Risk of Injury-Related Readmission Varies by Initial Presenting-Hospital Type Among Children at High Risk for Physical Abuse.

OBJECTIVES: Children experiencing physical abuse may initially present to hospitals with underappreciated minor injuries, only to experience more severe injuries in the future. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe young children presenting with high-risk diagnoses for physical abuse, 2) characterize the hospitals to which they initially presented, and 3) evaluate associations of initial presenting-hospital type with subsequent admission for injury. METHODS: Patients aged younger than 6 years from the 2009-2014 Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration database with high-risk diagnoses (codes previously associated with >70% risk of child physical abuse) were included. Patients were categorized by the hospital type to which they initially presented: community hospital, adult/combined trauma center, or pediatric trauma center. Primary outcome was subsequent injury-related hospital admission within 1 year. Association of initial presenting-hospital type with outcome was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, preexisting comorbidities, and injury severity. RESULTS: A total of 8626 high-risk children met inclusion criteria. Sixty-eight percent of high-risk children initially presented to community hospitals. At 1 year, 3% of high-risk children had experienced subsequent injury-related admission. On multivariable analysis, initial presentation to a community hospital was associated with higher risk of subsequent injury-related admission (odds ratio, 4.03 vs level 1/pediatric trauma center; 95% confidence interval, 1.83-8.86). Initial presentation to a level 2 adult or combined adult/pediatric trauma center was also associated with higher risk for subsequent injury-related admission (odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-7.27). CONCLUSIONS: Most children at high risk for physical abuse initially present to community hospitals, not dedicated trauma centers. Children initially evaluated in high-level pediatric trauma centers had lower risk of subsequent injury-related admission. This unexplained variability suggests stronger collaboration is needed between community hospitals and regional pediatric trauma centers at the time of initial presentation to recognize and protect vulnerable children.

Acute appendicitis: variation in outcomes by insurance status.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is often studied as a surrogate for acute care surgery. Previous studies have shown differences in outcomes based on insurance status, but associated costs to health care systems are in need of further study. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how treatment, outcomes, and health care resource utilization differ between the uninsured and commercially insured in the setting of AA. METHODS: Patients with AA were identified by International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition, codes using the Agency for Health Care Administration Florida Hospital inpatient discharge data sets for 2002-2011. The outcomes studied were admission with complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis, receiving laparoscopic versus open appendectomy and experiencing a perioperative complication, length of stay, and overall hospital cost. Data were analyzed using logistic, negative binomial, and least squares multivariate regression. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. All equations controlled for patient demographics, comorbidities, and year and hospital-fixed effects. RESULTS: The uninsured were more likely to present with complicated appendicitis (odds ratio = 1.31, P < 0.01), less likely to receive laparoscopic appendectomy (odds ratio = 0.70, P < 0.01), had longer length of stay, greater costs but had similar rates of perioperative complications in comparison to the commercially insured. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance status is known to affect health care utilization. The uninsured may delay seeking medical assistance, causing greater incidence of complicated disease and increased costs of treatment. Increasing the number of insured via the Affordable Care Act may improve patient outcomes and decrease costs related to AA. These findings may also apply to other acute care surgery conditions.

The International Classification of Disease Critical Care Severity Score demonstrates that pediatric burden of injury is similar to that of adults: Validation using the National Trauma Databank☆.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Resource-based severity of injury (SOI) measures, such as the International Classification of Disease (ICD) Critical Care Severity Score (ICASS), may characterize traumatic burden better than standard mortality-based measures. The purpose of this study was to validate the ICASS in a representative national-level trauma cohort and compare SOI measures between children and adults. METHODS: The National Trauma Databank was used to derive (2008-12) and validate (2013-15) ICASS and ICD Injury Severity Scores (ICISS, standard mortality-based SOI measure). SOI metrics and outcomes were compared between pediatric, adult, and elderly age groups. Logistic regression modeling evaluated predictors of critical care resource utilization. RESULTS: Derivation and validation cohorts consisted of 3.90 and 1.97 million patients, respectively. ICASS strongly predicted actual critical care utilization (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.04, p<0.0001). Mean ICASS was 24.4 for children and 33.0 for adults (ratio 0.74), indicating predicted critical care utilization in children was three-quarters that of adults. In contrast, predicted pediatric mortality was less than half that of adults. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality-based SOI measures underestimate pediatric burden of injury. This study validates ICASS and demonstrates that pediatric resource-based SOI is more similar to that of adults. ICASS is easily calculated without a trauma registry and complements mortality-based measures. Level of evidence III, retrospective comparative study.

