Frailty Increases Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Oncological Liver Resections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Considered to reflect a patients' biological age, frailty is a new syndrome shown to predict surgical outcomes in elderly patients. In view of the increasing age at which patients are proposed oncological liver surgery and the morbidity associated with it, we attempted to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare morbidity and mortality between frail and nonfrail patients after liver resections. METHODS: The study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all comparative studies examining surgical outcomes after liver resections between frail and nonfrail patients. RESULTS: Ten studies were included based on the selection criteria with a total of 71,102 patients, split into two groups: frail (n = 17,167) and the control group (n = 53,928). There were more elderly patients with a lower preoperative albumin level in the frail group (p = 0.02, p = 0.001). Frail patients showed higher rates of morbidity with more major complications and a higher incidence of postoperative liver failure (p < 0.001). Mortality (p < 0.001) and readmission rate (p = 0.021) also was higher in frail patients. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty seems to be a solid predictive risk factor of morbidity and mortality after liver surgery and should be considered a selection criterion for liver surgery in at-risk patients.

Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for endometriosis with rectal involvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and long-term outcomes.

PURPOSE: The optimal surgical approach for removal of colorectal endometrial deposits is unclear. Shaving and discoid excision of colorectal deposits allow organ preservation but risk recurrence with associated functional issues and re-operation. Formal resection risks potential higher complications but may be associated with lower recurrence rates. This meta-analysis compares peri-operative and long-term outcomes between conservative surgery (shaving and disc excision) versus formal colorectal resection. METHODS: The study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search was performed on PubMed and EMBASE databases. All comparative studies examining surgical outcomes in patients that underwent conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for rectal endometrial deposits were included. The two main groups (conservative versus resection) were compared in three main blocks of variables including group comparability, operative outcomes and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 2861 patients were analysed with patients subdivided by procedure: colorectal resection (n = 1389), shaving (n = 703) and discoid excision (n = 742). When formal colorectal resection was compared to conservative surgery there was lower risk of recurrence (p = 0.002), comparable functional outcomes (minor LARS, p = 0.30, major LARS, p = 0.54), similar rates of postoperative leaks (p = 0.22), pelvic abscesses (p = 0.18) and rectovaginal fistula (p = 0.92). On subgroup analysis, shaving had the highest recurrence rate (p = 0.0007), however a lower rate of stoma formation (p < 0.00001) and rectal stenosis (p = 0.01). Discoid excision and formal resection were comparable. CONCLUSION: Colorectal resection has a significantly lower recurrence rate compared to shaving. There is no difference in complications or functional outcomes between discoid excision and formal resection and both have similar recurrence rates.

Laparoscopic versus open resection of primary colorectal cancers and synchronous liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Combined resection of primary colorectal cancer and associated liver metastases is increasingly common. This study compares peri-operative and oncological outcomes according to surgical approach. METHODS: The study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search was performed for all comparative studies describing outcomes in patients that underwent laparoscopic versus open simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumours and liver metastases. Data was extracted and analysed using a random effects model via Rev Man 5.3 RESULTS: Twenty studies were included with a total of 2168 patients. A laparoscopic approach was performed in 620 patients and an open approach in 872. There was no difference in the groups for BMI (mean difference: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.63-0.70, p = 0.91), number of difficult liver segments (mean difference: 0.64, 95% CI:0.33-1.23, p = 0.18) or major liver resections (mean difference: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.69-1.35, p = 0.83). There were fewer liver lesions per operation in the laparoscopic group (mean difference 0.46, 95% CI: 0.13-0.79, p = 0.007). Laparoscopic surgery was associated with shorter length of stay (p < 0.00001) and less overall postoperative complications (p = 0.0002). There were similar R0 resection rates (p = 0.15) but less disease recurrence in the laparoscopic group (mean difference: 0.57, 95% CI:0.44-0.75, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Synchronous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancers and liver metastases is a feasible approach in selected patients and does not demonstrate inferior peri-operative or oncological outcomes.

Prolonged diversion after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Is it safe to wait?

