<0.001). The areas under receiver operating characteristics curves of XL probe for F2, F3, and F4 disease were 0.80, 0.85, and 0.91, respectively. XL probe tended to generate lower LSM than M probe in the same patient. At a cutoff of 7.2 kPa, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for F3 or greater disease were 78%, 78%, 60%, and 89%, respectively. Discordance of at least two stages between XL probe and histology was observed in 16 (9%) patients. Body mass index (BMI) over 35 kg/m(2) was independently associated with discordance (adjusted odds ratio 9.09; 95% confidence interval 1.10-75.43). Reliable measurements by XL probe were obtained in 75% of the overall population and 65% of patients with BMI over 30 kg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: LSM by XL probe can be performed successfully in most NAFLD patients, but obesity is associated with less accurate and reliable measurements.

Entecavir treatment in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B is a unique clinical presentation with significant morbidity and mortality. Lamivudine was used in most previous studies, but the drug was limited by the development of resistance. Our objective is to study the safety and efficacy of entecavir in patients with severe acute exacerbation. METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B were recruited from 1998 to 2009. All patients had serum alanine aminotransferase and bilirubin increased beyond 10 and 3 times the upper limit of normal, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall mortality at week 48. Virological and biochemical responses were also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients and 117 patients were treated with entecavir and lamivudine, respectively. By week 48, 7 (19%) patients in the entecavir group and 5 (4%) patients in the lamivudine group died (adjusted hazard ratio 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.5-17.2, p=0.010). Similarly, the entecavir group had higher liver-related mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-15.7, p=0.044). Despite a lower prevalence of cirrhosis, more patients in the entecavir group developed prolonged jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. Entecavir resulted in more rapid and complete viral suppression, with 71% of patients achieving undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA at week 48, compared to 40% in the lamivudine group (p=0.007). However, rapid HBV DNA reduction at week 4 was associated with prolonged jaundice. CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir treatment is associated with increased short-term mortality in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B but achieves better virological response in the long run.