Two novel resource-based metrics to quantify pediatric trauma severity based on probability of requiring critical care and anesthesia services.

BACKGROUND: Mortality-based metrics like the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Injury Severity Score (ICISS) may underestimate burden of pediatric traumatic disease due to lower mortality rates in children. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate two resource-based severity of injury (SOI) measures, then compare these measures and the ICISS across a broad age spectrum of injured patients. METHODS: The ICISS and two novel SOI measures, termed ICD Critical Care Severity Score (ICASS) and ICD General Anesthesia Severity Score (IGASS), were derived from Florida state administrative 2012 to 2016 data and validated with 2017 data. The ICASS and IGASS predicted the need for critical care services and anesthesia services, respectively. Logistic regression was used to validate each SOI measure. Distributions of ICISS, ICASS, and IGASS were compared across pediatric (0-15 years), adult (16-64 years), and elderly (65-84 years) age groups. RESULTS: The derivation and validation cohorts consisted of 668,346 and 24,070 emergency admissions, respectively. On logistic regression, ICISS, ICASS, and IGASS were strongly predictive of observed mortality, critical care utilization, and anesthesia utilization, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean ICISS was 10.6 for pediatric and 19.0 for adult patients (ratio, 0.56), indicating that the predicted mortality risk in pediatric patients was slightly over half that of adults. In contrast, the mean ICASS for pediatric and adult patients was 50.2 and 53.2, respectively (ratio, 0.94); indicating predicted critical care utilization in pediatric patients was nearly the same as that of adults. The IGASS comparisons followed comparable patterns. CONCLUSION: When a mortality-based SOI measure is used, the severity of pediatric injury appears much lower than that of adults, but when resource-based measures are used, pediatric and adult burden of injury appear very similar. The ICASS and IGASS are novel and valid resource-based SOI measures that are easily calculated with administrative data. They may complement mortality-based measures in pediatric trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic and epidemiological study.

Risk factors for avoidable transfer to a pediatric trauma center among patients 2 years and older.

BACKGROUND: Effective and sustainable pediatric trauma care requires systems of regionalization and interfacility transfer. Avoidable transfer, also known as secondary overtriage, occurs when a patient is transferred to a regional trauma center after initial evaluation at another facility that is capable of providing definitive care. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for avoidable transfer among pediatric trauma patients in southwest Florida. METHODS: All pediatric trauma patients 2 years and older transferred from outlying hospitals to the emergency department of a single state-designated pediatric trauma center between 2009 and 2017 were obtained from the institutional registry. Transfers were classified as avoidable if the patient suffered only minor injuries (International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev. Injury Severity Score > 0.9), did not require invasive procedures or intensive care unit monitoring, and was discharged within 48 hours. Demographics and injury characteristics were compared for avoidable and nonavoidable transfers. Logistic regression was used to estimate the independent effects of age, sex, insurance type, mechanism of injury, diagnosis, within region versus out-of-region residence, suspected nonaccidental trauma, and abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale score on the risk of avoidable transfer. RESULTS: A total of 3,876 transfer patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 1,628 (42%) were classified as avoidable. Among avoidable transfers, 29% had minor head injuries (isolated skull fractures, concussions, and mild traumatic brain injury not otherwise specified), and 58% received neurosurgery consultation. On multivariable analysis, the strongest risk factors for avoidable transfer were diagnoses of isolated skull fracture or concussion. Suspected nonaccidental trauma was predictive of nonavoidable transfer. CONCLUSION: Among injured children 2 years and older, those with minor head injuries were at greatest risk for avoidable transfer. Many were transferred because of a perceived need for evaluation by a pediatric neurosurgeon. Future projects seeking to reduce avoidable transfers should focus on children with isolated skull fractures and concussions, in whom there is no suspicion of nonaccidental trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Effect of hospital type on the treatment of acute appendicitis in teenagers.