AIM: Diverting loop ileostomy reversal (DLI-R) is routinely performed from 2-6 months following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The safety of delayed reversal after IPAA is not well-defined. The aim of this study was to determine if prolonged diversion is associated with adverse outcomes compared to routine closure. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing primary IPAA with DLI from 2000 to 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study from our institutional database. Patients were stratified into tertiles based on timing of reversal: Routine (56-116 days), Delayed (117-180 days), or Prolonged (>6 months). Univariate analysis compared categorical variables between groups. Patients reversed at <8 weeks were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 2615 patients underwent DLI-R following IPAA (3-stage 61%, 2-stage 39%; mean age 39.9 years). DLI-R was performed as Routine, Delayed and Prolonged in 1908 (72.9%), 426 (16.4%) and 281 (10.8%), respectively. Overall, DLI-R related complications occurred in 12.4% (n = 324). The complication rate in the Routine group was 11% (n = 210), in the Delayed group was 12.2% (n = 52) and in the Prolonged group was 22.1% (n = 62). Reasons for prolonged diversion in the Prolonged group were complications at the time of IPAA in 207 (73.9%) or patient preference/scheduling in 73 (26.1%). DLI-R >6 months after IPAA due to complications had higher rates of overall complications following ileostomy reversal (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.85-3.72, p < 0.001) whereas when DLI-R was delayed due to preference/scheduling outcomes were not different than the Routine group (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Prolonged time to ileostomy reversal after IPAA is probably safe without increased risk of complications when due to patient preference.

Impact of Quilting Sutures on Surgical Outcomes After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Seroma after mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is among the most common issue surgeons have to face in the early postoperative management of breast cancer. Using quilting sutures (QS) to aid in tissue approximation and decrease dead space is proposed as a simple technique to reduce seroma rate. We aimed to perform a systematic review, and analyse, in a meta-analytical model, the role of QS in improving wound outcomes and decrease volume, duration of drainage, and length of stay in hospital. METHODS: The study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases was performed for all comparative studies examining surgical outcomes in patients who underwent QS versus conventional closure (CC) after mastectomy ± ALND. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies with a total of 3473 patients (1736 in the study group and 1737 in the control group) were included based on the selection criteria. The study group showed significantly lower rates of seroma (p < 0.00001), total volume of drainage (p < 0.0001), days to drain removal (p < 0.00001), and length of stay (p < 0.00001) compared with the control group, while wound complication rates (surgical site infection, flap necrosis, hematoma, skin dimpling) were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: QS are a reliable intraoperative technique that decrease seroma formation, volume of postoperative drainage, duration of drainage and length of hospital stay, and should be considered in mastectomies with or without ALND.

Laparoscopic surgery for complex Crohn's disease: perioperative and long-term results from a propensity matched cohort.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery for complicated Crohn's (CD) is often technically challenging. Previous studies are limited by the comparison of heterogeneous cohorts of patients undergoing laparoscopic vs open surgery. We aimed to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of matched patients undergoing laparoscopic and open colonic and ileocolonic resection. Primary outcomes were operative time, blood loss, and complications. Long-term outcomes were subsequent intraabdominal CD surgery, incisional hernia repair, and stoma reversal rates. METHODS: Laparoscopic and open CD patients were 1:1 propensity score matched on age, body mass index, sex, indication, ASA grade, prior abdominal surgery, and postoperative Crohn's medication use based on the laparoscopic approach. RESULTS: A total of 906 patients underwent surgery for complex CD. After propensity matching, 386 were analyzed (193 open/193 lap, 51.3% male, mean age 33.9 + / - 12.6). Mean follow-up was 9.8 (range 7.9-12.1) years. Length of stay [(LOS) 6 (4, 8) vs 8 (5, 11) days, p < 0.001] and operative time [154 (110, 216) vs 176 (126, 239) min, p = 0.03] were shorter in the laparoscopic group. There was no difference in other complications or mortality. After adjusting for postoperative medications, no association was found between operative approach and subsequent intra-abdominal operation or incisional hernia repair. Laparoscopic patients were less likely to have postoperative sepsis [OR 0.40 (0.18, 0.91), p = 0.03]. CONCLUSION: In the setting of complicated Crohn's, in matched cohorts, laparoscopic surgery is associated with reduced operative times and LOS. Mortality, reoperation, and symptomatic hernia rates were equivalent to open surgery. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery are less likely to experience postoperative sepsis.

