Reperfusion therapies in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: data on safety and effectiveness from a multi-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT) are currently considered best practices in acute stroke patients. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are conflicting as regards haemorrhagic transformation, mortality, and functional outcome. This study sought to investigate for any differences, in terms of safety and effectiveness, between AF patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) treated and untreated with reperfusion therapies. METHODS: Data from two multicenter cohort studies (RAF and RAF-NOACs) on consecutive patients with AF and AIS were analyzed to compare patients treated and not treated with reperfusion therapies (IVT and/or EVT). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for outcome events: 90-day good functional outcome and mortality. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared treated and untreated patients. RESULTS: Overall, 441 (25.4%) were included in the reperfusion-treated group and 1,295 (74.6%) in the untreated group. The multivariable model suggested that reperfusion therapies were significantly associated with good functional outcome. Rates of mortality and disability were higher in patients not treated, especially in the case of higher NIHSS scores. In the PSM comparison, 173/250 patients (69.2%) who had received reperfusion therapies had good functional outcome at 90 days, compared to 146/250 (58.4%) untreated patients (p = 0.009, OR: 1.60, 95% CI:1.11-2.31). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF and AIS treated with reperfusion therapies had a significantly higher rate of good functional outcome and lower rates of mortality compared to those patients with AF and AIS who had undergone conservative treatment.

Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after acute pulmonary embolism: Role of residual pulmonary obstruction and persistent right ventricular dysfunction. A meta-analysis.

Essentials Debated is the role of residual pulmonary obstruction (RPO) in predicting venous thromboembolism. Whether right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) predicts recurrent venous thromboembolism is unknown. 15 studies on RPO and 4 on RVD and venous thromboembolism were included in this meta-analysis. RPO is a predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism when assessed by perfusion lung scan. RVD after acute pulmonary embolism is not associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism. BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding the role of residual pulmonary obstruction (RPO) or persistent right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) after pulmonary embolism (PE) as a predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to assess whether RPO or persistent RVD after PE is associated with recurrent VTE. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through December 2018. Studies reporting on (a) RPO either on computed tomography (CT) angiography or perfusion lung scan, or RVD on echocardiography or CT angiography, after therapeutic anticoagulation for the acute PE, and (b) recurrent VTE, were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: RPO was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE (16 studies; 3472 patients; odds ratio [OR] 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-3.05; I2  = 26%); the association was statistically significant for lung scan-detected RPO (11 studies; 2916 patients; OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.63-3.01) but not for CT angiography-detected RPO (five studies; 556 patients; OR 2.56; 95% CI 0.82-7.94). No significant association was found between persistent RVD and recurrent VTE (four studies; 852 patients; OR 1.62; 95% CI 0.63-4.17). CONCLUSIONS: RPO is a predictor of recurrent VTE after a first acute PE, mainly when assessed by perfusion lung scan.

Early recurrence in paroxysmal versus sustained atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between different patterns of atrial fibrillation and early recurrence after an acute ischaemic stroke is unclear. PURPOSE: In a prospective cohort study, we evaluated the rates of early ischaemic recurrence after an acute ischaemic stroke in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or sustained atrial fibrillation which included persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation. METHODS: In patients with acute ischaemic stroke, atrial fibrillation was categorised as paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or sustained atrial fibrillation. Ischaemic recurrences were the composite of ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack and symptomatic systemic embolism occurring within 90 days from acute index stroke. RESULTS: A total of 2150 patients (1155 females, 53.7%) were enrolled: 930 (43.3%) had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 1220 (56.7%) sustained atrial fibrillation. During the 90-day follow-up, 111 ischaemic recurrences were observed in 107 patients: 31 in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (3.3%) and 76 with sustained atrial fibrillation (6.2%) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.86 (95% CI 1.24-2.81)). Patients with sustained atrial fibrillation were on average older, more likely to have diabetes mellitus, hypertension, history of stroke/ transient ischaemic attack, congestive heart failure, atrial enlargement, high baseline NIHSS-score and implanted pacemaker. After adjustment by Cox proportional hazard model, sustained atrial fibrillation was not associated with early ischaemic recurrences (adjusted HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.74-2.04)). CONCLUSIONS: After acute ischaemic stroke, patients with sustained atrial fibrillation had a higher rate of early ischaemic recurrence than patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. After adjustment for relevant risk factors, sustained atrial fibrillation was not associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence, thus suggesting that the risk profile associated with atrial fibrillation, rather than its pattern, is determinant for recurrence.