BACKGROUND: Teenagers receive appendicitis care at both adult and pediatric facilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes following treatment of acute appendicitis in teenagers based on the type of hospital facility. METHODS: Patients aged 13-17years with acute appendicitis who were discharged from acute care hospitals from 2009 to 2014 were identified using a statewide discharge dataset. Hospitals were classified as pediatric or adult and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were 5585 patients treated in adult hospitals and 1625 in pediatric hospitals. Fewer patients at adult hospitals had complicated appendicitis (20.4% vs. 33.0%, p<0.01). Open appendectomy occurred more often in adult hospitals compared to pediatric hospitals (12.6% vs. 6.0%, p<0.01). Pediatric hospitals had higher rates of non-operative management (10% vs. 3.4%, p<0.01) and percutaneous drain placement (1.2% vs. 0.4%, p<0.01). Postoperative complication rates did not significantly differ between hospital types. CONCLUSION: Most teenagers undergo appendectomy at adult facilities; however, a greater proportion of younger patients and patients with complicated appendicitis is treated at pediatric hospitals. Treatment at a freestanding children's hospital results in lower rates of open procedures and no difference in complications. Opportunities may exist to standardize care across treating facilities to optimize outcomes and resource use. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

A closer look at non-accidental trauma: Caregiver assault compared to non-caregiver assault.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of non-accidental trauma (NAT) patients compared to other trauma (OT) patients across the state of Florida. In addition, NAT and OT patients with a mechanism of injury of assault were further analyzed. METHODS: A statewide database was reviewed from January 2010 to December 2014 for patients aged 0-18years who presented following trauma. Patients were sorted by admitting diagnosis into two groups: rule out NAT and all other diagnoses. Patients with a mechanism of assault were subanalyzed and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were 46,557 patients included. NAT patients were younger, had more severe injuries and had a higher mortality rate compared to OT patients. Assault was the mechanism of injury in 95% of NAT patients. NAT assault patients were younger, required more intensive care unit (ICU) resources, and had a higher mortality rate compared to other assault patients. CONCLUSION: Non-accidental trauma patients require more resources and have a higher mortality rate compared to accidental trauma patients, and these differences remain even when controlling for the mechanism of injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Immature patients in a mature system: Regional analysis of Florida's pediatric trauma system.

BACKGROUND: The state of Florida's trauma system is organized into seven regions, two of which lack designated pediatric trauma centers. Injured children residing in these regions often require transfer out of their home region for definitive care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the current regionalization approach, focusing on variations between regions. METHODS: Using the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration database, we identified all trauma patients 15 years old or younger admitted between 2009 and 2014. Patients with high-risk injury (ICD-9 Injury Severity Score < 0.85) who did not receive definitive treatment at a pediatric trauma center (PTC) were considered undertriaged. Outcomes of interest included mortality and long-term disability. Patients who were definitively treated at a facility outside their home region, but who had low risk injuries (ICD-9 Injury Severity Score > 0.9), required no procedures or ICU monitoring, and were discharged within 48 hours, were considered to have received potentially avoidable out-of-region treatment. Regions were compared, and patients treated in-region were compared to those treated out-of-region. Regression models were used to adjust for covariates. RESULTS: Of 34,816 patients, 8% had high-risk injuries and the overall mortality rate was 1%. Risk-adjusted outcomes were generally similar across all regions. Regional rates of undertriage varied from 0.4% to 4.7% and were highest in regions lacking a PTC. Eleven percent of patients required definitive treatment outside their home region; these patients had higher hospital charges and stayed in the hospital 0.96 days longer (least-squares mean). Rates of potentially avoidable out-of-region treatment ranged from 7% to 12% in the two regions lacking a PTC. After adjustment for confounders, significant unexplained differences in potentially avoidable out-of-region treatment remained between these two regions (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.6-2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Florida's regionalized pediatric trauma system performs effectively, with low undertriage and acceptable outcomes. Out-of-region treatment, an inevitable byproduct of the current regionalization approach, imposes a measurable burden on the treating facility and patient/family. Unexplained variations in potentially avoidable out-of-region treatment suggest improvements can be made in system efficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/decision study, level III.