Quality of life meta-analysis following coloanal anastomosis versus abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.

AIM: In low rectal cancers without sphincter involvement a permanent stoma can be avoided without compromising oncological safety. Functional outcomes following coloanal anastomosis (CAA) compared to abdominoperineal excision (APR) may be significantly different. This study examines all available comparative quality of life (QoL) data for patients undergoing CAA versus APR for low rectal cancer. METHODS: Published studies with comparative data on QoL outcomes following CAA versus APR for low rectal cancer were extracted from electronic databases. The study was registered with PROSPERO and adhered to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Data was combined using random-effects models. RESULTS: Seven comparative series examined QoL in 527 patients. There was no difference in the numbers receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy in the APR and CAA groups (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.78-1.81, p = 0.43). CAA was associated with higher mean scores for physical functioning(std mean diff -7.08, 95% CI: -11.92 to -2.25, p = 0.004) and body image (std. mean diff 11.11, 95% CI: 6.04-16.18, p < 0.0001). Male sexual problems were significantly increased in patients who had undergone APR compared to CAA (std. mean diff -16.20, 95% CI: -25.76 to -6.64, p = 0.0009). Patients who had an APR reported more fatigue, dyspnoea and appetite loss. Those who had a CAA reported higher scores for both constipation and diarrhoea. DISCUSSION: It is reasonable to offer a CAA to motivated patients where oncological outcomes will not be threatened. QoL outcomes appear to be superior when intestinal continuity is maintained, and permanent stoma avoided.

Complex surgery and optimal consent: A variety of opinions exist among healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Establishing healthcare professional's views on optimal consent in complex surgery could guide tailored consent policy, improving the process in challenging scenarios. To date, no studies have established if professionals of differing specialities agree on major aspects of consent in areas such as emergency surgery and cancer surgery. METHODS: An anonymous web based survey was distributed to a variety of disciplines in a tertiary referral centre. Questions regarding optimal methods and timing of consent in emergency and cancer surgery were posed. Comparative analyses of quantitative data were performed using chi-squared test. RESULTS: 57 responses were received from doctors and nurses of varying disciplines. Differences were found between doctors of separate specialities and nurses in opinion of optimal timing of consent (p = 0.02), consent validity over time (p < 0.001) and the utility of introducing more specific consent policy (p = 0.01). Almost all respondents agreed that healthcare professionals have differing ideas of what consent is. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates differences in opinion regarding optimal consent for cancer and emergency surgery. Consideration should be given to developing consensus among healthcare professionals regarding what consent for complex surgery constitutes.

Neoadjuvant Short-Course Radiotherapy for Upper Third Rectal Tumors: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Metaanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for tumors of the upper third of the rectum. Due to conflicting findings in high-quality trials and significant long-term side effects associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy, the benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for upper third rectal tumors is less certain than for lower two third rectal tumors. This metaanalysis compares oncological outcomes with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for upper third rectal tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable rectal cancer were included. Individual patient data were sought from the principal investigator of each eligible trial for comparative data on patients with upper third rectal tumors. The main outcomes measured were survival outcomes, oncological outcomes, postoperative morbidity, and late toxicity. RESULTS: Individual patient data from two RCTs examining outcomes in 758 patients were obtained. Published data from one further RCT containing comparable data on upper third rectal tumors were included in analysis of local recurrence. In patients with curative surgery, there was no significant reduction in local recurrence or significant improvement in overall survival or disease-free survival with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (LR RR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.14-1.04, p = 0.06) (OS RR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.98-1.24, p = 0.11) (DFS RR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.97-1.26, p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for upper third rectal tumors is not certain, and surgery alone for patients with potentially curative disease at preoperative staging may be sufficient.