The trauma ecosystem: The impact and economics of new trauma centers on a mature statewide trauma system.

INTRODUCTION: Florida serves as a model for the study of trauma system performance. Between 2010 and 2104, 5 new trauma centers were opened alongside 20 existing centers. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of trauma system expansion on system triage performance and trauma center patients' profiles. METHODS: A statewide data set was queried for all injury-related discharges from adult acute care hospitals using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for 2010 and 2014. The data set, inclusion criteria, and definitions of high-risk injury were chosen to match those used by the Florida Department of Health in its trauma registry. Hospitals were classified as existing Level I (E1) or Level II (E2) trauma centers and new E2 (N2) centers. RESULTS: Five N2 centers were established 11.6 to 85.3 miles from existing centers. Field and overall trauma system triage of high-risk patients was less accurate with increased overtriage and no change in undertriage. Annual volume at N2 centers increased but did not change at E1 and E2 centers. In 2014, Patients at E1 and E2 centers were slightly older and less severely injured, while those at N2 centers were substantially younger and more severely injured than in 2010. The injured patient-payer mix changed with a decrease in self-pay and commercial patients and an increase in government-sponsored patients at E1 and E2 centers and an increase in self-pay and commercial patients with a decrease in government-sponsored patients at N2 centers. CONCLUSION: Designation of new trauma centers in a mature system was associated with a change in established trauma center demographics and economics without an improvement in trauma system triage performance. These findings suggest that the health of an entire trauma system network must be considered in the design and implementation of a regional trauma system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level IV; epidemiological, level IV.

Decreased progression of postinjury lung dysfunction to the acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure.

BACKGROUND: Postinjury organ dysfunction is a result of unbridled systemic hyperinflammation. According to the two-event construct, patients are resuscitated into an early vulnerable window of systemic hyperinflammation (primed) in which a second otherwise innocuous event precipitates uncontrolled hyperinflammation, leading to secondary organ damage and dysfunction (activated). Recent efforts to decrease postinjury morbidity have focused on limiting the potential of second events and systemic inflammation. We hypothesized that the collective effects of recently implemented therapeutic strategies have resulted in decreased activation of the systemic inflammatory response relative to priming in recent years. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on trauma patients at risk for postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF). Inclusion criteria were age >15 years, trauma intensive care unit admission, Injury Severity Score >15 and survival >48 hours. Isolated head injuries and head injuries with an extracranial abbreviated injury score <2 were excluded. Daily physiologic and laboratory data were collected through surgical intensive care unit day 28, and clinical events were recorded thereafter until death or hospital discharge. Organ failure was characterized with the use of the Denver MOF Scale. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was defined according to the consensus definition. RESULTS: Over a 6.5-year period 897 patients were studied; 271 (31%) developed ARDS, and 226 (25%) developed MOF. Early lung dysfunction, as a measure of systemic priming, did not change over the study period. In contrast, the incidence of ARDS and MOF decreased from 43% to 25% and 33% to 12%, respectively. The incidence of early MOF decreased from 22% to 7% over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Priming of the postinjury inflammatory response is an early event and is primarily influenced by the injury itself. Recent advances in postinjury care such as judicious blood transfusion, lung protective ventilation, treatment of adrenal insufficiency, and tight glucose control are known to attenuate systemic inflammation. Step-wise adoption of these therapies is coincident with a decrease in the destructive processes resulting in ARDS and MOF. The global effect is a decrease in activation of the systemic inflammatory response over recent years.

Emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy for nontorso injuries.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative thoracotomy performed in the emergency department (EDT) continues to have clear indications in patients sustaining trauma to the torso, particularly penetrating injuries. However, adjunctive use of aortic cross-clamping during EDT for hemorrhagic shock also may be useful in the acute resuscitation of patient with nontorso injuries (NTI). We questioned the utility of EDT in patients with nontorso trauma. METHODS: Patients undergoing EDT have been prospectively followed since 1977 at our regional level I trauma center. RESULTS: During the 26-year study period, 959 patients underwent EDT; 27 (3%) of these patients underwent EDT for penetrating NTI. Three (11%) of these patients survived to leave the hospital, with only 1 patient sustaining mild neurologic deficit. The mechanism of injury in the survivors was stab wound to the neck (1), gunshot wound to the neck (1), and extremity vascular injury (1). All survivors of EDT for NTI underwent prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation and successful endotracheal intubation in the field. There were no survivors of EDT for penetrating injury to the head. CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitative EDT with aortic cross-clamping is a potential adjunct in the acute resuscitation of NTI involving penetrating neck or extremity vascular injuries.

Obesity increases risk of organ failure after severe trauma.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is an independent risk factor for a variety of diseases, including postinjury morbidity and mortality. Obesity is associated with a proinflammatory state that could affect the postinjury inflammatory response and increase risk of organ dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between obesity and postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study of patients at risk for postinjury MOF. Inclusion criteria were age older than 15 years, Injury Severity Score > 15, ICU admission within 24 hours of injury, and survival longer than 48 hours after injury. Isolated head injuries were excluded. Organ dysfunction was assessed using the Denver multiple organ failure score. RESULTS: Data were collected on 716 severely injured patients, 70% were men and 83% were victims of blunt trauma. There was no relationship between body mass index and injury severity or the amount of blood transfused within 12 hours of injury. Postinjury MOF was observed in 123 of 564 (22%) nonobese patients and 56 of 152 (37%) obese patients. Obesity was independently associated with MOF (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7) after adjusting for patient age, injury severity, and amount of blood transfused during resuscitation. In this study population, obesity was also associated with increased length of ICU and hospital stay but not death. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients are at increased risk of postinjury MOF. Study of the obesity-related inflammatory profile could provide additional insight into the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction and identify therapeutic targets for both obese and nonobese patients. Increased morbidity and length of stay in obese trauma patients implies greater resource allocation for this population.

The role of the lung in postinjury multiple organ failure.

BACKGROUND: Postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF) is a result of a dysfunctional inflammatory response to severe injury and shock. Acute lung injury is thought to promote further organ dysfunction by the systemic release of inflammatory mediators from injured lung tissue. Although clinical evidence supports this model, a clear understanding of the relationship between lung dysfunction and multiple organ failure has yet to be defined. We hypothesized that respiratory dysfunction is an early obligate event in the progression of postinjury MOF. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 1,344 trauma patients at risk for postinjury MOF. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 16 years, trauma intensive care unit admission, Injury Severity Score greater than 15, and survival longer than 48 hours. Isolated head injuries and head injuries with an extracranial abbreviated injury score of less than 2 were excluded. Daily physiologic and laboratory data were collected through surgical intensive care unit day 28 and clinical events were recorded thereafter until death or hospital discharge. Organ failure was characterized using the Denver MOF scale. RESULTS: Organ dysfunction was observed in 1,011 (75%) of 1,344 patients. Lung dysfunction was observed in 951 (94%) patients with 1 or more organ dysfunctions and 598 (99%) of 605 patients with 2 or more organ dysfunctions. Lung dysfunction preceded heart, liver, and kidney dysfunction by an average of 0.6 +/- 0.2 days, 4.8 +/- 0.2 days, and 5.5 +/- 0.5 days, respectively. The severity of lung dysfunction correlated with the severity of heart, liver, and kidney dysfunction, and the number of other dysfunctional organ systems. CONCLUSIONS: Postinjury respiratory dysfunction is an obligate event that precedes heart, liver, and kidney failure. The severity of other organ dysfunction is related directly to the severity of respiratory dysfunction. These data implicate lung dysfunction as central to the promotion of pathogenic inflammation and the development of postinjury MOF.