Segmental versus extended colectomy for tumours of the transverse colon: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: There is no consensus on the appropriate extent of oncological resection for tumours of the transverse colon. Concerns regarding tumour factors such as pattern of lymph node spread and technical factors such as anastomotic perfusion lead to a variety of procedures being performed. METHODS: A comprehensive search for published studies examining outcomes following segmental versus extended colectomy for transverse colon tumours was performed adhering to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Random effects methods were used to combine data. RESULTS: Seven comparative series examining outcomes in 3395 patients were identified. Segmental colectomy results in shorter operating times (mean difference 15.80 min, 95% CI -20.98 to -10.62, P < 0.001) and less ileus (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.81, P = 0.004). There was no difference in length of hospital stay (mean difference 1.53 days, 95% CI -3.79 to 0.73, P = 0.18). Extended colectomy results in a lower rate of anastomotic leak (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.97, P = 0.04). There are fewer nodes retrieved in segmental colectomy (mean difference 7.60 nodes, 95% CI -9.60 to -5.61, P < 0.001) but no difference in disease recurrence (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.34, P = 0.56) or overall survival (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68-1.4, P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Available data are limited due to a lack of randomized controlled trials. However, based on current evidence, segmental resection for transverse colon tumours is associated with less ileus but lower lymph node yields and higher anastomotic leak rates. Length of stay is similar. Oncological outcomes are equivalent.

Mucinous Rectal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated with a Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mucinous adenocarcinoma represents a potentially poor prognostic subgroup of rectal cancer. A consensus on the effect of mucinous cancer on outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative resection for rectal cancer has not been reached. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study is to use meta-analytical techniques to assess the association between mucinous histology and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library was performed. STUDY SELECTION: All studies examining the effect of mucinous histology on chemotherapeutic response in rectal cancer were included. INTERVENTIONS: No direct interventions were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma were compared with nonmucinous tumors by using random-effects methods to analyze data. Data are presented as ORs with 95% CIs. The main outcomes measured were the rates of pathological complete response, tumor and nodal downstaging, positive resection margin rate, local recurrence, and overall mortality. RESULTS: Eight comparative series describing outcomes in 1724 patients were identified, 241 had mucinous tumors (14%). Mucinous tumors had a reduced rate of pathological complete response (OR, 0.078; 95% CI, 0.015-0.397; p = 0.002) and tumor downstaging (OR, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.185-0.547; p < 0.001) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with an increased rate of positive resection margin (OR, 5.018; 95% CI, 3.224-7.810; p < 0.001) and poorer overall survival (OR, 1.526; 95% CI, 1.060-2.198; p = 0.023) following resection. Mucin expression did not significantly affect nodal downstaging (OR, 0.706; 95% CI, 0.295-1.693; p = 0.435) or local recurrence (OR, 1.856; 95% CI, 0.933-3.693; p = 0.078). There was no across-study heterogeneity for any end point. LIMITATIONS: Most studies were retrospectively designed, and there were variations in patient populations and duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma represents a biomarker for poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and is an adverse prognostic indicator.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is the intraluminal excision of rectal lesions with the use of instrumentation to maintain a stable pneumorectum, enabling a magnified view of the target lesion. Despite suggested benefits over traditional transanal excision, there is no consensus on which technique is superior. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study is to use meta-analytical techniques to compare transanal endoscopic microsurgery with transanal excision. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library was performed. STUDY SELECTION: All studies comparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery with transanal excision were included. INTERVENTIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was compared with transanal excision by using random-effects methods to combine data. Data are presented as ORs with 95% CIs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes measured were postoperative complication rate, negative microscopic margin rate, specimen fragmentation rate, and lesion recurrence. RESULTS: Six comparative series comparing outcomes following 927 local excisions were identified. There was no difference between techniques in postoperative complication rate (OR, 1.018; 95% CI, 0.658-1.575; p = 0.937). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery had a higher rate of negative microscopic margins in comparison with transanal excision (OR, 5.281; 95% CI, 3.201-8.712; p < 0.001). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery had a reduced rate of specimen fragmentation (OR, 0.096; 95% CI, 0.044-0.209; p < 0.001) and lesion recurrence (OR, 0.248; 95% CI, 0.154-0.401; p < 0.001) compared with transanal excision. There was no across-study heterogeneity for any end point. LIMITATIONS: Most studies were retrospectively designed, and there were variations in patient populations and duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Available data are limited because of a lack of randomized controlled trials. However, based on current evidence, transanal endoscopic microsurgery is oncologically superior to transanal excision for the excision of rectal neoplasms.