A 12-year prospective study of postinjury multiple organ failure: has anything changed?

HYPOTHESIS: The incidence and severity of postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF) has decreased over the last decade. DESIGN: A prospective 12-year inception cohort study ending December 31, 2003. SETTING: Regional academic level I trauma center. PATIENTS: One thousand three hundred forty-four trauma patients at risk for postinjury MOF. Inclusion criteria were aged older than 15 years, admission to the trauma intensive care unit, an Injury Severity Score higher than 15, and survival for more than 48 hours after injury. Isolated head injuries were excluded from this study. Previously identified risk factors for postinjury MOF were age, Injury Severity Score, and receiving a blood transfusion within 12 hours of injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multiple organ failure was defined by a Denver MOF score of 4 or more for longer than 48 hours after injury. Multiple organ failure severity was defined by the maximum daily MOF score and the number of MOF free days within the first 28 postinjury days. RESULTS: Multiple organ failure was diagnosed in 339 (25%) of 1244 patients. The mean age and Injury Severity Scores increased and the use of blood transfusion during resuscitation decreased over the 12-year study period. After adjusting for age, injury severity, and amount of blood transfused during resuscitation, there was a decreased incidence of MOF over the study period. Of the patients who developed MOF, there was a decrease in disease severity and duration as measured by the maximum daily MOF score and the MOF free days. Although the overall mortality rate remained constant, the MOF-specific mortality decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence, severity, and attendant mortality of postinjury MOF decreased over the last 12 years despite an increased MOF risk. Improvements in MOF outcomes can be attributed to improvements in trauma and critical care and are associated with decreased use of blood transfusion during resuscitation.

Carotid artery stents for blunt cerebrovascular injury: risks exceed benefits.

BACKGROUND: Carotid stenting has been advocated in patients with grade III blunt carotid artery injuries (hereafter referred to as "blunt CAIs") because of the persistence of the pseudoaneurysm and concern for subsequent embolization or rupture. HYPOTHESIS: Carotid stenting is safe and effective for blunt CAIs. DESIGN: Analysis of a prospective database of all patients with blunt CAIs. SETTING: A state-designated, level I, urban trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In January 1, 1996, we initiated comprehensive screening for blunt CAIs with angiography based on injury patterns. Patients without contraindications receive anticoagulation therapy immediately for documented lesions. Patients with persistent pseudoaneurysms on a second angiography at 7 to 10 days after injury are candidates for stent placement. RESULTS: During the study period (January 1, 1996, to May 1, 2004), 46 patients sustained blunt carotid pseudoaneurysms; 23 (50%) underwent carotid stent placement. There were 4 complications in patients undergoing carotid stent placement: 3 strokes and 1 subclavian dissection. Follow-up angiography was performed in 38 patients (18 patients with stents who received antithrombotic agents, 20 patients who received antithrombotic agents alone); 8 patients had poststent carotid occlusion despite having received concurrent anticoagulation therapy. Carotid occlusion rates were significantly different (45% in patients with stents vs 5% in those who received antithrombotic agents alone). In the patients not undergoing stent placement, the only complication was a middle cerebral artery stroke in a patient not treated with antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have carotid stents placed for blunt carotid pseudoaneurysms have a 21% complication rate and a documented occlusion rate of 45%. In contrast, patients treated with antithrombotic agents alone had an occlusion rate of 5%; no asymptomatic patient treated with antithrombotic agents for their injury had a stroke. Antithrombotic therapy remains the recommended therapy for blunt CAIs, but the role of intraluminal stents remains to be defined.

Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries is cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have argued that screening for blunt carotid injury is futile and have called for a cost analysis. Our data previously supported screening asymptomatic trauma patients for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) to prevent associated neurologic sequelae. Our hypothesis is that aggressive angiographic screening for BCVI based on a patient's injury pattern and symptoms allows for early diagnosis and treatment and is cost-effective because it prevents ischemic neurological events (INEs). METHODS: Beginning in January 1996, we began comprehensive screening using 4-vessel cerebrovascular angiography based on injury patterns; these patients have been followed-up prospectively. Patients without contraindications received antithrombotic therapy immediately for documented BCVI. RESULTS: From January 1996 through June 2004, there were 15,767 blunt-trauma patient admissions to our state-designated level I urban trauma center, of which 727 patients underwent screening angiography. Twenty-one patients presented with signs or symptoms of neurologic ischemia before diagnosis. BCVI was identified in 244 patients (34% screening yield); the majority were men (68%) with a mean age of 35 +/- 3.7 years and mean Injury Severity Score of 28 +/- 3.8. Asymptomatic patients (n = 187) were treated (heparin in 117, low molecular-weight heparin in 11, and antiplatelet in 59); 1 patient had a stroke (0.5%). Using estimated stroke rate by grade of injury, we averted neurologic events in 32 asymptomatic patients with antithrombotic treatment. Of the 48 asymptomatic patients who did not receive adequate anticoagulation, 10 (21%) had an INE. Patients with BCVI-related neurologic events had a statistically higher percentage requiring discharge to rehabilitation facilities (50% vs. 77% for carotid artery injury [CAI]), a higher percentage requiring rehabilitation for BCVI-related stroke (0% vs. 55% for CAI), and a higher stroke-related mortality rate (0% vs. 21% for CAI and 0% vs. 17% for vertebral artery injury) than those without neurologic events. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of long-term rehabilitation care and human life after BCVI-associated neurologic events is substantial. Surgeons caring for the multiply injured should screen for carotid and vertebral artery injuries in high-risk patients.

Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital?

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have shown laparoscopic appendectomy to be safe for both acute and perforated appendicitis, but there have been conflicting reports as to whether it is superior from a cost perspective. Our academic surgical group, who perform all operative cases with resident physicians, has been challenged to reduce expenses in this era of cost containment. We recognize resident training is an expensive commodity that is poorly reimbursed, and hypothesized laparoscopic appendectomy was too expensive to justify resident teaching of this procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine if laparoscopic appendectomy is more expensive than open appendectomy. METHODS: From April 2003 to April 2004, all patients undergoing appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis at our university-affiliated teaching hospital were reviewed; demographic data, equipment charge, minutes in the operating room (OR), hospital length of stay, and total hospital charge were analyzed. OR minute charges were gradated based on equipment use and level of skilled nursing care. Conversions to open appendectomy were included in the laparoscopic group for analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 247 patients underwent appendectomy for preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis, with 152 open (113 inflamed, 37 perforated, 2 normal), 88 laparoscopic (69 inflamed, 12 perforated, 7 normal), and 7 converted (2 inflamed, 4 perforated, 1 normal) operations performed. The majority were men (67%) with a mean age of 31.4 +/- 2.2 years. Overall, there was significant difference (P < .05) in intraoperative equipment charge (125.32 dollars +/- 3.99 dollars open versus 1,078.70 dollars +/- 24.06 dollars lap), operative time charge (3,022.16 dollars +/- 57.51 dollars versus 4,065.24 dollars +/- 122.64 dollars), and total hospital charge (12,310 dollars +/- 772 dollars versus 16,773 dollars +/- 1,319 dollars) but no significant difference in operative minutes (56.3 +/- 1.3 versus 57.4 +/- 2.3), operating room minutes (90.5 +/- 1.7 versus 95.7 +/- 2.5), or hospital days (2.6 versus 2.2). In subgroup analysis of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, open and laparoscopic groups had equivalent hospital days (1.47 versus 1.49) but significantly different hospital charges (9,632.44 dollars versus 14,251.07 dollars). CONCLUSIONS: Although operative time was similar between the 2 groups, operative and total hospital charges were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group. Unless patient factors warrant a laparoscopic approach (questionable diagnosis, obesity), we submit open appendectomy remains the most cost-effective procedure in a teaching environment.