A meta-analysis to determine the effect of primary tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases on patient survival.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20 % of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer will have distant metastases at first presentation (stage IV disease). The effect of removing the primary tumor on survival for patients with stage IV disease with unresectable metastases remains unclear. To address this a meta-analysis of all studies comparing primary tumor resection with chemotherapy alone in cases of stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases was performed. METHODS: A comprehensive search for published studies examining the effect of primary tumor resection in the setting of colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases was performed. Each study was reviewed and data extracted. Random-effects methods were used to combine data. RESULTS: There were 21 studies including a total of 44,226 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Resection of the primary tumor in patients with unresectable metastases compared with chemotherapy alone was associated with a lower mortality risk (OR 0.28; 95 % CI 0.165-0.474; P < 0.001), translating into a difference in mean survival of 6.4 months in favor of resection (95 % CI 5.025-7.858, P < 0.001). Patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor were more likely to have liver metastasis only (OR 1.551; 95 % CI 1.247-1.929; P < 0.001), were less likely to have ≥2 metastasis (OR 0.653; 95 % CI 0.508-0.839; P = 0.001), and were less likely to have rectal cancer (OR 0.495; 95 % CI 0.390-0.629; P < 0.001). There was significant cross-study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the primary tumor may confer a survival advantage in stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases but significant selection bias exists in current studies. Randomized controlled trials are essential to validate these findings.

The effect of hysterectomy on colonoscopy completion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of colonoscopy is a complete and thorough examination of the colon. There are a number of factors, however, that can potentially increase the difficulty of completing a colonoscopy. A significant proportion of women eligible for colorectal cancer screening have undergone hysterectomy. A history of hysterectomy is frequently considered to make colonoscopy more difficult, although there is no consensus in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of hysterectomy on colonoscopy completion. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database identified 6 eligible studies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that compared colonoscopy completion rates in women with a previous history of hysterectomy and women with no history of pelvic surgery were selected for review. INTERVENTION: Meta-analysis was performed by using random-effects methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome used was colonoscopy completion rate. The outcomes were calculated as odds ratio with 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 5947 patients were included in the final analysis. The average hysterectomy rate was 26.3% ± 14.5%. The colonoscopy completion rate was significantly reduced in patients with a history of hysterectomy compared with those with no history of pelvic surgery (87.1% vs 95.5%) (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16-0.49; p < 0.001). Analysis of the funnel plot demonstrated nonsignificant across-study publication bias. There was significant across-study heterogeneity (Cochran Q, 19.6; p = 0.002). LIMITATIONS: The endoscopist's experience is poorly defined in some studies. Indication for colonoscopy was not provided in all cases. There is significant across-study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy completion rates appear decreased in women with a history of hysterectomy, but the available literature is heterogenous. Further studies in this area are warranted.

The effect of implementing a transanal minimally invasive surgical programme for the local excision of early rectal neoplasia on outcomes in a tertiary referral rectal cancer centre.

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is a surgical alternative to proctectomy in the management of complex rectal polyps and early rectal cancers. In 2016, our institution introduced a TAMIS programme. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in practice and outcomes in our institution in the 3 years before and after the implementation of TAMIS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients who underwent proctectomy or TAMIS for the management of complex rectal polyps or early rectal cancers at our institution between 2013 and 2018. 96 patients were included in this study (41 proctectomy vs 55 TAMIS). A significant reduction was noted in the number of proctectomies performed in the 3 years after the implementation of TAMIS as compared to the 3 years before (13 vs 28) ( P  < 0.001); 43% of patients ( n  = 12) who underwent proctectomy in the period prior to implementation of TAMIS were American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade III, as compared to only 15% ( n  = 2) of patients during the period following TAMIS implementation ( P  = 0.02). TAMIS was associated with a significant reduction in length of inpatient stay ( P  < 0.001). Oncological outcomes were comparable between groups (log rank P  = 0.83). Our findings support TAMIS as a safe and effective alternative to radical resection. The availability of TAMIS has resulted in a significant reduction in the number of comorbid patients undergoing proctectomy at our institution. Consequently, we have observed a significant reduction in postoperative complications over this time period.